Are We Alone?

[zaangalewa]

Do you know how may factors habe tocome togaterh so life is able to exist at a iart if he double planet Earth-moone?

Who cares? Were not determining the likelihood of finding life exactly as we have it on earth. You need to look up Hoyle's fallacy. You can arbitrarily pile on probabilities all night and make the likelihood of any event approach zero. Your reasoning is specious and arbitrary.

no comment

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Do you know how may factors habe tocome togaterh so life is able to exist at a iart if he double planet Earth-moone?

Who cares? Were not determining the likelihood of finding life exactly as we have it on earth. You need to look up Hoyle's fallacy. You can arbitrarily pile on probabilities all night and make the likelihood of any event approach zero. Your reasoning is specious and arbitrary.

I don't have any idea why US Americans speak with each other.

Look up Hoyle's fallacy.

 

[zaangalewa]

Do you know how may factors habe tocome togaterh so life is able to exist at a iart if he double planet Earth-moone?

Who cares? Were not determining the likelihood of finding life exactly as we have it on earth. You need to look up Hoyle's fallacy. You can arbitrarily pile on probabilities all night and make the likelihood of any event approach zero. Your reasoning is specious and arbitrary.

I don't have any idea why US Americans speak with each other.

Look up Hoyle's fallacy.

France is not alone.

 

[zaangalewa]

... the scientists who study the possibility of life in the universe, [/qupte]

"Scientists" or "science fiction authors"

would guess that the Universe is crawling with life, at least with bacteria-like life.

We know only bacteriae with a terrrestrian phylogentic tree and terrestrian genetics.

We don’t know for sure

"for sure" = We know nothing about any from of life indpendent from an origin on planet Earth.

because we have not yet identified life anywhere else. But there are really three reasons for this shift.

First, in the 1990s, astronomers learned how to detect planets around other stars and now we know that most stars have solar systems,

}

=a system of planets

so there may be billions of planets quite like planet Earth just in our own galaxy,

In big parts of the galaxy - where exist the most stars for example - this regions are without any chance for life because of the heavy cosmic radiation there. Only the areas with not many stars are important in this context - and only the suns with nearly the same size (greater stars will not live long enough, and in the habitable zone of smaller stars is also much more radiation of the sun). And it needs also planets with nearly the same mass of our own planet.

the Milky Way, so there seem to be lots of places where life could possibly live.

You confuse hope with knowledge. A problem of atheistst is they often believe not to believe. That's why atheists often "know" things a Christian never would know, because truth is holy for Christians.

Second, on our own planet, Earth, life appeared quite soon after the planet formed.

Unconscous cells. But multi-cellular life - which is fundamental for the expression "life" - appeared about 10% of the current lifetime of our planet ago.

And that seems to suggest that where there exist the right “Goldilocks” conditions for life it can pop up quite easily.

Goldilocks - and much more gingers - need conditions of life, which are much more sophisticated than you seem to be able to imagine.

[Quote[Finally, we have now found bacteria existing in very harsh environments,

Bacteriae are terrestrian single-cell prokaryotes.

inside scalding hot springs, or inside rocks, and we know they can even survive short journeys in space. So they are tougher than we thought.

Sure they are tougher than you thought - but not tougher or thoughter - ah sorry: more intelligent - than we are.

But that’s bacteria. Big creatures like ourselves are probably much rarer. After all, on planet Earth it took just a few hundred million years to create the first bacteria, but it took almost 3 billion years to create the first large creatures, like worms or trilobites. So the chances of meeting creatures like us still seem very remote.

And now the religious folks won't care if we find bacteria.

The religious folks is responsible for the creation of all civilisations and cultures on this planet.

It will have to be complex. Then when we find creatures like dinosaurs our mice they won't care because they'll move the goal post.

Sure. The religious nuts are the worst. Weasels.

Then the creatures will have to be smart like us.

That's why they speak English.

So until we find creatures as smart as us religious people will always insist we are alone.

