its more like another failed attempt by a partisan to compare abortion with Gun rights.
I mean why not cancer victims? Or Aids, Or herpes? No it just had to be abortion. The agenda is quite clear.
I see partisans talking all the time about how n right is absolute, yet not one of them wants any reasonable restrictions on abortions.
I see partisans talking all the time about how n right is absolute, yet not one of them wants any reasonable restrictions on guns.
The difference one is a private matter between her and her doctor. The other isn't.
It is a "lawful" use of purchases and services. Why don't we list what "everyone" lawfully purchases or uses, according to name and address? It is a silly question. It is to illustrate the point that notifying criminals of where "guns" are (or aren't) could endanger people and property. If the criminals know who doesn't have guns, aren't they more likely to "target" those homes, over homes that do have guns (unless, they want guns to commit crimes, and are not prosecuted according to gun laws on the books). If you have daughters (or "little" boys) and you do not have a "dot" on your house, I would recommend that you do some extra work to protect your family.