America Needs to Implement Forced Labor

It seems the issue is Federal vs State
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

So the states could do what they decided was best for them

Feds started taking over more during the Depression
Made a National
Clinton with his Republican Congress pushed back to block funding
and more control to the states

Papa Obama has been eating away at that

Read it again. The 10th only allows states powers that the federal government doesn't prohibit them from having.

sure


Actual, it powers not delegated to the United States
nor prohibited by it to the states

by the US Constitution (it trumps)

Democrats always have a hard time with the US Constitution
no wonder they find it such a drag
 
It seems the issue is Federal vs State
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

So the states could do what they decided was best for them

Feds started taking over more during the Depression
Made a National
Clinton with his Republican Congress pushed back to block funding
and more control to the states

Papa Obama has been eating away at that

Read it again. The 10th only allows states powers that the federal government doesn't prohibit them from having.

sure


Actual, it powers not delegated to the United States
nor prohibited by it to the states

by the US Constitution (it trumps)

Democrats always have a hard time with the US Constitution
no wonder they find it such a drag

You just agreed with me and don't even know it.
 
Our infrastructure is not crumbling. We want professionals to build crap, not unskilled morons.

Trump's policies of deporting illegals, limiting legal immigration and bringing back the jobs, will lower the dole.

Not only is it crumbing, it's in danger of collapsing:

2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure

Is U.S. Infrastructure Destined to Crumble?

Our crumbling infrastructure is hurting U.S. competitiveness

Trump isn't going to do shit, because he won't be elected.
 
Our infrastructure is crumbling aka bridges, roads, etc. We have huge,huge untapped sources of labor that is not being utilized....we let this potential labor pool subsist on the dole and thus they are a drain on our economy aka parasites.

We could force these people to work...cleaning up streets, city parks, fighting mosquitoes,rats and cockroaches. They could be used in so many ways..yet they sit idle....drawing food stamps and other gubmint checks and they moonlight shoplifting, selling drugs and other sorts of criminal behavior...these are the thugs hanging out on the street corner...riding the subways and busses threatening and intimidating citizens.

If the socialist paradise of Venezuela can do it...why can't we?

Venezuela's new decree: Forced farm work for citizens

Why use code to signal you're talking about black people when there are more whites than blacks on welfare?

What exact code was used? I only see you invoking race, as usual.


Some figure that others must think the same way they do. Must be why libs always bring up race and they insult minorities by pretending that others are thinking that way.
 
It seems the issue is Federal vs State
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

So the states could do what they decided was best for them

Feds started taking over more during the Depression
Made a National
Clinton with his Republican Congress pushed back to block funding
and more control to the states

Papa Obama has been eating away at that

Read it again. The 10th only allows states powers that the federal government doesn't prohibit them from having.

sure


Actual, it powers not delegated to the United States
nor prohibited by it to the states

by the US Constitution (it trumps)

Democrats always have a hard time with the US Constitution
no wonder they find it such a drag

You just agreed with me and don't even know it.


not at all
You said " federal government doesn't prohibit them from having"
the amendment does not say that

it says states have power not delegated to the United States by the Consitution
or prohibited by it to the States ---
"it" is in reference to the Constitution

Federal gov't and the US Constitution are not the same
you are confusing it

The Constitution was very specific on what the Federal gov't was to do
The Bill of Rights is what the states were prohibited from doing
in addition to what was given the US gov;t
for example- printing money
 
It seems the issue is Federal vs State
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

So the states could do what they decided was best for them

Feds started taking over more during the Depression
Made a National
Clinton with his Republican Congress pushed back to block funding
and more control to the states

Papa Obama has been eating away at that

Read it again. The 10th only allows states powers that the federal government doesn't prohibit them from having.

sure


Actual, it powers not delegated to the United States
nor prohibited by it to the states

by the US Constitution (it trumps)

Democrats always have a hard time with the US Constitution
no wonder they find it such a drag

You just agreed with me and don't even know it.


not at all
You said " federal government doesn't prohibit them from having"
the amendment does not say that

it says states have power not delegated to the United States by the Consitution
or prohibited by it to the States ---
"it" is in reference to the Constitution

Federal gov't and the US Constitution are not the same
you are confusing it

The Constitution was very specific on what the Federal gov't was to do
The Bill of Rights is what the states were prohibited from doing
in addition to what was given the US gov;t
for example- printing money

No he has everything straight. It's you who are confused.
 
The reaction below of well educated Americans is rooted clearly in the libertarian and "originalist" nonsense about the Constitution. Orginalism originated with Rehnquist two centuries after the ratification of the Constitution.

3803440-img_3295.jpg
 
It seems the issue is Federal vs State
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

So the states could do what they decided was best for them

Feds started taking over more during the Depression
Made a National
Clinton with his Republican Congress pushed back to block funding
and more control to the states

Papa Obama has been eating away at that

Read it again. The 10th only allows states powers that the federal government doesn't prohibit them from having.

sure


Actual, it powers not delegated to the United States
nor prohibited by it to the states

by the US Constitution (it trumps)

Democrats always have a hard time with the US Constitution
no wonder they find it such a drag

You just agreed with me and don't even know it.


not at all
You said " federal government doesn't prohibit them from having"
the amendment does not say that

it says states have power not delegated to the United States by the Consitution
or prohibited by it to the States ---
"it" is in reference to the Constitution

Federal gov't and the US Constitution are not the same
you are confusing it

The Constitution was very specific on what the Federal gov't was to do
The Bill of Rights is what the states were prohibited from doing
in addition to what was given the US gov;t
for example- printing money

No he has everything straight. It's you who are confused.

thanks

it has always been concerning how so many think the Federal gov't and the bureaucracy
trump our US Constitution

Sad how some will dismiss it and belittle it
 
Break down the welfare recipients per capita per state.

