Dale Smith
Platinum Member
Actually, that is not what those e-mails are inquiring about at all. As I stated, the FBI's tech experts were required to get into Seth's computer. Now, why would any law enforcement need to get into someone's laptop over an alleged and random botched robbery where nothing was taken? Why was his room in the hospital was guarded by the Feds? He was expected to make a full recovery. One resident doctor reported that Seth's room was off-limits to the regular crew and then he suddenly dies? The folks at the DNC didn't give a fuck until they found out that a private investigator was snooping around the D.C police department. Then ALL of the sudden? They cared greatly and sent one of their P.R/damage control agents to "babysit" the Rich family and be their (snicker) "spokesman". Suddenly the Rich family wanted to distance themselves from the private detective that was being paid for by someone else.Those emails that your link thinks are so revelatory are just what I said they were. The FBI was notified that Assange was spouting his mouth off about Seth Rich conspiracies and to expect some righties to ask questions about.No, they didn't. That was part of an internet conspiracy theory. Part of it came from a Fox News article citing Rod Wheeler but that article was found out to have been fabricated and retracted.Nope. The only email that they provided is the FBI reacting to the bogus conspiracy theory that they were involved. The email you’re referring to is basically “heads up, nutty right wing media may ask you about Seth Rich”.FOIA requests to the FBI field office concerning Seth Rich that were stonewalled and then finally released says otherwise. Heavily redacted but still shows FBI involvement in the case.The FBI never involved themselves in the investigation into his death and they never had his laptop.Seth Rich was the one that downloaded the emails on more than one occasion. One of Podesta's emails had a veiled threat that the one doing it should made an example of. Why would the FBI involve themselves with a botched robbery attempt and need his laptop for months?It's a spin job, nothing more or less. Fact 1: Without forensics to see what kind of code was used ( and it is very provable of a hack because firewalls show data of penetration attempts) coupled with the fact that no I.T complained of hacking or warned of a hack until the Wikileaks drop. You are a joke clinging to lies because the truth is too painful and embarrassing.Yet you can’t provide any actual critique of it. What did the link do wrong?Most people work with computers every day. This is 2020, kiddo. We live on computers. Bill Binney is not an expert on cybersecurity and made critical mistakes in his analysis.I work with computers every day, asswipe. I have to laugh at your questioning of William Binney's expertise sans a link PLUS you have no explanation as to why the server was never turned over for evaluation. What i love best about the Wikileaks dump is how disgusting pieces of shit like you were more concerned about the fact that the dirty dealings were revealed instead of being shocked as to what the contents were. So eat shit and die slowly and painfully, you parasitic waste of life.I love it when people bring up Bill Binney. You want to talk about what he found? He made so many mistakes that half of his group posted a letter contradicting him. He claims to prove it wasn’t Russia based on transfer speeds. What he doesn’t do is demonstrate the transfer speed he was referring to occurred anywhere near the actual hack. He just assumed that’s the case with zero evidence. What he demonstrated is that the files were transferred at some time somewhere over a USB or similar direct connection. That’s it.The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Why did house democrats fire the Awn brothers?
LOVE the old leftard defense of "Uh-Uhhh!"The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Funny how you leftards sniff at the term "conspiracy" while pushing the lie that the DNC server was hacked by the ROOSKIES when William Binney, a a former 2nd in command of the NSA proved that the amount of data downloaded from a foreign country (as was claimed) would have taken many days and in small data streams and any decent I.T and firewall system would have seen the security breach. Leftards like you also ignore the fact that none of the three letter alphabet agencies were allowed to do forensics on the server. Fuckwads like yourself simply pretend that the topic is never brought up. The security breach was an inside job BEHIND the firewall and Seth Rich was the one that downloaded them on a thumb drive. Now, go fuck yourself.....
I expect exactly zero rebuttal from you because I’m guessing you don’t actually know anything other than his name and what you were told to believe.
