Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments,

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Mar 16, 2010
59,455
6,793
1,900
The Good insane United states of America
Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments,
CNSnews ^ | 6/26/15 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on ‎6‎/‎26‎/‎2015‎ ‎7‎:‎22‎:‎11‎ ‎PM by Nachum
(CNSNews.com) - In his dissent from the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which declared that same-sex marriage is a right, Justice Samuel Alito said the court had falsely likened opposition to same-sex marriage to racism and that its decision “will be used to vilify Americans unwilling to assent to the new orthodoxy.”
Alito warned that in the wake of the court’s ruling, Americans who dare to publicly express views in favor the traditional understanding that marriage is between a man and a woman will risk recrimination.
“I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools,” Alito wrote.
“By imposing its own views on the entire country,” he said, “the majority facilitates the marginalization of the many Americans who have traditional ideas.”
Here is a key excerpt from Alito’s dissent:

Pretty soon these bastards will start arresting people that speak our minds. I hate liberals as they're nothing more then fascist.
 
That's what they did in Canada. Although gays here might try to prohibit heterosexual marriage unless it is three people and at least one homosexual.
 
"Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments"

This fails as a slippery slope fallacy – one would think a jurist trained in the law would understand and avoid logical fallacies.

This is also unfounded demagoguery and fear-mongering.
 
"Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments"

This fails as a slippery slope fallacy – one would think a jurist trained in the law would understand and avoid logical fallacies.

This is also unfounded demagoguery and fear-mongering.
The way this ruling was worded leaves us all wide open to any perversion of marriage and the prosecution of anyone dissenting. More perversions will come and use this as case law. It's inevitable now.
 
Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments,
CNSnews ^ | 6/26/15 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on ‎6‎/‎26‎/‎2015‎ ‎7‎:‎22‎:‎11‎ ‎PM by Nachum
(CNSNews.com) - In his dissent from the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which declared that same-sex marriage is a right, Justice Samuel Alito said the court had falsely likened opposition to same-sex marriage to racism and that its decision “will be used to vilify Americans unwilling to assent to the new orthodoxy.”
Alito warned that in the wake of the court’s ruling, Americans who dare to publicly express views in favor the traditional understanding that marriage is between a man and a woman will risk recrimination.
“I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools,” Alito wrote.
“By imposing its own views on the entire country,” he said, “the majority facilitates the marginalization of the many Americans who have traditional ideas.”
Here is a key excerpt from Alito’s dissent:

Pretty soon these bastards will start arresting people that speak our minds. I hate liberals as they're nothing more then fascist.
That's idiotic.
 
"Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments"

This fails as a slippery slope fallacy – one would think a jurist trained in the law would understand and avoid logical fallacies.

This is also unfounded demagoguery and fear-mongering.

I remember that old slippery slope argument about abortion. You see way way back when it was to provide women who had suffered being raped or a victim of incest.

We argued that the slippery slope would lead it to become a method of birth control.

OMG. We were right.

That slippery slope now leads to a bitch **** from hell to testify in front of the Florida State legislature that as a rep from Planned Parenthood she believed that a baby born alive was not really alive unless the mother and the doctor deemed the child alive.

Oh there is never a slippery slope is there?
 
Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments,
CNSnews ^ | 6/26/15 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on ‎6‎/‎26‎/‎2015‎ ‎7‎:‎22‎:‎11‎ ‎PM by Nachum
(CNSNews.com) - In his dissent from the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which declared that same-sex marriage is a right, Justice Samuel Alito said the court had falsely likened opposition to same-sex marriage to racism and that its decision “will be used to vilify Americans unwilling to assent to the new orthodoxy.”
Alito warned that in the wake of the court’s ruling, Americans who dare to publicly express views in favor the traditional understanding that marriage is between a man and a woman will risk recrimination.
“I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools,” Alito wrote.
“By imposing its own views on the entire country,” he said, “the majority facilitates the marginalization of the many Americans who have traditional ideas.”
Here is a key excerpt from Alito’s dissent:

Pretty soon these bastards will start arresting people that speak our minds. I hate liberals as they're nothing more then fascist.
That's idiotic.
Idiotic 6 years ago would have been the government forcing you to purchase something you don't want or need. That happened. Idiotic would have been the actual wording of a law not being the actual meaning of that written law. It's now happened twice. Idiotic would have been a man claiming to be a woman or a white woman claiming to be black yet here we are. Idiotic would have been gay is equal to marriage. Idiotic is now normal.
 