Religious people are not alone. God is with us. And I will have to laugh a lot, when the first spaceship full of ECs (extraterrestrian Catholics) will land in Dharamsala and will have to ask the Dalai Lama for the right way to Rome. It's by the way as well for Catholics and Buddhists not any problem to have believers with 3 1/2 legs, four rows of diamond teeth and telekinetic abilities. A human being is a human being. We don't care whether someone is born on a planet in the Andromeda galaxy. This disqualifies no one.

By the way: France needs money for the rebuilding of Notre Dame. Notre Dame will be brought back to live.

 

[sealybobo]

... the scientists who study the possibility of life in the universe, [/qupte]

"Scientists" or "science fiction authors"

would guess that the Universe is crawling with life, at least with bacteria-like life.

We know only bacteriae with a terrrestrian phylogentic tree and terrestrian genetics.

We don’t know for sure

"for sure" = We know nothing about any from of life indpendent from an origin on planet Earth.

because we have not yet identified life anywhere else. But there are really three reasons for this shift.

First, in the 1990s, astronomers learned how to detect planets around other stars and now we know that most stars have solar systems,

}

=a system of planets

so there may be billions of planets quite like planet Earth just in our own galaxy,

In big parts of the galaxy - where exist the most stars for example - this regions are without any chance for life because of the heavy cosmic radiation there. Only the areas with not many stars are important in this context - and only the suns with nearly the same size (greater stars will not live long enough, and in the habitable zone of smaller stars is also much more radiation of the sun). And it needs also planets with nearly the same mass of our own planet.

the Milky Way, so there seem to be lots of places where life could possibly live.

You confuse hope with knowledge. A problem of atheistst is they often believe not to believe. That's why atheists often "know" things a Christian never would know, because truth is holy for Christians.

Second, on our own planet, Earth, life appeared quite soon after the planet formed.

Unconscous cells. But multi-cellular life - which is fundamental for the expression "life" - appeared about 10% of the current lifetime of our planet ago.

And that seems to suggest that where there exist the right “Goldilocks” conditions for life it can pop up quite easily.

Goldilocks - and much more gingers - need conditions of life, which are much more sophisticated than you seem to be able to imagine.

[Quote[Finally, we have now found bacteria existing in very harsh environments,

Bacteriae are terrestrian single-cell prokaryotes.

inside scalding hot springs, or inside rocks, and we know they can even survive short journeys in space. So they are tougher than we thought.

Sure they are tougher than you thought - but not tougher or thoughter - ah sorry: more intelligent - than we are.

But that’s bacteria. Big creatures like ourselves are probably much rarer. After all, on planet Earth it took just a few hundred million years to create the first bacteria, but it took almost 3 billion years to create the first large creatures, like worms or trilobites. So the chances of meeting creatures like us still seem very remote.

And now the religious folks won't care if we find bacteria.

The religious folks is responsible for the creation of all civilisations and cultures on this planet.

It will have to be complex. Then when we find creatures like dinosaurs our mice they won't care because they'll move the goal post.

Sure. The religious nuts are the worst. Weasels.

Then the creatures will have to be smart like us.

That's why they speak English.

So until we find creatures as smart as us religious people will always insist we are alone.

Religious people are not alone. God is with us. And I will have to laugh a lot, when the first spaceship full of ECs (extraterrestrian Catholics) will land in Dharamsala and will have to ask the Dalai Lama for the right way to Rome. It's by the way as well for Catholics and Buddhists not any problem to have believers with 3 1/2 legs, four rows of diamond teeth and telekinetic abilities. A human being is a human being. We don't care whether someone is born on a planet in the Andromeda galaxy. This disqualifies no one.

By the way: France needs money for the rebuilding of Notre Dame. Notre Dame will be brought back to live.

Not true. Arabs invented math before Islam took over.

The Chinese invented gun powder and many other things.

Will you guys decide if nazi Germany was Christian or not because they invented a lot of shit.

And the people who invent shit and challenge the status quo are usually not religious people

Einstein and all those other great minds weren’t that religious.

 

[zaangalewa]

... the scientists who study the possibility of life in the universe, [/qupte]

"Scientists" or "science fiction authors"

would guess that the Universe is crawling with life, at least with bacteria-like life.