(snicker)
CrowdStrike-Ukraine Explained
Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine mentions "CrowdStrike". I thought I'd explain this.What was said?This is the text from the conversation covered in this“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have...securityboulevard.com
The server wasn’t turned over because servers aren’t ever turned over. The evidence isn’t the hardware, it’s the data. Big organizations who are hacked don’t rip out their servers and ship them to Quantico. They pull the data off for forensic purposes, then scrub them and get them back up and running.Your provided link is a fucking joke. It is easily the worst spin job ever attempted. Keep believing tbat the ROOOSKIES denied the leftard clown posse of the pedo Hildebeast, ya creepy pussbag.Most people work with computers every day. This is 2020, kiddo. We live on computers. Bill Binney is not an expert on cybersecurity and made critical mistakes in his analysis.I work with computers every day, asswipe. I have to laugh at your questioning of William Binney's expertise sans a link PLUS you have no explanation as to why the server was never turned over for evaluation. What i love best about the Wikileaks dump is how disgusting pieces of shit like you were more concerned about the fact that the dirty dealings were revealed instead of being shocked as to what the contents were. So eat shit and die slowly and painfully, you parasitic waste of life.I love it when people bring up Bill Binney. You want to talk about what he found? He made so many mistakes that half of his group posted a letter contradicting him. He claims to prove it wasn’t Russia based on transfer speeds. What he doesn’t do is demonstrate the transfer speed he was referring to occurred anywhere near the actual hack. He just assumed that’s the case with zero evidence. What he demonstrated is that the files were transferred at some time somewhere over a USB or similar direct connection. That’s it.The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Why did house democrats fire the Awn brothers?
LOVE the old leftard defense of "Uh-Uhhh!"The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Funny how you leftards sniff at the term "conspiracy" while pushing the lie that the DNC server was hacked by the ROOSKIES when William Binney, a a former 2nd in command of the NSA proved that the amount of data downloaded from a foreign country (as was claimed) would have taken many days and in small data streams and any decent I.T and firewall system would have seen the security breach. Leftards like you also ignore the fact that none of the three letter alphabet agencies were allowed to do forensics on the server. Fuckwads like yourself simply pretend that the topic is never brought up. The security breach was an inside job BEHIND the firewall and Seth Rich was the one that downloaded them on a thumb drive. Now, go fuck yourself.....
I expect exactly zero rebuttal from you because I’m guessing you don’t actually know anything other than his name and what you were told to believe.
(snicker)
CrowdStrike-Ukraine Explained
Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine mentions "CrowdStrike". I thought I'd explain this.What was said?This is the text from the conversation covered in this“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have...securityboulevard.com
The server wasn’t turned over because servers aren’t ever turned over. The evidence isn’t the hardware, it’s the data. Big organizations who are hacked don’t rip out their servers and ship them to Quantico. They pull the data off for forensic purposes, then scrub them and get them back up and running.
More if you want:
Why that "file-copy" forensics of DNC hack is wrong
People keep asking me about this story about how forensics "experts" have found proof the DNC hack was an inside job, because files were co...blog.erratasec.comWell, you got one right. However, that was in Dec of 2019. What about the claim that "diabetes was no big deal?" When did he "brag" about his tobacco addition?I remember Limbaugh saying diabetes was no big deal. COVID is the common cold. The guy who famously bragged of his tobacco addition without caring about the consequence dying of lung cancer.It started with Limbaugh, as usual.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
Limbaugh was right about the years long Russia drama being nonsense. How did the rest of the media do on that point? That is one example of many. You don't like conservative media because they are telling the truth.
