Amateur psychiatry in today's politics. Who's really crazy?

The reader is reminded that easyt65 is insane.
Thank you for the demonstration of how when snowflakes find themselves getting their ass cut / losing, their only desperate last resort is to scream out about how the one kicking their ass is 'insane'.

:p

Insane is apt, it describes you and your posts accurately. Of course your posts are simply echoes of far right propaganda, racists' propaganda and and Trump himself. But, sane people see the lies, and the insane broadcast them for they believe them to be true.
 
Insane is apt, it describes you and your posts accurately.
Snowflakes refused to accept the President is elected through the Electoral College.
Snowflakes demanded Hillary be made the winner due to the insignificant 'popularity contest' outcome

When they did not get their way...
Snowflakes threatened the lives of Electoral College Voters
Snowflakes seditiously called for military coups
Snowflakes called for assassinations
Snowflakes TRIED TO CARRY OUT ASSASSINATIONS
Snowflakes Began the Non-Crime Witch Hunt
Snowflakes Exposed Liberal / Obama Crimes
Snowflakes have been UNABLE to produce any evidence...against Trump

Obama and his administration has been exposed for committing crimes
The FBI has been exposed as being criminally seditious
The DOJ has been exposed as having been criminally seditious
Hillary, the DNC, and Obama have been exposed as having committed crimes
Hillary's 2 aides and her IT tech have been exposed as having committed Lying to the FBI

Hillary is again under two FBI investigations based on exposed FBI evidence
Abedin, Mills, and Hillary's IT Tech face possible indictment
Mueller's part in the Uranium One deal, hiding Russian crimes, is under investigation
Obama's/Hillary's illegal buying/using the Russian Dossier is under investigation
Steele has been referred to the DOJ for Indictment

Snowflakes still refuse to acknowledge the reality that Trump beat Hillary for the Presidency...proving Hillary to be accurate when she declared...

upload_2018-1-8_9-54-50.jpeg


And in the face of all this evidence of both DNC crimes and GOP / Trump success all the snowflakes can do now it to try screaming 'Trump is nuts'.

Bwuhahahaha.....


Between Obama / Hillary working with / for terrorists, Hezbollah, the4 Russians, Iran, Mexican Drug Cartels, etc...and snowflakes who defen them, the US is 'under siege by domestic enemies of the state'.
 
Insane is apt, it describes you and your posts accurately.
Snowflakes refused to accept the President is elected through the Electoral College.
Snowflakes demanded Hillary be made the winner due to the insignificant 'popularity contest' outcome

When they did not get their way...
Snowflakes threatened the lives of Electoral College Voters
Snowflakes seditiously called for military coups
Snowflakes called for assassinations
Snowflakes TRIED TO CARRY OUT ASSASSINATIONS
Snowflakes Began the Non-Crime Witch Hunt
Snowflakes Exposed Liberal / Obama Crimes
Snowflakes have been UNABLE to produce any evidence...against Trump

Obama and his administration has been exposed for committing crimes
The FBI has been exposed as being criminally seditious
The DOJ has been exposed as having been criminally seditious
Hillary, the DNC, and Obama have been exposed as having committed crimes
Hillary's 2 aides and her IT tech have been exposed as having committed Lying to the FBI

Hillary is again under two FBI investigations based on exposed FBI evidence
Abedin, Mills, and Hillary's IT Tech face possible indictment
Mueller's part in the Uranium One deal, hiding Russian crimes, is under investigation
Obama's/Hillary's illegal buying/using the Russian Dossier is under investigation
Steele has been referred to the DOJ for Indictment

Snowflakes still refuse to acknowledge the reality that Trump beat Hillary for the Presidency...proving Hillary to be accurate when she declared...

View attachment 170518


And in the face of all this evidence of both DNC crimes and GOP / Trump success all the snowflakes can do now it to try screaming 'Trump is nuts'.

Bwuhahahaha.....


Between Obama / Hillary working with / for terrorists, Hezbollah, the4 Russians, Iran, Mexican Drug Cartels, etc...and snowflakes who defen them, the US is 'under siege by domestic enemies of the state'.

A rant ^^^ which offers more evidence that easyt65 is out of touch with reality.
 
A rant ^^^ which offers more evidence that easyt65 is out of touch with reality.
Thank you again for that demonstration that in the face of reality / fact, in the midst of getting your ass kicked, desperate snowflakes are left with their only option being to scream, 'They're insane' instead of trying (and failing) to offer up any evidence to counter the facts with which they have been presented.