We know only bacteriae with a terrrestrian phylogentic tree and terrestrian genetics.

We don’t know for sure

"for sure" = We know nothing about any from of life indpendent from an origin on planet Earth.

because we have not yet identified life anywhere else. But there are really three reasons for this shift.

First, in the 1990s, astronomers learned how to detect planets around other stars and now we know that most stars have solar systems,

}

=a system of planets

so there may be billions of planets quite like planet Earth just in our own galaxy,

In big parts of the galaxy - where exist the most stars for example - this regions are without any chance for life because of the heavy cosmic radiation there. Only the areas with not many stars are important in this context - and only the suns with nearly the same size (greater stars will not live long enough, and in the habitable zone of smaller stars is also much more radiation of the sun). And it needs also planets with nearly the same mass of our own planet.

the Milky Way, so there seem to be lots of places where life could possibly live.

You confuse hope with knowledge. A problem of atheistst is they often believe not to believe. That's why atheists often "know" things a Christian never would know, because truth is holy for Christians.

Second, on our own planet, Earth, life appeared quite soon after the planet formed.

Unconscous cells. But multi-cellular life - which is fundamental for the expression "life" - appeared about 10% of the current lifetime of our planet ago.

And that seems to suggest that where there exist the right “Goldilocks” conditions for life it can pop up quite easily.

Goldilocks - and much more gingers - need conditions of life, which are much more sophisticated than you seem to be able to imagine.

[Quote[Finally, we have now found bacteria existing in very harsh environments,

Bacteriae are terrestrian single-cell prokaryotes.

inside scalding hot springs, or inside rocks, and we know they can even survive short journeys in space. So they are tougher than we thought.

Sure they are tougher than you thought - but not tougher or thoughter - ah sorry: more intelligent - than we are.

But that’s bacteria. Big creatures like ourselves are probably much rarer. After all, on planet Earth it took just a few hundred million years to create the first bacteria, but it took almost 3 billion years to create the first large creatures, like worms or trilobites. So the chances of meeting creatures like us still seem very remote.

And now the religious folks won't care if we find bacteria.

The religious folks is responsible for the creation of all civilisations and cultures on this planet.

It will have to be complex. Then when we find creatures like dinosaurs our mice they won't care because they'll move the goal post.

Sure. The religious nuts are the worst. Weasels.

Then the creatures will have to be smart like us.

That's why they speak English.

So until we find creatures as smart as us religious people will always insist we are alone.

Religious people are not alone. God is with us. And I will have to laugh a lot, when the first spaceship full of ECs (extraterrestrian Catholics) will land in Dharamsala and will have to ask the Dalai Lama for the right way to Rome. It's by the way as well for Catholics and Buddhists not any problem to have believers with 3 1/2 legs, four rows of diamond teeth and telekinetic abilities. A human being is a human being. We don't care whether someone is born on a planet in the Andromeda galaxy. This disqualifies no one.

By the way: France needs money for the rebuilding of Notre Dame. Notre Dame will be brought back to live.

Not true. Arabs invented math before Islam took over.

"The Arabs" overtook mathematics from the ancient Greeks (not to forget Babylon and Egypt) and the people in India and China. And some of them are great mathematicians too.

The Chinese invented gun powder and many other things.

I don't understand how you think. You seem to think, what you say here has to do with people, cultures and civilisations without religion.

Will you guys decide if nazi Germany was Christian or not because they invented a lot of shit.

What for heavens sake is your problem? The convinced leading Nazis were pragmatic darwinistic atheists without scruple.

And the people who invent shit and challenge the status quo are usually not religious people

Einstein and all those other great minds weren’t that religious.

Now I got it. You are one of the fanatics you like to fight against. Albert Einstein had not any problem to try to find out how "the old one" made it.

By the way. Can it be you are so angry because Notre Dame burned down and you are helpless now? Hundreds of years destroyed in an eye wink. Sorrow causes sometimes a totally senseless fury. But god is with us and god is with France too. Perhaps you take your chance this year and you try really to find out what we Christians are speaking about at Easter.