The far right always ignores the individual and lumps populations all together as if they are the same, as if they are from the same set of cultural backgrounds.

The far right comrades have trouble seeing each and everyone of us as individuals.

The far right?

I guess that's why you're always on USMB talking about how Red states take up the most welfare?

People in glass houses.............
 
Break down the welfare recipients per capita per state.

The far right always ignores the individual and lumps populations all together as if they are the same, as if they are from the same set of cultural backgrounds.

The far right comrades have trouble seeing each and everyone of us as individuals.
The far right? I guess that's why you're always on USMB talking about how Red states take up the most welfare? People in glass houses.............
Fallacy of false equivalence, little buddy. You brought up the idea, and I pointed out the flaw.
 
wow
Our infrastructure is crumbling aka bridges, roads, etc. We have huge,huge untapped sources of labor that is not being utilized....we let this potential labor pool subsist on the dole and thus they are a drain on our economy aka parasites.

We could force these people to work...cleaning up streets, city parks, fighting mosquitoes,rats and cockroaches. They could be used in so many ways..yet they sit idle....drawing food stamps and other gubmint checks and they moonlight shoplifting, selling drugs and other sorts of criminal behavior...these are the thugs hanging out on the street corner...riding the subways and busses threatening and intimidating citizens.

If the socialist paradise of Venezuela can do it...why can't we?

Venezuela's new decree: Forced farm work for citizens

Work or starve mother fuckers. Nothing unconstitutional about that.


Sounds like North Korea. That is the liberterian belief for America!!!
 
Oh, the far right (not the GOPers) are indeed fascists and would love to put their enemies in forced labor slave camps.

No force at all. If you don't want to work for what we give you, then don't go on the program and get a job yourself.

Most Medicaid goes to children or the elderly. What jobs do you have for them?
most medicaid goes to children or the elderly because in the case of the children the parents are worthless fucks that dont care about the spawn they pop out and in the case of MOST elderly its because they never thought to plan for their later years.
Neither one should be considered my problem.
 
wow
Our infrastructure is crumbling aka bridges, roads, etc. We have huge,huge untapped sources of labor that is not being utilized....we let this potential labor pool subsist on the dole and thus they are a drain on our economy aka parasites.

We could force these people to work...cleaning up streets, city parks, fighting mosquitoes,rats and cockroaches. They could be used in so many ways..yet they sit idle....drawing food stamps and other gubmint checks and they moonlight shoplifting, selling drugs and other sorts of criminal behavior...these are the thugs hanging out on the street corner...riding the subways and busses threatening and intimidating citizens.

If the socialist paradise of Venezuela can do it...why can't we?

Venezuela's new decree: Forced farm work for citizens

Work or starve mother fuckers. Nothing unconstitutional about that.


Sounds like North Korea. That is the liberterian belief for America!!!

according to North Koreans, it is utopia
They just did a poll and it was 99.99% agreed

She sold me :)
probably because she nice looking

 
Socialism always end up with The People back in slave chains.


Yes, and socialism always leads to communism. The lazy love socialism because others will pay their way, which is where the left is taking us now. Eventually, that falls apart because one half gets tired of carrying the other half. That is when communism rears it's ugly head and the tyrants in government start telling people what they have to do.

In what countries has socialism led to Communism?

Cuba, the U.S.S.R.

Cuba went from a capitalistic dictatorship to Communism, by revolution.

Russia went from tsarist dictatorship to Communism, by revolution.

Socialism is Communism Lite
 
Socialism always end up with The People back in slave chains.


Yes, and socialism always leads to communism. The lazy love socialism because others will pay their way, which is where the left is taking us now. Eventually, that falls apart because one half gets tired of carrying the other half. That is when communism rears it's ugly head and the tyrants in government start telling people what they have to do.

In what countries has socialism led to Communism?

Cuba, the U.S.S.R.

Cuba went from a capitalistic dictatorship to Communism, by revolution.

Russia went from tsarist dictatorship to Communism, by revolution.

Socialism is Communism Lite

Lenin said:
The goal of socialism is communism.

Marx:
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.


explains a lot
today :)
 
Our infrastructure is crumbling aka bridges, roads, etc. We have huge,huge untapped sources of labor that is not being utilized....we let this potential labor pool subsist on the dole and thus they are a drain on our economy aka parasites.

We could force these people to work...cleaning up streets, city parks, fighting mosquitoes,rats and cockroaches. They could be used in so many ways..yet they sit idle....drawing food stamps and other gubmint checks and they moonlight shoplifting, selling drugs and other sorts of criminal behavior...these are the thugs hanging out on the street corner...riding the subways and busses threatening and intimidating citizens.

If the socialist paradise of Venezuela can do it...why can't we?

Venezuela's new decree: Forced farm work for citizens

Why use code to signal you're talking about black people when there are more whites than blacks on welfare?

:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:

This is the biggest problem of liberal democrats. The only thing they think about is race and they make assumptions on how others are thinking. First thing I thought of was my hometown which has an equal amount of black and white receiving govt assistance. Race never entered my mind. I am a conservative. Libs are the new KKK, trust me on this, the evidence is mounting everyday. In about 10 years it will be crystal clear to everyone.
 

Forum List

Back
Top