AOC Tells Teens Eating Bananas & Peanut Butter for Breakfast Fights Global Warming

[Pilot1]

Bananas and peanuts have no lower carbon footprint door to door than other foods. Maybe just eat dirt, or better yet coal to CONSUME the carbon.

 

[Crepitus]

Cuz of da science.

Yaz gotta noez your bananas shipped 8,000 miles to youz iz savn da planet.



Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tells teens that eating a banana with peanut butter for breakfast will combat global warming

Bananas and peanuts don't require intensive livestock farming. Instead of growing plants to feed animals that we then kill to feed us, we can just grow the plants and eat them.
I'm not a vegetarian, but that's the argument.

They also mostly aren't flown in, no matter what the linked article says. They are picked green and shipped here from South America by ship and rail which are pretty low footprint transportation comparatively. They also are rarely packaged in plastic, something else the linked article claims.

They also mostly aren't flown in, no matter what the linked article says. They are picked green and shipped here from South America by ship and rail which are pretty low footprint transportation comparatively. They also are rarely packaged in plastic, something else the linked article claims

So which is it? Flown in or shipped by rail or ship? You can’t keep your lie straight.

BTW - they are shipped by by cargo ship, which has a huge carbon footprint. No rail, no planes.
So stop your lies.

Hey dumbass, did you net read your own link? It says they are flown in.

Cargo ships have a very small carbon footprint per pound of freight. Especially compared to airplanes.

Not real big on facts are you.

They aren’t.

"They aren't" what?

 

[Crepitus]

Cuz of da science.

Yaz gotta noez your bananas shipped 8,000 miles to youz iz savn da planet.



Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tells teens that eating a banana with peanut butter for breakfast will combat global warming

Bananas and peanuts don't require intensive livestock farming. Instead of growing plants to feed animals that we then kill to feed us, we can just grow the plants and eat them.
I'm not a vegetarian, but that's the argument.

They also mostly aren't flown in, no matter what the linked article says. They are picked green and shipped here from South America by ship and rail which are pretty low footprint transportation comparatively. They also are rarely packaged in plastic, something else the linked article claims.

They also mostly aren't flown in, no matter what the linked article says. They are picked green and shipped here from South America by ship and rail which are pretty low footprint transportation comparatively. They also are rarely packaged in plastic, something else the linked article claims

So which is it? Flown in or shipped by rail or ship? You can’t keep your lie straight.

BTW - they are shipped by by cargo ship, which has a huge carbon footprint. No rail, no planes.
So stop your lies.

Hey dumbass, did you net read your own link? It says they are flown in.

Cargo ships have a very small carbon footprint per pound of freight. Especially compared to airplanes.

Not real big on facts are you.

Yeah, moving 40,000 tons thru water with Diesel engines is environmentally friendly.

Don't be stupier than you have to be.

Container ship is the most environmentally friendly way of moving large quantities of goods long distances.

Low Environmental Impact | World Shipping Council

 

[Weatherman2020]

Bananas and peanuts don't require intensive livestock farming. Instead of growing plants to feed animals that we then kill to feed us, we can just grow the plants and eat them.
I'm not a vegetarian, but that's the argument.

They also mostly aren't flown in, no matter what the linked article says. They are picked green and shipped here from South America by ship and rail which are pretty low footprint transportation comparatively. They also are rarely packaged in plastic, something else the linked article claims.

They also mostly aren't flown in, no matter what the linked article says. They are picked green and shipped here from South America by ship and rail which are pretty low footprint transportation comparatively. They also are rarely packaged in plastic, something else the linked article claims

So which is it? Flown in or shipped by rail or ship? You can’t keep your lie straight.

BTW - they are shipped by by cargo ship, which has a huge carbon footprint. No rail, no planes.
So stop your lies.

Hey dumbass, did you net read your own link? It says they are flown in.

Cargo ships have a very small carbon footprint per pound of freight. Especially compared to airplanes.

Not real big on facts are you.

Yeah, moving 40,000 tons thru water with Diesel engines is environmentally friendly.

Don't be stupier than you have to be.

Container ship is the most environmentally friendly way of moving large quantities of goods long distances.

Low Environmental Impact | World Shipping Council

Shipping industry says its environmentaly friendly and the tobacco industry says cigarettes are good for you.

So what’s your point?

 

[Crepitus]

They also mostly aren't flown in, no matter what the linked article says. They are picked green and shipped here from South America by ship and rail which are pretty low footprint transportation comparatively. They also are rarely packaged in plastic, something else the linked article claims.

They also mostly aren't flown in, no matter what the linked article says. They are picked green and shipped here from South America by ship and rail which are pretty low footprint transportation comparatively. They also are rarely packaged in plastic, something else the linked article claims

So which is it? Flown in or shipped by rail or ship? You can’t keep your lie straight.

BTW - they are shipped by by cargo ship, which has a huge carbon footprint. No rail, no planes.
So stop your lies.

Hey dumbass, did you net read your own link? It says they are flown in.

Cargo ships have a very small carbon footprint per pound of freight. Especially compared to airplanes.

Not real big on facts are you.

Yeah, moving 40,000 tons thru water with Diesel engines is environmentally friendly.

Don't be stupier than you have to be.

Container ship is the most environmentally friendly way of moving large quantities of goods long distances.

Low Environmental Impact | World Shipping Council

Shipping industry says its environmentaly friendly and the tobacco industry says cigarettes are good for you.

So what’s your point?

You are just incurably stupid.

This is me, throwing my hands up in disgust, and walking away.

Enjoy your evening, and wipe that drool off your chin.

 

[Weatherman2020]

So which is it? Flown in or shipped by rail or ship? You can’t keep your lie straight.

