Amazon bans Holocaust denial books

I began reading "holocaust denial" literature ---PROBABLY BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.[...]
I was born in 1936, so that is not likely.

[...]

Holocaust denial literature dates back to the mid 1930s.
And what "holocaust" would that be referring to? The Armenian genocide? I don't believe anyone has ever denied that event took place.

I think you need to clarify exactly what you mean by "Holocaust."

I am fascinated that you ask me "when did the "HOLOCAUST" begin and that you allude to the Armenian genocide. The Armenian genocide began circa 1915. -----the HOLOCAUST began with Constantine---emperor of the
"HOLY" roman empire---the FIRST REICH 4th century AD ----he outlawed the riding of horses by non-CHRISTIANS. THE NUREMBURG code
 
If the holocash AKA holohoax was true, we'd be allowed to challenge it.

https://www.thejc.com/news/world/under-pressure-amazon-stops-selling-holocaust-denial-books-1.433963

march 8 2017 The online retailer Amazon has stopped selling three Holocaust-denial books after Jewish groups voiced growing frustration that the website was giving a platform to antisemites.

Amazon has been criticised for years over the revisionist titles for sale on its website, but the recent upsurge in antisemitism across America promoted Robert Rozett, a senior official at Yad Vashem, to write to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos last month calling for immediate action.

On Wednesday morning, the three titles that Mr Rozett had complained about were unavailable for purchase. Two were not showing up in searches, and one was listed but with a note saying that it was under review and could not be bought. This was the case for both US and UK stores.

Mr Rozett said the company had taken a “positive first step” which showed that they were listening to him and other Jewish groups that echoed his demand, such as the World Jewish Congress.
Now Amazon has joined the censorship brigade. Congratulations on your victory, dipshits.
 
Amazon only has authority to ban books from its sales catalog. It has in fact, a fiduciary responsibility to its investors and owners. If information is brought to attention that the sale of certain books will have a negative impact on overall sales, hence profits, it has an obligation to rectify that situation. Messages from a large faction of its clients objecting to Holocaust denial books indicated sales, hence profits, would be hindered if sales of those books continued. The decision to stop carrying those books is thus, justified for financial reasons.
The fact is Israel (Yad Vashem) is behind Amazon's decision: Israel urges Amazon to stop selling Holocaust denial books | Daily Mail Online

In other words, Israel is telling you that it doesn't want you to be reading books on this topic. So the point is not whether or not you wish to read any such books but rather how you feel about Israel deciding whether or not you have access to them.

How do you feel about it?
 
Amazon only has authority to ban books from its sales catalog. It has in fact, a fiduciary responsibility to its investors and owners. If information is brought to attention that the sale of certain books will have a negative impact on overall sales, hence profits, it has an obligation to rectify that situation. Messages from a large faction of its clients objecting to Holocaust denial books indicated sales, hence profits, would be hindered if sales of those books continued. The decision to stop carrying those books is thus, justified for financial reasons.
The fact is Israel (Yad Vashem) is behind Amazon's decision: Israel urges Amazon to stop selling Holocaust denial books | Daily Mail Online

In other words, Israel is telling you that it doesn't want you to be reading books on this topic. So the point is not whether or not you wish to read any such books but rather how you feel about Israel deciding whether or not you have access to them.

How do you feel about it?
I don't care if people who own or run Amazon want to listen to somebody from Israel, Denmark or anywhere else. Israel or Amazon does not decide what books I can obtain or read. They only have the right to decide what books I might buy from them. Other sources for books are just a click away.
 
“Should any member of the public find further offending works, please get in contact with us and we will report them using the appropriate channels.”

Just the start! They start with holohoax denial books I can only imagine what's next. Biographies of Hitler? Books critical of Israel or Jews? Books supportive of Palestine? I can only imagine.

In a 100 years, no one will see the word Palestinian, and if they do, they were horrible killers who tried to take over Israel.
A hundred years ago no one ever heard of a Palestinian either. So what's your point?

Yes there was a Palestine 2100 years ago, and before that the land of Canaan.
 
I began reading "holocaust denial" literature ---PROBABLY BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.[...]
I was born in 1936, so that is not likely.

[...]

Holocaust denial literature dates back to the mid 1930s.
And what "holocaust" would that be referring to? The Armenian genocide? I don't believe anyone has ever denied that event took place.

I think you need to clarify exactly what you mean by "Holocaust."

