Are conservatives smarter than liberals?

[kaz]

Proof their are stupid questions^^^

The only time I point out spelling and grammar are in posts calling people stupid. And then ... it's priceless ...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

Why do you support all of that?

LOL, are you channeling CrusaderFrank? Or, are idiot-grams the only tool you have?

I asked you a simple question why do you support that?

Proof there are stupid questions^^^

Why do you support it? You really don't believe you're support the very thing you condemned Kaz for?
Take a closer look at the group and people you support, follow the money grasshopper.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Gotcha, the party that calls their opponents, racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly and lovers of the rich and corporations who want to destroy our environment your reasonableness stands on it's own. Even is this posts where you defend a guy calling Republicans "terrorists."

You really are sick.

Do you support racists, sexists, homophobes, xenophobes, haters of the elderly? Do you support polluters, yes, the rich who whose profits come first, believe regulations which require protecting the environment are an abuse of their freedom and fund propaganda to benefit them at the expense of our land, air and water?

Your honor, I rest my case...

 

[Wry Catcher]

17 alerts all from the few, the crazy and the right wing fringe. To quote Wil: " the lady doth protest too much, Methinks "***

***"The lady doth protest too much, methinks" is a quotation from the 1602 play Hamlet by William Shakespeare. It has been used as a figure of speech, in various phrasings, to indicate that a person's overly frequent or vehement attempts to convince others of something have ironically helped to convince others that the opposite is true, by making the person look insincere and defensive.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

17 alerts all from the few, the crazy and the right wing fringe. To quote Wil: " the lady doth protest too much, Methinks "

​

• Irony is a figure of speech in which words are used in such a way that their intended meaning is different from the actual meaning of the words. It may also be a situation that may end up in quite a different way than what is generally anticipated. In simple words, it is a difference between the appearance and the reality.​

​

​

 

[Wry Catcher]

17 alerts all from the few, the crazy and the right wing fringe. To quote Wil: " the lady doth protest too much, Methinks "

​

• Irony is a figure of speech in which words are used in such a way that their intended meaning is different from the actual meaning of the words. It may also be a situation that may end up in quite a different way than what is generally anticipated. In simple words, it is a difference between the appearance and the reality.​

​

​

LOL, you really are stupid if you believe this post is substantive.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

LOL, you really are stupid if you believe this post is substantive.

ROFLMNAO!

• Irony is a figure of speech in which words are used in such a way that their intended meaning is different from the actual meaning of the words. It may also be a situation that may end up in quite a different way than what is generally anticipated. In simple words, it is a difference between the appearance and the reality.​

​

​

 

[Faun]

^^^ Above is what a post looks like when a pre-K'er gets a hold of his mommy's iPhone ^^^

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

yes, conservatives know to support freedom while liberals don't.

Do you understand now? Of course not, as a liberal you lack the intelligence to understand what is very very simple.

PS Einstein was an uber liberal. So, he was smart at physics and dumb at politics.

Still over your head?

 

[PostmodernProph]

is not the liberal agenda based on feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeling sorry for illegals, minorities, the poor, muslims, africans, chinese, and themselves? Is not the legal agenda based on a victim mentality?

Is it logical that this country is 17.5 trillion in debt? is deficit spending not a liberal concept?

and don't be confused there are liberals in both parties.

Actually, no. $17.5 trillion debt is a Conservative concept. Liberals subscribe to the tax and spend philosophy whereas Conservatives tend to be more of the borrow and spend type.

lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....

And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.

but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....

is not the liberal agenda based on feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeling sorry for illegals, minorities, the poor, muslims, africans, chinese, and themselves? Is not the legal agenda based on a victim mentality?

Is it logical that this country is 17.5 trillion in debt? is deficit spending not a liberal concept?

and don't be confused there are liberals in both parties.

Actually, no. $17.5 trillion debt is a Conservative concept. Liberals subscribe to the tax and spend philosophy whereas Conservatives tend to be more of the borrow and spend type.

lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....

And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.

but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....

The House, not the president, controls spending. All spending bills start in the House. The president can only approve or deny what the Congress spends.

does that somehow give retroactive control of the House to Republicans for 2009 and 2010?.....those were the two years when Obama created most of his record breaking deficit.....

 

[Faun]

Actually, no. $17.5 trillion debt is a Conservative concept. Liberals subscribe to the tax and spend philosophy whereas Conservatives tend to be more of the borrow and spend type.

lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....

And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.

but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....

Actually, no. $17.5 trillion debt is a Conservative concept. Liberals subscribe to the tax and spend philosophy whereas Conservatives tend to be more of the borrow and spend type.

lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....

And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.

but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....

