At one time, liberals were outraged that the government would spy on a US citizen.

Under Bush, warrentless wiretapping of US citizerns caused outrage by the liberals. What changed?

  • Im liberal and now a FASCIST and agree with whatever the government does to the other side.

    Votes: 2 25.0%
  • As a moderate, what ever happens i could care less as long as it isnt me.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • As a concerned citizens, with what the government is doing, it can be turned back against those.

    Votes: 6 75.0%

  • Total voters
    8
Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping
ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

16427332-10154970314523630-1334218084963727076-n_orig.jpg

Troll post. The intelligence agencies doing their jobs investigating possible foreign influence in government isn't spying.

And they proved beyond any doubt there was, and still is.

Says the troll?
How is IT?
You've got nothing.
 
At one time, Americans were outraged that a foreign adversary would try to interfere with our elections.

No more, for half of us anyway.
--------------------------------- isn't interference in USA Elections just a fact of life isn't it ?? Tit for TAT isn't it ?? A couple years ago 'mrobama' was interfering in Israeli Elections to defeat Bibi Netanyahu . English and other fureigners wrote letters to American voters urging American voters to vote for 'algore' over 'gwb' in 'gwb' first run for the Presidency . As far as the Russians the only thing that can be done is for the USA to guard against fureign intererference in USA Elections. --------- or nuke Russia OldLady .
 
MSNBC used to be the one reporting corruption, even Rachel Maddow. I know because I used to like her show in the early days, so, believe me, it's difficult to post a Sean Hannity video....like trying to throw left-handed.


 
Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping
ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.
Here's living proof ....MSNBC 10 years ago.....


 
At one time, Americans were outraged that a foreign adversary would try to interfere with our elections.

No more, for half of us anyway.
Lol, Mueller said no collusion.
She meant Israel and Saudi Arabia.
You mean the way Obama meddled in Israel's election?
You've been shown he didn't, why do you keep repeating the lie? the money the Obama State dept gave, was for a two state solution.... and completely used up, before Netanyahu even called for an election....

there was no intent of the Obama administration to interfere with an Israeli election.... there was no Israeli election scheduled when they gave the money....

And even Netanyahu, at the time they gave the money for pushing a two state solution, STILL SUPPORTED a two state solution.

STOP LYING.
 
At one time, Americans were outraged that a foreign adversary would try to interfere with our elections.

No more, for half of us anyway.
Lol, Mueller said no collusion.
She meant Israel and Saudi Arabia.
You mean the way Obama meddled in Israel's election?
You've been shown he didn't, why do you keep repeating the lie? the money the Obama State dept gave, was for a two state solution.... and completely used up, before Netanyahu even called for an election....

there was no intent of the Obama administration to interfere with an Israeli election.... there was no Israeli election scheduled when they gave the money....

And even Netanyahu, at the time they gave the money for pushing a two state solution, STILL SUPPORTED a two state solution.

STOP LYING.
The only reason I brought this up is to show that if Russia meddling in the election is a big deal, why isn't it when Israel, China, Great Britain or anyone else does ?
 
I'm not interested in your RW conspiracy tripe.
You break it down.

Tell us who spied and when. Tell us what if anything was used against Trump.

Remember, there was not even public confirmation of an investigation involving the Trump campaign until after he was sworn in as president.

So "huh uh" is all you have? It's all laid out for you by Barry's own guy.

What guy?

Break it down for us.

No need to "break" anything down, you're a punk troll nothing more.

Ahh.....I see. You're yet another loser who is unable to articulate what you "know" to be true.

Good job.


Who is " Barry's guy" ?

You lose boi.

You can't say? Why is that? You seemed really sure.
 
Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping
ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

16427332-10154970314523630-1334218084963727076-n_orig.jpg
A court warrant is now spying. AG Barr taught me this. :20:
A court warrant from a bogus dossier, that was never vetted, because the FBI chief lied to the FISA court? Is that still spying?

The FISA Court application was over 70 pages, of which the information used from the Dossier was referenced as secondary evidence. The Dossier confirmed evidence they already had, and was not new evidence.

The evidence from the Dossier used in the FISA application had been confirmed when they used it. ALL of the evidence in the Dossier has now been confirmed as true except the pee tape.

So everything in your post is lies meant to give cover to Trump’s lie that the Mueller Report exonerates him.
 
Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping
ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

16427332-10154970314523630-1334218084963727076-n_orig.jpg
A court warrant is now spying. AG Barr taught me this. :20:
A court warrant from a bogus dossier, that was never vetted, because the FBI chief lied to the FISA court? Is that still spying?

The FISA Court application was over 70 pages, of which the information used from the Dossier was referenced as secondary evidence. The Dossier confirmed evidence they already had, and was not new evidence.

The evidence from the Dossier used in the FISA application had been confirmed when they used it. ALL of the evidence in the Dossier has now been confirmed as true except the pee tape.

So everything in your post is lies meant to give cover to Trump’s lie that the Mueller Report exonerates him.
The Dossier confirmed evidence they already had, and was not new evidence.
The dossier was bogus from the beginning and the FBI knew it yet submitted it as factual to the FISA court. This was lying to the FISA court to spy on a US citizen.

