9thIDdoc
Gold Member
- Aug 8, 2011
- 7,956
- 3,112
- 325
bullshit criteria that everyone knows is easily scammed
Nobody knows any such thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
bullshit criteria that everyone knows is easily scammed
The world has caught on to Dante, but what has been done about this?
As disability awards grow, so do concerns with veracity of PTSD claims
August 3, 2014
The 49-year-old veteran explained that he suffered from paranoia in crowds, nightmares and unrelenting flashbacks from the Iraq war. He said he needed his handgun to feel secure and worried that he would shoot somebody.
The symptoms were textbook post-traumatic stress disorder.
But Robert Moering, the conducting the disability examination at a Veterans Affairs hospital in Tampa, Fla., suspected the veteran was exaggerating. Hardly anybody had so many symptoms of PTSD so much of the time.
There is a big difference between those of who served in Vietnam (referred to as IN COUNTRY ) and those who did not. However, non In Country Vets deserve praise for their Military Service.So...the more symptoms they have the more likely they are to be faking?
Does that also mean that someone who denies any symptoms at all must be a real basket case?
Strange.
If they are Vietnam Era vets, that equals two strikes out of three
The Doctor's credential look impressive.
http://www.cavcbar.net/confpdf/Presenters Bios.pdf
In the past soldiers were altogether ignored for the trauma they experienced post military duty. The down side to a soldier faking or exagarating trauma is it takes away help and funding from those who are severely suffering.
War's psychic toll
In some ways, the explosion in PTSD cases is a sign of progress.
Though descriptions of the disorder show up in literature as far back as Shakespeare, it did not become a formal diagnosis until 1980, and even then remained controversial. After decades of downplaying the psychological toll of war,
the government has finally acknowledged the damage and boosted assistance to veterans in need.
What kind of compensation package would prevent soldiers who do not suffer from it to not to make up a story?
Even some veterans whose diagnosis falls under deep suspicion have managed to keep their disability ratings.
In one case that Moering reviewed in 2009, he searched military records and concluded that a Navy veteran on the disability rolls for PTSD had lied to VA clinicians about having served in the elite SEALs and concocted his combat history.
The Doctor's credential look impressive.
http://www.cavcbar.net/confpdf/Presenters Bios.pdf
In the past soldiers were altogether ignored for the trauma they experienced post military duty. The down side to a soldier faking or exagarating trauma is it takes away help and funding from those who are severely suffering.
War's psychic toll
In some ways, the explosion in PTSD cases is a sign of progress.
Though descriptions of the disorder show up in literature as far back as Shakespeare, it did not become a formal diagnosis until 1980, and even then remained controversial. After decades of downplaying the psychological toll of war, the government has finally acknowledged the damage and boosted assistance to veterans in need.
What kind of compensation package would prevent soldiers who do not suffer from it to not to make up a story?
Even some veterans whose diagnosis falls under deep suspicion have managed to keep their disability ratings.
In one case that Moering reviewed in 2009, he searched military records and concluded that a Navy veteran on the disability rolls for PTSD had lied to VA clinicians about having served in the elite SEALs and concocted his combat history.
Many are educated guesses. It's almost impossible to know exactly what one feels or thinks. Basically, it's opinions and guess work. Mental disorders, or mental disabilities, are very difficult to determine under certain conditions. Some are obvious, while other are "iffy". War produces many side effects. War is hell. War is traumatic on the battlefield, and not easily forgotten once one leaves a combat zone. Sometimes, mental side effects lay dormant for years before surfacing and causing one to become disabled. Until an exact science to determine whether one is truly disabled as a result of war is developed, the guessing game will continue. It'll remain a judgment call and educated guess.[/QUOTEThe world has caught on to Dante, but what has been done about this?
As disability awards grow, so do concerns with veracity of PTSD claims
August 3, 2014
The 49-year-old veteran explained that he suffered from paranoia in crowds, nightmares and unrelenting flashbacks from the Iraq war. He said he needed his handgun to feel secure and worried that he would shoot somebody.
The symptoms were textbook post-traumatic stress disorder.
