As Predicted- No There, There- Kushner Releases 11- Page Report Prior To Inquiry

[The Original Tree]

Has anyone actually read his statement?

His claim "I did not collude" has no credibility. It is up to others to decide

You Must Be Deluded to Believe He Colluded

 

[danielpalos]

Okay, that's his side of the story.

And, evidently, the opinion of many 'investigators' who have found no Russian Collusion for over a half a year now...

tick, tock,,,

Dam, is the butter hard yet?

-Geaux

links?

 

[The Original Tree]

The question for Kushner is why didn't he disclose these meetings with Russian agents when he applied for a security clearance?

Why did he decide to go to that meeting with Lil' Donnie? Was it to get some dirt on Hillary or to discuss Russian adoption policies?

My question for you is why aren't you disclosing that you are a member of The Deep State's Cyber Warfare Propaganda Unit and Colluding with The Deep State to undermine The Presidency for The Establishment?

 

[nat4900]

Schumer just admitted that the entire Russian Collusion SCAM is pure bullshit:

Schumer tells Clinton 'blame yourself'; Trump echoes criticism

Reading comprehension issues by a junior high drop out???? LOL

 

[The Original Tree]

Why would Kilsiak want to set up secret channels to discuss Syria military moves and NOT discuss these military moves from Russian generals with the US Military and government working with the Russian government DAILY? And before the election, BEFORE anyone even thought Trump would win? Russians obviously thought or knew due to their shenanigans that he would win??? Hmmmm.... it doesn't make sense?

Why is Kushner interviewing with only staffers?

Why is Kushner not testifying under oath???

Why is Rice, Loretta Lynch, and James Comey not testifying under oath about ACTUAL CRIMES they Committed?

 

[easyt65]

Reading comprehension issues by a junior high drop out???? LOL

Don't be so hard on yourself...I am sure you got your GED...or will one day. "p

 

[Rambunctious]

I wanted lettuce and tomato and cheese and mustard and ketchup and an all beef patty but all I got was a bun....

 

[Rambunctious]

we have to investigate to find out what was in it or errrrr something like that

 

[nat4900]

And, evidently, the opinion of many 'investigators' who have found no Russian Collusion for over a half a year now...

Did you wipe and flush after the above "revelation"???......LOL

 

[Valerie]

As Predicted- No There, There- Kushner Releases 11- Page Report Prior To Inquiry

Easy Dems..... Don't let facts confuse you

-Geaux

AS PREDICTED-- trumpswab traitors and dumbo parrots continue to spread FAKE NEWS.

AS PREDICTED-- yet another bold faced denial by another SHAMELESS trump family member.



Jared Kushner, sought a secret line of communications with Russian officials that would bypass American intelligence services is four large Goodyears tossed onto the White House tire fire. There is no "legitimate" reason why Trump's transition team should have sought out a secret line of communication with a foreign nation that the American government wouldn't know about. Sunday shows be damned; there is no spin that makes that "better." That's colluding with a foreign government in defiance of your own no matter how you look at it, and is prima facie evidence that there was something going on between the top members of Team Trump and Russian officials that they didn't want American officials getting wind of—and that's even without considering the breaking news that Kushner had still more conversations with Russian officials that he did not previously bother to mention.

This news now puts Jared Kushner in the center ring of the Russia investigation, the one now being handled by a special counsel after Trump fired the FBI director running it.

Jared Kushner and Russian ambassador discussed setting up a secret communications channel

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

RUSSIA!!!! RUSSIA!!!!

 

[bendog]

I can't go to jail! I need to keep kosher!

 

[Valerie]

RUSSIA!!!! RUSSIA!!!!

is this an admission that you've been posting from Russia all along??



"The Russian active measures campaign may have begun as early as 2015, when Russian intelligence services launched a series of spear fishing attacks designed to penetrate the computers of a broad array of Washington based Democratic and Republican party organizations, think tanks and other entities. This continued at least through the winter of 2016.

While at first the hacking may have been intended solely for the collection of foreign intelligence. In mid-2016 the Russians weapon eyes the stolen data and used platforms established by the Intel services, such as D.C. leaks in existing third-party channels like WikiLeaks to dump the documents. The stolen documents were almost uniformly damaging to the candidate Putin despised, Hillary Clinton. And by forcing her campaign to constantly respond to the daily drip of disclosures, the releases greatly benefited Donald Trump's campaign.

None of these facts is seriously in question. And they're reflected in the consensus conclusion of our intelligence agencies.

We will never know whether the Russian intervention was determinative in such a close election. Indeed, it is unknowable in a campaign to which so many small changes could have dictated a different result. More importantly, and for the purposes of our investigation, it simply does not matter.

What does matter is this, the Russians successfully meddled in our democracy and our intelligence agencies have concluded they will do so again. Ours is not the first democracy to be attacked by the Russians in this way. Russian intelligence has been simile interfering in the internal and political affairs of our European and other allies for decades.


SCHIFF: What is striking here is the degree to which the Russians were willing to undertake such an audacious and risky action against the most powerful nation on Earth. That ought to be a warning to us that if we thought that the Russians would not dare to so blatantly interfere in our affairs, we were wrong.

And if we do not do our very best to understand how the Russians accomplished this unprecedented attack on our democracy and what we need to do to protect ourselves in the future, we will only have ourselves to blame.

We know a lot about the Russian operation, about the way they amplified the damage their hacking and dumping of stolen documents was causing through the use of slick propaganda like R.T., the Kremlin's media arm. But there is a lot we don't know.

Full transcript: FBI Director James Comey testifies on Russian interference in 2016 election

Most important, we do not yet know whether the Russians have the help of U.S. citizens including people associated with the Trump campaign. Many of the Trump's campaign personnel, including the president himself, have ties to Russia and Russian interests. This is of course no crime. On the other hand, if the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it aided or abetted the Russians, it would not only be a serious crime, it would also represent one of the most shocking betrayals of democracy in history."

