AIPAC to push for war!

The US role in this war is to tip the scales of the ground war so that the mercenaries and finish off Assad. The gas was our signal to jump in. The stage is set. Barry and Kerry have just dropped the ball a couple of times.
What if both (all) sides in the Syrian conflict have used poison gas?

No one really cares who used it.
So does that mean the US role is to now finish of Assad and the rebels?
It seems like it's Syria's turn to go the way of Iraq and Libya with Iran up next.


"The phrase petrodollar warfare refers to a hypothesis that one of the driving forces of United States foreign policy has been the status of the United States dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency and as the currency in which oil is priced."
 
What if both (all) sides in the Syrian conflict have used poison gas?

No one really cares who used it.
So does that mean the US role is to now finish of Assad and the rebels?
It seems like it's Syria's turn to go the way of Iraq and Libya with Iran up next.


"The phrase petrodollar warfare refers to a hypothesis that one of the driving forces of United States foreign policy has been the status of the United States dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency and as the currency in which oil is priced."

I think once America alters the balance of the ground war we may be happy to sit back and watch someone else pick up the pieces. Of course we'll be interested in any business opportunities that may arise.
 
Last edited:
I fear that the AIPAC/Jewish Congressman driving force behind this war will be successful.

They will bring up the Holocaust and Czechoslovakia.

They will say that not attacking Syria will give a green light to Iran to nuke Israel.

They will say attacking Syria will prevent another Jewish Holcaust.


....and then when the war goes very badly for the USA, the Jews will be blamed.

:(
So, Miss Hoffstra, there are no Syrian Americans (and perhaps those Arabs of the Sunni sect) in your neighborhood pushing for war? Is everything going to be blamed on the Jews, as per usual?
 
Obviously, you have never talked to any of the 90% of Syria's sunni citizens about Assad and his murderous ways. .. :cool:

Do you really see the potential for a stable government for Syria in the Opposition? They will not even agree to diplomacy, they reject participating in Geneva II talks. How is a diplomatic solution to be reached when the Opposition renounces diplomacy?
The Syrian people have been under the boot of Assad and his father for several decades.

They do not want to negotiate and have a future that includes Assad and his brutal henchmen.

In fact, they are willing to fight to the death rather than being slaves to that murdering psychopath.

Any red blooded American should empathize with the Syrian peoples fight against a tyrant like Assad and desire for freedom. .. :cool:
Naturally we will get that from SunniMan who closes his eyes to any atrocity his newly-adopted Sunni brethren will commit. It appears that no matter how bad a Muslim tyrant is in many Middle East countries, at least the religious minorities have it much better than they would have it under fanatical Islamist Muslims like those SunniMan favors, which of course he doesn't consider psychopaths.

A dilemma for Syria's minorities - latimes.com
 
Looks like AIPAC, Sheldon Adelson, and other Zionist warhawks will NOT be getting their war after all.

:)

Yup, which means that Assad will continue to kill his people by the thousands through shelling, airstrikes and infantry.
While Obama's solution calls for the US to kill them first with cruise missiles and stealth bombers in defense of petrodollars:

"The phrase petrodollar warfare refers to a hypothesis that one of the driving forces of United States foreign policy has been the status of the United States dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency and as the currency in which oil is priced."

False. His goal was to attack Assads military facilities. The U.S , as you already know, has the technology to pinpoint their strikes and hit what they want to hit.
But since it doesn't seem like that's going to happen, Assad will continue to prove to us why he is called the "Butcher of "Damascus". Not that you give a hoot, since you're too busy condemning the U.S and Israel for something that hasn't even happened
 
Last edited:
I fear that the AIPAC/Jewish Congressman driving force behind this war will be successful.

They will bring up the Holocaust and Czechoslovakia.

They will say that not attacking Syria will give a green light to Iran to nuke Israel.

They will say attacking Syria will prevent another Jewish Holcaust.