If that’s who you want to stick with, be my guest. I hope you’re not taking medical advice from him.whats so funny? It proves that they were indeed indicating that Russia was the source of the hack before Wikileaks.Washington Post and CNN?????It's a spin job, nothing more or less. Fact 1: Without forensics to see what kind of code was used ( and it is very provable of a hack because firewalls show data of penetration attempts) coupled with the fact that no I.T complained of hacking or warned of a hack until the Wikileaks drop. You are a joke clinging to lies because the truth is too painful and embarrassing.Yet you can’t provide any actual critique of it. What did the link do wrong?Most people work with computers every day. This is 2020, kiddo. We live on computers. Bill Binney is not an expert on cybersecurity and made critical mistakes in his analysis.I work with computers every day, asswipe. I have to laugh at your questioning of William Binney's expertise sans a link PLUS you have no explanation as to why the server was never turned over for evaluation. What i love best about the Wikileaks dump is how disgusting pieces of shit like you were more concerned about the fact that the dirty dealings were revealed instead of being shocked as to what the contents were. So eat shit and die slowly and painfully, you parasitic waste of life.I love it when people bring up Bill Binney. You want to talk about what he found? He made so many mistakes that half of his group posted a letter contradicting him. He claims to prove it wasn’t Russia based on transfer speeds. What he doesn’t do is demonstrate the transfer speed he was referring to occurred anywhere near the actual hack. He just assumed that’s the case with zero evidence. What he demonstrated is that the files were transferred at some time somewhere over a USB or similar direct connection. That’s it.The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Why did house democrats fire the Awn brothers?
LOVE the old leftard defense of "Uh-Uhhh!"The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Funny how you leftards sniff at the term "conspiracy" while pushing the lie that the DNC server was hacked by the ROOSKIES when William Binney, a a former 2nd in command of the NSA proved that the amount of data downloaded from a foreign country (as was claimed) would have taken many days and in small data streams and any decent I.T and firewall system would have seen the security breach. Leftards like you also ignore the fact that none of the three letter alphabet agencies were allowed to do forensics on the server. Fuckwads like yourself simply pretend that the topic is never brought up. The security breach was an inside job BEHIND the firewall and Seth Rich was the one that downloaded them on a thumb drive. Now, go fuck yourself.....
I expect exactly zero rebuttal from you because I’m guessing you don’t actually know anything other than his name and what you were told to believe.
(snicker)
CrowdStrike-Ukraine Explained
Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine mentions "CrowdStrike". I thought I'd explain this.What was said?This is the text from the conversation covered in this“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have...securityboulevard.com
The server wasn’t turned over because servers aren’t ever turned over. The evidence isn’t the hardware, it’s the data. Big organizations who are hacked don’t rip out their servers and ship them to Quantico. They pull the data off for forensic purposes, then scrub them and get them back up and running.Your provided link is a fucking joke. It is easily the worst spin job ever attempted. Keep believing tbat the ROOOSKIES denied the leftard clown posse of the pedo Hildebeast, ya creepy pussbag.Most people work with computers every day. This is 2020, kiddo. We live on computers. Bill Binney is not an expert on cybersecurity and made critical mistakes in his analysis.I work with computers every day, asswipe. I have to laugh at your questioning of William Binney's expertise sans a link PLUS you have no explanation as to why the server was never turned over for evaluation. What i love best about the Wikileaks dump is how disgusting pieces of shit like you were more concerned about the fact that the dirty dealings were revealed instead of being shocked as to what the contents were. So eat shit and die slowly and painfully, you parasitic waste of life.I love it when people bring up Bill Binney. You want to talk about what he found? He made so many mistakes that half of his group posted a letter contradicting him. He claims to prove it wasn’t Russia based on transfer speeds. What he doesn’t do is demonstrate the transfer speed he was referring to occurred anywhere near the actual hack. He just assumed that’s the case with zero evidence. What he demonstrated is that the files were transferred at some time somewhere over a USB or similar direct connection. That’s it.The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Why did house democrats fire the Awn brothers?
LOVE the old leftard defense of "Uh-Uhhh!"The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Funny how you leftards sniff at the term "conspiracy" while pushing the lie that the DNC server was hacked by the ROOSKIES when William Binney, a a former 2nd in command of the NSA proved that the amount of data downloaded from a foreign country (as was claimed) would have taken many days and in small data streams and any decent I.T and firewall system would have seen the security breach. Leftards like you also ignore the fact that none of the three letter alphabet agencies were allowed to do forensics on the server. Fuckwads like yourself simply pretend that the topic is never brought up. The security breach was an inside job BEHIND the firewall and Seth Rich was the one that downloaded them on a thumb drive. Now, go fuck yourself.....
