AM Joy destroys Uranium One Conspiracy Theory

It is so nice to be a democrat who got paid $500,000 for a speech in Russia. Was given $150,000,000 to your Clinton Crime Foundation by a Russian firm, just so you didn't get favors of Uranium that would eventually end up in Iran...

View attachment 158131

But none of them approved the deal. 9 members of Cifus approved it and even said they' do the deal today if they could.

Sorry, you got nothing but conflation.
Like I said, must be nice to be a RICH, liberal elite politicians whose constituents allow to get away with everything, even murder....

View attachment 158142

It was voted on and approved by 9 other people who aren't named Clinton. Sorry, you lose and rely on silly pics as a debate tactic.
I bet if they didn't vote for it, they would suddenly commit suicide and you would sit there and say, so what if all nine committed suicide.

I bet that your bullshit bet doesn't change facts and you have nothing but assaination fantasies as a reasonable back up...lol
Your chances of surviving if you are to testify against a Clinton. Isn't very good.
 
Watch MSNBC’s Joy Reid Expertly Debunk Lies Around Uranium-Clinton Story

Reid: Who got the money when the Canadian company was sold to the Russian company? The Uranium One? Who received the money?

Kerns: I presume the company.
Reid: Yes. Okay, second question. Who approved the sale?

Kerns: Yes. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
Reid: How many people sit on the committee?

Kerns: Nine members.

Reid: How many have to approve a deal like this?

Kerns: All nine of them.

Reid: All nine.

Kerns: Absolutely.

Reid: How many approved this deal?

Kerns: All nine of them.

Reid: Who is the person who donated to Hillary Clinton who is related to and had an investment in uranium one? What is that person's name? Do you remember their name?

Kerns: They are board members of Uranium One donated up to $143 million I think to the Clinton Foundation.

Reid: Did he own any assets in Uranium One at the time Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State?

Kerns: You know, I don't know that, but here's what I would...

Reid: He did not. Sold them.

Kerns: Here's what i would like to know…

Reid: He sold them years before. So what you're talking about is a deal that nine members of CFIUS approved unanimously. None of them was Hillary Clinton. You have a donor who separately gave Hillary Clinton donations at a time when she was not Secretary of State. The two things cross in the night, they have no relation to each other. The members of CFIUS have been very clear Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with that approving that deal. She would have had to strong-arm eight people in order to get them to unanimously approve the deal and also the President of the United States would intervene if they saw any problems.
The CFIUS people say now that if that deal came before them today they would still approve it unanimously. There's actually nothing about the deal that's controversial. The only reason we're talking about it is because per your admission, which I think is very honest, the RNC would like us to be talking about this now.


So, to recap....9 members approved this deal and Hillary wasn' part of it. And the guy who donated to Hillary had 0 shares at the time which wouldbe benefitted him none
Why did we need CFIUS approval if the company was not a US company

"Foreign Investment and National Security

In some cases, mergers and acquisitions by foreign firms create security concerns. OIA represents the Department of State on the Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). CFIUS is an inter-agency committee that reviews mergers and acquisitions of U.S. business by foreigners to determine whether such transactions could affect U.S. national security. CFIUS issues an annual report to Congress."

Notice what their role is

CFIUS is an inter-agency committee that reviews mergers and acquisitions of U.S. business by foreigners to determine whether such transactions could affect U.S. national security.

So what is our investment and where is the money for said investments?
 
every day - same shit - same idiot RW argument - same results, and they're too damn stupid to notice

BUT

they got to start an anti-clinton rant on a message board !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

poor little simpletons
 
Anyone see the journalistic standard here?
She did not interview her guest, she lectured to him with prepared statements. Like a lawyer defending a client.

Ahahaha so she should be allowed to lie on TV because the host asking factual questions just ain't fair! :crybaby:Where is the journalistic standards! :crybaby:

:lmao:
which ones were the factual statements? I didn't actually see any in the OP. so show us which ones?
 
I saw that CC - Joy Reid is a national treasure

Claims of Clinton-Russia Uranium Collusion Are A Real Empty Barrel

15059d1439569660-nothing-burger-jpg
 
every day - same shit - same idiot RW argument - same results, and they're too damn stupid to notice

BUT

they got to start an anti-clinton rant on a message board !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

poor little simpletons
I think it was a liberal who brought up this post.. Yell at them....
 
Reid left out a couple of nasty little details namely that Hussein said he approved the sale to make sure the Russians approved his convoluted Iran nuclear deal. It doesn't make much sense but that's what he said. Meanwhile Hillary facilitated the deal and her husband's "foundation" coincidentally received a windfall couple of mil from "foreign" benefactors. In the light of CBS using forged documents to swing an election to democrats it's not terribly surprising that MSNBC would set up a little dialog to make ignorant lefties feel better about the Clinton's impending indictment.
 
Watch MSNBC’s Joy Reid Expertly Debunk Lies Around Uranium-Clinton Story

Reid: Who got the money when the Canadian company was sold to the Russian company? The Uranium One? Who received the money?

