Anchor-Babies v. 14th Amendment

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by kyzr, Dec 26, 2010.

?

Would you support a new Law stopping "anchor-babies"?

  1. YES. Two illegals cannot make a legal US citizen.

    18 vote(s)
    69.2%
  2. NO. Let the 14th Amendment stand as currently interpreted.

    8 vote(s)
    30.8%
  1. kyzr
    Offline

    kyzr Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,447
    Thanks Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +630
    The GOP needs to focus on stopping the flood of illegals, and their illegal votes, from creating a new anti-US voter bloc. The 14th Amendment is being mis-interpreted to allow the babies of non-citizent to become US citizens.

    We need Congress to work on resolving the anchor-baby problem. Two illegals can't make a legal citizen.

    Lets take a poll...
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    The 14th will have to amended to reflect it.
     
  3. kyzr
    Offline

    kyzr Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,447
    Thanks Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +630
    It all depends on how the 14th is interpreted. You're right that to date, the USSC supports that babies born to illegals are citizens. IMHO that needs to be challenged one more time before the USSC.
     
  4. The T
    Offline

    The T George S. Patton Party Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Messages:
    48,072
    Thanks Received:
    5,473
    Trophy Points:
    1,773
    Location:
    What USED TO BE A REPUBLIC RUN BY TYRANTS
    Ratings:
    +5,502
    However the USSC can be overridden BY the Amendment process. The Courts are never the final say. The Founders built three equal but separate branches...one looking over the shoulder of the other.

    The ultimate voice belongs to the people, and if they demand such an amendment? I can happen...but the big hurdle are politicians that are in this game for their own edification...and that hurdles has to be overcome by getting Statesmen...instead of perpetual government employees as the Congress presently exists. And that relies on the people getting angry enough to make it happen.
     
  5. loosecannon
    Offline

    loosecannon Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,888
    Thanks Received:
    263
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +264
    I firmly agree with every point you made. Now that we need those jobs it suddenly becomes urgent to reclaim them.

    I would think that if any issue was compelling enough to succeed as a constitutional amendment today, this would be the one.

    That and "touch my junk and I will have you arrested". Both extremely popular pov.
     
  6. jillian
    Online

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,556
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,434
    they can't vote if they're illegal.

    :rolleyes:

    and the 14th amendment isn't being 'misinterpreted'. it says what it says.
     
  7. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,705
    American Citizenship and Immigration Clarification Act




    A resolution clarifying the intent and purpose of the 14 Amendment to the Constitution of these united States.


    A Resolution
    Recognizing the intent and purpose of the 14 Amendment to the Constitution of these united States to protect the rights of African Americans following emancipation and clarifying the meaning thereof as pertains to the Law and the immigration and citizenship status of persons not legally within the borders of these united States.


    • Be it recognized by these united States and all bodies and agencies thereof that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of these united States served the important function of protecting the legal rights and status of African American persons, including but not limited to Freed Persons following the abolition of slavery in these united States. Be it recognized that the intent of purpose of this this amendment was never to undermine the sovereignty of this republic by establishing birthright citizenship to those born to persons not legally present within this republic. Be it recognized that such an interpretation of this amendment as to establish birthright citizenship for those born to persons not legally present within this republic was not known or put into effect at the passing of the amendment, just as it remains to this day understood that those born to non-citizens legally present in this republic, including but not limited to foreign dignitaries are not bestowed citizenship upon birth within the borders of this republic.
    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.


    • This Act may be cited as the `American Citizenship and Immigration Clarification Act'.
    SEC. 2. Enforcement of the original purpose and intent of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of these united States



    • (a) Clarification of the legal recognition of the citizenship status of children born within this republic
      1)Children born to a parent who is a citizen of these united States are recognized as citizens of these united States so long as they are declared so by their parents or legal guardians and are not declared as citizens of any other sovereign nation by the same

      2)Those who are not legally present in these untied States are recognized as citizens of the sovereign from whence they have come are do not, therefore, meet the requirement laid out in the Fourteenth Amendment to these united States that a person be 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the State in which they reside, or of this Republic as they remain subject to the jurisdiction of the sovereign of which they are recognized by this republic as being a citizen, being subject to the law of the State in which they reside and this republic only in those same criminal matters as any other foreign national operating within the boundaries of this Republic and not subject to diplomatic considerations. Be it recognized that those born to such persons are recognized by this republic as citizens of and subject to the jurisdiction of the same sovereign as those to whom they are born, and therefore also fail to meet those requirements outlined in the Fourteenth Amendment (outlined above) to the Constitution of these united States.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
    Last edited: Dec 26, 2010
  8. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,705
    that it does


    do you know what it says?
     
  9. Meister
    Offline

    Meister Platinum Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2009
    Messages:
    25,900
    Thanks Received:
    8,101
    Trophy Points:
    493
    Location:
    Conservative part of the Northwest
    Ratings:
    +8,102
    Let me highlight some of this
     
  10. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,705
    I mean... to say that children born to female members of an invading military are citizens because they are born here is absurd on its face, yet that is what the current [mis]interpretation of the 14th says
     

Share This Page