I expect exactly zero rebuttal from you because I’m guessing you don’t actually know anything other than his name and what you were told to believe.
(snicker)
CrowdStrike-Ukraine Explained
Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine mentions "CrowdStrike". I thought I'd explain this.What was said?This is the text from the conversation covered in this“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have...securityboulevard.com
The server wasn’t turned over because servers aren’t ever turned over. The evidence isn’t the hardware, it’s the data. Big organizations who are hacked don’t rip out their servers and ship them to Quantico. They pull the data off for forensic purposes, then scrub them and get them back up and running.
More if you want:
Why that "file-copy" forensics of DNC hack is wrong
People keep asking me about this story about how forensics "experts" have found proof the DNC hack was an inside job, because files were co...blog.erratasec.com
Hey Dale, as always, you're lying and I can prove it:
Here's an article from June 14th, 2016 saying the Russians hacked the DNC.
And here's another article dated July 25th, 2016 about the first dump of DNC Emails by WikiLeaks:
What was in the DNC email leak?
Debbie Wasserman Schultz's stewardship of the Democratic National Committee has been under fire through most of the presidential primary process.www.cnn.com
So to say that "no one complained about the hacking until after the first email dump is UTTERLY FALSE.
ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!
Unless you think the WaPo travels through time?
Think, son, think......it will be a totally be new experience and maybe even life altering!
There’s zero evidence to suggest Seth Rich had anything to do with it outside a nonsensical statement from Assange that didn’t actually claim he was the source.
So no, they weren’t involved.Again and as usual, you would be wrong. D.C police enlisted FBI help to get into Seth's computer because it required a password.Nope. The only email that they provided is the FBI reacting to the bogus conspiracy theory that they were involved. The email you’re referring to is basically “heads up, nutty right wing media may ask you about Seth Rich”.FOIA requests to the FBI field office concerning Seth Rich that were stonewalled and then finally released says otherwise. Heavily redacted but still shows FBI involvement in the case.The FBI never involved themselves in the investigation into his death and they never had his laptop.Seth Rich was the one that downloaded the emails on more than one occasion. One of Podesta's emails had a veiled threat that the one doing it should made an example of. Why would the FBI involve themselves with a botched robbery attempt and need his laptop for months?It's a spin job, nothing more or less. Fact 1: Without forensics to see what kind of code was used ( and it is very provable of a hack because firewalls show data of penetration attempts) coupled with the fact that no I.T complained of hacking or warned of a hack until the Wikileaks drop. You are a joke clinging to lies because the truth is too painful and embarrassing.Yet you can’t provide any actual critique of it. What did the link do wrong?Most people work with computers every day. This is 2020, kiddo. We live on computers. Bill Binney is not an expert on cybersecurity and made critical mistakes in his analysis.I work with computers every day, asswipe. I have to laugh at your questioning of William Binney's expertise sans a link PLUS you have no explanation as to why the server was never turned over for evaluation. What i love best about the Wikileaks dump is how disgusting pieces of shit like you were more concerned about the fact that the dirty dealings were revealed instead of being shocked as to what the contents were. So eat shit and die slowly and painfully, you parasitic waste of life.I love it when people bring up Bill Binney. You want to talk about what he found? He made so many mistakes that half of his group posted a letter contradicting him. He claims to prove it wasn’t Russia based on transfer speeds. What he doesn’t do is demonstrate the transfer speed he was referring to occurred anywhere near the actual hack. He just assumed that’s the case with zero evidence. What he demonstrated is that the files were transferred at some time somewhere over a USB or similar direct connection. That’s it.The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Why did house democrats fire the Awn brothers?