 

[sealybobo]

... the scientists who study the possibility of life in the universe, [/qupte]

"Scientists" or "science fiction authors"

would guess that the Universe is crawling with life, at least with bacteria-like life.

We know only bacteriae with a terrrestrian phylogentic tree and terrestrian genetics.

We don’t know for sure

"for sure" = We know nothing about any from of life indpendent from an origin on planet Earth.

because we have not yet identified life anywhere else. But there are really three reasons for this shift.

First, in the 1990s, astronomers learned how to detect planets around other stars and now we know that most stars have solar systems,

}

=a system of planets

so there may be billions of planets quite like planet Earth just in our own galaxy,

In big parts of the galaxy - where exist the most stars for example - this regions are without any chance for life because of the heavy cosmic radiation there. Only the areas with not many stars are important in this context - and only the suns with nearly the same size (greater stars will not live long enough, and in the habitable zone of smaller stars is also much more radiation of the sun). And it needs also planets with nearly the same mass of our own planet.

the Milky Way, so there seem to be lots of places where life could possibly live.

You confuse hope with knowledge. A problem of atheistst is they often believe not to believe. That's why atheists often "know" things a Christian never would know, because truth is holy for Christians.

Second, on our own planet, Earth, life appeared quite soon after the planet formed.

Unconscous cells. But multi-cellular life - which is fundamental for the expression "life" - appeared about 10% of the current lifetime of our planet ago.

And that seems to suggest that where there exist the right “Goldilocks” conditions for life it can pop up quite easily.

Goldilocks - and much more gingers - need conditions of life, which are much more sophisticated than you seem to be able to imagine.

[Quote[Finally, we have now found bacteria existing in very harsh environments,

Bacteriae are terrestrian single-cell prokaryotes.

inside scalding hot springs, or inside rocks, and we know they can even survive short journeys in space. So they are tougher than we thought.

Sure they are tougher than you thought - but not tougher or thoughter - ah sorry: more intelligent - than we are.

But that’s bacteria. Big creatures like ourselves are probably much rarer. After all, on planet Earth it took just a few hundred million years to create the first bacteria, but it took almost 3 billion years to create the first large creatures, like worms or trilobites. So the chances of meeting creatures like us still seem very remote.

And now the religious folks won't care if we find bacteria.

The religious folks is responsible for the creation of all civilisations and cultures on this planet.

It will have to be complex. Then when we find creatures like dinosaurs our mice they won't care because they'll move the goal post.

Sure. The religious nuts are the worst. Weasels.

Then the creatures will have to be smart like us.

That's why they speak English.

So until we find creatures as smart as us religious people will always insist we are alone.

Religious people are not alone. God is with us. And I will have to laugh a lot, when the first spaceship full of ECs (extraterrestrian Catholics) will land in Dharamsala and will have to ask the Dalai Lama for the right way to Rome. It's by the way as well for Catholics and Buddhists not any problem to have believers with 3 1/2 legs, four rows of diamond teeth and telekinetic abilities. A human being is a human being. We don't care whether someone is born on a planet in the Andromeda galaxy. This disqualifies no one.

By the way: France needs money for the rebuilding of Notre Dame. Notre Dame will be brought back to live.

Not true. Arabs invented math before Islam took over.

"The Arabs" overtook mathematics from the ancient Greeks (not to forget Babylon and Egypt) and the people in India and China. And some of them are great mathematicians too.

The Chinese invented gun powder and many other things.

I don't understand how you think. You seem to think, what you say here has to do with people, cultures and civilisations without religion.

Will you guys decide if nazi Germany was Christian or not because they invented a lot of shit.

What for heavens sake is your problem? The convinced leading Nazis were pragmatic darwinistic atheists without scruple.

And the people who invent shit and challenge the status quo are usually not religious people

Einstein and all those other great minds weren’t that religious.

Now I got it. You are one of the fanatics you like to fight against. Albert Einstein had not any problem to try to find out how "the old one" made it.