....and then when the war goes very badly for the USA, the Jews will be blamed.

:(
So, Miss Hoffstra, there are no Syrian Americans (and perhaps those Arabs of the Sunni sect) in your neighborhood pushing for war? Is everything going to be blamed on the Jews, as per usual?
Some might be very upset now that it looks like the US president got wet feet when Syria called his bluff, they can't run around pointing fingers at the Joooooos.
 
Yup, which means that Assad will continue to kill his people by the thousands through shelling, airstrikes and infantry.
While Obama's solution calls for the US to kill them first with cruise missiles and stealth bombers in defense of petrodollars:

"The phrase petrodollar warfare refers to a hypothesis that one of the driving forces of United States foreign policy has been the status of the United States dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency and as the currency in which oil is priced."

False. His goal was to attack Assads military facilities. The U.S , as you already know, has the technology to pinpoint their strikes and hit what they want to hit.
But since it doesn't seem like that's going to happen, Assad will continue to prove to us why he is called the "Butcher of "Damascus". Not that you give a hoot, since you're too busy condemning the U.S and Israel for something that hasn't even happened

If Obama ever decides to take action against Assads military facilities he will change the balance of the ground war in favor of the attacking coalition. The Saudis and Qataris are banking on it. They have a lot invested in this regime change.
 
We protect SK due to anti-Communist nonsense.

We protect Israel due to campaign donations and Holocaust guilt.

No, the U.S protects Israel because they are allies, and Israel provides the U.S with vital information about certain occurrences in the Middle East.

Just because you hate Israel, doesn't mean you have to make shit up

when I want your opinion asshole, I will ask for it.

The USA protects Israel because of Holocaust guilt and campaign contributions from wealthy Zionists.
I am getting a big chuckle at who is calling someone else an "asshole."
A refined woman you are not, and I doubt this is what they teach you at Hofstra University.where you are probably in your Freshman year. All you really have been doing is showing us that once you get off on Fridays, you sit on your porta-potty all weekend in front of your computer dissing the Jews and Israel. I am beginning to wonder if you by chance go to those Friday sermons at the mosque and get all worked up there. If not, maybe you get worked up at the local Bund meetings. Perhaps Miss Hoffstra should take her act on the streets of America where the majority of average Americans back Israel because they feel it is the right thing to do, and it has nothing to do with the Holocaust or money. Be glad Toastman that you probably don't have such vulgar women in your social circles, and ones who hate the Jews like this "asshole."
 
calling me a faggot, how mature :lol:

You need to grow up dude , really, you're making a massive fool of yourself

you've obsessively stalked my posts and insulted me, unprovoked and without response, for more than a week.

and you have the balls to talk about maturity.
Miss Hoffstra doesn't like anyone to say anything against her posts. She wants everyone to accept everything she says as the Gospel truth. As for cojones, Miss Hoffstra, your girlfriend is certainly happy that you don't have any so of course she doesn't call you faggot the way you refer to others.
 
Looks like I got a new obsessive stalker, named Hossfly.

:)


I am getting a big chuckle at who is calling someone else an "asshole."
A refined woman you are not, and I doubt this is what they teach you at Hofstra University.where you are probably in your Freshman year. All you really have been doing is showing us that once you get off on Fridays, you sit on your porta-potty all weekend in front of your computer dissing the Jews and Israel. I am beginning to wonder if you by chance go to those Friday sermons at the mosque and get all worked up there. If not, maybe you get worked up at the local Bund meetings. Perhaps Miss Hoffstra should take her act on the streets of America where the majority of average Americans back Israel because they feel it is the right thing to do, and it has nothing to do with the Holocaust or money. Be glad Toastman that you probably don't have such vulgar women in your social circles, and ones who hate the Jews like this "asshole."

Miss Hoffstra doesn't like anyone to say anything against her posts. She wants everyone to accept everything she says as the Gospel truth. As for cojones, Miss Hoffstra, your girlfriend is certainly happy that you don't have any so of course she doesn't call you faggot the way you refer to others.
 
