Unreal how deep the Jew-hate is, isn’t it? Now we have some shothead denying Anne Frank’s diary.Oh they were not.
Good fckn grief
May she RIP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Unreal how deep the Jew-hate is, isn’t it? Now we have some shothead denying Anne Frank’s diary.Oh they were not.
Good fckn grief
Unreal how deep the Jew-hate is, isn’t it? Now we have some shothead denying Anne Frank’s diary.
May she RIP.
You mean you DO NOT understand the hate.I just understand the hate
You mean you DO NOT understand the hate.
It's demonic in origin. It flares up and precedes major bloodletting in the world's history. The difference this time is that if the Jews burn, they have to capacity to make sure their enemies burn, as well.Back in 1945 the world said never again... but yet here we are
I don't understand antisemitism and hatred of Israel
Not all street art is graffiti, but we know if the situation was flipped the vandalism would be labeled by the left as a hate crime.
Yes, I do recognize that boy. Famous photo. May he RIP.
That said, the antisemitism being spread by the pro-Palestinians is disgusting and dangerous. A friend of mine warned me five years ago that as our country admits more and more Muslims, the Jew-hate would get more and more widespread and deep.
Both sides have their ranks of easily-triggered folks. Perhaps it was a historian upset that Anne Frank was depicted holding a flag of a nation that did not exist when she was alive so they felt a need to add to the absurdity. Who knows. The left is heavily divided on this current conflict.
"Absurdity"? Really dude?
Israel existed 3000 years ago.Do you have evidence Israel existed when Anne Frank was alive?
Do you have evidence Israel existed when Anne Frank was alive?
I didn't say it did, but there's nothing "absurd" about the mural. The artist was simply creating an abstract of the conflict. You have a Palestinian girl, burning the Hamas flag, and a tearful Anne Frank representing Israel.
You're looking at it way too literally.
“Open to all viewpoints” does not mean antisemites can vandalize a mural that shows sympathy to a poor girl tortured by the Nazis.You are the one who is looking at it literally. I am looking at it as speech in a public place should be open to all viewpoints, art can be speech, and someone spoke and another person responded. And while you don't find it absurd, does not mean that others cannot. The word has a few synonyms, one being incongruous.
the murals was ART------Well if one "street artist" paints something on a wall, don't be surprised if another "street artist" comes along and paints something else. graffiti kind of works that way.
You are the one who is looking at it literally. I am looking at it as speech in a public place should be open to all viewpoints, art can be speech, and someone spoke and another person responded. And while you don't find it absurd, does not mean that others cannot. The word has a few synonyms, one being incongruous.
Uh those Nazis that attacked and killed Jewish folks were white, so you altered the picture to fit your madness.
Uh those Nazis that attacked and killed Jewish folks were white, so you altered the picture to fit your madness.
So why didn't you show an actual image of an Arab holding a gun on a Jewish child since you claim that is what is happening.Huh?
I showed the original image of the child from WWII so posters here would understand the use of his image in this mural.