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

RUSSIA!!!! RUSSIA!!!!

is this an admission that you've been posting from Russia all along??



"The Russian active measures campaign may have begun as early as 2015, when Russian intelligence services launched a series of spear fishing attacks designed to penetrate the computers of a broad array of Washington based Democratic and Republican party organizations, think tanks and other entities. This continued at least through the winter of 2016.

While at first the hacking may have been intended solely for the collection of foreign intelligence. In mid-2016 the Russians weapon eyes the stolen data and used platforms established by the Intel services, such as D.C. leaks in existing third-party channels like WikiLeaks to dump the documents. The stolen documents were almost uniformly damaging to the candidate Putin despised, Hillary Clinton. And by forcing her campaign to constantly respond to the daily drip of disclosures, the releases greatly benefited Donald Trump's campaign.

None of these facts is seriously in question. And they're reflected in the consensus conclusion of our intelligence agencies.

We will never know whether the Russian intervention was determinative in such a close election. Indeed, it is unknowable in a campaign to which so many small changes could have dictated a different result. More importantly, and for the purposes of our investigation, it simply does not matter.

What does matter is this, the Russians successfully meddled in our democracy and our intelligence agencies have concluded they will do so again. Ours is not the first democracy to be attacked by the Russians in this way. Russian intelligence has been simile interfering in the internal and political affairs of our European and other allies for decades.


SCHIFF: What is striking here is the degree to which the Russians were willing to undertake such an audacious and risky action against the most powerful nation on Earth. That ought to be a warning to us that if we thought that the Russians would not dare to so blatantly interfere in our affairs, we were wrong.

And if we do not do our very best to understand how the Russians accomplished this unprecedented attack on our democracy and what we need to do to protect ourselves in the future, we will only have ourselves to blame.

We know a lot about the Russian operation, about the way they amplified the damage their hacking and dumping of stolen documents was causing through the use of slick propaganda like R.T., the Kremlin's media arm. But there is a lot we don't know.

Full transcript: FBI Director James Comey testifies on Russian interference in 2016 election

Most important, we do not yet know whether the Russians have the help of U.S. citizens including people associated with the Trump campaign. Many of the Trump's campaign personnel, including the president himself, have ties to Russia and Russian interests. This is of course no crime. On the other hand, if the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it aided or abetted the Russians, it would not only be a serious crime, it would also represent one of the most shocking betrayals of democracy in history."

The key words in your post is:

1. May have
2. If
3. We do not yet know

 

[Valerie]

RUSSIA!!!! RUSSIA!!!!

is this an admission that you've been posting from Russia all along??



"The Russian active measures campaign may have begun as early as 2015, when Russian intelligence services launched a series of spear fishing attacks designed to penetrate the computers of a broad array of Washington based Democratic and Republican party organizations, think tanks and other entities. This continued at least through the winter of 2016.

While at first the hacking may have been intended solely for the collection of foreign intelligence. In mid-2016 the Russians weapon eyes the stolen data and used platforms established by the Intel services, such as D.C. leaks in existing third-party channels like WikiLeaks to dump the documents. The stolen documents were almost uniformly damaging to the candidate Putin despised, Hillary Clinton. And by forcing her campaign to constantly respond to the daily drip of disclosures, the releases greatly benefited Donald Trump's campaign.

None of these facts is seriously in question. And they're reflected in the consensus conclusion of our intelligence agencies.

We will never know whether the Russian intervention was determinative in such a close election. Indeed, it is unknowable in a campaign to which so many small changes could have dictated a different result. More importantly, and for the purposes of our investigation, it simply does not matter.

What does matter is this, the Russians successfully meddled in our democracy and our intelligence agencies have concluded they will do so again. Ours is not the first democracy to be attacked by the Russians in this way. Russian intelligence has been simile interfering in the internal and political affairs of our European and other allies for decades.


SCHIFF: What is striking here is the degree to which the Russians were willing to undertake such an audacious and risky action against the most powerful nation on Earth. That ought to be a warning to us that if we thought that the Russians would not dare to so blatantly interfere in our affairs, we were wrong.

And if we do not do our very best to understand how the Russians accomplished this unprecedented attack on our democracy and what we need to do to protect ourselves in the future, we will only have ourselves to blame.

We know a lot about the Russian operation, about the way they amplified the damage their hacking and dumping of stolen documents was causing through the use of slick propaganda like R.T., the Kremlin's media arm. But there is a lot we don't know.

Full transcript: FBI Director James Comey testifies on Russian interference in 2016 election

Most important, we do not yet know whether the Russians have the help of U.S. citizens including people associated with the Trump campaign. Many of the Trump's campaign personnel, including the president himself, have ties to Russia and Russian interests. This is of course no crime. On the other hand, if the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it aided or abetted the Russians, it would not only be a serious crime, it would also represent one of the most shocking betrayals of democracy in history."

The key words in your post is:

1. May have
2. If
3. We do not yet know

wow, you can read... now let's see if you are capable of grasping the concept of legal terminology amidst an ongoing investigation.

 

[nat4900]

The key words in your post is:

1. May have
2. If
3. We do not yet know

Great events begin with those phrases above......(be very scared, Stevie...LOL)

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

The key words in your post is:

1. May have
2. If
3. We do not yet know

Great events begin with those phrases above

Such as?

 

[nat4900]

Such as?

Watergate.......

 

[jc456]

Okay, that's his side of the story.

whose side would he have given if not his?

 

[Mac1958]

Okay, that's his side of the story.

whose side would he have given if not his?

No one.
.