Kerns: I presume the company.
Reid: Yes. Okay, second question. Who approved the sale?

Kerns: Yes. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
Reid: How many people sit on the committee?

Kerns: Nine members.

Reid: How many have to approve a deal like this?

Kerns: All nine of them.

Reid: All nine.

Kerns: Absolutely.

Reid: How many approved this deal?

Kerns: All nine of them.

Reid: Who is the person who donated to Hillary Clinton who is related to and had an investment in uranium one? What is that person's name? Do you remember their name?

Kerns: They are board members of Uranium One donated up to $143 million I think to the Clinton Foundation.

Reid: Did he own any assets in Uranium One at the time Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State?

Kerns: You know, I don't know that, but here's what I would...

Reid: He did not. Sold them.

Kerns: Here's what i would like to know…

Reid: He sold them years before. So what you're talking about is a deal that nine members of CFIUS approved unanimously. None of them was Hillary Clinton. You have a donor who separately gave Hillary Clinton donations at a time when she was not Secretary of State. The two things cross in the night, they have no relation to each other. The members of CFIUS have been very clear Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with that approving that deal. She would have had to strong-arm eight people in order to get them to unanimously approve the deal and also the President of the United States would intervene if they saw any problems.
The CFIUS people say now that if that deal came before them today they would still approve it unanimously. There's actually nothing about the deal that's controversial. The only reason we're talking about it is because per your admission, which I think is very honest, the RNC would like us to be talking about this now.


So, to recap....9 members approved this deal and Hillary wasn' part of it. And the guy who donated to Hillary had 0 shares at the time which wouldbe benefitted him none
Why did we need CFIUS approval if the company was not a US company

"Foreign Investment and National Security

In some cases, mergers and acquisitions by foreign firms create security concerns. OIA represents the Department of State on the Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). CFIUS is an inter-agency committee that reviews mergers and acquisitions of U.S. business by foreigners to determine whether such transactions could affect U.S. national security. CFIUS issues an annual report to Congress."

Notice what their role is

CFIUS is an inter-agency committee that reviews mergers and acquisitions of U.S. business by foreigners to determine whether such transactions could affect U.S. national security.

So what is our investment and where is the money for said investments?

Irrelevant unless you're conceding you were wrong
 
Reid left out a couple of nasty little details namely that Hussein said he approved the sale to make sure the Russians approved his convoluted Iran nuclear deal. It doesn't make much sense but that's what he said. Meanwhile Hillary facilitated the deal and her husband's "foundation" coincidentally received a windfall couple of mil from "foreign" benefactors. In the light of CBS using forged documents to swing an election to democrats it's not terribly surprising that MSNBC would set up a little dialog to make ignorant lefties feel better about the Clinton's impending indictment.
I know, and aren't the Clintons the only people who made money off the deal?
 
Watch MSNBC’s Joy Reid Expertly Debunk Lies Around Uranium-Clinton Story

Reid: Who got the money when the Canadian company was sold to the Russian company? The Uranium One? Who received the money?

Kerns: I presume the company.
Reid: Yes. Okay, second question. Who approved the sale?

Kerns: Yes. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
Reid: How many people sit on the committee?

Kerns: Nine members.

Reid: How many have to approve a deal like this?

Kerns: All nine of them.

Reid: All nine.

Kerns: Absolutely.

Reid: How many approved this deal?

Kerns: All nine of them.

Reid: Who is the person who donated to Hillary Clinton who is related to and had an investment in uranium one? What is that person's name? Do you remember their name?

Kerns: They are board members of Uranium One donated up to $143 million I think to the Clinton Foundation.

Reid: Did he own any assets in Uranium One at the time Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State?

Kerns: You know, I don't know that, but here's what I would...

Reid: He did not. Sold them.

Kerns: Here's what i would like to know…

Reid: He sold them years before. So what you're talking about is a deal that nine members of CFIUS approved unanimously. None of them was Hillary Clinton. You have a donor who separately gave Hillary Clinton donations at a time when she was not Secretary of State. The two things cross in the night, they have no relation to each other. The members of CFIUS have been very clear Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with that approving that deal. She would have had to strong-arm eight people in order to get them to unanimously approve the deal and also the President of the United States would intervene if they saw any problems.
The CFIUS people say now that if that deal came before them today they would still approve it unanimously. There's actually nothing about the deal that's controversial. The only reason we're talking about it is because per your admission, which I think is very honest, the RNC would like us to be talking about this now.


So, to recap....9 members approved this deal and Hillary wasn' part of it. And the guy who donated to Hillary had 0 shares at the time which wouldbe benefitted him none
Why did we need CFIUS approval if the company was not a US company

"Foreign Investment and National Security

In some cases, mergers and acquisitions by foreign firms create security concerns. OIA represents the Department of State on the Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). CFIUS is an inter-agency committee that reviews mergers and acquisitions of U.S. business by foreigners to determine whether such transactions could affect U.S. national security. CFIUS issues an annual report to Congress."

