schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 9,997
- 6,565
- 938
The record clearly shows otherwise.He is not an apologist for trump or anyone else.
Dershowitz is an 84-year-old media performer with no standing in the adjudication.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The record clearly shows otherwise.He is not an apologist for trump or anyone else.
You are an ill informed person posting on a message board.The record clearly shows otherwise.
Dershowitz is an 84-year-old media performer with no standing in the adjudication.
The glove didn't fit.Dershowitz also told us OJ was innocent
Al, like Jonathon Turley, likes to see his face on TV. They'll say anything to do so. Al just proved it.Alan Dershowitz slams Trump indictment, shares one ‘damning piece of evidence’ in DOJ's case
'Sunday Morning Futures' panelists Alan Dershowitz and Matthew Whitaker discuss the second indictment of former President Donald Trump.www.foxnews.com
This was awesome, what Dersh said
There was one moment i wondered about, however...the very end where he says it is would novel to deal with the issue of whether... as John Ratcliffe (former DNI) called it.. (something like) Committing crime to prosecute a crime (which seems to be what these POSes are doing) See Maria Bartiromo video
What is novel about that? It seems that is what attorneys routinely call Fruit of the Poisonous tree...
If something illegal is done in order to prosecute someone, that poisonous tree thing should mean the case is tossed...(?) or ..and/or
if some certain piece of evidence is presented in court, but it was illegally obtained, it is dismissed, the jury can't see that fake evidence
The phone call seems to be fake evidence... can't cross-examine it. ..
Schmidlap said:Dershowitz is an 84-year-old media performer with no standing in the adjudication.
If you fantasize that 1) Dershowitz is not 84-year-old, 2) not a media performer, and 3) does have standing in this adjudication, make your case.You are an ill informed person posting on a message board.
Sure I can but you would disagree so why even try?If you fantasize that 1) Dershowitz is not 84-year-old, 2) not a media performer, and 3) does have standing in this adjudication, make your case.
You can't, can you?
He should move to WVa.For some reason or another this "groomer" gets a free pass. People who have absolutely no reason to be condemned get condemned but Dershowitz continues to get a free pass.
Does it have to do with defending Trump? That's all one has to do to get a free pass?
Despite widespread attention to his role in the Epstein case — and a defamation suit from one of his accusers — Dershowitz has no intention of laying low. For instance, he continues to publicly criticize age-of-consent laws — most recently on Twitter, earlier this week.
Alan Dershowitz helped Jeffrey Epstein get a plea deal. Now he’s tweeting about age of consent laws.
You can just honestly admit that you can't refute the facts that Dershowitz is 84-year-old, a media performer, and does not have standing in this adjudication, you know.Sure I can but you would disagree so why even try?
lol ^^^'TRump Cheats cuz he can afford lawyers!!!!' lolAlan Dershowitz draws a big salary from Trump's top donors.
Nobody defends Trump unless they're being paid very well to do so. Or unless they possess a fanatical ideological devotion to fascism.
Fox News’ Turley: Trump could face ‘terminal sentence’ if DOJ proves even one count
Barr 'shocked' by Trump indictment details: 'If even half of it is true, then he's toast'
John Bolton Calls on Trump to ‘Immediately Withdraw’ from
Presidential Race over Second Indictment
I am concerned that Trump might not be the GOP nominee for President in 2024.
Alan Dershowitz slams Trump indictment, shares one ‘damning piece of evidence’ in DOJ's case
'Sunday Morning Futures' panelists Alan Dershowitz and Matthew Whitaker discuss the second indictment of former President Donald Trump.www.foxnews.com
This was awesome, what Dersh said
There was one moment i wondered about, however...the very end where he says it is would novel to deal with the issue of whether... as John Ratcliffe (former DNI) called it.. (something like) Committing crime to prosecute a crime (which seems to be what these POSes are doing) See Maria Bartiromo video
What is novel about that? It seems that is what attorneys routinely call Fruit of the Poisonous tree...
If something illegal is done in order to prosecute someone, that poisonous tree thing should mean the case is tossed...(?) or ..and/or
if some certain piece of evidence is presented in court, but it was illegally obtained, it is dismissed, the jury can't see that fake evidence
The phone call seems to be fake evidence... can't cross-examine it. ..
His connection to the child sex dealings with Epstein has been proven to be fiction.For some reason or another this "groomer" gets a free pass. People who have absolutely no reason to be condemned get condemned but Dershowitz continues to get a free pass.
Does it have to do with defending Trump? That's all one has to do to get a free pass?
Despite widespread attention to his role in the Epstein case — and a defamation suit from one of his accusers — Dershowitz has no intention of laying low. For instance, he continues to publicly criticize age-of-consent laws — most recently on Twitter, earlier this week.
Alan Dershowitz helped Jeffrey Epstein get a plea deal. Now he’s tweeting about age of consent laws.
His connection to the child sex dealings with Epstein has been proven to be fiction.
Alan 'I wore my underpants' Dershowitz, sadly, has drifted into the 'outlier' region, of late, ever since he made the controversial legal argument that a president could engage in a quid pro quo for personal political benefit as long as the president believes his or her reelection is in the public interest. Seems Trump can do no wrong for this guy.Alan Dershowitz slams Trump indictment, shares one ‘damning piece of evidence’ in DOJ's case
'Sunday Morning Futures' panelists Alan Dershowitz and Matthew Whitaker discuss the second indictment of former President Donald Trump.www.foxnews.com
This was awesome, what Dersh said
There was one moment i wondered about, however...the very end where he says it is would novel to deal with the issue of whether... as John Ratcliffe (former DNI) called it.. (something like) Committing crime to prosecute a crime (which seems to be what these POSes are doing) See Maria Bartiromo video
What is novel about that? It seems that is what attorneys routinely call Fruit of the Poisonous tree...
If something illegal is done in order to prosecute someone, that poisonous tree thing should mean the case is tossed...(?) or ..and/or
if some certain piece of evidence is presented in court, but it was illegally obtained, it is dismissed, the jury can't see that fake evidence
The phone call seems to be fake evidence... can't cross-examine it. ..
His connection to the child sex dealings with Epstein has been proven to be fiction.
Idiot.Oh yeah, because, you know, like Alan said 'I wore my underpants'.
Bill Barr says Trump is ”Toast”
I will listen to him more than Dershowitz
Dershowitz always defends Trump.Alan Dershowitz slams Trump indictment, shares one ‘damning piece of evidence’ in DOJ's case
'Sunday Morning Futures' panelists Alan Dershowitz and Matthew Whitaker discuss the second indictment of former President Donald Trump.www.foxnews.com
This was awesome, what Dersh said
There was one moment i wondered about, however...the very end where he says it is would novel to deal with the issue of whether... as John Ratcliffe (former DNI) called it.. (something like) Committing crime to prosecute a crime (which seems to be what these POSes are doing) See Maria Bartiromo video
What is novel about that? It seems that is what attorneys routinely call Fruit of the Poisonous tree...
If something illegal is done in order to prosecute someone, that poisonous tree thing should mean the case is tossed...(?) or ..and/or
if some certain piece of evidence is presented in court, but it was illegally obtained, it is dismissed, the jury can't see that fake evidence
The phone call seems to be fake evidence... can't cross-examine it. ..
Dershowitz defends the constitution and rule of law.Dershowitz always defends Trump.
You guys do the same thing with Jonathan Turley. “ liberal, progressive left wing Jonathan Turley defends Trump for the 2653th time this year!”