I am fascinated that you ask me "when did the "HOLOCAUST" begin and that you allude to the Armenian genocide. The Armenian genocide began circa 1915. -----the HOLOCAUST began with Constantine---emperor of the
"HOLY" roman empire---the FIRST REICH 4th century AD ----he outlawed the riding of horses by non-CHRISTIANS. THE NUREMBURG code


Too bad you guys had a civil war and Rome had to step in and install peace.
 
I would. They have the right to pick and choose what they sell.

BTW they are not banning the books. They just arent selling them at Amazon you dip shit.
Amazon has in fact banned all books on the topic of Holocaust Denial from its inventory.
Just as I figured...no one wants to fill us in as to WHY the 6 million MYTH was being pushed FORTY YEARS before ANYONE was found dead from disease etc in prison camps.

Alfa bank in Russia, Russian Ukraine Jew owned, Mikhail Fridman . Israel is just their headquarters, their reach is the world.
 
I don't care if people who own or run Amazon want to listen to somebody from Israel, Denmark or anywhere else. Israel or Amazon does not decide what books I can obtain or read. They only have the right to decide what books I might buy from them. Other sources for books are just a click away.

That won't last you fool. Soon you won't be able to buy holocaust denial books anywhere.
 
I began reading "holocaust denial" literature ---PROBABLY BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.[...]
I was born in 1936, so that is not likely.

[...]

Holocaust denial literature dates back to the mid 1930s.
And what "holocaust" would that be referring to? The Armenian genocide? I don't believe anyone has ever denied that event took place.

I think you need to clarify exactly what you mean by "Holocaust."

I am fascinated that you ask me "when did the "HOLOCAUST" begin and that you allude to the Armenian genocide. The Armenian genocide began circa 1915. -----the HOLOCAUST began with Constantine---emperor of the
"HOLY" roman empire---the FIRST REICH 4th century AD ----he outlawed the riding of horses by non-CHRISTIANS. THE NUREMBURG code


Too bad you guys had a civil war and Rome had to step in and install peace.
Uh huh.
 
I don't care if people who own or run Amazon want to listen to somebody from Israel, Denmark or anywhere else. Israel or Amazon does not decide what books I can obtain or read. They only have the right to decide what books I might buy from them. Other sources for books are just a click away.
For now.
 
That won't last you fool. Soon you won't be able to buy holocaust denial books anywhere.
The Holocaust Denial category of books has been around for well over half a century without a significant word of protest from any source. Suddenly, now, one of the world's most prominent booksellers has yielded to pressure from one of the most powerful entities in the Jewish world, Yad Vashem, in Israel. Why?

I believe this attack on the so-called "Holocaust Denial" book category is a deceptive effort to suppress one book. One book which cannot be included in the Holocaust Denial category -- because it does not attempt to deny that the so-called Holocaust took place.

This book is called, The Holocaust Industry. It is the work of Professor Norman Finkelstein, himself a Jew whose parents are Holocaust survivors. This book does not attempt to debunk or deny the existence of the Pogrom. Instead it seeks only to expose the vast fortunes which have been accumulated by exploiting this historical atrocity. In it the author explains in scholarly, erudite fashion how certain aspects of the Pogrom have been exaggerated, dramatized and fictionalized for the purpose of capitalizing on its emotional impact.

This is the book the anti-Holocaust Denial effort is aimed at. The following excerpt presents a much more substantive explanation of why. I promise it is very educational.


Professor Norman Finkelstein, himself a Jew, has caused a storm on both sides of the Atlantic and it is not hard to see why: he says the Holocaust has been exploited to extort cash, that most 'survivors' are bogus and that too much money is spent commemorating the Nazi genocide. In the first of two exclusive extracts he argues that it's time to shut down 'the holocaust industry.'

The Business of Death:
Excerpted from Norman Finkelstein's, The Holocaust Industry.
E-MAIL AUTHOR: [email protected]:
===================================


Both my father and mother were survivors of the Warsaw Ghetto and the Nazi concentration camps. Apart from my parents, every family member on both sides was exterminated by the Nazis. My earliest memory, so to speak, of the Nazi Holocaust is my mother glued in front of the television watching the trial of Adolf Eichmann (1961) when I came home from school. Although they had been liberated from the camps only 16 years before the trial, an unbridgeable abyss always separated, in my mind, the parents I knew from that. Photographs of my mother's family hung on the living-room wall. I could never quite make sense of my connection with them, let alone conceive what happened.