WC, thanks for expertly continuing to prove my point. You're the best. :p
 
A rant ^^^ which offers more evidence that easyt65 is out of touch with reality.
Thank you again for that demonstration that in the face of reality / fact, in the midst of getting your ass kicked, desperate snowflakes are left with their only option being to scream, 'They're insane' instead of trying (and failing) to offer up any evidence to counter the facts with which they have been presented.

WC, thanks for expertly continuing to prove my point. You're the best. :p
Trump, king snowflake, has no facts. Lies every day.
 
A rigid inability to face an election that was lost and let it go is stark proof of an illness that has progressed to psychosis.
Are you saying Tea Party/Birther crowd are psychotic?

Its funny liberals lost the House, Senate, and White House a trifecta of FAIL :eusa_dance:
They won congressional and senate seats in 2016. Your hubris is so epic.

They lost 4 congressional elections in a row AFTER Trump won :laugh: They tried to purchase 1 seat for $50 million and still lost. :laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
Yea...That's right libtard...

Your polls had hillary with a 90% chance of winning..

Later dip shit.

and she did until comet's little announcement ten days before the election.

but then again, you're too stupid to understand that. so no worries.

you should also probably learn a little something about statistics and how they work. but no worries, we know you're too stupid for that too.



You are the stupid one..

You got your ass stomped with your made

up statistics. Everyone already knew Crooked

hillary destroyed her emails while they were

under subpoena...

All your lame excuses prove your stupidity..

Later Dumb Ass....
The deleted emails were not all under subpoena; the vast majority were not. And the ones that seemed to be work related were not relevant, and deemed by the investigators. But a guy like you can just craft his own little fantasyland, where all the facts he likes are facts, and the ones he doesnt like are lies that everyone has invented just to avoid your brilliant theories. Embarrassing.

liberal liar....

How would you know they were not relevant?

Please enlighten us...
Because the investigative team told us so. And you dont like that fact, so you call it a lie. You act like a toddler.


You are full of shit liar...
 
Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung notwithstanding, the impact of their influence has been long supplanted by the emergence of psychotropic drugs in the 1950’s and 60’s. Recalcitrant schoolchildren are now chemically controlled like zoo animals and modern professional psychiatry has been in a credibility holding pattern for many decades.

Conversely amateur psychiatry is not only ubiquitous, it is rampant. Nowhere is this more evident than in contemporary politics and mass media. The president has come under fire in recent weeks from bush league psychiatry in the press and the political arena that has a nearly hysterical aspect to it.

Surprisingly a lot of jack leg psychiatry is being practiced by trained psychiatrists who are chiming in on the mental health of a president they have not examined or even met. This isn’t new. In 1964 When Barry Goldwater was running for president against Lyndon Johnson, Fact Magazine published a poll of nearly 1200 psychiatrists saying that Goldwater was psychologically unfit to lead the country. Not one of them had ever personally examined Goldwater.

Goldwater lost in a landslide and filed a winning suit against the magazine. This gave rise to section 7 of the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Principles of Medical Ethics, better known as the “Goldwater Rule” stating that is unethical to make a clinical diagnosis or give a professional opinion without personally examining the patient.

Ethics, medical or otherwise, have been in short supply in our society and today they are apparently seen as optional, replaced by winning at all costs. Armchair psychoanalysis of a president is going to be on the table because the desperation of the losing side is as bottomless as it is intense.

Everything they had hoped for, all their dreams and the fundamental construct of their dearly held worldview came under threat when the president got elected. This drove them over the edge and they lost their sanity. This of course is an amateur psychiatric diagnosis but it’s as good as any.

They will not civilly and sanely step aside and accept reality. They will stop at nothing short of impeachment. Everything in their delusional toolbox is a weapon to dismantle the windmill of Donald Trump. Trump has gone from an object of their hatred to a suicidal fetish.

A rigid inability to face an election that was lost and let it go is stark proof of an illness that has progressed to psychosis.

'There is more to the 5-axis diagnosis than a personal interview, and it is my understanding that the "Goldwater rule" is not the be all end all of the process.

For the record, Trump is the President of the United States. However he did not win the popular vote and his behavior during the first year of his presidency is problematic.

Donald Trump's Windmill, is mostly hot air. It changes, sometimes hourly, and even if he is consistent in a message, his handlers spin the mill to make it seem to be sane. It is not by any stretch of the imagination sane.

