At one time, liberals were outraged that the government would spy on a US citizen.

[bendog]

Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping

ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

A court warrant is now spying. AG Barr taught me this.

 

[gipper]

Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping

ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

They were right. Dumb ass W should have been impeached but so should have Big Ears, when he not only continued the illegal spying but expanded it.

Trump has continued the practice. So you believe he should be impeached, too? How deep does your hypocrisy go?

I do. You are the hypocrite.

 

[jknowgood]

At one time, Americans were outraged that a foreign adversary would try to interfere with our elections.

No more, for half of us anyway.

Lol, Mueller said no collusion.

She meant Israel and Saudi Arabia.

You mean the way Obama meddled in Israel's election?

That was "meddling?" When a head of state openly says who he/she supports in an ally's election? Netanyahu didn't have any qualms about coming here and addressing Congress when he wanted his way, either, did he?

Obama sent over $200,000 to be used against Netanyahu.

 

[the other mike]

Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping

ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

They were right. Dumb ass W should have been impeached but so should have Big Ears, when he not only continued the illegal spying but expanded it.

Trump has continued the practice. So you believe he should be impeached, too? How deep does your hypocrisy go?

I do. You are the hypocrite.

At one time, Americans were outraged that a foreign adversary would try to interfere with our elections.

No more, for half of us anyway.

Lol, Mueller said no collusion.

She meant Israel and Saudi Arabia.

You mean the way Obama meddled in Israel's election?

That was "meddling?" When a head of state openly says who he/she supports in an ally's election? Netanyahu didn't have any qualms about coming here and addressing Congress when he wanted his way, either, did he?

Obama sent over $200,000 to be used against Netanyahu.

We're not straying too far off topic here are we ?

 

[gipper]

Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping

ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

They were right. Dumb ass W should have been impeached but so should have Big Ears, when he not only continued the illegal spying but expanded it.

Trump has continued the practice. So you believe he should be impeached, too? How deep does your hypocrisy go?

I do. You are the hypocrite.

Lol, Mueller said no collusion.

She meant Israel and Saudi Arabia.

You mean the way Obama meddled in Israel's election?

That was "meddling?" When a head of state openly says who he/she supports in an ally's election? Netanyahu didn't have any qualms about coming here and addressing Congress when he wanted his way, either, did he?

Obama sent over $200,000 to be used against Netanyahu.

We're not straying too far off topic here are we ?

I don't think so. Spying on Americans is clearly illegal, if you accept the Constitution as the law of the land. For any POTUS to allow this to continue, is against his sworn duty to uphold the Constitution. However, this duty also applies to all in Congress....so it is far past the time to get rid of the whole bunch.

 

[Ambivalent1]

AG Barr Suggests Multiple Intel Agencies Involved In Anti-Trump Spy Op

Break it down for us ,chief.

(From the link I posted which you apparently refuse to read)
There have always been indications that the operation went far beyond the FBI, however. For example, former CIA director John Brennan, now an MSNBC contributor, separately briefed Sen. Harry Reid, (D-Nev.) about the operation. Reid understood that move was undertaken so he could publicize the Russia investigation to influence the ongoing presidential election campaign.

Former director of national intelligence James Clapper, now a CNN contributor, admitted to discussions with media outlets about the investigation. The U.S. embassy in London was used contrary to established protocol to funnel hearsay that was used as a pretext to officially launch a wide-ranging investigation against the entire Trump orbit. Clinton-connected officials in the State Department were also used to disseminate unverified gossip and allegations about Trump throughout the federal government.

The use of covert individuals to surreptitiously obtain information on private American citizens and share it with the government is the most obvious publicly known indication that agencies beyond the FBI may have been intimately involved in the operation. It is clearly possible that every single instance of intelligence collection was done entirely by the FBI without any assistance from any other federal intelligence agency. However, that has not been determined by any investigative body.

The use of Stefan Halper, for example, a London-based American academic with longstanding ties to the FBI, CIA, and Defense Department, raises serious questions about whether CIA assets or resources were used against American citizens. Following Nixon-era domestic spying abuses by the U.S. intelligence community, oversight bodies restricted the authority of the CIA to spy on U.S. citizens on U.S. soil.

I'm not interested in your RW conspiracy tripe.
You break it down.

Tell us who spied and when. Tell us what if anything was used against Trump.

Remember, there was not even public confirmation of an investigation involving the Trump campaign until after he was sworn in as president.

So "huh uh" is all you have? It's all laid out for you by Barry's own guy.

What guy?

Break it down for us.

No need to "break" anything down, you're a punk troll nothing more.

 

[Thinker101]

At one time, Americans were outraged that a foreign adversary would try to interfere with our elections.