But Robert Moering, the psychologist conducting the disability examination at a Veterans Affairs hospital in Tampa, Fla., suspected the veteran was exaggerating. Hardly anybody had so many symptoms of PTSD so much of the time.
Did Mr Moering seve in combat when he served in the USMC? He should have requested a copy of the Vets Records. The Vet's DD214's gives some good information: Combat MOS, a Medals of Valor( A Bronze Star with out a Combat is not a Medal of Valor), Purple Heart, Combat Infantry Badge or Combat Medic Badge issued by the US Army, Combat Action Ribbon issued by USMC, US Navy, or the USCG.
All of the above are evidence of a stressor.
The world has caught on to Dante, but what has been done about this?
As disability awards grow, so do concerns with veracity of PTSD claims
August 3, 2014
The 49-year-old veteran explained that he suffered from paranoia in crowds, nightmares and unrelenting flashbacks from the Iraq war. He said he needed his handgun to feel secure and worried that he would shoot somebody.
The symptoms were textbook post-traumatic stress disorder.
But Robert Moering, the psychologist conducting the disability examination at a Veterans Affairs hospital in Tampa, Fla., suspected the veteran was exaggerating. Hardly anybody had so many symptoms of PTSD so much of the time.
The Doctor's credential look impressive.
http://www.cavcbar.net/confpdf/Presenters Bios.pdf
In the past soldiers were altogether ignored for the trauma they experienced post military duty. The down side to a soldier faking or exagarating trauma is it takes away help and funding from those who are severely suffering.
War's psychic toll
In some ways, the explosion in PTSD cases is a sign of progress.
Though descriptions of the disorder show up in literature as far back as Shakespeare, it did not become a formal diagnosis until 1980, and even then remained controversial. After decades of downplaying the psychological toll of war,
the government has finally acknowledged the damage and boosted assistance to veterans in need.
What kind of compensation package would prevent soldiers who do not suffer from it to not to make up a story?
Even some veterans whose diagnosis falls under deep suspicion have managed to keep their disability ratings.
In one case that Moering reviewed in 2009, he searched military records and concluded that a Navy veteran on the disability rolls for PTSD had lied to VA clinicians about having served in the elite SEALs and concocted his combat history.
When a Veteran files a claim for PTSD the VA requests and receives a copy of their military records. A combat MOS, a Purple Heart, a Medal of Valor. (A Bronze Stare Medal without a Combat V is not a Medal of Valor).The ARMY Combat Infantry Badge, Combat Medic Badge,the Combat Action Ribbon USMC, NAVY and USCG.
All of the above prove the stressor for a PTSD Claim.
I can not believe you named actual people.
The Doctor's credential look impressive.
http://www.cavcbar.net/confpdf/Presenters Bios.pdf
In the past soldiers were altogether ignored for the trauma they experienced post military duty. The down side to a soldier faking or exagarating trauma is it takes away help and funding from those who are severely suffering.
War's psychic toll
In some ways, the explosion in PTSD cases is a sign of progress.
Though descriptions of the disorder show up in literature as far back as Shakespeare, it did not become a formal diagnosis until 1980, and even then remained controversial. After decades of downplaying the psychological toll of war, the government has finally acknowledged the damage and boosted assistance to veterans in need.
What kind of compensation package would prevent soldiers who do not suffer from it to not to make up a story?
Even some veterans whose diagnosis falls under deep suspicion have managed to keep their disability ratings.
In one case that Moering reviewed in 2009, he searched military records and concluded that a Navy veteran on the disability rolls for PTSD had lied to VA clinicians about having served in the elite SEALs and concocted his combat history.
Many are educated guesses. It's almost impossible to know exactly what one feels or thinks. Basically, it's opinions and guess work. Mental disorders, or mental disabilities, are very difficult to determine under certain conditions. Some are obvious, while other are "iffy". War produces many side effects. War is hell. War is traumatic on the battlefield, and not easily forgotten once one leaves a combat zone. Sometimes, mental side effects lay dormant for years before surfacing and causing one to become disabled. Until an exact science to determine whether one is truly disabled as a result of war is developed, the guessing game will continue. It'll remain a judgment call and educated guess.[/QUOTEThe world has caught on to Dante, but what has been done about this?
