Are conservatives smarter than liberals?

[Faun]

People that argue they are smarter while supporting such nonsense like young earth and dissing science and education pretty much prove exactly how smart they are.

Gruber said you were stupid, but you don't seem to be bother about that.

Aren't you an American voter? Gruber called you stupid too, dumbass.

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

shit stains like Grampa Murked U have had infantile reactionary siggies for as long as I've been here. I asked that retard to remove it last year but he refused at the time. Its like me having a siggie which reads- "Republicans are terrorist" (which they are BTW) but I don't do it because Righties are easily flustered and many are downright idiots like Kosh, Shootspeeders, EdwardBiaimonte, etc... ALL Righties. He's also the Grampa Marked U is preeminent drama queen on this board.

It always cracks me up when liberals claim how reasonable you are, you aren't nuts like the Republicans, and you say things like this while you do it.

Most liberals do not need to claim that they are reasonable; most posts by the set you consider to be liberal are rational, fact based and sans emotionality. Can the same be said for those whose attacks on liberals are ubiquitous?

Liberals can and do claim to be all manner of things which they are not... but I gotta say, I can NOT GET MY FILL OF: Liberals 'claiming' to be rational, fact based and unemotional?

As THAT IS HYSTERICAL! And in every SENSE of the word.

Conservatives are no different.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

If you close your eyes and listen very carefully, you can hear the shrieking voices from Ignore...

LOL!

That is SO COOL!

 

[Faun]

If you close your eyes and listen very carefully, you can hear the shrieking voices from Ignore...

LOL!

That is SO COOL!

No worries ... unchallenged arguments are the easiest victories.

 

[Wry Catcher]

something a third partier would say- yes it IS THAT SIMPLE and to deny it it shows how clueless you are.

It's "...THAT SIMPLE..."

So you're saying there is only two choices in life? Black or white? Yes or no? Right or wrong? Either/Or? There no other choices than those?

You're either a conservative, or a liberal?
If you're not wrong, you must be right?
You're either with us, or against us?​

You don't think you can be conservative on some issues and conservative on others? You don't think someone can be with you on some issues and against you on others? How about against you on one issue and with you on the same issue, under different circumstances?

Take the Iraq war, for example, I've been completely against it from day one, for the simple fact that we attacked country, that did not attack us first. But if we were attacked by Iraq (with a significant force and not some frontier incident), I would've completely supported us going over there and fucking up their shit!

I guess my point is this...

"Anyone who makes blanket statements, then acts like that is the truth in every case..."

Ooops, I almost made a blanket statement, in protest of blanket statements!

I'll revise my point...

Anyone who makes a blanket statement, don't beat yourself up, it's not the end of the world.

But Iraq not only attacked us, it did so repeatedly, around the world, using the same proxy that attacked us on 9-11. Iraq also repeatedly attacked our Allies as well as our interests... for decades. The most egregious being its invasion of Kuwait.

Which resulted on our kicking the hell out of it, it signing a treaty which allowed its fascist government to remain in power; a treaty which it had chronically, consistently and continuously violated and in the post 9-11 paradigm, that chronic belligerence was incontrovertibly intolerable. So, after 18 months of intense diplomatic negotiations, when Iraq finally failed to meet the minimal requirements which were clearly set forth, in which it had A YEAR AND A HALF TO PREPARE... THEN and only then did the IS go to work to remove the socialists governing Iraq... .

So while we can disagree on many things, it is not possible for you to claim that you "Iraq didn't attack us". Your ignorance of the attacks by Iraq upon the US, her allies and interests around the world, does not suddenly strike Iraq as innocent.

In truth, the US had little choice but to remove that government from power.

You didn't quote a source or provide evidence as a basis for your opinionated rant! Those of us who were adults and have observed US Foreign Policy since the mid 1960's can't be fooled by revisionist partisan hacks like you.

The evidence exists, it readily available to anyone who needs to see it, from the same place I would get it and that I didn't provide it, IN NO WAY, undermines the truth intrinsic to my position.

If you'd like to state a specific contest, staking your own, personal credibility on my having stated a falsehood as truth, then do so and I will take you down yet another peg.

But 'feel' carefully here scamp... as you're gettin' mighty short in the credibility department.

You have no credibility. And, you cannot prove anything you've posted or would have. This post is nothing but an arrogant defense of your constant effort to remake history to fit the Crazy Right Wing ideology you espouse. Your use of language suggests you have an education, but the words you put together suggest (to me) a pathology. One which maybe simple dishonesty, or something best described in DSM-V. I have not ruled out both.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

(Let the record reflect that she will NOT specify a contest, because she understands now, that to do so is to LOSE!)