No more, for half of us anyway.

Yes indeed, thank you Obama.

 

[the other mike]

I don't think so. Spying on Americans is clearly illegal, if you accept the Constitution as the law of the land. For any POTUS to allow this to continue, is against his sworn duty to uphold the Constitution. However, this duty also applies to all in Congress....so it is far past the time to get rid of the whole bunch.

I started these threads back in January...if anyone really wants to go down the rabbit hole.
How NSA tracks you and why it's illegal.

CIA whistleblower exposes the shadow government.

Weaponizing the Term Conspiracy Theory - Disinformation Agents and the CIA

 

[Ambivalent1]

So...did I kill the topic, hypocrites? Should Trump be impeached, too?

You aren't intelligent enough to kill anything kid. You support everything any Dem pol does.

 

[Ambivalent1]

Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping

ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

FISA is a Carter creation. Bush drastically expanded it and EVERYONE in Gov cheered it.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping

ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

A court warrant is now spying. AG Barr taught me this.

A court warrant from a bogus dossier, that was never vetted, because the FBI chief lied to the FISA court? Is that still spying?

 

[Oddball]

You mean like Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi??? For 5 years?

Here’s the difference. Russian interference actually happened and it’s still happening.

 

[skews13]

Remember back in the day under George W.(liberal republican) Bush when he enacted the FISA courts to battle terrorism, and if someone overseas was conversing with a US citizen, they FISA were allowed to warrantless wiretap on said US citizen. The left went crazy about civil liberties...Why doesnt it bother you today, liberals, that our government has spied on a US citizen without proper vetting of a bogus dossier, that was paid for by the DNC? Have you gone so far down the FASCIST path that you will allow your government to do such a dirty dead?

Poll: Americans support impeaching Bush for wiretapping

ecently White House spokesman Scott McClellan cited a Rasmussen poll that found 64% believe the NSA "should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects." Of course, that is exactly what Congress authorized when it created the FISA courts to issue special expedited secret warrants for terrorism suspects. But Bush defied the FISA law and authorized warrantless wiretaps of Americans, which has outraged Americans to the point that a majority believe Congress should consider Bush's impeachment.

Troll post. The intelligence agencies doing their jobs investigating possible foreign influence in government isn't spying.

And they proved beyond any doubt there was, and still is.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Break it down for us ,chief.

(From the link I posted which you apparently refuse to read)
There have always been indications that the operation went far beyond the FBI, however. For example, former CIA director John Brennan, now an MSNBC contributor, separately briefed Sen. Harry Reid, (D-Nev.) about the operation. Reid understood that move was undertaken so he could publicize the Russia investigation to influence the ongoing presidential election campaign.

Former director of national intelligence James Clapper, now a CNN contributor, admitted to discussions with media outlets about the investigation. The U.S. embassy in London was used contrary to established protocol to funnel hearsay that was used as a pretext to officially launch a wide-ranging investigation against the entire Trump orbit. Clinton-connected officials in the State Department were also used to disseminate unverified gossip and allegations about Trump throughout the federal government.

The use of covert individuals to surreptitiously obtain information on private American citizens and share it with the government is the most obvious publicly known indication that agencies beyond the FBI may have been intimately involved in the operation. It is clearly possible that every single instance of intelligence collection was done entirely by the FBI without any assistance from any other federal intelligence agency. However, that has not been determined by any investigative body.

The use of Stefan Halper, for example, a London-based American academic with longstanding ties to the FBI, CIA, and Defense Department, raises serious questions about whether CIA assets or resources were used against American citizens. Following Nixon-era domestic spying abuses by the U.S. intelligence community, oversight bodies restricted the authority of the CIA to spy on U.S. citizens on U.S. soil.

I'm not interested in your RW conspiracy tripe.
You break it down.

Tell us who spied and when. Tell us what if anything was used against Trump.

Remember, there was not even public confirmation of an investigation involving the Trump campaign until after he was sworn in as president.

So "huh uh" is all you have? It's all laid out for you by Barry's own guy.

What guy?

Break it down for us.

No need to "break" anything down, you're a punk troll nothing more.

Ahh.....I see. You're yet another loser who is unable to articulate what you "know" to be true.

Good job.


Who is " Barry's guy" ?

 

[Ambivalent1]

(From the link I posted which you apparently refuse to read)
There have always been indications that the operation went far beyond the FBI, however. For example, former CIA director John Brennan, now an MSNBC contributor, separately briefed Sen. Harry Reid, (D-Nev.) about the operation. Reid understood that move was undertaken so he could publicize the Russia investigation to influence the ongoing presidential election campaign.