Apart from this phantom presence, I do not remember the Nazi Holocaust ever intruding on my childhood. I do not recall a single friend (or parent of a friend) asking a single question about what my mother and father endured. This was not a respectful silence. It was indifference. In this light, one cannot but be skeptical of the outpourings of anguish in later decades, after the Holocaust industry was firmly established.

I sometimes think that American Jewry 'discovering' the Nazi Holocaust was worse than its having been forgotten. True, my parents brooded in private; the suffering they endured was not publicly validated. But wasn't that better than the current crass exploitation of Jewish martyrdom? Before the Nazi Holocaust became the Holocaust, only a few scholarly studies (by Raul
Hilberg, Viktor Frankl and Ella Lingens-Reiner) were published on the subject.

But this small collection of gems is better than the shelves upon shelves of shlock that now line libraries and bookstores. Both my parents, although daily reliving that past until the day each died, lost interest by the end of their lives in the Holocaust as a public spectacle. One of my father's lifelong friends was a former inmate with him in Auschwitz, a seemingly incorruptible leftwing idealist who on principle refused German compensation after the war.

Eventually he became a director of the Israeli Holocaust museum Yad Vashem. Reluctantly and with genuine disappointment, my father finally admitted that even this man had been corrupted by the Holocaust industry, tailoring his beliefs for power and profit. As the rendering of the Holocaust assumed ever more absurd forms, my mother liked to quote (with intentional irony) Henry Ford: 'History is bunk'. The tales of 'Holocaust survivors' all concentration camp inmates, all heroes of the resistance were a special source of wry amusement in my home.

My parents often wondered why I would grow so indignant at the falsification and exploitation of the Nazi genocide. The most obvious answer is that it has been used to justify criminal policies of the Israeli state and US support for these policies. There is a personal motive as well. I do care about the memory of my family's persecution. The current campaign of the Holocaust industry to extort money from Europe in the name of 'needy Holocaust victims' has shrunk the moral stature of their martyrdom to that of a Monte Carlo casino.

The Holocaust only emerged in American life after Israel's victory in the 1967 Six Day war against its Arab neighbours. [Since then] too many public and private resources have been invested in memorialising the Nazi genocide. Most of the output is worthless, a tribute not to Jewish suffering but to Jewish aggrandisement.

The Holocaust has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon. Through its deployment, one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a 'victim' state, and the most successful ethnic group in the US has likewise acquired victim status. Considerable dividends accrue from this specious victimhood in particular, immunity to criticism, however justified.

The time is long past to open our hearts to the rest of humanity's sufferings. This was the main lesson my mother imparted. I never once heard her say: 'Do not compare.' My mother always compared. In the face of the sufferings of African-Americans, Vietnamese and Palestinians, my mother's credo always was: 'We are all holocaust victims.'

The term 'Holocaust survivor' originally designated those who suffered the unique trauma of the Jewish ghettos, concentration camps and slave labour camps, often in sequence. The figure for these Holocaust survivors at war's end is generally put at some 100,000. The number of living survivors cannot be more than a quarter of this figure now.

Because enduring the camps became a crown of martyrdom, many Jews who spent the war elsewhere represented themselves as camp survivors. Another strong motive behind this misrepresentation, however, was material. The postwar German government provided compensation to Jews who had been in ghettos or camps. Many Jews fabricated their pasts to meet this eligibility requirement. 'If everyone who claims to be a survivor actually is one,' my mother used toe exclaim, 'who did Hitler kill?'

Even within the Holocaust industry, Deborah Lipstadt, for example, wryly observes that Holocaust survivors frequently maintain they were personally examined by Josef Mengele at Auschwitz. Because survivors are now revered as secular saints, one doesn't dare question them. Preposterous statements pass without comment. Elie Wiesel reminisces in his acclaimed memoir that, recently liberated from Buchenwald and only 18 years old, 'I read the Critique of Pure Reason don't laugh! in Yiddish.' Leaving aside Wiesel's acknowledgment that at the time 'I was wholly ignorant of Yiddish grammar,' The Critique of Pure Reason was never translated into Yiddish. 'The truth I present is unvarnished,' Wiesel sighs, 'I cannot do otherwise.'

In recent years, 'Holocaust survivor' has been redefined to designate not only those who endured but also those who managed to evade the Nazis. One contributor to a Holocaust website maintained that, although he spent the war in Tel Aviv, he was a Holocaust survivor because his grandmother died in Auschwitz.

