Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dear, deficits are paid for with taxes. See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?Dear ,not wanting to tax and wanting to stimulus spend is impossible. Do you understand??
- Somebody never heard of deficit spending.
tsk tsk
- I see. Except for at any time ever.
You do realize that the national debt represents all of those deficits, right?
Nobody got taxed...dear.
dear, we're always getting taxed more and more to pay for the growing debt.
-Pook, as our deficits have climbed, taxes have mostly gone down.
Did you just realize that our national debt is increasing, so we can NOT be paying for those deficits with increases in taxes.
Dear, deficits are paid for with taxes. See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?- Somebody never heard of deficit spending.
tsk tsk
- I see. Except for at any time ever.
You do realize that the national debt represents all of those deficits, right?
Nobody got taxed...dear.
dear, we're always getting taxed more and more to pay for the growing debt.
-Pook, as our deficits have climbed, taxes have mostly gone down.
Did you just realize that our national debt is increasing, so we can NOT be paying for those deficits with increases in taxes.
lib commie govt is spending more and more of GDP, and this does not even include more and more regulations like Obamacare, so the lib commie interference is at all time high and growth is at all time low.
So is this the time to start raising taxes to pay for the ever growing debt?? Keynes wanted to eventually pay the debt didn't he?
What an idiot liberal. If true there would no reason not to always deficit spend.Dear, deficits are paid for with taxes. See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
- I see. Except for at any time ever.
You do realize that the national debt represents all of those deficits, right?
Nobody got taxed...dear.
dear, we're always getting taxed more and more to pay for the growing debt.
-Pook, as our deficits have climbed, taxes have mostly gone down.
Did you just realize that our national debt is increasing, so we can NOT be paying for those deficits with increases in taxes.
lib commie govt is spending more and more of GDP, and this does not even include more and more regulations like Obamacare, so the lib commie interference is at all time high and growth is at all time low.
So is this the time to start raising taxes to pay for the ever growing debt?? Keynes wanted to eventually pay the debt didn't he?
- Edward, government spending isn't "of GDP", it ADDS to GDP.
Deficit spending is, by definition, government spending money that doesn't exist until government spends it.
In other words, it doesn't "crowd out" other spending. It ADDS to what is spent. It creates new economic activity.
What an idiot liberal. If true there would no reason not to always deficit spend.- I see. Except for at any time ever.
You do realize that the national debt represents all of those deficits, right?
Nobody got taxed...dear.
dear, we're always getting taxed more and more to pay for the growing debt.
-Pook, as our deficits have climbed, taxes have mostly gone down.
Did you just realize that our national debt is increasing, so we can NOT be paying for those deficits with increases in taxes.
lib commie govt is spending more and more of GDP, and this does not even include more and more regulations like Obamacare, so the lib commie interference is at all time high and growth is at all time low.
So is this the time to start raising taxes to pay for the ever growing debt?? Keynes wanted to eventually pay the debt didn't he?
- Edward, government spending isn't "of GDP", it ADDS to GDP.
Deficit spending is, by definition, government spending money that doesn't exist until government spends it.
In other words, it doesn't "crowd out" other spending. It ADDS to what is spent. It creates new economic activity.
See why we are positive liberalism is based in pure ignorance.
If you were at full employment and had a trade surplus, would you still want deficits?
If you were at full employment and had a trade surplus, would you still want deficits?
dear, conservatives don't ever want deficits because stealing from people who know how to earn money and giving it to libturd bureaucrats who only know how to waste it on bridges no where and crippling welfare impedes economic growth.
Further, you said deficits "create new economic activity". If so you should always want to create it . I know conservatives always want to add to the economy an ever growing supply of new Republican inventions at the fastest rate possible. How did the liberal think we got from the stone age to here??
Do you understand.
What an idiot liberal. If true there would no reason not to always deficit spend.dear, we're always getting taxed more and more to pay for the growing debt.
-Pook, as our deficits have climbed, taxes have mostly gone down.
Did you just realize that our national debt is increasing, so we can NOT be paying for those deficits with increases in taxes.
lib commie govt is spending more and more of GDP, and this does not even include more and more regulations like Obamacare, so the lib commie interference is at all time high and growth is at all time low.
So is this the time to start raising taxes to pay for the ever growing debt?? Keynes wanted to eventually pay the debt didn't he?
- Edward, government spending isn't "of GDP", it ADDS to GDP.
Deficit spending is, by definition, government spending money that doesn't exist until government spends it.
In other words, it doesn't "crowd out" other spending. It ADDS to what is spent. It creates new economic activity.
See why we are positive liberalism is based in pure ignorance.
- There would be nor reason not to always deficit spend?
Wow. You really don't look at a very big picture, do you? If you were at full employment and had a trade surplus, would you still want deficits?
What an idiot liberal. If true there would no reason not to always deficit spend.-Pook, as our deficits have climbed, taxes have mostly gone down.
Did you just realize that our national debt is increasing, so we can NOT be paying for those deficits with increases in taxes.
lib commie govt is spending more and more of GDP, and this does not even include more and more regulations like Obamacare, so the lib commie interference is at all time high and growth is at all time low.
So is this the time to start raising taxes to pay for the ever growing debt?? Keynes wanted to eventually pay the debt didn't he?
