Alan Dershowitz (law professor), NOT a conservative.. defends Trump against indictment

[nomadic5]

Alan Dershowitz slams Trump indictment, shares one ‘damning piece of evidence’ in DOJ's case

'Sunday Morning Futures' panelists Alan Dershowitz and Matthew Whitaker discuss the second indictment of former President Donald Trump.

www.foxnews.com

This was awesome, what Dersh said

There was one moment i wondered about, however...the very end where he says it is would novel to deal with the issue of whether... as John Ratcliffe (former DNI) called it.. (something like) Committing crime to prosecute a crime (which seems to be what these POSes are doing) See Maria Bartiromo video

What is novel about that? It seems that is what attorneys routinely call Fruit of the Poisonous tree...

If something illegal is done in order to prosecute someone, that poisonous tree thing should mean the case is tossed...(?) or ..and/or

if some certain piece of evidence is presented in court, but it was illegally obtained, it is dismissed, the jury can't see that fake evidence

The phone call seems to be fake evidence... can't cross-examine it. ..

 

[Billiejeens]

Alan Dershowitz slams Trump indictment, shares one ‘damning piece of evidence’ in DOJ's case

'Sunday Morning Futures' panelists Alan Dershowitz and Matthew Whitaker discuss the second indictment of former President Donald Trump.

www.foxnews.com

This was awesome, what Dersh said

There was one moment i wondered about, however...the very end where he says it is would novel to deal with the issue of whether... as John Ratcliffe (former DNI) called (something like) Commiting crime to prosecute crimes

What is novel about that? It seems that is what attorneys routinely call Fruit of the Poisonous tree...

If something illegal is done in order to prosecute someone, that poisonous tree thing should mean it the case is tossed... or ..and/or

if some certain piece of evidence is presented in court, but it was illegally obtained, it is dismissed, the jury can't see that fake evidence

The phone call seems to be fake evidence... can't cross-examine it. ..

AD is a Lunatic Fringe Social Leftist.
That changes on matters of law.
He is as adherent to the rule of law as anyone that you will find.
Jonathon Turley is the same.

 

[schmidlap]

Dershowitz is an elderly media entertainer whose knee-jerk response derives from a career as a defense attorney.

He has no legal capacity in this case, whatever.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Alan Dershowitz slams Trump indictment, shares one ‘damning piece of evidence’ in DOJ's case

'Sunday Morning Futures' panelists Alan Dershowitz and Matthew Whitaker discuss the second indictment of former President Donald Trump.

www.foxnews.com

This was awesome, what Dersh said

There was one moment i wondered about, however...the very end where he says it is would novel to deal with the issue of whether... as John Ratcliffe (former DNI) called it.. (something like) Committing crime to prosecute a crime (which seems to be what these POSes are doing) See Maria Bartiromo video

What is novel about that? It seems that is what attorneys routinely call Fruit of the Poisonous tree...

If something illegal is done in order to prosecute someone, that poisonous tree thing should mean the case is tossed...(?) or ..and/or

if some certain piece of evidence is presented in court, but it was illegally obtained, it is dismissed, the jury can't see that fake evidence

The phone call seems to be fake evidence... can't cross-examine it. ..

Goody. Maybe he can do the same thing for Trump that he did for OJ.
Trump will get his day in court. He will have his due process.

If it were up to me, I'd issue summary judgement. He's on tape admitting to it for Christ's sake!

 

[Billiejeens]

Dershowitz is an elderly media entertainer whose knee-jerk response derives from a career as a defense attorney.

He has no legal capacity in this case, whatever.

Poor dudey

 

[rightwinger]

Dershowitz also told us OJ was innocent and NEVER sides against Trump

 

[pknopp]

For some reason or another this "groomer" gets a free pass. People who have absolutely no reason to be condemned get condemned but Dershowitz continues to get a free pass.

Does it have to do with defending Trump? That's all one has to do to get a free pass?

