The ClayTaurus
Senior Member
- Sep 19, 2005
- 7,062
- 333
- 48
Does that guarantee you will if I do?I won't hold my breath until you do just that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Does that guarantee you will if I do?I won't hold my breath until you do just that.
My apologies; not trying to hateful.What a hateful thing to say. For what reason, because I disagree with you?
I'm trying to figure out why you thought it was necessary to tell me my friend wasn't fooling the Lord when his intention was never to fool anyone. He didn't sign up for Catholocism; he just agreed not to intervene in his future family being raised Catholic (as was where the current discussion was at). He didn't even fool the priest; it's not like he lied about becoming Catholic or anything...Figger it out on your own.
The very word describes it: Protestant. Let's not get into the Reformation but essentially the protestants were denying the authority of the Church. There are many differences between the Catholic Church and the Protestants. In fact, the number of Protestant churches has expanded and multiplied due to so many different "takes" on what they believe and have moved further and further away from the Church. They establish new sects and believe in just about anything they choose.
So is that a "No, Protestants aren't Christians" or a "Yes, Protestants are Christians?"
of course catholics are christiansI'm curious for everyone's input on this issue. It's one that I used to come across a lot back when I was a Catholic Apologist. Of course, I always defended Catholocism as a Christian denomination and I believe it still is. But how many of you feel differently or the same, etc.?
Now, I want to be very straight-forward: this is about the validity of Catholocism as a denomination in Christianity, nothing more. No talk about molestations, no bashing others here, and above all, stay on topic. We've seen the disaster that was the original thread. Let's try again, shall we?
lets have a poll!I'm curious for everyone's input on this issue. It's one that I used to come across a lot back when I was a Catholic Apologist. Of course, I always defended Catholocism as a Christian denomination and I believe it still is. But how many of you feel differently or the same, etc.?
Now, I want to be very straight-forward: this is about the validity of Catholocism as a denomination in Christianity, nothing more. No talk about molestations, no bashing others here, and above all, stay on topic. We've seen the disaster that was the original thread. Let's try again, shall we?
i have made a poll now ….I'm curious for everyone's input on this issue. It's one that I used to come across a lot back when I was a Catholic Apologist. Of course, I always defended Catholocism as a Christian denomination and I believe it still is. But how many of you feel differently or the same, etc.?
Now, I want to be very straight-forward: this is about the validity of Catholocism as a denomination in Christianity, nothing more. No talk about molestations, no bashing others here, and above all, stay on topic. We've seen the disaster that was the original thread. Let's try again, shall we?
what was that desaster?I'm curious for everyone's input on this issue. It's one that I used to come across a lot back when I was a Catholic Apologist. Of course, I always defended Catholocism as a Christian denomination and I believe it still is. But how many of you feel differently or the same, etc.?
Now, I want to be very straight-forward: this is about the validity of Catholocism as a denomination in Christianity, nothing more. No talk about molestations, no bashing others here, and above all, stay on topic. We've seen the disaster that was the original thread. Let's try again, shall we?