By the way. Can it be you are so angry because Notre Dame burned down and you are helpless now? Hundreds of years destroyed in an eye wink. Sorrow causes sometimes a totally senseless fury. But god is with us and god is with France too. Perhaps you take your chance this year and you try really to find out what we Christians are speaking about at Easter.

The arabs were brilliant. Then religion took over. Christianity fought the enlightenment too don't deny it.

The arab world invented algorithms and algebra. What have they done since Islam?

List of Muslim Nobel laureates - Wikipedia

Only 3 Nobel laureates in science.

The top five countries with the most Nobel laureates are all western nations - with the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France and Sweden topping the rankings for the best minds in peace, literature, science and economics. The United States has had the most Nobel Prize winners, with 336 winners overall.

Most of the winners are not very religious and even if they are, religion isn't very pro science. They deny global warming and evolution. No one who wins a Nobel prize denies global warming or evolution. Laughing stock.

 

[zaangalewa]

... The arabs were brilliant. Then religion took over. Christianity fought the enlightenment too don't deny it.

The arab world invented algorithms and algebra. What have they done since Islam?

List of Muslim Nobel laureates - Wikipedia

Only 3 Nobel laureates in science.

[...] The United States has had the most Nobel Prize winners, with 336 winners overall.

Most of the winners are not very religious and even if they are, religion isn't very pro science. They deny global warming and evolution. No one who wins a Nobel prize denies global warming or evolution. Laughing stock.

I don't discuss now your weird ideas about the history of the Arabs nor do I like to discuss now with you about Nobel price winners. Your belief is atheism, your cult is pseudo-science and your church is your nationalism. What to say to your simplifying ideas except "Aha"?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Your belief is atheism, your cult is pseudo-science and your church is your nationalism.

And your cult is magical sky daddies and zombie kings. And that magical horseshit has no place in this science thread.

 

[sealybobo]

... The arabs were brilliant. Then religion took over. Christianity fought the enlightenment too don't deny it.

The arab world invented algorithms and algebra. What have they done since Islam?

List of Muslim Nobel laureates - Wikipedia

Only 3 Nobel laureates in science.

[...] The United States has had the most Nobel Prize winners, with 336 winners overall.

Most of the winners are not very religious and even if they are, religion isn't very pro science. They deny global warming and evolution. No one who wins a Nobel prize denies global warming or evolution. Laughing stock.

I don't discuss now your weird ideas about the history of the Arabs nor do I like to discuss now with you about Nobel price winners. Your belief is atheism, your cult is pseudo-science and your church is your nationalism. What to say to your simplifying ideas except "Aha"?

You people are screwed up.

When the media, universities and scientists are the enemy somethings wrong.

 

[zaangalewa]

Your belief is atheism, your cult is pseudo-science and your church is your nationalism.

And your cult is magical sky daddies and zombie kings. And that magical horseshit has no place in this science thread.

You sound like a pupil of the Nobel price winner Richard Dawkin, who wrote once the book "the selfish gene" and the gene, which he is, wrote in later times on busses the intellectual message: "be happy: god is not existing", what was on the other side an unbelievable solace for an unknown hyothetical man, who had waited for the bus in front of the clinic, where his wife had died just some moments (psychologiclaly) and some hours (physically) ago, because all wonders of the modern medicine were not able to save her - also not the robot, which told her, she will not survive. A masterpiece of Borg economy and Borg techniques.

Make an experiment by thoughts: Take a pseudo time machine, bomb virtually down the stupid spiritual hunterers and gatherers of Göbekli Tepe - and you will see in this simulation of reality what you could be now: a nothing. By the way: "Nothing" seems to be the material god used to create all heavens and worlds. Keeps the problem: How valueable is nothing? I "know" god knows. But what do you know about? And what knows the nothing on its own about the nothing? That it also contains not a nothing?

 

[zaangalewa]

... The arabs were brilliant. Then religion took over. Christianity fought the enlightenment too don't deny it.

The arab world invented algorithms and algebra. What have they done since Islam?

List of Muslim Nobel laureates - Wikipedia

Only 3 Nobel laureates in science.

