I like nuclear power.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I like nuclear power.
maybe because that was one of the few telling the truth. Don't you understand? NASA is in on the hoax. But even if we are affecting the climate, the harm the US is doing is tiny compared to China and you libs never mention trying to stop China from polluting. Why is that?Your link goes to a page that belongs to OpentheWord.org, a Christian organization. My links all go to NASA pages. Why did you think you had to go through OpentheWord.org?
your masters don't like it.I like nuclear power.
I have no masters. You're projecting.your masters don't like it.
wrong, if you believe that human activity is changing the planet's climate then you are a slave to your brainwashing masters. Human activity is polluting the planet is many places, but there is no proven direct link between pollution and climate. That is what you libs refuse to accept. and BTW there is no way you are going to control my thermostat from DC, or my water use, or my gas use. You assholes want a revolution, try that shit on the american people.I have no masters. You're projecting.
If you do not, then you have rejected mainstream science just as clearly as flat-Earthers and creationistswrong, if you believe that human activity is changing the planet's climate then you are a slave to your brainwashing masters.
It's called the greenhouse effect Whizzo.Human activity is polluting the planet is many places, but there is no proven direct link between pollution and climate.
You are the one refusing to accept.That is what you libs refuse to accept.
That's getting to be an old, tired and feeble threat.and BTW there is no way you are going to control my thermostat from DC, or my water use, or my gas use. You assholes want a revolution, try that shit on the american people.
Was the winter colder? Do you have a link? Let's see what I can find.the whole "it is hotter than it used to be" whine is old, of course it is hotter the planet is 1 degree warmer than it was a hundred years ago. that means warmer summers. but it doesn't explain colder winters now does it?
one final question: Gore in 2009 said that by 2013 there would be no ice at the north pole due to man made climate change, is there ice at the north pole today in 2023? yes or no. Was Gore lying or was he scamming you?If you do not, then you have rejected mainstream science just as clearly as flat-Earthers and creationists
It's called the greenhouse effect Whizzo.
You are the one refusing to accept.
That's getting to be an old, tired and feeble threat.
Nice charts, who made them? what is the makers agenda. if true, how exactly are humans causing it?Was the winter colder? Do you have a link? Let's see what I can find.
Well, nothing really. On what did you base your comments? Could you post it here?
By emitting billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere and thereby enhancing the greenhouse effect.Nice charts, who made them? what is the makers agenda. if true, how exactly are humans causing it?
My apologies
2020 in Review: Global Temperature Rankings | Climate Central
The global temperature data is in and signs of climate change could not be clearer—2020 was one of the two warmest years on record.www.climatecentral.org
Annual 2020 Global Climate Report | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
An analysis of global temperatures and precipitation, placing the data into a historical perspectivewww.ncei.noaa.gov
except that CO2 makes up .039% of the atomosphere and was at that same level 100,000 years ago. BTW, CO2 is not a pollutant, without it there could be no life of any kind on earth.By emitting billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere and thereby enhancing the greenhouse effect.
Oh please.except that CO2 makes up .039% of the atomosphere and was at that same level 100,000 years ago. BTW, CO2 is not a pollutant, without it there could be no life of any kind on earth.
Oh please.
CO2 makes up 0.042% of the atmosphere. The LD50 for dioxin is 107 uG/kG or 0.0000107% of your body mass.
CO2 has not been at its current level in over 3 million years. And its maximum rate of change during glacial cycles over the last million years was about 7 ppm per century. The current rate of change is 243 ppm per century
CO2 is not necessary for YOUR life and will kill you at levels above 4%
These arguments were stupid the first 50 times your denier buddies tried to make them. Please move on.
OMG thank goodness democrat sponser china is building hundreds of new coal fired plants...they weill help stave off global warming no doubt
No it didn’t, and you can’t prove it with dataThe Evidence Is Clear, Denying It Isn't Helping Anyone.
This is terrifying news. We need to take action now before it's too late.
Our planet is in trouble and we are all responsible for fixing it.
Governments aren't doing enough.
Individual actions matter too. We should reduce our carbon footprint by using public transportation or electric cars instead of gasoline ones, reducing energy consumption at home etc.
The transition to electric cars is threatened if Donald Trump becomes president because he lives in the 20th century. He advocates gasoline cars only.
He came out against electric cars last week.
If you believe humans have a significant impact in a global warming, Donald Trump is not your candidate.
Globe has hottest June on record as well as hottest day, data shows
News of the global extremes comes amid other indicators of human-caused climate change.www.axios.com