Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Gulliani has been investigating what was behind the Russian collusion hoax. What you are charging here is pure nonsense...And further it is a transparent attempt to derail this thread...
Your personal dislike of those involved, based on their not of the same ideological bent as you is just ridiculous...
Solomon is a bonafide journalistic investigative reporter. The problem you have with him is that his work has uncovered the lies people you believe in perpetuate....I can't help you there.
Guilliani. Read my post again. Don’t stare at it.
I was just giving an example the difference of how Fox News covered the story. What nonsense?
Fox News portrayed him as a hero. A personal lawyer doing an investigation for a corrupted president?a personal lawyer?
Since when that is acceptable?
Just the fact that nearly every other politician has used private lawyers to investigate things...Including if you remember, Hillary who employed a private firm to funnel money to a foreign former spy, to compile a dossier full of pure BS to go after her opponent in 2016.
So, what you are actually doing here is saying that it's ok when politicians whom you approve of do things like this, but not politicians you dislike....Pretty hypocritical...
That is their whole life.
Without that core value - they have no value.
Oh absolutely...See, they can't stand when their own tactics and arguments are used against them...Which is why they have such a problem now....They have done so much underhanded crap in the past few years that they will be squealing like stuck pigs when it comes back at them.
It's probably half and half
Half are hypocrites that know better and don't care.
The other half get their info from The Food Network and Fakebook - and are literally just clueless.
Guilliani. Read my post again. Don’t stare at it.
I was just giving an example the difference of how Fox News covered the story. What nonsense?
Fox News portrayed him as a hero. A personal lawyer doing an investigation for a corrupted president?a personal lawyer?
Since when that is acceptable?
Just the fact that nearly every other politician has used private lawyers to investigate things...Including if you remember, Hillary who employed a private firm to funnel money to a foreign former spy, to compile a dossier full of pure BS to go after her opponent in 2016.
So, what you are actually doing here is saying that it's ok when politicians whom you approve of do things like this, but not politicians you dislike....Pretty hypocritical...
That is their whole life.
Without that core value - they have no value.
Oh absolutely...See, they can't stand when their own tactics and arguments are used against them...Which is why they have such a problem now....They have done so much underhanded crap in the past few years that they will be squealing like stuck pigs when it comes back at them.
It's probably half and half
Half are hypocrites that know better and don't care.
The other half get their info from The Food Network and Fakebook - and are literally just clueless.
Oh, I don't think anyone spending time on boards like this are "clueless"... The problem is that although they constantly denegrate those of us on the right for getting our information from FNC, they on the other hand don't see that their whole information stream comes from Maddow (MSNBC), or Lemon (CNN)...
1. Fox and Trump said never happened.
2. What foreign policies that are good?
3. Trump promoted. Obama’s wall was to prevent illegals coming in.
4. Windmill caused cancer. Trump said that.
5. Trump cage children as a deterrent that’s a fact. Obama cage children selectively.
6. Trump loud and clear. He said the Clinton killed Eipstein. You have to be fucking dumb and ignorant to ignore that.
7. That’s dumb. Do you have any proof?
1. Which kind of disproves your entire point, doesn't it? You are essentially saying that people follow like lemmings whatever Fox and Trump says. Yet I have not met a single conservative anywhere, that thinks Trump did not sleep with a porn star. So apparently right-wingers are thinking people, who do not unquestioningly accept whatever they are told.
2. Backing out of the Iran deal. Moving the embassy to Jerusalem. And while it's not done yet, I think his moves on North Korea are good.
3. How many illegals have gotten into his gated community? Because I had some illegals in mine, and it sucked.
4. And you believed him enough to repeat it? Which right-wing pundit, or right-winger on this forum, has said they caused cancer?
Trump really has you people by the balls doesn't it?
5. Irrelevant The 9th circuit court changed the law. That's a fact. Before the 9th circuit court said Children had to be separated from their parents, it didn't happen. Moreover, you can't just release children randomly, and we know for a fact that children were traveling with human traffickers, and that they were specifically used to get across the border in the past, because we were releasing adults who had children with them.
This caused a problem. Or are you in favor of human trafficking and slavery? If not, then give me your solution. Either put up, or shut up.
6. I stand by my previous statement. No other political couple has left a wider path of bodies behind them.
7. Just read history. Count how many people who were close the Clinton's, ended up dead, or fleeing the country, and just somehow disappear.
1. Wrong. We are talking about Fox News coverage of Trump idiocies.
2. Wrong. Iran is now enriching high grade plutonium. Hard water facility to produce nuclear grade in Arak will be completed in 6 months.
Jerusalem who give a fuck.
NK Kim still playing with his nuclear toys. He just kicked US negotiators. Kim will never give up his toys.
3. That is not the point. The idea that Trump has to promote is unbelievable stupid. Just imagine the fucking mentality of this moron POTUS.
4. Wrong.. Trump said windmills cause cancer. What part of that don’t you understand?
5. Who give a fuck about 9th districts or human trafficking? So Trump caging children makes that better?
6. In short you don’t have any proof. You are a LIAR.
7. In short you don’t have any proof. You are a liar.
My goodness you are an idiot
Well Billiejean. I’m still waiting for you to prove it......... Take your time.
Read what you wrote and then prove that you're not.
Here’s the problem with that.
Example....... you have this personal lawyer Guilliani running around doing the investigation like he work for state department. Trying to dig dirt of Trump political enemy based from conspiracy crap working with corrupted Ukrainian people.
