An imposter in the White House

Stupid libtards say they're against men in power taking advantage of those in their employ, but look at Felcher Lum or whatever his name is... Giving Bill a pass. Phony Felcher Lum..get off your soap box and wipe the drool of your chin, bruh.

No one gave Bill a pass hon, you're assigning views again. Bill's an obvious sexual predator.
Yes you did. I read your posts on this thread. If you're so worried about a sexual predator in the White House...why are you voting for Hillary?

And don't play dumb, he will be in the White House if she wins and she said he will be on her economic policy development team.

Again son, not voting Hilary, sweet Jesus you're far too emotional about this to make any sense at all. Sexual predators are woven all through your society, get real, go look into it. Your society has very real and serous issues, partisanshitheadedness feeds the beast.
 
A true American respects the freedom of others opinions. A true American believes in that Freedom. I cannot say that most of the left on this board believe in freedom... (And yes some on the right as well.)
 
Jill is a lefty, not insane.
Wasn't it the rapist Bill Clinton who tricked a 23 year old intern into giving him blowjobs under the oral I mean oval office desk, and his wife Hillary who attacked all his victims? Just saying...
Now there is an opinion. Bill was an adult, so was Monica. Hillary attacked all his victims? You sure about that?

Yes. You know what your difficulty here is, you're expecting his assuredness to be linked with objective reality.
Roudy? No. He is in fact an antiSemetic Jew, one of the few.
How did religion get into this discussion? Damn, why are all lefties insane.
We were describing your insanity. You are a confused person. Now shake your tiny fists in the air.
 
Jill is a lefty, not insane.
Is it any wonder that empty-suit disaster president Oblahblah is now campaigning as if he's running for president?

FROM THE EDITOR OF NEWSWEEK...

The liberal Newsweek Magazine is going out of business, but not before it attacks the President. This is quite an article, even more so when you consider that NEWSWEEK finally had the guts to admit it. WOW! Newsweek COVER!!! Also read the article at the end. AMAZING!!!

Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his Agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built around him by the liberal media...

By Matt Patterson
(Newsweek Columnist -- Opinion Writer)
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job?
Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor;" a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president? There is no evidence that he ever attended or worked for any university or that he ever sat for the Illinois bar. We have no documentation for any of his claims. He may well be the greatest hoax in history.Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day.

But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were 'a bit' extreme, he was given a pass. Let that Sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard because of the color of his skin. Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest? Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves. Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back.

Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is. And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.
What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches)
And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerless-ness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on track). But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.
View attachment 96975
Wasn't it the rapist Bill Clinton who tricked a 23 year old intern into giving him blowjobs under the oral I mean oval office desk, and his wife Hillary who attacked all his victims? Just saying...
Now there is an opinion. Bill was an adult, so was Monica. Hillary attacked all his victims? You sure about that?
Yeah, then why were Hillary and Bill attacking her? A powerful married adult male who violated the sanctity of the Oval Office by tricking a girl young enough to be his daughter into giving him blowjobs? Ha ha ha.

Total dodge:

"Hillary attacked all his victims? You sure about that?"
Yeah, like I said it's a matter of historical record. Maybe you were too young, or perhaps had your head up your ass, like you do now.

Hillary Clinton’s Long History of Targeting Women

Women who have accused her husband, former President Bill Clinton, of sexual misconduct have received special criticism from the former first lady.

One victim of Clinton’s wrath was Monica Lewinsky, whom Clinton called a “narcissistic loony toon” in private conversations with close friend Diane Blair.

Lewinsky was not the only woman who had a sexual relationship with Bill targeted by Hillary: she called Gennifer Flowers “trailer trash.”

Flowers alleged in a 2000 lawsuit that Clinton created and ran a “war room” during the 1992 campaign to “smear, defame, and harm” adversaries such as herself.

Prior to the 1992 election, Clinton worked to get sworn statements from all the women Bill was rumored to have slept with who said the rumors were false. She interviewed some of the women herself, according to Carl Bernstein’s A Woman in Charge.

Kathleen Willey, who claimed Bill Clinton sexually harassed her during his first term as president, said Hillary Clinton made it a point to launch a “terror campaign” against her and all other women.

“She is the war on women, as far as I’m concerned, because with every woman that she’s found out about—and she made it a point to find out who every woman had been that’s crossed his path over the years—she’s orchestrated a terror campaign against every one of these women, including me,” said Willey.

One of those women was Juanita Broaddrick, who says Hillary Clinton threatened her in person two weeks after she claimed Bill Clinton raped her.

Hillary’s aggressive attitude was not limited to those who accused her husband of sexual misconduct: other men received the benefit of the doubt from Hillary when she needed their support politically. When former Sen. Bob Packwood was accused of sexual harassment, Clinton told her friend Blair that she was “tired of all those whiney women,” and that she needed Packwood on health care.

Hillary has also suggested that Bill’s problems with women are the fault of a woman: his mother.

Clinton attempted to explain to Lucinda Franks that Bill’s infidelity is rooted in his abused childhood, stating during an interview that he was abused and that “when a mother does what she does, it affects you forever.”

Clinton’s remarks concerning her husband’s tough childhood came in response to a question about how “Bill’s sexual addiction began.”

“I am not going into it, but I’ll say that when this happens in children, it scars you,” said Clinton. “You keep looking in all the wrong places for the parent who abused you.”
 
Stupid libtards say they're against men in power taking advantage of those in their employ, but look at Felcher Lum or whatever his name is... Giving Bill a pass. Phony Felcher Lum..get off your soap box and wipe the drool of your chin, bruh.
I thought his real name was Farting Dumb? :question: :razz:
 

Forum List

Back
Top