Analysis of Benghazi: Right Wing World Spin & Distortions
The Washington Times pretends to analyze fairly and with balance, the GOP obsession with Benghazi
The GOP promises 'bombshells' and promises to 'expose' things that have supposedly been 'suppressed'. GOP members are 'shocked' (ever watch FOX News commentators who are 'shocked' on a daily basis?) by 'press reports' (from FOX?) about 'whistleblowers' 'intimidation' and possible 'coverups' ---
--- the Washington Times prints this shit and then covers itself with something most of Right Wing World will magically glide over without really absorbing...
[The accountability review board “interviewed everyone that was there who played a role in the events such that their account was needed to answer the questions they had,” said the source familiar with the review, speaking on the condition of anonymity."
...the person familiar with the investigation by the accountability review board, which published a 40-page report last year, insisted that the board already interviewed 100 witnesses, including all the CIA and State Department personnel involved in the defense of the diplomatic post and of the secret CIA base known as the annex a few miles away.
They also had access to transcripts of all the FBI interviews of those and other witnesses.
“The unclassified report is the best account of the events as they unfolded,” he said, adding that, although the inquiry also issued a longer classified report, its conclusions were the same.
The classified version “amplifies and extends the account the Board gave [in the published version] but doesn’t in any way change the conclusions it came to,” said the person, who had access to both versions.]
Benghazi investigations included CIA activities; personnel had secret base in Libyan city - Washington Times
What is wrong with this picture? Is the Washington Times reporting/spinning anything new, anything that was previously unknown?
The Washington Times pretends to analyze fairly and with balance, the GOP obsession with Benghazi
The GOP promises 'bombshells' and promises to 'expose' things that have supposedly been 'suppressed'. GOP members are 'shocked' (ever watch FOX News commentators who are 'shocked' on a daily basis?) by 'press reports' (from FOX?) about 'whistleblowers' 'intimidation' and possible 'coverups' ---
--- the Washington Times prints this shit and then covers itself with something most of Right Wing World will magically glide over without really absorbing...
[The accountability review board “interviewed everyone that was there who played a role in the events such that their account was needed to answer the questions they had,” said the source familiar with the review, speaking on the condition of anonymity."
...the person familiar with the investigation by the accountability review board, which published a 40-page report last year, insisted that the board already interviewed 100 witnesses, including all the CIA and State Department personnel involved in the defense of the diplomatic post and of the secret CIA base known as the annex a few miles away.
They also had access to transcripts of all the FBI interviews of those and other witnesses.
“The unclassified report is the best account of the events as they unfolded,” he said, adding that, although the inquiry also issued a longer classified report, its conclusions were the same.
The classified version “amplifies and extends the account the Board gave [in the published version] but doesn’t in any way change the conclusions it came to,” said the person, who had access to both versions.]
Benghazi investigations included CIA activities; personnel had secret base in Libyan city - Washington Times
What is wrong with this picture? Is the Washington Times reporting/spinning anything new, anything that was previously unknown?
Last edited:
and 
Right Wing World 101: personal attacks and attacking the source. Except here the source is the right wing Washington Times, so all we get is the personal attack. 
I would be concerned for their mental health if one day they woke up and found nothing to be 'shocked' at
