JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,543
- 280
1. There is no united oligarchy controlling the world's resources.
Then what do you think the roles of the IMF and World Bank are? Those two nefarious entities are crucial to the implementation of
strategies aimed at destroying prosperity and
Infrastructure in developing nations. The end of colonialism on the African continent was replaced by a new kind of western exploitation. Arms sales to western friendly factions strained the already depleted coffers of fledgling nations. Loans to buy those tanks, planes and guns were arranged by the IMF/World Bank...but usuary , not altruism, was behind it all. The Contract generally was essentially an economic death knell for the well being of hapless citizensin those countries.. Austerity was the key component of the plan. All tax money and monies generated to benefit the citizens was liened to repay the burdensome national debt to the IMF/World Bank.
2. Deposing rulers who don't want to sell, is very old, and not done any more, not for a long time
Saddam Hussein, and Khaddifi perished because of western perogatives.
. Khaddifi was bubbling incompetence by our leadership. Don't try to find sense there.
I think you mean we should have left Khaddifi alone...if so...I agree.
It appears that to millions of Africans...Western Capitalism is a bigger threat than Communism.4. Communism was a real threat. SOrry your side lost. Deal with it.
LOL!!! Africa? A threat? Sure, that's was the fear...NOT.
A unified Africa could be a formidible economic juggernaut. With all the natural resources controled by a central pan African entity...Africa would be a worrisome problem to the west.