Last edited:
Why would anyone think it's a hoax?...

CAMERA, the Israeli factcheck organization, called it a hoax.
Then why don't you tell them to listen to what Martin Luther King told a group of Jews at a meeting? Are you saying that the people listening to him weren't really there? It really kills Muslims like Miss Hoffstra when a famous Black Christian man speaks up for Israel. She much rather hear about Calypso Louie's rant against the Jews.
 
Why would anyone think it's a hoax?...

CAMERA, the Israeli factcheck organization, called it a hoax.
Again, not being able to verify a quote doesn't make it a hoax. Now that we're calling whatever CAMERA says, the ultimate word, here's what else it said:

CAMERA: MLK on Peace, Israeli Security and Anti-Zionism

January 16, 2012

MLK on Peace, Israeli Security and Anti-Zionism

In light of the tendency by some propaganda films and anti-Israel speakers to posthumously enlist Martin Luther King, Jr., for their attacks on the Jewish state, it's worth noting what the civil rights hero actually felt about Israel and its situation.

Those who knew King well have recalled his strong support for Israel, his understanding of the links between Israeli security and peace, and his opposition to anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism.

Rep. John Lewis, in his own right a leader in the civil rights movement, wrote an Op-Ed in 2002 describing King's "special bond with Israel":

During his lifetime King witnessed the birth of Israel and the continuing struggle to build a nation. He consistently reiterated his stand on the Israeli-Arab conflict, stating "Israel's right to exist as a state in security is uncontestable." It was no accident that King emphasized "security" in his statements on the Middle East.

On March 25, 1968, less than two weeks before his tragic death, he spoke out with clarity and directness stating, "peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality."

During the recent U.N. Conference on Racism held in Durban, South Africa, we were all shocked by the attacks on Jews, Israel and Zionism. The United States of America stood up against these vicious attacks.

Once again, the words of King ran through my memory, "I solemnly pledge to do my utmost to uphold the fair name of the Jews -- because bigotry in any form is an affront to us all."

The Op-Ed also pointed out that King was clearly against against attacks on Zionists. Lewis wrote that "During an appearance at Harvard University shortly before his death, a student stood up and asked King to address himself to the issue of Zionism. The question was clearly hostile. King responded, ‘When people criticize Zionists they mean Jews, you are talking anti-Semitism.'" (This is not to be confused with a widely circulated letter said to be written by King.)

Clarence B. Jones, a friend and advisor to King, likewise recalled King's opposition to anti-Zionism. "I can say with absolute certainty that Martin abhorred anti-Semitism in all its forms, including anti-Zionism," he explained in a 2008 Op-Ed. Jones elaborated on that point in What Would Martin Say?, a book he co-authored with Joel Engel. Mainstream reporters, he argues, have given a pass to anti-Semitism by black leaders like Al Sharpton because they buy the rationale that Israel's existence is a provocation to Arabs. "Martin, for one, could see this coming after the Six-Day War in 1967, which is why he warned repeatedly that anti-Semitism would soon be disguised as anti-Zionism."

While King would surely support better circumstances for both Israelis and Palestinians, it seems clear that he was unambiguously opposed to the Israel-bashing that counts as pro-Palestinian advocacy today. His strong statement about Israel's right to exist suggests he recognized the centrality of this issue to the conflict. And judging by his views on anti-Zionism, he would be outraged by the idea that an avowed anti-Zionist like Omar Barghouti, who openly calls for replacing Israel with a state in which Jews will be a minority, pretends King would back boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel.
 
Last edited:
While Obama's solution calls for the US to kill them first with cruise missiles and stealth bombers in defense of petrodollars:

"The phrase petrodollar warfare refers to a hypothesis that one of the driving forces of United States foreign policy has been the status of the United States dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency and as the currency in which oil is priced."