Did Comey Really Testify That the Entire Steele Dossier Was Unverified?
Increasingly, it appears that the Bureau failed to verify Steele’s allegations before the DOJ used some of them to bolster an application for a spying warrant from the FISA court (i.e., the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court).
Subsequently, however, former FBI director James Comey told a Senate committee that the dossier remained “salacious and unverified.”
Are you really such a stupid bitch to not understand what "unverified" means? Dont answer that, you are a liberal, we understand your stupidity...

unverified
unverified
(ʌnˈvɛrɪˌfaɪd)
adj
not having been confirmed, substantiated, or proven to be true
 
Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping
ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.
They were right. Dumb ass W should have been impeached but so should have Big Ears, when he not only continued the illegal spying but expanded it.
Trump has continued the practice. So you believe he should be impeached, too? How deep does your hypocrisy go?
I do. You are the hypocrite.
Lol, Mueller said no collusion.
She meant Israel and Saudi Arabia.
You mean the way Obama meddled in Israel's election?
That was "meddling?" When a head of state openly says who he/she supports in an ally's election? Netanyahu didn't have any qualms about coming here and addressing Congress when he wanted his way, either, did he?
Obama sent over $200,000 to be used against Netanyahu.
We're not straying too far off topic here are we ?
Well you claim foreign countries influenced the election you lost. Just remember your boy did the same. That means, you need to shut up!
 
Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping
ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

16427332-10154970314523630-1334218084963727076-n_orig.jpg
A court warrant is now spying. AG Barr taught me this. :20:
A court warrant from a bogus dossier, that was never vetted, because the FBI chief lied to the FISA court? Is that still spying?

The FISA Court application was over 70 pages, of which the information used from the Dossier was referenced as secondary evidence. The Dossier confirmed evidence they already had, and was not new evidence.

The evidence from the Dossier used in the FISA application had been confirmed when they used it. ALL of the evidence in the Dossier has now been confirmed as true except the pee tape.

So everything in your post is lies meant to give cover to Trump’s lie that the Mueller Report exonerates him.
ROFL! You are the most shameless liar in this forum. Nothing in the "dossier" has been confirmed. Nothing. Andrew McCabe admitted as much when he testified before Congress.
 
At one time, Americans were outraged that a foreign adversary would try to interfere with our elections.

No more, for half of us anyway.
Lol, Mueller said no collusion.
She meant Israel and Saudi Arabia.
You mean the way Obama meddled in Israel's election?
You've been shown he didn't, why do you keep repeating the lie? the money the Obama State dept gave, was for a two state solution.... and completely used up, before Netanyahu even called for an election....

there was no intent of the Obama administration to interfere with an Israeli election.... there was no Israeli election scheduled when they gave the money....

And even Netanyahu, at the time they gave the money for pushing a two state solution, STILL SUPPORTED a two state solution.

STOP LYING.
Get Obama's pus out of your mouth. He hated Israel. Quit trying to rewrite history.
 
At one time, Americans were outraged that a foreign adversary would try to interfere with our elections.

No more, for half of us anyway.
Lol, Mueller said no collusion.

Here's the a summary of the FBI's Investigation of Clinton where it clears her of all charges about her supposed "Illegal" email server.

"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts."

"Set Her Free"
"Set Her Free"
"Set Her Free"
That's a Comey lie, and nothing more.

Nope, it lets her off Scott free, entirely.

</sarcasm> Jesus!
How does it let her off? Do you imagine Barr is constrained in any way by Comey's worthless opinion? It's likely Comey is headed for prison for his "investigation" (white wash) of Hillary.


It completely exonerates her.

Didn't you see my quote from Comey's summary?

She never mishandled or removed anything!

</really?>The devil made me do it
 
It completely exonerates her.
Some people are desperately hoping you're right.
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/10/obama-had-a-secret-plan-in-case-trump-rejected-2016-results.html

In October 2016, senior staff in the Obama White House discussed what they should do if Hillary Clinton won the November election and Donald Trump refused to accept the result as legitimate. They had cause to be worried. At that time, Trump had openly speculated that the election might be “rigged.” During his final debate with Clinton on October 19, he said that his opponent “should never have been allowed to run” and declined to answer the question of whether he would concede. “I’ll keep you in suspense,” the Republican nominee said.
 
So "huh uh" is all you have? It's all laid out for you by Barry's own guy.

What guy?

Break it down for us.

No need to "break" anything down, you're a punk troll nothing more.

Ahh.....I see. You're yet another loser who is unable to articulate what you "know" to be true.

Good job.


Who is " Barry's guy" ?

You lose boi.

You can't say? Why is that? You seemed really sure.

This is a "winning" game for you?
 
Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping
ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

16427332-10154970314523630-1334218084963727076-n_orig.jpg
A court warrant is now spying. AG Barr taught me this. :20:
A court warrant from a bogus dossier, that was never vetted, because the FBI chief lied to the FISA court? Is that still spying?

The FISA Court application was over 70 pages, of which the information used from the Dossier was referenced as secondary evidence. The Dossier confirmed evidence they already had, and was not new evidence.

The evidence from the Dossier used in the FISA application had been confirmed when they used it. ALL of the evidence in the Dossier has now been confirmed as true except the pee tape.

So everything in your post is lies meant to give cover to Trump’s lie that the Mueller Report exonerates him.

My my my, so many lies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top