LOVE the old leftard defense of "Uh-Uhhh!"The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Funny how you leftards sniff at the term "conspiracy" while pushing the lie that the DNC server was hacked by the ROOSKIES when William Binney, a a former 2nd in command of the NSA proved that the amount of data downloaded from a foreign country (as was claimed) would have taken many days and in small data streams and any decent I.T and firewall system would have seen the security breach. Leftards like you also ignore the fact that none of the three letter alphabet agencies were allowed to do forensics on the server. Fuckwads like yourself simply pretend that the topic is never brought up. The security breach was an inside job BEHIND the firewall and Seth Rich was the one that downloaded them on a thumb drive. Now, go fuck yourself.....
I expect exactly zero rebuttal from you because I’m guessing you don’t actually know anything other than his name and what you were told to believe.
(snicker)
CrowdStrike-Ukraine Explained
Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine mentions "CrowdStrike". I thought I'd explain this.What was said?This is the text from the conversation covered in this“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have...securityboulevard.com
The server wasn’t turned over because servers aren’t ever turned over. The evidence isn’t the hardware, it’s the data. Big organizations who are hacked don’t rip out their servers and ship them to Quantico. They pull the data off for forensic purposes, then scrub them and get them back up and running.Your provided link is a fucking joke. It is easily the worst spin job ever attempted. Keep believing tbat the ROOOSKIES denied the leftard clown posse of the pedo Hildebeast, ya creepy pussbag.Most people work with computers every day. This is 2020, kiddo. We live on computers. Bill Binney is not an expert on cybersecurity and made critical mistakes in his analysis.I work with computers every day, asswipe. I have to laugh at your questioning of William Binney's expertise sans a link PLUS you have no explanation as to why the server was never turned over for evaluation. What i love best about the Wikileaks dump is how disgusting pieces of shit like you were more concerned about the fact that the dirty dealings were revealed instead of being shocked as to what the contents were. So eat shit and die slowly and painfully, you parasitic waste of life.I love it when people bring up Bill Binney. You want to talk about what he found? He made so many mistakes that half of his group posted a letter contradicting him. He claims to prove it wasn’t Russia based on transfer speeds. What he doesn’t do is demonstrate the transfer speed he was referring to occurred anywhere near the actual hack. He just assumed that’s the case with zero evidence. What he demonstrated is that the files were transferred at some time somewhere over a USB or similar direct connection. That’s it.The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Why did house democrats fire the Awn brothers?
LOVE the old leftard defense of "Uh-Uhhh!"The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Funny how you leftards sniff at the term "conspiracy" while pushing the lie that the DNC server was hacked by the ROOSKIES when William Binney, a a former 2nd in command of the NSA proved that the amount of data downloaded from a foreign country (as was claimed) would have taken many days and in small data streams and any decent I.T and firewall system would have seen the security breach. Leftards like you also ignore the fact that none of the three letter alphabet agencies were allowed to do forensics on the server. Fuckwads like yourself simply pretend that the topic is never brought up. The security breach was an inside job BEHIND the firewall and Seth Rich was the one that downloaded them on a thumb drive. Now, go fuck yourself.....
I expect exactly zero rebuttal from you because I’m guessing you don’t actually know anything other than his name and what you were told to believe.
(snicker)
CrowdStrike-Ukraine Explained
Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine mentions "CrowdStrike". I thought I'd explain this.What was said?This is the text from the conversation covered in this“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have...securityboulevard.com
The server wasn’t turned over because servers aren’t ever turned over. The evidence isn’t the hardware, it’s the data. Big organizations who are hacked don’t rip out their servers and ship them to Quantico. They pull the data off for forensic purposes, then scrub them and get them back up and running.
More if you want:
Why that "file-copy" forensics of DNC hack is wrong
People keep asking me about this story about how forensics "experts" have found proof the DNC hack was an inside job, because files were co...blog.erratasec.comWell, you got one right. However, that was in Dec of 2019. What about the claim that "diabetes was no big deal?" When did he "brag" about his tobacco addition?I remember Limbaugh saying diabetes was no big deal. COVID is the common cold. The guy who famously bragged of his tobacco addition without caring about the consequence dying of lung cancer.It started with Limbaugh, as usual.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
Limbaugh was right about the years long Russia drama being nonsense. How did the rest of the media do on that point? That is one example of many. You don't like conservative media because they are telling the truth.