False. His goal was to attack Assads military facilities. The U.S , as you already know, has the technology to pinpoint their strikes and hit what they want to hit.
But since it doesn't seem like that's going to happen, Assad will continue to prove to us why he is called the "Butcher of "Damascus". Not that you give a hoot, since you're too busy condemning the U.S and Israel for something that hasn't even happened

If Obama ever decides to take action against Assads military facilities he will change the balance of the ground war in favor of the attacking coalition. The Saudis and Qataris are banking on it. They have a lot invested in this regime change.

Prince Bandar and Zionist Lobby Partnering to Maneuver Obama into Prolonged War with Syria By Franklin Lamb August 28, 2013

Reportedly, the Saudi-Zionist discretely coordinated effort, confirmed by Congressional staffers working on the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, as well as the US Senate Foreign Relations committee, is being led by Bandar protégé, Adel A. al-Jubeir, the current Saudi ambassador, and facilitated by Bahrain ambassador Houda Ezra Ebrahimis Nonoo, who is the first Jewish person and third woman to be appointed ambassador of Bahrain. Long known for having myriad contacts at the AIPAC headquarters and as an ardent Zionist, Houda Nonoo has attended lobby functions while advising *associates that the “Arabs must forget about the so-called Liberation of Palestine. It will never happen.” Prince Bandar and Zionist Lobby Partnering to Maneuver Obama into Prolonged War with Syria | Foreign Policy Journal
 
Yup, which means that Assad will continue to kill his people by the thousands through shelling, airstrikes and infantry.
While Obama's solution calls for the US to kill them first with cruise missiles and stealth bombers in defense of petrodollars:

"The phrase petrodollar warfare refers to a hypothesis that one of the driving forces of United States foreign policy has been the status of the United States dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency and as the currency in which oil is priced."

False. His goal was to attack Assads military facilities. The U.S , as you already know, has the technology to pinpoint their strikes and hit what they want to hit.
But since it doesn't seem like that's going to happen, Assad will continue to prove to us why he is called the "Butcher of "Damascus". Not that you give a hoot, since you're too busy condemning the U.S and Israel for something that hasn't even happened
The US I know has maimed, murdered, and displaced millions of Muslim civilians since 911. Are you under the impression they missed hitting what they wanted to hit?

I'm unclear on why I shouldn't be suspicious of Saudi fascists and AIPAC urging more dead Muslims in the Middle East:

"One of the most common phases being uttered by AIPAC to congressional offices this week are the words, 'Assad’s massive use of chemical weapons'.

"Bandar has reportedly agreed that Israel can call the shots, but that the air assault will be led by the US and involve roughly two dozen US allies including Turkey, the UK, and France.

"The German weekly Focus reported on August 26 that the IDF’s 8200 intelligence unit bugged the Syrian leadership during the chemical weapons attack last week and that Israel 'sold' the incriminating information to the White House."

Prince Bandar and Zionist Lobby Partnering to Maneuver Obama into Prolonged War with Syria | Foreign Policy Journal
 
False. His goal was to attack Assads military facilities. The U.S , as you already know, has the technology to pinpoint their strikes and hit what they want to hit.
But since it doesn't seem like that's going to happen, Assad will continue to prove to us why he is called the "Butcher of "Damascus". Not that you give a hoot, since you're too busy condemning the U.S and Israel for something that hasn't even happened

If Obama ever decides to take action against Assads military facilities he will change the balance of the ground war in favor of the attacking coalition. The Saudis and Qataris are banking on it. They have a lot invested in this regime change.