[...] The United States has had the most Nobel Prize winners, with 336 winners overall.

Most of the winners are not very religious and even if they are, religion isn't very pro science. They deny global warming and evolution. No one who wins a Nobel prize denies global warming or evolution. Laughing stock.

I don't discuss now your weird ideas about the history of the Arabs nor do I like to discuss now with you about Nobel price winners. Your belief is atheism, your cult is pseudo-science and your church is your nationalism. What to say to your simplifying ideas except "Aha"?

You people are screwed up.

When the media, universities and scientists are the enemy somethings wrong.

We planted the root of all universities. We created the roots of all modern sciene. I'm a Catholic with Jewish roots, idiot. We have seen a lot of cultures and civilisations come and go. It were not always the best, who survived. Nevertheless the idea "mankind is the wolve of mankind" explains nothing, whether such idiots call this "evolution" or not.

 

[sealybobo]

... The arabs were brilliant. Then religion took over. Christianity fought the enlightenment too don't deny it.

The arab world invented algorithms and algebra. What have they done since Islam?

List of Muslim Nobel laureates - Wikipedia

Only 3 Nobel laureates in science.

[...] The United States has had the most Nobel Prize winners, with 336 winners overall.

Most of the winners are not very religious and even if they are, religion isn't very pro science. They deny global warming and evolution. No one who wins a Nobel prize denies global warming or evolution. Laughing stock.

I don't discuss now your weird ideas about the history of the Arabs nor do I like to discuss now with you about Nobel price winners. Your belief is atheism, your cult is pseudo-science and your church is your nationalism. What to say to your simplifying ideas except "Aha"?

You people are screwed up.

When the media, universities and scientists are the enemy somethings wrong.

We planted the root of all universities. We created the roots of all modern sciene. I'm a Catholic with Jewish roots, idiot. We have seen a lot of cultures and civilisations come and go. It were not always the best, who survived. Nevertheless the idea "mankind is the wolve of mankind" explains nothing, whether such idiots call this "evolution" or not.

Please don’t say “we” invented anything. Each invention was invented by one man. It was never a group of religious men who invented anything.

But there have always been groups of religious men who have slowed our progress.

A man Bruno giordano figured out the universe and the church murdered him for going against church doctrine.

Today we have religious nuts slowing stem cell research and denying science.

 

[zaangalewa]

... The arabs were brilliant. Then religion took over. Christianity fought the enlightenment too don't deny it.

The arab world invented algorithms and algebra. What have they done since Islam?

List of Muslim Nobel laureates - Wikipedia

Only 3 Nobel laureates in science.

[...] The United States has had the most Nobel Prize winners, with 336 winners overall.

Most of the winners are not very religious and even if they are, religion isn't very pro science. They deny global warming and evolution. No one who wins a Nobel prize denies global warming or evolution. Laughing stock.

I don't discuss now your weird ideas about the history of the Arabs nor do I like to discuss now with you about Nobel price winners. Your belief is atheism, your cult is pseudo-science and your church is your nationalism. What to say to your simplifying ideas except "Aha"?

You people are screwed up.

When the media, universities and scientists are the enemy somethings wrong.

We planted the root of all universities. We created the roots of all modern sciene. I'm a Catholic with Jewish roots, idiot. We have seen a lot of cultures and civilisations come and go. It were not always the best, who survived. Nevertheless the idea "mankind is the wolve of mankind" explains nothing, whether such idiots call this "evolution" or not.

Please don’t say “we” invented anything. Each invention was invented by one man. It was never a group of religious men who invented anything.

But there have always been groups of religious men who have slowed our progress.

A man Bruno giordano figured out the universe and the church murdered him for going against church doctrine.

Giordano Bruno provoked everyone with this totally stupid nonsense - but this was indeed not a reason to kill him. But I guess some people lost their patience and this caused his death on reasons of a judicial error in the year 1600. I don't know wether this was a real error or an intentional murder. We will see. Judical errors can cause disasters. In 1935 for example made the Nazis the first darwinistic racial laws in Germany and nearly no one in the world protested, because the world was full of racial laws. Or last year had to die in the USA more than a million human beings a very short time before they were born, because of a judical error of the supreme court of the USA of the year 1973.