According to Israel Gutman, a former inmate of Auschwitz, director of Yad Vashem and a Holocaust lecturer at Hebrew University, 'it's not that important' whether Binjamin Wilkomirski's [now discredited 'autobiographical' account of childhood in the camps], Fragments, is a fraud. 'Wilkomirski has written a story which he has experienced deeply; that's for sure . . . He is not a fake. He is someone who lives this story very deeply in his soul.' So it doesn't matter whether he spent the war in a concentration camp or a Swiss chalet; Wilkomirski is a Holocaust survivor because 'his pain is authentic.'

The Israeli prime minister's office recently put the number of 'living Holocaust survivors' at nearly a million. The main motive behind this inflationary revision is again not hard to find. It is difficult to press massive new claims for reparations if only a handful of Holocaust survivors are still alive.

In the early 1950s, Germany entered into negotiations with Jewish institutions and signed indemnification agreements. It has paid out to date some Dollars 60bn. The German government also negotiated a financial settlement with the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, an umbrella of major Jewish organisations including the American Jewish Committee, American Jewish Congress, B'nai B'rith, the Joint Distribution Committee. The claims conference was supposed to use the monies, Dollars 10m annually for 12 years, or about a billion dollars in current values, for Jewish victims of Nazi persecution who had fallen through the cracks in the compensation process.

My mother was a case in point. A survivor of the Warsaw Ghetto, Majdanek concentration camp and slave labour camps at Czestochowa and Skarszysko-Kamiena, she received only Dollars 3,500 in compensation from the German government. Other Jewish victims (and many who in fact were not victims), however, received lifetime pensions from Germany, eventually totalling hundreds of thousands of dollars.

In a flagrant breach of its letter and spirit, the conference earmarked the monies not for the rehabilitation of Jewish victims who had received minimal compensation but for the rehabilitation of Jewish 'communities'. Indeed, a guiding principle of the claims conference prohibited use of monies for 'direct allocations to
individuals'.

In a classic instance of looking after one's own, however, the conference provided exemptions for two categories of victims: rabbis and 'outstanding Jewish leaders' received individual payments. As the conference came under attack from defrauded Jews, Rabbi Arthur Hertzberg cast a plague on both sides, sneering that: 'It's not about justice, it's a fight for money.' When Germans or Swiss refuse to pay compensation, the heavens cannot contain the righteous indignation of organised American Jewry. But when Jewish elites rob Jewish survivors, no ethical issues arise: it's just about money.

Others involved in the reparations process have also done well. The reported annual salary of Saul Kagan, long-time executive secretary of the claims conference, is Dollars 105,000. Kagan rings up in 12 days what my mother received for suffering six years of Nazi persecution.

In recent years, the Holocaust industry has become an outright extortion racket. Purporting to represent all of world Jewry, living and dead, it is laying claim to Holocaust-era Jewish assets throughout Europe. Fittingly dubbed the 'last chapter of the Holocaust', this double shakedown of European countries as well as legitimate Jewish claimants first targeted Switzerland. [After a protracted campaign which enlisted the American political establishment] the Swiss finally caved in 1998 and agreed to pay Dollars 1.25bn. 'The aim . . .' a Swiss bank's press release read, 'is to avert the threat of sanctions as well as long and costly court proceedings.'

Its solicitude for 'needy Holocaust survivors' notwithstanding, the World Jewish Congress wants nearly half the Swiss monies earmarked for Jewish organisations and 'Holocaust education'. The Simon Wiesenthal Centre maintains that if 'worthy' Jewish organisations receive monies, 'a portion should go to Jewish educational centres'. As they 'angle' for a bigger share of the loot, reform and orthodox organisations each claim that the 6m dead would have preferred their branch of Judaism as financial beneficiary.

Meanwhile, the Holocaust industry forced Switzerland into a settlement because time was allegedly of the essence: 'Needy Holocaust survivors are dying every day.' Once the Swiss signed away the money, however, the urgency miraculously passed. More than a year after the settlement was reached there was still no distribution plan.

By the time the money is finally divvied out, all the 'needy Holocaust survivors' will probably be dead. In fact, by last December, less than half of the Dollars 200m 'Special Fund for Needy Victims of the Holocaust' established in February 1997 had been distributed to actual victims. After lawyers' fees have been paid, [total attorney fee demands for the case run to Dollars 15m] the Swiss monies will then flow into the coffers of 'worthy' Jewish organisations.