Notice what their role is

CFIUS is an inter-agency committee that reviews mergers and acquisitions of U.S. business by foreigners to determine whether such transactions could affect U.S. national security.

So what is our investment and where is the money for said investments?

Irrelevant unless you're conceding you were wrong
about?
 
every day - same shit - same idiot RW argument - same results, and they're too damn stupid to notice

BUT

they got to start an anti-clinton rant on a message board !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

poor little simpletons

a damn Liberal isnt making RW's showcase their stupidity by ignoring facts.
 
Watch MSNBC’s Joy Reid Expertly Debunk Lies Around Uranium-Clinton Story

Reid: Who got the money when the Canadian company was sold to the Russian company? The Uranium One? Who received the money?

Kerns: I presume the company.
Reid: Yes. Okay, second question. Who approved the sale?

Kerns: Yes. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
Reid: How many people sit on the committee?

Kerns: Nine members.

Reid: How many have to approve a deal like this?

Kerns: All nine of them.

Reid: All nine.

Kerns: Absolutely.

Reid: How many approved this deal?

Kerns: All nine of them.

Reid: Who is the person who donated to Hillary Clinton who is related to and had an investment in uranium one? What is that person's name? Do you remember their name?

Kerns: They are board members of Uranium One donated up to $143 million I think to the Clinton Foundation.

Reid: Did he own any assets in Uranium One at the time Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State?

Kerns: You know, I don't know that, but here's what I would...

Reid: He did not. Sold them.

Kerns: Here's what i would like to know…

Reid: He sold them years before. So what you're talking about is a deal that nine members of CFIUS approved unanimously. None of them was Hillary Clinton. You have a donor who separately gave Hillary Clinton donations at a time when she was not Secretary of State. The two things cross in the night, they have no relation to each other. The members of CFIUS have been very clear Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with that approving that deal. She would have had to strong-arm eight people in order to get them to unanimously approve the deal and also the President of the United States would intervene if they saw any problems.
The CFIUS people say now that if that deal came before them today they would still approve it unanimously. There's actually nothing about the deal that's controversial. The only reason we're talking about it is because per your admission, which I think is very honest, the RNC would like us to be talking about this now.


So, to recap....9 members approved this deal and Hillary wasn' part of it. And the guy who donated to Hillary had 0 shares at the time which wouldbe benefitted him none


He sold the shares three years earlier. How long do you think it takes for a uranium deal of this magnitude to get approved? How much of the anticipation of this deal was priced into the value of the shares? A guy engaging in this type of activity is smart and he's not going to wait until the day after the deal is approved to sell his shares, he needs a great deal of distance. He was going to see a handsome profit one way or another you can be sure of it. These types of businesses and deals mean he has heavy influence at the highest degree of government (hence his massive donations to the Foundation).

If you think there is a sheer coincidence between massive payments to her Foundation and this type of deal, well, then we view the world with a different degree of skepticism. Consider how much Obama is making in speeches now. He didn't get paid this money when he was president, right? He certainly is receiving some great benefit payments now though it would seem...

No one I repeat, NO ONE can defend Clinton and her potential crimes unless record of those who contributed to the Clinton Foundation is made available to all. Considering her open ability to obstruct justice and destroy evidence, I am guessing she is not worried about any legal repercussions, she's the Teflon Don. Even Podesta in an email that as released expressed concerns about Clintons Foundation if I recall correctly.

Finally, this company was opened in Canada because of NAFTA and because businesses don't have to disclose anywhere near the degree they have to in America. This deal smells, and I can only imagine that Reagan is rolling in his grave. I can tell you this, even if there wasn't anything nefarious about this deal, it is precisely these types of deals of giving resources for nukes to a mortal enemy that drove people to vote for Trump.

No one has shown that bribes to obtain approval were ever even necessary. No one has shown that approval was in jeopardy without intervention from Clinton. No one has shown that Clinton even had any personal involvement at all.

I can tell you this, even if there wasn't anything nefarious about this deal, it is precisely these types of deals of giving resources for nukes to a mortal enemy that drove people to vote for Trump.

^ This is just ignorant blather and shows clearly just how effective disinformation is in influencing people's perceptions. It's precisely why this is even being discussed. It's a very effective diversionary tool.

The two US mines are licensed by the NRC to only sell their Uranium in the US. That hasn't changed.
 
So Hillary didn't get $145,000,000?

For what?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^EXACTLY^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Exactly, what?
EXACTLY, ......WHAT?

You clearly don't have a reason but you want everyone to believe it's bad because of your horrible display of acting?
I just want you to answer the question from the post you responded to. did hitlery get 145,000,000 or not? why can't you answer it? you don't like a message board debate?
 
What did Russia get out of the deal? How much of our uranium did they get? Any where near the 500 tons of highly enriched uranium that they sold to the US nuclear power industry between 1993 and 2013?
 

Forum List

Back
Top