Al Gore is a friggin' FRAUD!.....And all the poof necessary is in this lil' exchange!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Wicked Jester, Oct 30, 2009.

  1. Wicked Jester
    Offline

    Wicked Jester Libsmackin'chef

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    11,924
    Thanks Received:
    1,859
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    So. Cal, Malibu!
    Ratings:
    +1,859
    [ame]www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLK4RZDdzI&feature=related[/ame]
    I post this now because Lord Monckton went on Glenn Beck today and fully discredited both Gores and the enviro-nazis claims. He even made an impassioned plea to Gore to debate him before the world. He's been trying to get Gore to debate him for quite some time. Of course Gore abjectly refuses. He's such a liberal pussy!

    ALL of you should check out the rerun of Beck this evening. It was classic television to be sure. But, if not, i'll be back with the Youtube next week!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2009
  2. Murf76
    Offline

    Murf76 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    2,464
    Thanks Received:
    593
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +594
    I saw that. The last graph was devastating to the eco-freak movement. Entertaining presentation too.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Wicked Jester
    Offline

    Wicked Jester Libsmackin'chef

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    11,924
    Thanks Received:
    1,859
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    So. Cal, Malibu!
    Ratings:
    +1,859
    Seriously, it was compelling indeed.

    When are these liberal idiots going to WTFU?
     
  4. KittenKoder
    Offline

    KittenKoder Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    23,281
    Thanks Received:
    1,711
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,714
    It's not liberals, it's environuts who still fall for his bullshit. ;)
     
  5. Wicked Jester
    Offline

    Wicked Jester Libsmackin'chef

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    11,924
    Thanks Received:
    1,859
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    So. Cal, Malibu!
    Ratings:
    +1,859
    Unfortunately, or not, it's primarily liberal loons who are buying into this bullshit!
     
  6. Political Junky
    Online

    Political Junky Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Messages:
    19,563
    Thanks Received:
    2,948
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +5,541
    The whole room was laughing at Blackburn, of course you're too stupid to have realized that.
     
  7. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,703
    Gore has yet to engage scientists in discussion.

    Gore's no scientist, but he plays one on TV (an in a movie, and in Congress).

    How pathetically transparent he is.

    PS. Love the thread title! ;)
     
  8. Diuretic
    Offline

    Diuretic Permanently confused

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12,653
    Thanks Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Australia est 1836
    Ratings:
    +1,397
    If Gore debated Monckton then it would be two non-scientists doing the debating :D
     
  9. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,703
    Yes it would be. But if he even took on another with opposing views, he would be less transparent.
     
  10. Diuretic
    Offline

    Diuretic Permanently confused

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12,653
    Thanks Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Australia est 1836
    Ratings:
    +1,397
    My problem with it would be that both sides would be using scientific material in a non-scientific manner. Now I need to clarify that. I have to say I would prefer to see scientists - and scientists who were credentialled in the appropriate areas - debating this issue. I know in five minutes it would be over my head but I would prefer to struggle to keep up rather than listen to propaganda from either side.

    My own view on it is un-scientific but prudent (obviously I'd think that). My disappointment with the debate is that it's not scientific, it's ideological - again on both sides.
     

Share This Page