If that’s who you want to stick with, be my guest. I hope you’re not taking medical advice from him.whats so funny? It proves that they were indeed indicating that Russia was the source of the hack before Wikileaks.Washington Post and CNN?????It's a spin job, nothing more or less. Fact 1: Without forensics to see what kind of code was used ( and it is very provable of a hack because firewalls show data of penetration attempts) coupled with the fact that no I.T complained of hacking or warned of a hack until the Wikileaks drop. You are a joke clinging to lies because the truth is too painful and embarrassing.Yet you can’t provide any actual critique of it. What did the link do wrong?Most people work with computers every day. This is 2020, kiddo. We live on computers. Bill Binney is not an expert on cybersecurity and made critical mistakes in his analysis.I work with computers every day, asswipe. I have to laugh at your questioning of William Binney's expertise sans a link PLUS you have no explanation as to why the server was never turned over for evaluation. What i love best about the Wikileaks dump is how disgusting pieces of shit like you were more concerned about the fact that the dirty dealings were revealed instead of being shocked as to what the contents were. So eat shit and die slowly and painfully, you parasitic waste of life.I love it when people bring up Bill Binney. You want to talk about what he found? He made so many mistakes that half of his group posted a letter contradicting him. He claims to prove it wasn’t Russia based on transfer speeds. What he doesn’t do is demonstrate the transfer speed he was referring to occurred anywhere near the actual hack. He just assumed that’s the case with zero evidence. What he demonstrated is that the files were transferred at some time somewhere over a USB or similar direct connection. That’s it.The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Why did house democrats fire the Awn brothers?
LOVE the old leftard defense of "Uh-Uhhh!"The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Funny how you leftards sniff at the term "conspiracy" while pushing the lie that the DNC server was hacked by the ROOSKIES when William Binney, a a former 2nd in command of the NSA proved that the amount of data downloaded from a foreign country (as was claimed) would have taken many days and in small data streams and any decent I.T and firewall system would have seen the security breach. Leftards like you also ignore the fact that none of the three letter alphabet agencies were allowed to do forensics on the server. Fuckwads like yourself simply pretend that the topic is never brought up. The security breach was an inside job BEHIND the firewall and Seth Rich was the one that downloaded them on a thumb drive. Now, go fuck yourself.....
I expect exactly zero rebuttal from you because I’m guessing you don’t actually know anything other than his name and what you were told to believe.
(snicker)
CrowdStrike-Ukraine Explained
Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine mentions "CrowdStrike". I thought I'd explain this.What was said?This is the text from the conversation covered in this“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have...securityboulevard.com
The server wasn’t turned over because servers aren’t ever turned over. The evidence isn’t the hardware, it’s the data. Big organizations who are hacked don’t rip out their servers and ship them to Quantico. They pull the data off for forensic purposes, then scrub them and get them back up and running.Your provided link is a fucking joke. It is easily the worst spin job ever attempted. Keep believing tbat the ROOOSKIES denied the leftard clown posse of the pedo Hildebeast, ya creepy pussbag.Most people work with computers every day. This is 2020, kiddo. We live on computers. Bill Binney is not an expert on cybersecurity and made critical mistakes in his analysis.I work with computers every day, asswipe. I have to laugh at your questioning of William Binney's expertise sans a link PLUS you have no explanation as to why the server was never turned over for evaluation. What i love best about the Wikileaks dump is how disgusting pieces of shit like you were more concerned about the fact that the dirty dealings were revealed instead of being shocked as to what the contents were. So eat shit and die slowly and painfully, you parasitic waste of life.I love it when people bring up Bill Binney. You want to talk about what he found? He made so many mistakes that half of his group posted a letter contradicting him. He claims to prove it wasn’t Russia based on transfer speeds. What he doesn’t do is demonstrate the transfer speed he was referring to occurred anywhere near the actual hack. He just assumed that’s the case with zero evidence. What he demonstrated is that the files were transferred at some time somewhere over a USB or similar direct connection. That’s it.The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Why did house democrats fire the Awn brothers?