The evidence that he is a least a bubble off center, is obvious in his tweets, in his speeches and in his denial of things obvious to most citizens.

I give the same advice to you, get a copy of DSM5. It provides definitions which give a clue as to the mental health of the President, and people you know well and only socially. It is estimated that nearly 50% of the population have or will have a diagnosed mental issue in their lifetime. However, only a very few have the power that does Trump.

..."some psychiatrists and other mental-health professionals are shedding long-held norms to argue that Trump’s condition presents risks to the nation and the world. “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump” features more than two dozen essays breaking down the president’s perceived traits, which the contributors find consistent with symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder, sociopathy and other maladies."
Review | Is Trump mentally ill? Or is America? Psychiatrists weigh in.


What a load of chicken little bull shit....

There is no doubt hillary would have destroyed

our Country.

Thank God for President Donald J. Trump...
So you like what Trump’s doing with weakening consumer protections, letting Big Coal pollute with immunity and replacing scientists at the EPA with fossil fuel executives?
Hillary would have done the exact opposite.


hillary would have drove us in the ground

just like obama.......

Can you say President Donald J. Trump..

Come on, I know you can..........
 
Trump is not crazy, he is a stable genius.

he rarely follows a script, instead taking a concept and improvising to fill the role. in politics and TV, Trump instantly spots a good idea, through a combination of intuition and bravado, and then improvise with consistently successful results.
 
The unhinged left wants this to become a debate about made-up attacks against Trump rather than the Trump’s successes and the success of the country

This is a pretty pathetic move.
 
Trump's ASSOCIATES are being forced to play the part of Mueller's 'Scooter Libby's, attempted justifications of a failed witch hunt.

Okay, buddy, you keep telling yourself that...

But even Bannon thinks Trump is going down for this.

Most presidents are narcissists. Remember Obama and the day the earth began to heal? Narcissism is bound to be common among people who feel qualified to try their hand at running the free world in the first place.

Obama didn't put his name in 20 foot letters on everything and claim it was all about him like Trump does.

And seriously, how about addressing Trump instead of sputtering, "but, but, but... Obama!"

In all fairness, Obama never built anything that could hold his name in 20 foot letters. He's also not as extroverted or dominating as Trump. That doesn't mean he's less narcissistic, just less likely to be so loud about it.

And seriously, I did address Trump, and I agreed that he is an obvious narcissist. I mentioned Obama as another example of a narcissistic president in order to make the point that the vast majority of them are, including the ones that you never argued should be impeached based on narcissism. The point is, I'm not a fan of narcissists, but if they can't be allowed to hold the office of president, we should just eliminate the entire concept of a single person holding executive power over the country, because that office is primarily going to draw narcissists.
 
In all fairness, Obama never built anything that could hold his name in 20 foot letters. He's also not as extroverted or dominating as Trump.

Trump never built anything either. Those were Polish workers he cheated out of wages.
In all fairness, Obama never built anything that could hold his name in 20 foot letters. He's also not as extroverted or dominating as Trump.

Trump never built anything either. Those were Polish workers he cheated out of wages.

Lol. Labor worshipper, huh? Without the guy putting the project together, purchasing the plot of land, purchasing the materials and paying for the machinery, those Poles would've had nothing to build.

Cheating them out of wages is horrific, but a different conversation altogether.
 
Lol. Labor worshipper, huh? Without the guy putting the project together, purchasing the plot of land, purchasing the materials and paying for the machinery, those Poles would've had nothing to build.

Sure they could have. If they had the rich paying their fair share and infrastructure programs like most other civilized societies, they have built schools and roads and things that benefitted everyone instead of a gaudy hotel that only benefits a few rich people.

The Capitalist is a parasite that has convinced you he's a vital organ.
 
Lol. Labor worshipper, huh? Without the guy putting the project together, purchasing the plot of land, purchasing the materials and paying for the machinery, those Poles would've had nothing to build.

Sure they could have. If they had the rich paying their fair share and infrastructure programs like most other civilized societies, they have built schools and roads and things that benefitted everyone instead of a gaudy hotel that only benefits a few rich people.

The Capitalist is a parasite that has convinced you he's a vital organ.

Lol. "Someone else could have built it!"

But they didn't.