Former director of national intelligence James Clapper, now a CNN contributor, admitted to discussions with media outlets about the investigation. The U.S. embassy in London was used contrary to established protocol to funnel hearsay that was used as a pretext to officially launch a wide-ranging investigation against the entire Trump orbit. Clinton-connected officials in the State Department were also used to disseminate unverified gossip and allegations about Trump throughout the federal government.

The use of covert individuals to surreptitiously obtain information on private American citizens and share it with the government is the most obvious publicly known indication that agencies beyond the FBI may have been intimately involved in the operation. It is clearly possible that every single instance of intelligence collection was done entirely by the FBI without any assistance from any other federal intelligence agency. However, that has not been determined by any investigative body.

The use of Stefan Halper, for example, a London-based American academic with longstanding ties to the FBI, CIA, and Defense Department, raises serious questions about whether CIA assets or resources were used against American citizens. Following Nixon-era domestic spying abuses by the U.S. intelligence community, oversight bodies restricted the authority of the CIA to spy on U.S. citizens on U.S. soil.

I'm not interested in your RW conspiracy tripe.
You break it down.

Tell us who spied and when. Tell us what if anything was used against Trump.

Remember, there was not even public confirmation of an investigation involving the Trump campaign until after he was sworn in as president.

So "huh uh" is all you have? It's all laid out for you by Barry's own guy.

What guy?

Break it down for us.

No need to "break" anything down, you're a punk troll nothing more.

Ahh.....I see. You're yet another loser who is unable to articulate what you "know" to be true.

Good job.


Who is " Barry's guy" ?

You lose boi.

 

[Mike473]

At one time, the liberals would be marching in support of someone like Julian Assange.

At one time, the liberals would be marching in support of getting out of as many war zones as possible.

 

[the other mike]

I'm not interested in your RW conspiracy tripe.
You break it down.

Tell us who spied and when. Tell us what if anything was used against Trump.

Remember, there was not even public confirmation of an investigation involving the Trump campaign until after he was sworn in as president.

So "huh uh" is all you have? It's all laid out for you by Barry's own guy.

What guy?

Break it down for us.

No need to "break" anything down, you're a punk troll nothing more.

Ahh.....I see. You're yet another loser who is unable to articulate what you "know" to be true.

Good job.


Who is " Barry's guy" ?

You lose boi.

To truly understand Trump-haters like Bear Huggy , I would recommend reading
The Death of the Liberal Class by Chris Hedges.
excerpt;
“If we really saw war, what war does to young minds and bodies, it would be impossible to embrace the myth of war. If we had to stand over the mangled corpses of schoolchildren killed in Afghanistan and listen to the wails of their parents, we would not be able to repeat clichés we use to justify war. This is why war is carefully sanitized. This is why we are given war's perverse and dark thrill but are spared from seeing war's consequences. The mythic visions of war keep it heroic and entertaining…"

 

[Ambivalent1]

So "huh uh" is all you have? It's all laid out for you by Barry's own guy.

What guy?

Break it down for us.

No need to "break" anything down, you're a punk troll nothing more.

Ahh.....I see. You're yet another loser who is unable to articulate what you "know" to be true.

Good job.


Who is " Barry's guy" ?

You lose boi.

To truly understand Trump-haters like Bear Huggy , I would recommend reading
The Death of the Liberal Class by Chris Hedges.
excerpt;
“If we really saw war, what war does to young minds and bodies, it would be impossible to embrace the myth of war. If we had to stand over the mangled corpses of schoolchildren killed in Afghanistan and listen to the wails of their parents, we would not be able to repeat clichés we use to justify war. This is why war is carefully sanitized. This is why we are given war's perverse and dark thrill but are spared from seeing war's consequences. The mythic visions of war keep it heroic and entertaining…"

I've seen it, I have the scars.
People like Huggy and most Progs live in a theoretical world.
My fervent wish is that someone they love die at the hands of those whom they defend.
ONLY then will they get it.

 

[toobfreak]

At one time, Americans were outraged that a foreign adversary would try to interfere with our elections.

No more, for half of us anyway.

As I recall, wasn't that the McCarthy Hearings?

Conducted by the GOP?

And the Democrats laughed the idea that we could be compromised by communists right out the fricking door. Ha. Ha. Ha.

Kinda like Barry did a few years ago when Romney tried to tell him Russia might be our greatest threat.

But now that we are finding out how much Barry and Hildegarde conspired with foreign interests in 2016 to thwart Trump, I agree, we need to look deeply at the matter.

Are ya listing Lindsay Graham and AG Barr???

 

[Moonglow]

Hell republicans and conservatives love to spy on people..