- Edward, government spending isn't "of GDP", it ADDS to GDP.
Deficit spending is, by definition, government spending money that doesn't exist until government spends it.
In other words, it doesn't "crowd out" other spending. It ADDS to what is spent. It creates new economic activity.
See why we are positive liberalism is based in pure ignorance.
- There would be nor reason not to always deficit spend?
Wow. You really don't look at a very big picture, do you? If you were at full employment and had a trade surplus, would you still want deficits?
You must understand that Ed is a congenital idiot, paid to post conservative dogma (though he is not required to understand what he posts), and to try and end any discussion not directed by a conservative.. Poor dear can really not help himself. Just plain bad luck.
Many of us have found it easier to simply ignore trolls like Ed, since he will not understand what your post anyway. He is a simple waste of time.
On another subject, I find your posts interesting. You have a good grasp of economics. How did that come about?
If you were at full employment and had a trade surplus, would you still want deficits?
If you were at full employment and had a trade surplus, would you still want deficits?
dear, conservatives don't ever want deficits because stealing from people who know how to earn money and giving it to libturd bureaucrats who only know how to waste it on bridges no where and crippling welfare impedes economic growth.
Further, you said deficits "create new economic activity". If so you should always want to create it . I know conservatives always want to add to the economy an ever growing supply of new Republican inventions at the fastest rate possible. How did the liberal think we got from the stone age to here??
Do you understand.
- I guess my question was designed to see if you think about how different economic situations might be different from each other, and it's obvious you don't.
so I've just gone back to studying it.
If you were at full employment and had a trade surplus, would you still want deficits?
dear, conservatives don't ever want deficits because stealing from people who know how to earn money and giving it to libturd bureaucrats who only know how to waste it on bridges to no where and crippling welfare impedes economic growth.
Further, you said deficits "create new economic activity". If so you should always want to create it . I know conservatives always want to add to the economy an ever growing supply of new Republican inventions at the fastest rate possible. How did the liberal think we got from the stone age to here??
Do you understand.
If you were at full employment and had a trade surplus, would you still want deficits?
dear, conservatives don't ever want deficits because stealing from people who know how to earn money and giving it to libturd bureaucrats who only know how to waste it on bridges to no where and crippling welfare impedes economic growth.
Further, you said deficits "create new economic activity". If so you should always want to create it . I know conservatives always want to add to the economy an ever growing supply of new Republican inventions at the fastest rate possible. How did the liberal think we got from the stone age to here??
Do you understand.
- Deficits are stealing? How is not taxing people stealing?
If you were at full employment and had a trade surplus, would you still want deficits?
dear, conservatives don't ever want deficits because stealing from people who know how to earn money and giving it to libturd bureaucrats who only know how to waste it on bridges to no where and crippling welfare impedes economic growth.
Further, you said deficits "create new economic activity". If so you should always want to create it . I know conservatives always want to add to the economy an ever growing supply of new Republican inventions at the fastest rate possible. How did the liberal think we got from the stone age to here??
Do you understand.
- Deficits are stealing? How is not taxing people stealing?
dear, we are always taxing more and more to pay for the debt!! Do you understand?
- We're not. The debt always rises because we absolutely don't do what you suggest.[raise taxes]
- We're not. The debt always rises because we absolutely don't do what you suggest.[raise taxes]
dear, I urge you to ask yourself if as a typical liberal you have the IQ to be here??
Fed Revenue in 2000 was $2 trillion in 2015 its $6 trillion. Do you understand that 6 is more than 2???
See why we are positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??
- We're not. The debt always rises because we absolutely don't do what you suggest.[raise taxes]
dear, I urge you to ask yourself if as a typical liberal you have the IQ to be here??
Fed Revenue in 2000 was $2 trillion in 2015 its $6 trillion. Do you understand that 6 is more than 2???
See why we are positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??
Total revenue in 2014 was just over 3 Trillion:
US Federal Budget Revenue Estimate vs. Actual for FY2014 - Charts
Fed Revenue in 2000 was $2 trillion in 2015 its $3.5 trillion, in 2020 projected to be 4.2.- We're not. The debt always rises because we absolutely don't do what you suggest.[raise taxes]
dear, I urge you to ask yourself if as a typical liberal you have the IQ to be here??
Fed Revenue in 2000 was $2 trillion in 2015 its $6 trillion. Do you understand that 6 is more than 2???
See why we are positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance??
Total revenue in 2014 was just over 3 Trillion:
US Federal Budget Revenue Estimate vs. Actual for FY2014 - Charts
If you were at full employment and had a trade surplus, would you still want deficits?
dear, conservatives don't ever want deficits because stealing from people who know how to earn money and giving it to libturd bureaucrats who only know how to waste it on bridges to no where and crippling welfare impedes economic growth.
Further, you said deficits "create new economic activity". If so you should always want to create it . I know conservatives always want to add to the economy an ever growing supply of new Republican inventions at the fastest rate possible. How did the liberal think we got from the stone age to here??
Do you understand.
- Deficits are stealing? How is not taxing people stealing?
dear, we are always taxing more and more to pay for the debt!! Do you understand?
- We're not. The debt always rises because we absolutely don't do what you suggest.
