All is Well ?

Foolardi

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 2021
6,148
3,036
938
Mores like - Between Heaven and Hell - { 1956 } and that's being
generous.Of course to a fault.
Our Economy is in dire straights.Inflation seems unstoppable.
First time in my lifetime.Prices appear to only rise and
service seems to fall flat ... Maybe On purpose.
Our Border does not exist.But Illegals exist like the dynamic
in - The Naked Jungle - { 1954 } where on a South American
cocoa plantation there is a streaming 2-mile wide,20 mile long
march of extremely determined column of army ants.Who
mean business.To the utter chagrin of young plantation owner
Charlton Heston and his potential Gal { Eleanor Parker }.
However what Americans are witnessing and under the thumb
from is The Real Thing.No way to cotton candy the seriousness.
Yet the sluts in the MSM { males included } seem hellbent on
transfixing We the People.This surely ain't no version of
Shock & Awe as seen {demonstrated } by Bush 43 after warning
Saddam Hussein and his sadist sons { Via national TV } they got
48 hrs. to leave Baghdad.Then the historic flight { Fastest military
movement } of troops { waiting dilligently in Kuwait}.
An Economy and Reporting of events is sticky bidness.But it
needn't be.Great Leaders find a way to Stop any onslaught of
Unamericanism.Like Winston Churchill managed to do for his
beloved England.Even managing to go out in public using
public transportation { Train } to mingle with his flock.
With his sidekick { fat cigar }.
We no longer have *Mr.Positive with his big cigar and
weekday Talk Radio preachings of what should be.Real
americans seldom need..This ain't the Dust Bowl decade.
But it mise well be.If anyone cares to notice.

* Rush Limbaugh { Maha Rushie }
 


Excerpt

Churchill was in no doubt that gas could be profitably employed against the Kurds and Iraqis (as well as against other peoples in the Empire): "I do not understand this sqeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favour of using poison gas against uncivilised tribes." Henry Wilson shared Churchills enthusiasm for gas as an instrument of colonial control but the British cabinet was reluctant to sanction the use of a weapon that had caused such misery and revulsion in the First World War. Churchill himself waskeen to argue that gas, fired from ground-based guns or dropped from aircraft, would cause "only discomfort or illness, but not death" to dissident tribespeople; but his optimistic view of the effects of gas were mistaken. It was likely that the suggested gas would permanently damage eyesight and "kill children and sickly persons, more especially as the people against whom we intend to use it have no medical knowledge with which to supply antidotes."

Churchill remained unimpressed by such considerations, arguing that the use of gas, a "scientific expedient," should not be prevented "by the prejudices of those who do not think clearly". In the event, gas was used against the Iraqi rebels with excellent moral effect" though gas shells were not dropped from aircraft because of practical difficulties
 

Forum List

Back
Top