Gulliani has been investigating what was behind the Russian collusion hoax. What you are charging here is pure nonsense...And further it is a transparent attempt to derail this thread...
A personal lawyer a henchmen doing an FBI work?
Since when that is acceptable?
Fox News portrayed him as a hero.
Your personal dislike of those involved, based on their not of the same ideological bent as you is just ridiculous...
Then Fox just hired John Solomon a creator of conspiracy theories from all over. He just throw those shit to the wall and he knows it will stick because Fox die hard fans will grab it.
Solomon is a bonafide journalistic investigative reporter. The problem you have with him is that his work has uncovered the lies people you believe in perpetuate....I can't help you there.
Guilliani. Read my post again. Don’t stare at it.
I was just giving an example the difference of how Fox News covered the story. What nonsense?
Fox News portrayed him as a hero. A personal lawyer doing an investigation for a corrupted president?a personal lawyer?
Since when that is acceptable?
Just the fact that nearly every other politician has used private lawyers to investigate things...Including if you remember, Hillary who employed a private firm to funnel money to a foreign former spy, to compile a dossier full of pure BS to go after her opponent in 2016.
So, what you are actually doing here is saying that it's ok when politicians whom you approve of do things like this, but not politicians you dislike....Pretty hypocritical...
Guilliani. Read my post again. Don’t stare at it.
I was just giving an example the difference of how Fox News covered the story. What nonsense?
Fox News portrayed him as a hero. A personal lawyer doing an investigation for a corrupted president?a personal lawyer?
Since when that is acceptable?
Just the fact that nearly every other politician has used private lawyers to investigate things...Including if you remember, Hillary who employed a private firm to funnel money to a foreign former spy, to compile a dossier full of pure BS to go after her opponent in 2016.
So, what you are actually doing here is saying that it's ok when politicians whom you approve of do things like this, but not politicians you dislike....Pretty hypocritical...
That is their whole life.
Without that core value - they have no value.
Oh absolutely...See, they can't stand when their own tactics and arguments are used against them...Which is why they have such a problem now....They have done so much underhanded crap in the past few years that they will be squealing like stuck pigs when it comes back at them.
It's probably half and half
Half are hypocrites that know better and don't care.
The other half get their info from The Food Network and Fakebook - and are literally just clueless.
Oh, I don't think anyone spending time on boards like this are "clueless"... The problem is that although they constantly denegrate those of us on the right for getting our information from FNC, they on the other hand don't see that their whole information stream comes from Maddow (MSNBC), or Lemon (CNN)...
Here’s the problem with that.
Example....... you have this personal lawyer Guilliani running around doing the investigation like he work for state department. Trying to dig dirt of Trump political enemy based from conspiracy crap working with corrupted Ukrainian people.
Gulliani has been investigating what was behind the Russian collusion hoax. What you are charging here is pure nonsense...And further it is a transparent attempt to derail this thread...
A personal lawyer a henchmen doing an FBI work?
Since when that is acceptable?
Fox News portrayed him as a hero.
Your personal dislike of those involved, based on their not of the same ideological bent as you is just ridiculous...
Then Fox just hired John Solomon a creator of conspiracy theories from all over. He just throw those shit to the wall and he knows it will stick because Fox die hard fans will grab it.
Solomon is a bonafide journalistic investigative reporter. The problem you have with him is that his work has uncovered the lies people you believe in perpetuate....I can't help you there.
Guilliani. Read my post again. Don’t stare at it.
I was just giving an example the difference of how Fox News covered the story. What nonsense?
Fox News portrayed him as a hero. A personal lawyer doing an investigation for a corrupted president?a personal lawyer?
Since when that is acceptable?
Just the fact that nearly every other politician has used private lawyers to investigate things...Including if you remember, Hillary who employed a private firm to funnel money to a foreign former spy, to compile a dossier full of pure BS to go after her opponent in 2016.
So, what you are actually doing here is saying that it's ok when politicians whom you approve of do things like this, but not politicians you dislike....Pretty hypocritical...
That’s not even close to what I’m talking about. Sure anybody can hire a personal lawyer to represent me or you. The difference with Guilliani is running around with information from corrupted Ukrainian based from conspiracy theory crap. Like he represents the state department.
We are talking about Fox News coverage. STAY FOCUS.
Just the fact that nearly every other politician has used private lawyers to investigate things...Including if you remember, Hillary who employed a private firm to funnel money to a foreign former spy, to compile a dossier full of pure BS to go after her opponent in 2016.
So, what you are actually doing here is saying that it's ok when politicians whom you approve of do things like this, but not politicians you dislike....Pretty hypocritical...
That is their whole life.
Without that core value - they have no value.
Oh absolutely...See, they can't stand when their own tactics and arguments are used against them...Which is why they have such a problem now....They have done so much underhanded crap in the past few years that they will be squealing like stuck pigs when it comes back at them.
It's probably half and half
Half are hypocrites that know better and don't care.
The other half get their info from The Food Network and Fakebook - and are literally just clueless.
Oh, I don't think anyone spending time on boards like this are "clueless"... The problem is that although they constantly denegrate those of us on the right for getting our information from FNC, they on the other hand don't see that their whole information stream comes from Maddow (MSNBC), or Lemon (CNN)...
And you relied on Fox with input from Hannity.
No wonder both of you are so clueless.