And hotels serve a function, like it or not. I'm pretty sure that the hundreds of people employed by these places aren't all rich. I grew up in Hawaii, my mother worked in the hotel industry for most of my childhood. She wasn't anywhere in the vicinity of rich, but earned enough of a living to raise 2 kids. In my lifetime, I've met a lot of people who work in the hotel industry, none of them rich. Never met a rich porter. Never met a rich hotel maid. Never met a rich front desk clerk or any rich folks working in reservations alongside my mom. Not rich, and yet they benefitted from the existence of fancy hotels.

The thing about hotels is that they facilitate tourism, which boosts the entire economy of the tourist destination. Moreover, the especially big, fancy, "only benefitting the rich" hotels do more than that. They actually encourage tourism by being a draw in and of themselves. That means that these big Trump hotels, aside from the rich folks on their boards, benefit the tourists themselves, many of whom aren't rich, but simply people who save up for years at a time so that they can take their families somewhere nice, but these fancy hotels also benefit surrounding restaurants and shops, as well as creating the opportunity for small businesses such as souvenir sellers, tour guides, performers and artists of various sorts. If you think hotels only benefit a few rich people, you don't even understand BASIC economics, let alone the macroeconomic ideas that you're trying to pedal at me.

Also, I don't know if you noticed, but the US has built infrastructure. We've collected tax dollars to build lots of roads and schools, despite the fact that rich capitalists build hotels in this country. Apparently, these things aren't mutually exclusive. Imagine that! Even more mind blowing is that, in those other civilized societies that you're touting, there are hotels! Holy shit! Even the "enlightened" folks in places where, apparently, government builds everything better than what we do here in the US, they still have buildings that only benefit a few rich people! You'd think they'd know better!

Sorry, JoeB, but that response. . . I think you might actually be retarded.
 
Last edited:
Lol. "Someone else could have built it!"

But they didn't.

No, someone else would have built something practical, that didn't go bankrupt a couple years later leaving investors holding the bag.... so you have a point there.

Also, I don't know if you noticed, but the US has built infrastructure. We've collected tax dollars to build lots of roads and schools, despite the fact that rich capitalists build hotels in this country.

Yes, we did. And then we got this truly retarded notion that if we give tax giveaways to the rich, they'll do great things with it.

So they built casinos and bullshit like that, and our schools and bridges are crumbling.

America's Infrastructure Ranks... 25th In The World
 
Lol. "Someone else could have built it!"

But they didn't.

No, someone else would have built something practical, that didn't go bankrupt a couple years later leaving investors holding the bag.... so you have a point there.

Also, I don't know if you noticed, but the US has built infrastructure. We've collected tax dollars to build lots of roads and schools, despite the fact that rich capitalists build hotels in this country.

Yes, we did. And then we got this truly retarded notion that if we give tax giveaways to the rich, they'll do great things with it.

So they built casinos and bullshit like that, and our schools and bridges are crumbling.

America's Infrastructure Ranks... 25th In The World

Yeah, because all of Trump's hotels go bankrupt, and building a hotel isn't practical in the first place. Do you even read the shit you type?

And "we give tax giveaways to the rich"? You mean, letting them keep the money that they acquire? So, when a rich person does something to acquire money, that money is partially yours, and so letting them keep it is the same as you, along with "society", "giving" it to them? You have an interesting take on ownership and causation, comrade.

So, only things that you consider necessary should be built, and not these expensive businesses that are based only around leisure? Got it. Schools, municipal structures, habitation pods, and turnip farms. And we all own them, like public property. But unlike how everybody never gave a shit about public property before and people tended to mistreat it, this time everybody will actually put their best into that public property because they'll be doing it in the name of everybody having enough turnips and a free education, which is guaranteed to motivate the proletariat. And we will revel in our abundance of necessities! Glory to the worker!
 
Yeah, because all of Trump's hotels go bankrupt, and building a hotel isn't practical in the first place. Do you even read the shit you type?

And "we give tax giveaways to the rich"? You mean, letting them keep the money that they acquire?

No, guy, the rich don't "acquire' money, they steal it from the people who do the actual work.

When the poor steal, it's called crime.
When the rich steal, it's called profits.

But unlike how everybody never gave a shit about public property before and people tended to mistreat it, this time everybody will actually put their best into that public property because they'll be doing it in the name of everybody having enough turnips and a free education, which is guaranteed to motivate the proletariat. And we will revel in our abundance of necessities! Glory to the worker!

Where I'm at, our public parks are very nice. So are our schools and libraries.
 

Forum List

Back
Top