You have no credibility.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Wry Catcher]

People that argue they are smarter while supporting such nonsense like young earth and dissing science and education pretty much prove exactly how smart they are.

Gruber said you were stupid, but you don't seem to be bother about that.

Aren't you an American voter? Gruber called you stupid too, dumbass.

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

shit stains like Grampa Murked U have had infantile reactionary siggies for as long as I've been here. I asked that retard to remove it last year but he refused at the time. Its like me having a siggie which reads- "Republicans are terrorist" (which they are BTW) but I don't do it because Righties are easily flustered and many are downright idiots like Kosh, Shootspeeders, EdwardBiaimonte, etc... ALL Righties. He's also the Grampa Marked U is preeminent drama queen on this board.

It always cracks me up when liberals claim how reasonable you are, you aren't nuts like the Republicans, and you say things like this while you do it.

Most liberals do not need to claim that they are reasonable; most posts by the set you consider to be liberal are rational, fact based and sans emotionality. Can the same be said for those whose attacks on liberals are ubiquitous?

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Gruber said you were stupid, but you don't seem to be bother about that.

Aren't you an American voter? Gruber called you stupid too, dumbass.

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

shit stains like Grampa Murked U have had infantile reactionary siggies for as long as I've been here. I asked that retard to remove it last year but he refused at the time. Its like me having a siggie which reads- "Republicans are terrorist" (which they are BTW) but I don't do it because Righties are easily flustered and many are downright idiots like Kosh, Shootspeeders, EdwardBiaimonte, etc... ALL Righties. He's also the Grampa Marked U is preeminent drama queen on this board.

It always cracks me up when liberals claim how reasonable you are, you aren't nuts like the Republicans, and you say things like this while you do it.

Most liberals do not need to claim that they are reasonable; most posts by the set you consider to be liberal are rational, fact based and sans emotionality. Can the same be said for those whose attacks on liberals are ubiquitous?

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

Why do you support all of that?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Gruber said you were stupid, but you don't seem to be bother about that.

Aren't you an American voter? Gruber called you stupid too, dumbass.

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

shit stains like Grampa Murked U have had infantile reactionary siggies for as long as I've been here. I asked that retard to remove it last year but he refused at the time. Its like me having a siggie which reads- "Republicans are terrorist" (which they are BTW) but I don't do it because Righties are easily flustered and many are downright idiots like Kosh, Shootspeeders, EdwardBiaimonte, etc... ALL Righties. He's also the Grampa Marked U is preeminent drama queen on this board.

It always cracks me up when liberals claim how reasonable you are, you aren't nuts like the Republicans, and you say things like this while you do it.

Most liberals do not need to claim that they are reasonable; most posts by the set you consider to be liberal are rational, fact based and sans emotionality. Can the same be said for those whose attacks on liberals are ubiquitous?

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

Well my goodness... Nothing Irrationally emotional about THAT!

ROFLMNAO! Chicks...

 

[Wry Catcher]

(Let the record reflect that she will NOT specify a contest, because she understands now, that to do so is to LOSE!)

You have no credibility.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

You have no credibility. And, you cannot prove anything you've posted or would have. This post is nothing but an arrogant defense of your constant effort to remake history to fit the Crazy Right Wing ideology you espouse. Your use of language suggests you have an education, but the words you put together suggest (to me) a pathology. One which maybe simple dishonesty, or something best described in DSM-V. I have not ruled out both.

You got part of it right; that you didn't post the rest of my comment (bold above) suggests at bit more evidence that you are dishonest (lies by omission are still lies). That of course does not rule out psychiatric disorders.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

(Let the record reflect that she will NOT specify a contest, because she understands now, that to do so is to LOSE!)

You have no credibility.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

You have no credibility. And, you cannot prove anything you've posted or would have. This post is nothing but an arrogant defense of your constant effort to remake history to fit the Crazy Right Wing ideology you espouse. Your use of language suggests you have an education, but the words you put together suggest (to me) a pathology. One which maybe simple dishonesty, or something best described in DSM-V. I have not ruled out both.

You got part of it right; that you didn't post the rest of my comment (bold above) suggests at bit more evidence that you are dishonest (lies by omission are still lies). That of course does not rule out psychiatric disorders.

