CaughtInTheMid
VIP Member
- Jan 7, 2012
- 949
- 80
- 63
NO, that's NOT why, you weak son of a bitch. Take your coward's philosophy and shove it up your worthless ass. YOU are part of the problem.
the fact that you, and people like yourself, can't admit that our foreign policy causes us problems is why we have those problems. put yourself in their shoes for half a second. if somebody came over here and bombed us, or performed a covert operation to take out someone living here, or put up a blockade in our shipping routes, or supplied money to a country that was taking out citizens and nuclear facilities, we would want a pound of flesh. the fact that you guys can't see that is weird.
but like i've said before, all countries will eventually have nukes. and i don't think the crazies will be going after canada first.
So isn't it in our interest to prevent the crazies from getting nukes? Or in your world, would we sit idly by and allow them to take out San Francisco... Scratch San Fran. Would we sit idly by and allow them to take out Dallas?
sure, we can spend a whole lot of time and money preventing other countries from getting nukes. then, at some point in the future, all countries will have nukes. so, which is better?