Today we have religious nuts slowing stem cell research and denying science.

You have nothing to do with real science. You use the complexity of science only as a dark reason for idiotic ideas how societies should work. I remember for example the moment I heard the first time of this research. I was angry, because I saw not any sense in this genetical nonsense for medical research. Much more interesting were - and are - the steem cells wich exist in every body. With this cells medicine is able to help the owners of this cells and there is no need to play "god" with human beings in petri dishes in this case. Now today exists a wide field of useful purposes for endogenous steem cells and I still do not see a big sense in the research of exogenous steem cells (=human beings in some cases) except perhaps in the research for biological weapons.

“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”
Albert Einstein

Today Albert would perhaps add "... with stick and stones from entities, which we will not be able to identify as normal human beings any longer. But this monsters will think they are super-humans while all others are for them sub-humans or worthless life."

 

[zaangalewa]

abu afak

What did you like to say? Is the only thing what you are able to do to devalue what others say by calling "funny" what's not the sense of the word funny? Funny means "funny" - and not "this man is an idiot, because he shares not my own opinion, which I am not able to verbalize nor I am able to discuss about".

 

[james bond]

A man Bruno giordano figured out the universe and the church murdered him for going against church doctrine.

He was wrong about an infinite universe because it's a closed system of entropy. Everything must die in the system.

He wasn't murdered. He was found guilty of heresy during the Inquisition period of Roman law.

 

[sealybobo]

A man Bruno giordano figured out the universe and the church murdered him for going against church doctrine.

He was wrong about an infinite universe because it's a closed system of entropy. Everything must die in the system.

He wasn't murdered. He was found guilty of heresy during the Inquisition period of Roman law.

The Church played a role in his death. Please don't try to defend the Catholic church. It's impossible.

He was murdered. Funny you right wingers think abortion is murder but what happened to him wasn't.

Yea he was wrong. He didn't know about multiverses. It's unknowable right now but probably true.

 

[progressive hunter]

A man Bruno giordano figured out the universe and the church murdered him for going against church doctrine.

He was wrong about an infinite universe because it's a closed system of entropy. Everything must die in the system.

He wasn't murdered. He was found guilty of heresy during the Inquisition period of Roman law.

The Church played a role in his death. Please don't try to defend the Catholic church. It's impossible.

He was murdered. Funny you right wingers think abortion is murder but what happened to him wasn't.

Yea he was wrong. He didn't know about multiverses. It's unknowable right now but probably true.

and yet you call that murder but not abortion,,,

 

[sealybobo]

A man Bruno giordano figured out the universe and the church murdered him for going against church doctrine.

He was wrong about an infinite universe because it's a closed system of entropy. Everything must die in the system.

He wasn't murdered. He was found guilty of heresy during the Inquisition period of Roman law.

The Church played a role in his death. Please don't try to defend the Catholic church. It's impossible.

He was murdered. Funny you right wingers think abortion is murder but what happened to him wasn't.

Yea he was wrong. He didn't know about multiverses. It's unknowable right now but probably true.

and yet you call that murder but not abortion,,,

Why didn't Trump, Mitch and Paul Ryan outlaw abortion in 2017 if it's murder?

 

[progressive hunter]

A man Bruno giordano figured out the universe and the church murdered him for going against church doctrine.

He was wrong about an infinite universe because it's a closed system of entropy. Everything must die in the system.

He wasn't murdered. He was found guilty of heresy during the Inquisition period of Roman law.

The Church played a role in his death. Please don't try to defend the Catholic church. It's impossible.

He was murdered. Funny you right wingers think abortion is murder but what happened to him wasn't.

Yea he was wrong. He didn't know about multiverses. It's unknowable right now but probably true.

and yet you call that murder but not abortion,,,

Why didn't Trump, Mitch and Paul Ryan outlaw abortion in 2017 if it's murder?

you should direct that question to them,,,,

and it still doesnt change my comment to you,,,