And now on to the more serious question of immunity. . .

[MagicMike]

If Fani Willis is meeting with Kamala Harris then she's meeting with people that represents the White House.

Or don't you know who the Vice President is, shitforbrains?

Do you have the transcript of what they talked about or is this just the latest conspiracy theory your cult is pushing this week?

 

[MagicMike]

No. You asked me about Jan 6th being staged.
Biden admitted that he was trying to keep Trump from running using the constitution, which is why they claimed Jan 6th was an insurrection. Not because it was, but because they felt they could blame Trump for insurrection using the media. Which was going to be the excuse to take him off of the ballot in several states.

Even though he cannot be charged with insurrection.....they all want us to assume he's guilty of it, and a bunch of liberal judges and secretary of states have decided to take him off the ballot, up until the Supreme Court put the Kabash on that false premise permanently.

Are you really this slow, or are you just playing dumb.

We all saw the evidence of insurrection in the J6 hearings.

 

[mudwhistle]

We all saw the evidence of insurrection in the J6 hearings.

You mean all of the evidence that the Jan 6th committee destroyed?

You do know that most of their evidence doesn't exist anymore, don't you?

As to Fani Willis:

 

[Care4all]

Not sure who is making that argument.

Trump has never claimed ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY. You need to stop watching MSNBC et al - they literally feed to misinformation.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/18/politics/immunity-court-trump-what-matters/index.html

It's not just CNN?

Donald Trump Loses His ‘Absolute Immunity’ Claim

And rightly so.

www.theatlantic.com

https://www.axios.com/2024/02/28/supreme-court-trump-immunity-jan-6

 

[Care4all]

You do know that most of their evidence doesn't exist anymore, don't you?

Fake News!

Every bit of the evidence still exists!

 

[mudwhistle]

Fake News!

Every bit if the evidence still exists!

Nope. Before they left they destroyed over 80% of everything they had before turning it over to the new Republican congress.
They didn't want to be exposed as committing fraud.

 

[Marener]

For the most part that is true. But this is the first time a militarized/weaponized administration has declared political opponents to be public enemies, has taken political prisoners, has maliciously and vindictively tried to destroy a political opponent who was a threat.

So because of this administration, we need protection from the court to prevent it from happening again.

The OP however is not about misconduct by any particular President or administration but rather how SCOTUS should rule in order to protect the country from it happening again.

That’s one framing.

The other side says this is the first time a president has so brazenly violated the law in a self-serving effort to illegally maintain power. and that going unpunished will assure that this abuse will occur again.

If Trump is actually innocent, the trial will prove it. Why not let the system work the way it always has?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That’s one framing.

The other side says this is the first time a president has so brazenly violated the law in a self-serving effort to illegally maintain power. and that going unpunished will assure that this abuse will occur again.

If Trump is actually innocent, the trial will prove it. Why not let the system work the way it always has?

Because they know full well that he is guilty.

The next time a trump supporter is honest about any of this will be the first.

 

[Rawley]

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/18/politics/immunity-court-trump-what-matters/index.html

It's not just CNN?

Donald Trump Loses His ‘Absolute Immunity’ Claim

And rightly so.

www.theatlantic.com

https://www.axios.com/2024/02/28/supreme-court-trump-immunity-jan-6

LOL Seeing a pattern here? Note that they never quote Trump or his lawyers with this bullshit. They want you to believe he's claiming he can assassinate Newsom with impunity.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

LOL Seeing a pattern here? Note that they never quote Trump or his lawyers with this bullshit. They want you to believe he's claiming he can assassinate Newsom with impunity.

That is the claim they forwarded.

 

[Rambunctious]

Who would want to run for office if you could be prosecuted for doing your job after you leave office... WTF people... do you want a president or a captive?....

 

[Foxfyre]

That’s one framing.

The other side says this is the first time a president has so brazenly violated the law in a self-serving effort to illegally maintain power. and that going unpunished will assure that this abuse will occur again.

If Trump is actually innocent, the trial will prove it. Why not let the system work the way it always has?

Because I never want another malicious administration being able to force a political opponent into a bogus trial.

 

[Marener]

Because I never want another malicious administration being able to force a political opponent into a bogus trial.

If the charges are bogus, then the former president will be fine.

There’s no need for protection.

But the consequences of protecting presidents could result in lawlessness from the most powerful person in the country. A far worse consequence.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Who would want to run for office if you could be prosecuted for doing your job after you leave office...

Trump supporter nonsense and fear porn.

The crimes Trump committed had nothing to do with doing his job.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Because I never want another malicious administration being able to force a political opponent into a bogus trial.

Yet you couldn't argue what is bogus about it if your life depended on it.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Because I never want another malicious administration being able to force a political opponent into a bogus trial.

Marener is pulling tail in the fox pen. Trump has brought this all on himself.

 

[Rambunctious]

Trump supporter nonsense and fear porn.

The crimes Trump committed had nothing to do with doing his job.

What crimes?....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What crimes?....

Don't feed the sealions.

 

[Rambunctious]

Don't feed the sealions.

Just tell me what crimes... not one of you can...

 

[Rambunctious]

Don't feed the sealions.

Still waiting for the list of crimes.... but I know you have already ran away...