The staggering dimensions of Hitler's Final Solution are by now well known. And isn't the 'normal' history of humankind replete with horrifying chapters of inhumanity? A crime need not be aberrant to warrant atonement. The challenge today is to restore the Nazi Holocaust as a rational subject of inquiry. Only then can we really learn from it. The abnormality of the Nazi Holocaust springs not from the event itself but from the exploitative industry that has grown up around it.

The Holocaust industry has always been bankrupt. What remains is to openly declare it so. The time is long past to put it out of business. The noblest gesture for those who perished is to preserve their memory, learn from their suffering and let them, finally, rest in peace.

The Holocaust Industry, by Norman G Finkelstein, (Verso, pounds 16), is available from the Guardian Cultureshop at the reduced price of pounds 13 + 99p UK postage. 0800 316 6102.
 
Last edited:
I am fascinated that you ask me "when did the "HOLOCAUST" begin and that you allude to the Armenian genocide. The Armenian genocide began circa 1915. -----the HOLOCAUST began with Constantine---emperor of the
"HOLY" roman empire---the FIRST REICH 4th century AD ----he outlawed the riding of horses by non-CHRISTIANS. THE NUREMBURG code
Don't be fascinated. Just explain how you managed to read about the "Holocaust" in the mid-1930s when the Wannsee Conference (re: the Final Solution) didn't take place until 1941. In fact, the term, Holocaust, used in reference to the Nazi effort to exterminate the Jews, was not used until 1946, when it appeared in a New York Times article. Before then the Nazi effort was called the "Final Solution" or "The New Pogrom."
 
I am fascinated that you ask me "when did the "HOLOCAUST" begin and that you allude to the Armenian genocide. The Armenian genocide began circa 1915. -----the HOLOCAUST began with Constantine---emperor of the
"HOLY" roman empire---the FIRST REICH 4th century AD ----he outlawed the riding of horses by non-CHRISTIANS. THE NUREMBURG code
Don't be fascinated. Just explain how you managed to read about the "Holocaust" in the mid-1930s when the Wannsee Conference (re: the Final Solution) didn't take place until 1941. In fact, the term, Holocaust, used in reference to the Nazi effort to exterminate the Jews, was not used until 1946, when it appeared in a New York Times article. Before then the Nazi effort was called the "Final Solution" or "The New Pogrom."

so typical -----you are quibbling over semantics. The Nuremburg laws
were enacted in Germany in 1935------the laws that you advocate that
rendered genocide of jews in Germany LEGAL------your "god" adolf----explained his agenda in your bible "mein Kampf" in 1925. ---by the mid-
1930s there were jews ----in concentration camps------to the delight of
your kith and kin. My mother was 16 in 1936------even back then her father
KNEW----what was happening to his brothers in your VATERLAND. Your
literature promulgated in the USA in 1939 declared anyone who complained
about those facts were "JEWISH WAR MONGERS"-
 
“Should any member of the public find further offending works, please get in contact with us and we will report them using the appropriate channels.”

Just the start! They start with holohoax denial books I can only imagine what's next. Biographies of Hitler? Books critical of Israel or Jews? Books supportive of Palestine? I can only imagine.

In a 100 years, no one will see the word Palestinian, and if they do, they were horrible killers who tried to take over Israel.
A hundred years ago no one ever heard of a Palestinian either. So what's your point?

Yes there was a Palestine 2100 years ago, and before that the land of Canaan.

the term CANAAN refers to a mass of land------something like the term
ANTARCTICA refers to a mass of land. "Palestine" is a word used
by Herodotus to refer to the mass of land which later came
to be known as the Levant. The Roman empire builders (the ones that
also enslaved the Slavic people and the Britons and all of Gaul) decided to
refer to the lands Judea and Israel as "Palestina". You should learn some history, penny dear. Simple semantics has you all tied up in a
knot
 
I began reading "holocaust denial" literature ---PROBABLY BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.[...]
I was born in 1936, so that is not likely.

[...]

Holocaust denial literature dates back to the mid 1930s.
And what "holocaust" would that be referring to? The Armenian genocide? I don't believe anyone has ever denied that event took place.

I think you need to clarify exactly what you mean by "Holocaust."

I am fascinated that you ask me "when did the "HOLOCAUST" begin and that you allude to the Armenian genocide. The Armenian genocide began circa 1915. -----the HOLOCAUST began with Constantine---emperor of the
"HOLY" roman empire---the FIRST REICH 4th century AD ----he outlawed the riding of horses by non-CHRISTIANS. THE NUREMBURG code


Too bad you guys had a civil war and Rome had to step in and install peace.
Uh huh.