Make sure you grab enough vaseline now heterosexuals because get ready to get fucked over big time. Just grab your ankles.

YOU ARE THE PERVERT HETEROS.

Worse yet, just because we need the vaseline to easy it on up some son of a bitch is going to penalize us for using a petroleum product.

:lmao:
 
The idea the straight marriage needs to be "defended" is a complete fallacy. Heterosexual marriage isn't under attack so there is nothing to defend.

People will get married according to their nature. Straights will marry members of the opposite sex and gays will marry other gays.

What will change is that gays can have the same rights under the law regarding their families that married heterosexuals have: being considered their partner's next of kin in matters of healthcare and inheritance.

I hope that the public expression of homophobia becomes as socially unacceptable as public expression of racial hatred. To hate someone because of their differences is odious.
 
The idea the straight marriage needs to be "defended" is a complete fallacy. Heterosexual marriage isn't under attack so there is nothing to defend.

People will get married according to their nature. Straights will marry members of the opposite sex and gays will marry other gays.

What will change is that gays can have the same rights under the law regarding their families that married heterosexuals have: being considered their partner's next of kin in matters of healthcare and inheritance.

I hope that the public expression of homophobia becomes as socially unacceptable as public expression of racial hatred. To hate someone because of their differences is odious.

When are you going to mount the attacks against Islam. Just wondering?
 
Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments,
CNSnews ^ | 6/26/15 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on ‎6‎/‎26‎/‎2015‎ ‎7‎:‎22‎:‎11‎ ‎PM by Nachum
(CNSNews.com) - In his dissent from the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which declared that same-sex marriage is a right, Justice Samuel Alito said the court had falsely likened opposition to same-sex marriage to racism and that its decision “will be used to vilify Americans unwilling to assent to the new orthodoxy.”
Alito warned that in the wake of the court’s ruling, Americans who dare to publicly express views in favor the traditional understanding that marriage is between a man and a woman will risk recrimination.
“I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools,” Alito wrote.
“By imposing its own views on the entire country,” he said, “the majority facilitates the marginalization of the many Americans who have traditional ideas.”
Here is a key excerpt from Alito’s dissent:

Pretty soon these bastards will start arresting people that speak our minds. I hate liberals as they're nothing more then fascist.


Hyperbole and hysteria.
 
Idiotic 6 years ago would have been the government forcing you to purchase something you don't want or need. That happened. Idiotic would have been the actual wording of a law not being the actual meaning of that written law. It's now happened twice. Idiotic would have been a man claiming to be a woman or a white woman claiming to be black yet here we are. Idiotic would have been gay is equal to marriage. Idiotic is now normal.

No, it isn't. Idiotic is not normal and will never be normal, no matter how much leftists bleat that it is. They are wrong.
 
Alito Warns: Defenders of Traditional Marriage Now Risk Being Treated as Bigots by Governments,
CNSnews ^ | 6/26/15 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on ‎6‎/‎26‎/‎2015‎ ‎7‎:‎22‎:‎11‎ ‎PM by Nachum
(CNSNews.com) - In his dissent from the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which declared that same-sex marriage is a right, Justice Samuel Alito said the court had falsely likened opposition to same-sex marriage to racism and that its decision “will be used to vilify Americans unwilling to assent to the new orthodoxy.”
Alito warned that in the wake of the court’s ruling, Americans who dare to publicly express views in favor the traditional understanding that marriage is between a man and a woman will risk recrimination.
“I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools,” Alito wrote.
“By imposing its own views on the entire country,” he said, “the majority facilitates the marginalization of the many Americans who have traditional ideas.”
Here is a key excerpt from Alito’s dissent:

Pretty soon these bastards will start arresting people that speak our minds. I hate liberals as they're nothing more then fascist.


Hyperbole and hysteria.


And I call bullshit on you. There is a certain segment of the gay community that has a mega hard on for joe average breeders. This happy dancey everyone is like Elton John bullshit is a joke.

Get a grip.
 

Forum List

Back
Top