LOVE the old leftard defense of "Uh-Uhhh!"The party did not use password and Awan brothers did not steal classified information.Russia hacked the DNC and Clinton advisors, launched an internet troll campaign and all to help Trump win the election.you're right, RUSSIA was in fact a fake scandal pushed on us by people mad they lost.The coup language is beyond a doubt the dumbest thing about this whole fake scandal.
And nothing you or any internet conspiracy theorist says changes that.
So we should vote for the party that uses "password"...and the DNC didn't seem concerned with Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Awan brothers who not only stole large sums of money but also classified information.
Multiple right wing lies and conspiracies in one post. Congrats.
Funny how you leftards sniff at the term "conspiracy" while pushing the lie that the DNC server was hacked by the ROOSKIES when William Binney, a a former 2nd in command of the NSA proved that the amount of data downloaded from a foreign country (as was claimed) would have taken many days and in small data streams and any decent I.T and firewall system would have seen the security breach. Leftards like you also ignore the fact that none of the three letter alphabet agencies were allowed to do forensics on the server. Fuckwads like yourself simply pretend that the topic is never brought up. The security breach was an inside job BEHIND the firewall and Seth Rich was the one that downloaded them on a thumb drive. Now, go fuck yourself.....
I expect exactly zero rebuttal from you because I’m guessing you don’t actually know anything other than his name and what you were told to believe.
(snicker)
CrowdStrike-Ukraine Explained
Trump's conversation with the President of Ukraine mentions "CrowdStrike". I thought I'd explain this.What was said?This is the text from the conversation covered in this“I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have...securityboulevard.com
The server wasn’t turned over because servers aren’t ever turned over. The evidence isn’t the hardware, it’s the data. Big organizations who are hacked don’t rip out their servers and ship them to Quantico. They pull the data off for forensic purposes, then scrub them and get them back up and running.
More if you want:
Why that "file-copy" forensics of DNC hack is wrong
People keep asking me about this story about how forensics "experts" have found proof the DNC hack was an inside job, because files were co...blog.erratasec.com
Hey Dale, as always, you're lying and I can prove it:
Here's an article from June 14th, 2016 saying the Russians hacked the DNC.
And here's another article dated July 25th, 2016 about the first dump of DNC Emails by WikiLeaks:
What was in the DNC email leak?
Debbie Wasserman Schultz's stewardship of the Democratic National Committee has been under fire through most of the presidential primary process.www.cnn.com
So to say that "no one complained about the hacking until after the first email dump is UTTERLY FALSE.
ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!
Unless you think the WaPo travels through time?
Think, son, think......it will be a totally be new experience and maybe even life altering!
There’s zero evidence to suggest Seth Rich had anything to do with it outside a nonsensical statement from Assange that didn’t actually claim he was the source.
So no, they weren’t involved.
DNC staffer's murder draws fresh conspiracy theories
A spokesman for the family of a young Democratic National Committee staffer who was murdered last year said Tuesday that a conservative businessman had paid for a private investigation into the unsolved slaying that has ignited right-wing conspiracy theories, although the businessman denies any...www.nbcnews.com
That Time Fox News Retracted Their Story Linking Seth Rich's Murder to Leaked E-mails
A year after retracting the conspiracy-tainted story and vowing to investigate the matter further, Fox News has not issued an update.www.snopes.com
Theory that Comey hid WikiLeaks email source unproven
A conspiracy theory that said former FBI director James Comey was covering up the source of leaked Democratic National Cwww.politifact.comThe FBI Has Been Lying About Seth Rich - Global Research
A persistent American lawyer has uncovered the undeniable fact that the FBI has been continuously lying, including giving false testimony in court, in response to Freedom of Information requests for its records on Seth Rich. The FBI has previously given affidavits that it has no records...www.globalresearch.ca
There was no FBI involvement in the case and the emails demonstrate that.