As disability awards grow, so do concerns with veracity of PTSD claims
August 3, 2014
The 49-year-old veteran explained that he suffered from paranoia in crowds, nightmares and unrelenting flashbacks from the Iraq war. He said he needed his handgun to feel secure and worried that he would shoot somebody.
The symptoms were textbook post-traumatic stress disorder.
But Robert Moering, the psychologist conducting the disability examination at a Veterans Affairs hospital in Tampa, Fla., suspected the veteran was exaggerating. Hardly anybody had so many symptoms of PTSD so much of the time.
Did Mr Moering seve in combat when he served in the USMC? He should have requested a copy of the Vets Records. The Vet's DD214's gives some good information: Combat MOS, a Medals of Valor( A Bronze Star with out a Combat is not a Medal of Valor), Purple Heart, Combat Infantry Badge or Combat Medic Badge issued by the US Army, Combat Action Ribbon issued by USMC, US Navy, or the USCG.
All of the above are evidence of a stressor.
For some reason the administration has it rigged so that a former member of the Military doesn't even have to relate the alleged incident that allegedly caused the alleged trauma. As a matter of fact a freaking clerk who spent his/her tour pushing papers can file for PTSD compensation. The ironic thing is that the hypocrites who want to restrict legal possession of firearms for people without a criminal record or an admitted mental disability are against restricting PTSD patients from obtaining a firearm. If PTSD is a real issue at least show some respect for actual combat Veterans and restrict PTSD compensation to Veterans who were awarded a Purple Heart.
Hey doc, take your own advice. Read and learn. You don't get away with posting words like "slanderous bullshit" and pretending it's an argument.For some reason the administration has it rigged so that a former member of the Military doesn't even have to relate the alleged incident that allegedly caused the alleged trauma. As a matter of fact a freaking clerk who spent his/her tour pushing papers can file for PTSD compensation. The ironic thing is that the hypocrites who want to restrict legal possession of firearms for people without a criminal record or an admitted mental disability are against restricting PTSD patients from obtaining a firearm. If PTSD is a real issue at least show some respect for actual combat Veterans and restrict PTSD compensation to Veterans who were awarded a Purple Heart.
You have voiced such slanderous bullshit before and it is the same old lies as always. Read. Learn.
Navigating the drive through at Burger King is not combat experience.Of course Dante has years of combat experience battling other Lord & Taylor customers during lingerie sales and the like. He has a 30% lingerie shopper trauma disability rating...and SSI and welfare too I'm sure.
more combat experience than a majority of veterans, yes
Call it slander and then you don't have to take all that time to research and argue your point. Another PTSD symptom?"Hey doc, take your own advice. Read and learn. You don't get away with posting words like "slanderous bullshit" and pretending it's an argument."
I made, and make, no pretense of argument with your slander. We've been around this same bush before and you simply ignore truth (both then and earlier in this thread) rather than make any effort to refute it or argue the question. If you don't feel the need then neither do I. Again. You lie. And you should be ashamed of slandering those who have sacrificed to protect your sorry ass.
What evidence? The idiot who murdered the Navy Seal sniper is using PTSD as a defense. Nobody cares if Vets play the nut case PTSD role in a bar to pick up biker chicks, the problem is when they pick my taxpayer pocket for a pension. Here's a suggestion; only award a PTSD pension to Veterans with a Purple Heart and restrict gun purchases for Veterans who claim that they are so mentally ill that they require constant therapy a pension for their service.I say again:
I made, and make, no pretense of argument with your slander. We've been around this same bush before and you simply ignore truth (both then and earlier in this thread) rather than make any effort to refute it or argue the question. If you don't feel the need then neither do I. Again. You lie. And you should be ashamed of slandering those who have sacrificed to protect your sorry ass.
You contradicted several posts in this thread without giving any evidence to support your argument. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If you want to argue a point we will, but if you just make unsupported statements then don't expect more from me.