Okay- under what naturalization law does that fall?
you tell me, the courts have apparently found some excuse for making this so.
But imagine a child born to a us citizen woman who raises her child with her ISIS husband overseas. Does it make sense for this child to be a US citizen?.....I think not.
Imagine a child born in the United States to two U.S. citizen parents- who the mother raises her child with her ISIS husband overseas.
What is that child called?
A Natural born citizen.
Actually, no. Under those circumstances, the mother doesn't meet the residency requirements to convey citizenship to her child.
It's not like this shit isn't available on the Internet, so what is so damned difficult about people looking it up, reading it, and comprehending it?
Imagine a child born in the United States to two U.S. citizen parents- who the mother raises her child with her ISIS husband overseas.
And how does the mother not meet residency requirements in the scenario I presented?
The candidate would have to meet the residency requirements to be President- but in the case I presented above- born in the United States is all that is required. There is no residency requirement for a mother to convey citizenship to her child born in the United States.
Born to two citizen parents was just put there to annoy those who want to pretend that is also a requirement.
Um, there IS a residency requirement for the citizen parent.
Go read the law. I'm tired of quoting it over and over and over and having people just skim past it and re-assert their errors.
I am not sure if you are confused or just ignorant.
Any person born in the United States- regardless of the status of their parents- EXCEPT the children of diplomats(and children born to invading armies) is a U.S. citizen at birth.
There is no residency requirement of parents of any kind for children born within the United States.