BTW - they are shipped by by cargo ship, which has a huge carbon footprint. No rail, no planes.
So stop your lies.

Hey dumbass, did you net read your own link? It says they are flown in.

Cargo ships have a very small carbon footprint per pound of freight. Especially compared to airplanes.

Not real big on facts are you.

Yeah, moving 40,000 tons thru water with Diesel engines is environmentally friendly.

Don't be stupier than you have to be.

Container ship is the most environmentally friendly way of moving large quantities of goods long distances.

Low Environmental Impact | World Shipping Council

Shipping industry says its environmentaly friendly and the tobacco industry says cigarettes are good for you.

So what’s your point?

You are just incurably stupid.

This is me, throwing my hands up in disgust, and walking away.

Enjoy your evening, and wipe that drool off your chin.

Democrats say ban all cars and planes. But shipping is good?

Hilarious.

 

[tycho1572]

Hey dumbass, did you net read your own link? It says they are flown in.

Cargo ships have a very small carbon footprint per pound of freight. Especially compared to airplanes.

Not real big on facts are you.

Yeah, moving 40,000 tons thru water with Diesel engines is environmentally friendly.

Don't be stupier than you have to be.

Container ship is the most environmentally friendly way of moving large quantities of goods long distances.

Low Environmental Impact | World Shipping Council

Shipping industry says its environmentaly friendly and the tobacco industry says cigarettes are good for you.

So what’s your point?

You are just incurably stupid.

This is me, throwing my hands up in disgust, and walking away.

Enjoy your evening, and wipe that drool off your chin.

Democrats say ban all cars and planes. But shipping is good?

Hilarious.

People are seeing the absurdity of democrats.

 

[tycho1572]

Btw.. I’ve been buying bananas on my last 3 grocery trips. I also bought a can of Planters nuts.

 

[justoffal]

Cuz of da science.

Yaz gotta noez your bananas shipped 8,000 miles to youz iz savn da planet.

!
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tells teens that eating a banana with peanut butter for breakfast will combat global warming

HOLY SHIT THAT BITCH IS NOT JUST DUMB

SHE'S DHUUUUUUUM

 

[tycho1572]

Cuz of da science.

Yaz gotta noez your bananas shipped 8,000 miles to youz iz savn da planet.

!
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tells teens that eating a banana with peanut butter for breakfast will combat global warming

HOLY SHIT THAT BITCH IS NOT JUST DUMB

SHE'S DHUUUUUUUM

I’m glad she’s voting democrat.

 

[justoffal]

Btw.. I’ve been buying bananas on my last 3 grocery trips. I also bought a can of Planters nuts.

Peanut farming is a huge co2 source.

Jo

 

[tycho1572]

Btw.. I’ve been buying bananas on my last 3 grocery trips. I also bought a can of Planters nuts.

Peanut farming is a huge co2 source.

Jo

These are my favorites...

 

[justoffal]

Btw.. I’ve been buying bananas on my last 3 grocery trips. I also bought a can of Planters nuts.

Peanut farming is a huge co2 source.

Jo

These are my favorites...

View attachment 244712

Agree!

Jo

 

[Manonthestreet]

imagine the govt in charge of your diet 24/7.....no thanks

 

[Crepitus]

Yeah, moving 40,000 tons thru water with Diesel engines is environmentally friendly.

Don't be stupier than you have to be.

Container ship is the most environmentally friendly way of moving large quantities of goods long distances.

Low Environmental Impact | World Shipping Council

Shipping industry says its environmentaly friendly and the tobacco industry says cigarettes are good for you.

So what’s your point?

You are just incurably stupid.

This is me, throwing my hands up in disgust, and walking away.

Enjoy your evening, and wipe that drool off your chin.

Democrats say ban all cars and planes. But shipping is good?

Hilarious.

People are seeing the absurdity of democrats.

Don't encourage the stupid.

 

[Crick]

Yeah, moving 40,000 tons thru water with Diesel engines is environmentally friendly.

What do you believe to be a more environmentally friendly mode?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yeah, moving 40,000 tons thru water with Diesel engines is environmentally friendly.

What do you believe to be a more environmentally friendly mode?

How about 400 private jets not be used at every climate change conference? Ever heard of Skype?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Don't be stupier than you have to be.

Container ship is the most environmentally friendly way of moving large quantities of goods long distances.

Low Environmental Impact | World Shipping Council

Shipping industry says its environmentaly friendly and the tobacco industry says cigarettes are good for you.

So what’s your point?

You are just incurably stupid.

This is me, throwing my hands up in disgust, and walking away.

Enjoy your evening, and wipe that drool off your chin.

Democrats say ban all cars and planes. But shipping is good?

Hilarious.

People are seeing the absurdity of democrats.

Don't encourage the stupid.

Tell us more about banning all cars and planes in 10 years.

 

[tycho1572]

Don't be stupier than you have to be.

Container ship is the most environmentally friendly way of moving large quantities of goods long distances.

Low Environmental Impact | World Shipping Council

Shipping industry says its environmentaly friendly and the tobacco industry says cigarettes are good for you.

So what’s your point?

You are just incurably stupid.

This is me, throwing my hands up in disgust, and walking away.

Enjoy your evening, and wipe that drool off your chin.

Democrats say ban all cars and planes. But shipping is good?

Hilarious.

People are seeing the absurdity of democrats.

Don't encourage the stupid.

They don’t need any encouragement. You’ve shown us that.

 

[Crick]

Yeah, moving 40,000 tons thru water with Diesel engines is environmentally friendly.

What do you believe to be a more environmentally friendly mode?

How about 400 private jets not be used at every climate change conference? Ever heard of Skype?

Don't weasel. What do you believe to be a more environmentally friendly mode of shipping 40,000 tons across an ocean?