Despite widespread attention to his role in the Epstein case — and a defamation suit from one of his accusers — Dershowitz has no intention of laying low. For instance, he continues to publicly criticize age-of-consent laws — most recently on Twitter, earlier this week.

Alan Dershowitz helped Jeffrey Epstein get a plea deal. Now he’s tweeting about age of consent laws.

 

[Billiejeens]

Goody. Maybe he can do the same thing for Trump that he did for OJ.
Trump will get his day in court. He will have his due process.

If it were up to me, I'd issue summary judgement. He's on tape admitting to it for Christ's sake!

My God you are spectacularly fucking ignorant.
In a criminal case Summary Judgment can only be used to acquit a defendant not convict.

Stay in your stupid lane.

 

[schmidlap]

... Jonathon Turley is the same.

Jonathan Turley is a practicing attorney, a dyed-in-the-wool conservative, and has been a chronic apologist for Trump.

Jonathan Turley tells Fox News the Trump indictment is ‘extremely damning’
and a ‘hit below the waterline’​

 

[Billiejeens]

For some reason or another this "groomer" gets a free pass. People who have absolutely no reason to be condemned get condemned but Dershowitz continues to get a free pass.

Does it have to do with defending Trump? That's all one has to do to get a free pass?

Despite widespread attention to his role in the Epstein case — and a defamation suit from one of his accusers — Dershowitz has no intention of laying low. For instance, he continues to publicly criticize age-of-consent laws — most recently on Twitter, earlier this week.

Alan Dershowitz helped Jeffrey Epstein get a plea deal. Now he’s tweeting about age of consent laws.

Almost all of that is not true.
There are a couple of kernels of truth -with outrageous hyperbole all around it.

 

[Billiejeens]

Jonathan Turley is a practicing attorney, a dyed-in-the-wool conservative, and has been a chronic apologist for Trump.

Jonathan Turley tells Fox News the Trump indictment is ‘extremely damning’
and a ‘hit below the waterline’​

Nope

 

[tahuyaman]

Dershowitz is an elderly media entertainer whose knee-jerk response derives from a career as a defense attorney.

He has no legal capacity in this case, whatever.

He understands the US constitution and the law.

 

[pknopp]

Almost all of that is not true.
There are a couple of kernels of truth -with outrageous hyperbole all around it.

He didn't defend Epstein? He didn't help him get a slap on the wrist sentence? He didn't make the statement he is quoted as saying?

 

[rightwinger]

Bill Barr says Trump is ”Toast”

I will listen to him more than Dershowitz

 

[Donald H]

No legal avenues are going to save Trump. He needs to drum up enough political support to make an impression on government. America doesn't function according to the rule of law anymore.

Dershowitz is just trying to sell books, as is typical in America.

 

[Toro]

Dershowitz has been defending Trump for years.

You do know that he was on Epstein's list, right? It was in Julie K Brown's book.

 

[schmidlap]

Nope

Fox News’ Turley: Trump could face ‘terminal sentence’ if DOJ proves even one count

Barr 'shocked' by Trump indictment details: 'If even half of it is true, then he's toast'

John Bolton Calls on Trump to ‘Immediately Withdraw’ from
Presidential Race over Second Indictment​

I am concerned that Trump might not be the GOP nominee for President in 2024.

 

[schmidlap]

Alan Dershowitz: DOJ has "enough evidence" to indict Trump​

He understands the US constitution and the law.

He's been kissing Trump's big flabby ass for years.

He's a media entertainer who has been trying to get celebrity lowlifes off since O.J Simpson.

​

 

[Blaster]

Jonathan Turley is a practicing attorney, a dyed-in-the-wool conservative, and has been a chronic apologist for Trump.

Jonathan Turley tells Fox News the Trump indictment is ‘extremely damning’
and a ‘hit below the waterline’​

He is not an apologist for trump or anyone else.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Dershowitz also told us OJ was innocent and NEVER sides against Trump

Isn't today the anniversary of the death of OJ's wife?