Penny learned history from her catechism nun. ------the one who also told
her that "the vestal virgins" were virgins
 
We really need to stop fighting for the jews, remember the Germans were mainly evangelicals and the Americans at that time were Christians. Now we are giving Israel 3.8 billion a year and they pretty much broke Germany. The top foreign language in Israel is Russian, and a jew owned Alpha Bank of Russia (3 jews). The pandering to the jews needs to stop, I suspect Donald's kids married jews due to arrangement, and same with Hillary's dtr. Not saying they do not love each other , but I can hear it now, why not marry a nice Jew, since ZOG is alive and doing well in Washington.

Whenever the EU speaks up about Jews and Palestinians they get badmouthed. France has a very active JDL there.
 
We really need to stop fighting for the jews,

how nice-----penny has joined a "fight for da joooos" organization.
You got a name for your club, penny dear?


remember the Germans were mainly evangelicals and the Americans at that time were Christians.

?? evangelicals? Adolf was a catholic----and MOST of his top
murder gang were catholics------Eichmann was one of the very few
protestants. Lutheranism is a biggy in Germany---but there are
other Christian sects and lots of muslims now



Now we are giving Israel 3.8 billion a year and they pretty much broke Germany.

Germany got broke?--------when? who is "we" in that sentence?


The top foreign language in Israel is Russian,

just a guess-----I would guess that the "top foreign language" in
the USA is Spanish -----so??? Used to be in ENGLAND----
just about everyone who was anyone spoke French---same in
old time Russia -----so? I have never met an Israeli who did
not speak Hebrew. An interesting factoid------even jews who fled
Russia seemed to have studied Hebrew on the sly. During the
communist reign the filthy eastern orthos (a sect of Catholicism)
outlawed the learning of Hebrew-----the jews did it on the sly


and a jew owned Alpha Bank of Russia (3 jews).

really??? I did not know. so?


The pandering to the jews needs to stop,

what pandering??-----you and your gang are "panderers" penny?
does the town sheriff know?


I suspect Donald's kids married jews due to arrangement, and same with Hillary's dtr. Not saying they do not love each other , but I can hear it now, why not marry a nice Jew, since ZOG is alive and doing well in Washington.

I can hear it now------'" c'mon penny------ya got five more clients
waiting----' "" 'this is an "entertainment club"----not a nursery.
when you grow up you can run your own brothel"


Whenever the EU speaks up about Jews and Palestinians they get badmouthed. France has a very active JDL there.

The EU "spoke up"??? in what language? what did the "EU"
say? Would be wonderful if France had an active JDL-----lots
of people being murdered by those who penny calls "we"
 
I believe this attack on the so-called "Holocaust Denial" book category is a deceptive effort to suppress one book. One book which cannot be included in the Holocaust Denial category -- because it does not attempt to deny that the so-called Holocaust took place.

This book is called, The Holocaust Industry. It is the work of Professor Norman Finkelstein, himself a Jew whose parents are Holocaust survivors. This book does not attempt to debunk or deny the existence of the Pogrom. Instead it seeks only to expose the vast fortunes which have been accumulated by exploiting this historical atrocity. In it the author explains in scholarly, erudite fashion how certain aspects of the Pogrom have been exaggerated, dramatized and fictionalized for the purpose of capitalizing on its emotional impact.

.

I read that book years ago. No question the holocaust has been a cash cow for jewish organizations. They say they give the money to H-survivors but they don't.
 
I believe this attack on the so-called "Holocaust Denial" book category is a deceptive effort to suppress one book. One book which cannot be included in the Holocaust Denial category -- because it does not attempt to deny that the so-called Holocaust took place.

This book is called, The Holocaust Industry. It is the work of Professor Norman Finkelstein, himself a Jew whose parents are Holocaust survivors. This book does not attempt to debunk or deny the existence of the Pogrom. Instead it seeks only to expose the vast fortunes which have been accumulated by exploiting this historical atrocity. In it the author explains in scholarly, erudite fashion how certain aspects of the Pogrom have been exaggerated, dramatized and fictionalized for the purpose of capitalizing on its emotional impact.

.

I read that book years ago. No question the holocaust has been a cash cow for jewish organizations. They say they give the money to H-survivors but they don't.

You read a book and got convinced of something? can you name some of the "organizations" to which you refer?
 

Forum List

Back
Top