The House, not the president, controls spending. All spending bills start in the House. The president can only approve or deny what the Congress spends.

does that somehow give retroactive control of the House to Republicans for 2009 and 2010?.....those were the two years when Obama created most of his record breaking deficit.....

No, that would be Democrats. But that was also due to the Great Recession. And don't forget ... Bush approved the continuing resolution which budgeted spending for half of FY2009. But to return to the discussion, which was spending, not deficits ... the biggest spending years occurred under Republican-led Houses.

 

[PostmodernProph]

lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....

And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.

but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....

lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....

And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.

but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....

The House, not the president, controls spending. All spending bills start in the House. The president can only approve or deny what the Congress spends.

does that somehow give retroactive control of the House to Republicans for 2009 and 2010?.....those were the two years when Obama created most of his record breaking deficit.....

No, that would be Democrats. But that was also due to the Great Recession. And don't forget ... Bush approved the continuing resolution which budgeted spending for half of FY2009. But to return to the discussion, which was spending, not deficits ... the biggest spending years occurred under Republican-led Houses.

as long as we're clear that the Dems are the kings of spending more than you have......

 

[Faun]

And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.

but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....

And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.

but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....

The House, not the president, controls spending. All spending bills start in the House. The president can only approve or deny what the Congress spends.

does that somehow give retroactive control of the House to Republicans for 2009 and 2010?.....those were the two years when Obama created most of his record breaking deficit.....

No, that would be Democrats. But that was also due to the Great Recession. And don't forget ... Bush approved the continuing resolution which budgeted spending for half of FY2009. But to return to the discussion, which was spending, not deficits ... the biggest spending years occurred under Republican-led Houses.

as long as we're clear that the Dems are the kings of spending more than you have......

Keep adding qualifiers to find something you can pin on Democrats. Meanwhile, the record for spending remains with Republicans. And see that? No qualifiers needed.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.

The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.

I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.

Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?

Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?

shit stains like Grampa Murked U have had infantile reactionary siggies for as long as I've been here. I asked that retard to remove it last year but he refused at the time. Its like me having a siggie which reads- "Republicans are terrorist" (which they are BTW) but I don't do it because Righties are easily flustered and many are downright idiots like Kosh, Shootspeeders, EdwardBiaimonte, etc... ALL Righties. He's also the Grampa Marked U is preeminent drama queen on this board.

Got a bit of sand in your pussy yesterday eh?

 

[Dot Com]

Got a bit of sand in your pussy yesterday eh?

misogynist much drama boi?

BTW- thanks for reminding me of my brilliant post. I think I'll "bump" it.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Got a bit of sand in your pussy yesterday eh?

misogynist much drama boi?

BTW- thanks for reminding me of my brilliant post. I think I'll "bump" it.

I'm flattered that you think of me even when I'm not around. Lets me know I'm doing it right.

 

[Dot Com]

Got a bit of sand in your pussy yesterday eh?

misogynist much drama boi?

BTW- thanks for reminding me of my brilliant post. I think I'll "bump" it.

I'm flattered that you think of me even when I'm not around. Lets me know I'm doing it right.

you are an excellent example of the hate & fear that the rw in this great nation harbor. Sad, sad, SAD!!!

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Got a bit of sand in your pussy yesterday eh?

misogynist much drama boi?

BTW- thanks for reminding me of my brilliant post. I think I'll "bump" it.

I'm flattered that you think of me even when I'm not around. Lets me know I'm doing it right.

you are an excellent example of the hate & fear that the rw in this great nation harbor. Sad, sad, SAD!!!

U mad bro?

 

[Dot Com]

Got a bit of sand in your pussy yesterday eh?

misogynist much drama boi?

BTW- thanks for reminding me of my brilliant post. I think I'll "bump" it.

I'm flattered that you think of me even when I'm not around. Lets me know I'm doing it right.

you are an excellent example of the hate & fear that the rw in this great nation harbor. Sad, sad, SAD!!!

U mad bro?

no I just like bitter, low-info, mouth-breathing, drones like you

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Got a bit of sand in your pussy yesterday eh?

misogynist much drama boi?

BTW- thanks for reminding me of my brilliant post. I think I'll "bump" it.

I'm flattered that you think of me even when I'm not around. Lets me know I'm doing it right.

you are an excellent example of the hate & fear that the rw in this great nation harbor. Sad, sad, SAD!!!

U mad bro?

no I just like bitter, low-info, mouth-breathing, drones like you

You talk about me when I'm not around. That is proof positive that I've gotten under your skin. A smart person doesn't even bother to engage so called low info posters. So you're either stupid or I've succeeded.

Which is it dear? Or are you just having Bon Bon withdrawls?