Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Are we talking about the Clinton definition of sexual relationship or the accepted definition? Most states now have online predator laws. That is where I would be looking, if I were going to charge him with something.
LOL!!!!!!!!!! It's great to see cons defend Foley. I love it!!!!!!!
LOL!!!!!!!!!! It's great to see cons defend Foley. I love it!!!!!!!
dude! what are you going to do when your wife asks you to talk dirty to her?
you may get him with that but again it will go to age of consent laws....nailing him on harassment is easy....but the intern seems to enjoy the banter as much as foley does.....doesn't make it right....just more difficult to prove unwanted.....can't harass the willing
He's not defending. He's punching holes in the case against him. I can see where he is coming from. Foley may skirt the law on this one and get off.(pun intended)
I am referring to graphic details provided by other people. For example, if your neighbor started talking about how he enjoys sodomizing his wife every Friday night until she squeals like a pig, is your first thought going to be "I am intrigued" or "This is pretty nasty"
i am a live and let live guy....so i would tell my neighbor "thats just fantastic and by the way she sounds more like a baby harp seal" then walk away ....
:
can't answer the questions huh?
waht makes you think i am a conservative or that i am defending foley?
i am just asking questions you can't answer.
you sure are good at accusing people of things i will give you that...you would have done well at the salem witch trials
: on technicallities. But the fact that he exchanged EROTIC email with young pages doesn't disturb you??
he should treat his homosexuality problem, too! If that were cured, this incident would never have happened.
You're right. He may GET OFF
You're right. He may GET OFF
It's an issue of power. He is able to control the small child. He is also a homosexual, but if he weren't, he'd just go after little girls.
the age of consent in DC is 16 (i am sure there are nuances to the law)
a senate intern must be at least 16
the facts so far (and that may change) indicate no sexual relations, not even the clinton kind, only flirting on line
at the moment i see no crime (sexual harassment maybe, but hey the bar was set pretty high during the blow job years) just stupidity.....
You'll find that I do very little in the way of "avoiding" - particularly in regard to friends of mine being insulted. Let's examine, shall we?
It sounds to me like she was saying, "Funny thing about the pedophilia thing, seems so far that he wasn't getting any? He's just an online voyeur". And that is nothing more or less than a faithful recounting of the facts as we now understand them.
Sounds more to me like you are very young, and not yet a parent. It is quite possible that you don't grasp the seriousness of what you have done here. Let me give you some advice: when you're talking to a parent, and his/her kids come into the conversation, CHOOSE YOUR WORDS VERY CAREFULLY. You are dealing with primal feelings of love, fear, and ferocity that are beyond your capacity to understand.
I still think you should apologize.
musicman said:It sounds to me like she was saying, "Funny thing about the pedophilia thing, seems so far that he wasn't getting any? He's just an online voyeur". And that is nothing more or less than a faithful recounting of the facts as we now understand them.
I still think shes trying to play it down. Whats so funny about a 52 year old man writting dirty messeages to a minor?
dillo wrote:
No. Although frankly, it wouldn't surprise me if he was lying about part or all of it. What I am accusing him of is pulling out every possible misery in his life and throwing it out there in an attempt to garner any and every possible morsel of public sympathy he can. And I find that to be pathetic, sad, and indicative of our its-everyones-fault-but-mine culture that our politicians, Republican and Democrat alike, seem to revel in.
He has accepted total responsibilty for his actions, spilled all the beans and resigned from public office. His life is ruined. There's a time to let up on sinners who have confessed, repented and are seeking help.
There are hundreds of infamous "sick fucks" who deny to this day that they even did anything wrong. Look how quickly the Libs are done with him. To them his sin is being a conservative and they plan to "convict" as many as they can to take advantage of his actions. They don't really think what he did was wrong--they think what he did was an opporunity for them.
Let's identify all the "sick fucks" here--especially the ones who won't even admit what they are doing.
Have you even seen these Im's????
If so could you post afor them...
I read the im's on drudgreport Friday. They are salacious, but that seems all they have. The guy is sick and I'm glad he resigned. What I find interesting though, as with the Plame affair, a well known problem was held for political reasons. It wasn't just the republicans that knew there was a problem.