Irony is thick

 

[Wry Catcher]

Aren't you an American voter? Gruber called you stupid too, dumbass.

shit stains like Grampa Murked U have had infantile reactionary siggies for as long as I've been here. I asked that retard to remove it last year but he refused at the time. Its like me having a siggie which reads- "Republicans are terrorist" (which they are BTW) but I don't do it because Righties are easily flustered and many are downright idiots like Kosh, Shootspeeders, EdwardBiaimonte, etc... ALL Righties. He's also the Grampa Marked U is preeminent drama queen on this board.

It always cracks me up when liberals claim how reasonable you are, you aren't nuts like the Republicans, and you say things like this while you do it.

Most liberals do not need to claim that they are reasonable; most posts by the set you consider to be liberal are rational, fact based and sans emotionality. Can the same be said for those whose attacks on liberals are ubiquitous?

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

Why do you support all of that?

LOL, are you channeling CrusaderFrank? Or, are idiot-grams the only tool you have?

 

[Wry Catcher]

(Let the record reflect that she will NOT specify a contest, because she understands now, that to do so is to LOSE!)

You have no credibility.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

You have no credibility. And, you cannot prove anything you've posted or would have. This post is nothing but an arrogant defense of your constant effort to remake history to fit the Crazy Right Wing ideology you espouse. Your use of language suggests you have an education, but the words you put together suggest (to me) a pathology. One which maybe simple dishonesty, or something best described in DSM-V. I have not ruled out both.

You got part of it right; that you didn't post the rest of my comment (bold above) suggests at bit more evidence that you are dishonest (lies by omission are still lies). That of course does not rule out psychiatric disorders.

Irony is thick

I suggest you buy a dictionary.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It always cracks me up when liberals claim how reasonable you are, you aren't nuts like the Republicans, and you say things like this while you do it.

Most liberals do not need to claim that they are reasonable; most posts by the set you consider to be liberal are rational, fact based and sans emotionality. Can the same be said for those whose attacks on liberals are ubiquitous?

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

Why do you support all of that?

LOL, are you channeling CrusaderFrank? Or, are idiot-grams the only tool you have?

I asked you a simple question why do you support that?

 

[Wry Catcher]

• Irony is a figure of speech in which words are used in such a way that their intended meaning is different from the actual meaning of the words. It may also be a situation that may end up in quite a different way than what is generally anticipated. In simple words, it is a difference between the appearance and the reality.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

(Let the record reflect that she will NOT specify a contest, because she understands now, that to do so is to LOSE!)

You have no credibility.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

You have no credibility. ... .

Your second concession of the same standing points is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Most liberals do not need to claim that they are reasonable; most posts by the set you consider to be liberal are rational, fact based and sans emotionality. Can the same be said for those whose attacks on liberals are ubiquitous?

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

Why do you support all of that?

LOL, are you channeling CrusaderFrank? Or, are idiot-grams the only tool you have?

I asked you a simple question why do you support that?

Proof there are stupid questions^^^

 

[Wry Catcher]

Actually, proof ^^^ self defined conservatives (that is, the haters of liberals and members of the Crazy Right Wing) are much dumber than the general population, as well as dishonest to the bone, in their own words.

 

[kaz]

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

Your honor, I rest my case...

 

[kaz]

Aren't you an American voter? Gruber called you stupid too, dumbass.

shit stains like Grampa Murked U have had infantile reactionary siggies for as long as I've been here. I asked that retard to remove it last year but he refused at the time. Its like me having a siggie which reads- "Republicans are terrorist" (which they are BTW) but I don't do it because Righties are easily flustered and many are downright idiots like Kosh, Shootspeeders, EdwardBiaimonte, etc... ALL Righties. He's also the Grampa Marked U is preeminent drama queen on this board.

It always cracks me up when liberals claim how reasonable you are, you aren't nuts like the Republicans, and you say things like this while you do it.

Most liberals do not need to claim that they are reasonable; most posts by the set you consider to be liberal are rational, fact based and sans emotionality. Can the same be said for those whose attacks on liberals are ubiquitous?

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

Why do you support all of that?

He supports it because of his greed.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It always cracks me up when liberals claim how reasonable you are, you aren't nuts like the Republicans, and you say things like this while you do it.

Most liberals do not need to claim that they are reasonable; most posts by the set you consider to be liberal are rational, fact based and sans emotionality. Can the same be said for those whose attacks on liberals are ubiquitous?

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

Why do you support all of that?

He supports it because of his greed.

Yes but for him to cure himself he must acknowledge his own faults.