Prince Bandar and Zionist Lobby Partnering to Maneuver Obama into Prolonged War with Syria By Franklin Lamb August 28, 2013

Reportedly, the Saudi-Zionist discretely coordinated effort, confirmed by Congressional staffers working on the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, as well as the US Senate Foreign Relations committee, is being led by Bandar protégé, Adel A. al-Jubeir, the current Saudi ambassador, and facilitated by Bahrain ambassador Houda Ezra Ebrahimis Nonoo, who is the first Jewish person and third woman to be appointed ambassador of Bahrain. Long known for having myriad contacts at the AIPAC headquarters and as an ardent Zionist, Houda Nonoo has attended lobby functions while advising *associates that the “Arabs must forget about the so-called Liberation of Palestine. It will never happen.” Prince Bandar and Zionist Lobby Partnering to Maneuver Obama into Prolonged War with Syria | Foreign Policy Journal
Rich Jews and even richer Saudi Royals uniting to kill even more Syrians:

"The Bandar-Zionist lobby collaboration, currently the cocktail party talk of many in Washington, is not a case of strange bedfellows, given three decades of mutual cooperation that started during Prince Bandar’s long tenure as Saudi ambassador in Washington.

"Based in Washington, but with a palace out west and up north, Bandar developed almost familial relationships with five presidents and their key advisers. His voice was one of the shrillest urging the United States to invade Iraq in 2003.

"In the 1980s, Prince Bandar was deeply involved in the Iran-Contra scandal in Nicaragua, and it his intelligence agency that first alerted Western allies to the alleged use of sarin gas by the Syrian regime in February.

"Bandar has reportedly for months been focused exclusively on garnering international support, including arms and training, for Syrian rebel factions in pursuit of the eventual toppling of President Bashar al-Assad."

Prince Bandar and Zionist Lobby Partnering to Maneuver Obama into Prolonged War with Syria | Foreign Policy Journal

Bandar Bush should've been dropped into a six by ten foot cell with Ollie North for his Iran-Contra dealings thirty years ago. When it comes time for the New Middle East to push into Iran, he will be pulling the strings of whatever puppet happens to be in the White House at that moment.
 
Last edited:
While Obama's solution calls for the US to kill them first with cruise missiles and stealth bombers in defense of petrodollars:

"The phrase petrodollar warfare refers to a hypothesis that one of the driving forces of United States foreign policy has been the status of the United States dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency and as the currency in which oil is priced."

False. His goal was to attack Assads military facilities. The U.S , as you already know, has the technology to pinpoint their strikes and hit what they want to hit.
But since it doesn't seem like that's going to happen, Assad will continue to prove to us why he is called the "Butcher of "Damascus". Not that you give a hoot, since you're too busy condemning the U.S and Israel for something that hasn't even happened
The US I know has maimed, murdered, and displaced millions of Muslim civilians since 911. Are you under the impression they missed hitting what they wanted to hit?

I'm unclear on why I shouldn't be suspicious of Saudi fascists and AIPAC urging more dead Muslims in the Middle East:

"One of the most common phases being uttered by AIPAC to congressional offices this week are the words, 'Assad’s massive use of chemical weapons'.

"Bandar has reportedly agreed that Israel can call the shots, but that the air assault will be led by the US and involve roughly two dozen US allies including Turkey, the UK, and France.

"The German weekly Focus reported on August 26 that the IDF’s 8200 intelligence unit bugged the Syrian leadership during the chemical weapons attack last week and that Israel 'sold' the incriminating information to the White House."

Prince Bandar and Zionist Lobby Partnering to Maneuver Obama into Prolonged War with Syria | Foreign Policy Journal
Georgie Boy, just whom do you think you are kidding? I doubt there are many viewers who actually believe you care about the Arabs. In fact, you are happy that they are around for you to use as your pawns in your hatred against the U.S. and Israel (Jews). Never ever have you brought up the fact that the Muslims have murdered millions in the name of their religion. It is always America and Israel that you want to blame for everything even though one would think that at least a person like you would be appalled that the Muslim President of the Sudan wants to get rid of all the Black tribes. You don't even care how Blacks are thought of in the Arab world because the U.S. and Israel (Jews) are not involved.
 

Forum List

Back
Top