African Americans oppressed, segregated Liberia.

SobieskiSavedEurope

Gold Member
Apr 13, 2017
25,611
1,200
290
Putnam Lake, NY raised, Pawling, NY resident.
It seems the innocent eternal victims aren't so innocent.

Certainly Whites aren't the only guilty party.

When the tables turned African Americans certainly in Liberia saw nothing wrong with mistreating indigenous Liberians.

Gee, how hypocritical.

Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians

During the 1800s, the American Colonization Society enticed free Negroes to go to Africa. Slaves were freed on the condition they leave. These two groups that became the “Americo-Liberians” who ruled Liberia, carried with them the evils of racism and the limitations of slavery.

Racism inevitably reproduces itself in the minds of the oppressed in order to rise. In the “Imitation of Supremacy,” as victim becomes victimizer, the Americo-Liberians saw the natives the way whites saw them. Now that the Americo-Liberians were rulers, they mimicked white rule. They justified their exploitation of the natives on the basis of cultural inferiority just as whites used racism to justify slavery. In America, race trumped all other considerations. In Liberia, culture trumped race as the classification of inferiority.

In the “Imitation of Superiority,” [some? many?] Americo-Liberians mimicked and retained the culture of the antebellum South because they derived their cultural superiority from it. The vast majority of the Americo-Liberians were freed slaves, including slaves freed on the high seas. Because of the limitations of slavery, they were image rather than reality. What they evolved was a pseudo culture, a poor replication of what they didn’t really understand. As slaves they had had only a “taste” of Western culture.

Ironically, they replicated what they despised – oppression and discrimination based upon “inferiority.” Natives were disparaged and ridiculed as “country people.” The Americo-Liberians set up all the Jim Crow laws of the South in Liberia. There was social segregation in Monrovia, the capital city. Among other things, natives could not enter through the front door. They could not vote. They could not speak unless spoken to. There were sexual restrictions. No native man could marry or have a sexual relationship with an Americo-Liberian woman. Even when natives became educated, they were restricted from government positions. Only a token few were allowed to participate.

-
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
1929- An International Commission investigated charges of slavery and forced labor in Liberia. A year later, the committee could not substantiate such charges according to international law. They did find, however, that Liberian officials, including the republic’s vice president, profited from indigenous people’s forced labor.

1944- William V. S. Tubman was elected to the first of seven terms as Liberian president.

1946- The right to vote and participate in elections was extended to Liberia’s indigenous peoples

Photos Liberia
 
I wonder how we can entice feral, racist, knuckle dragging, trailer trash. kkk to go back to hell - from whence they came.

They cannot be taught past about the 4th grade, they take up space, air and other valuable resources that be better utilized by actual human beings.
 
During the 1800s, the American Colonization Society enticed free Negroes to go to Africa. Slaves were freed on the condition they leave. These two groups that became the “Americo-Liberians” who ruled Liberia, carried with them the evils of racism and the limitations of slavery.

Racism inevitably reproduces itself in the minds of the oppressed in order to rise. In the “Imitation of Supremacy,” as victim becomes victimizer, the Americo-Liberians saw the natives the way whites saw them. Now that the Americo-Liberians were rulers, they mimicked white rule. They justified their exploitation of the natives on the basis of cultural inferiority just as whites used racism to justify slavery. In America, race trumped all other considerations. In Liberia, culture trumped race as the classification of inferiority.

In the “Imitation of Superiority,” [some? many?] Americo-Liberians mimicked and retained the culture of the antebellum South because they derived their cultural superiority from it. The vast majority of the Americo-Liberians were freed slaves, including slaves freed on the high seas. Because of the limitations of slavery, they were image rather than reality. What they evolved was a pseudo culture, a poor replication of what they didn’t really understand. As slaves they had had only a “taste” of Western culture.

Ironically, they replicated what they despised – oppression and discrimination based upon “inferiority.” Natives were disparaged and ridiculed as “country people.” The Americo-Liberians set up all the Jim Crow laws of the South in Liberia. There was social segregation in Monrovia, the capital city. Among other things, natives could not enter through the front door. They could not vote. They could not speak unless spoken to. There were sexual restrictions. No native man could marry or have a sexual relationship with an Americo-Liberian woman. Even when natives became educated, they were restricted from government positions. Only a token few were allowed to participate.

Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians -

Mod Note:

Opening Posts require more than a Copy and Paste with a Link, You need to include relevant, on topic material of your own.
 
During the 1800s, the American Colonization Society enticed free Negroes to go to Africa. Slaves were freed on the condition they leave. These two groups that became the “Americo-Liberians” who ruled Liberia, carried with them the evils of racism and the limitations of slavery.

Racism inevitably reproduces itself in the minds of the oppressed in order to rise. In the “Imitation of Supremacy,” as victim becomes victimizer, the Americo-Liberians saw the natives the way whites saw them. Now that the Americo-Liberians were rulers, they mimicked white rule. They justified their exploitation of the natives on the basis of cultural inferiority just as whites used racism to justify slavery. In America, race trumped all other considerations. In Liberia, culture trumped race as the classification of inferiority.

In the “Imitation of Superiority,” [some? many?] Americo-Liberians mimicked and retained the culture of the antebellum South because they derived their cultural superiority from it. The vast majority of the Americo-Liberians were freed slaves, including slaves freed on the high seas. Because of the limitations of slavery, they were image rather than reality. What they evolved was a pseudo culture, a poor replication of what they didn’t really understand. As slaves they had had only a “taste” of Western culture.

Ironically, they replicated what they despised – oppression and discrimination based upon “inferiority.” Natives were disparaged and ridiculed as “country people.” The Americo-Liberians set up all the Jim Crow laws of the South in Liberia. There was social segregation in Monrovia, the capital city. Among other things, natives could not enter through the front door. They could not vote. They could not speak unless spoken to. There were sexual restrictions. No native man could marry or have a sexual relationship with an Americo-Liberian woman. Even when natives became educated, they were restricted from government positions. Only a token few were allowed to participate.

Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians -

This is what happens when stormfront troopers are allowed to argue about racism in America. They talk about Liberia and aren't even honest when they do that.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
I wonder how we can entice feral, racist, knuckle dragging, trailer trash. kkk to go back to hell - from whence they came.

They cannot be taught past about the 4th grade, they take up space, air and other valuable resources that be better utilized by actual human beings.

So, you think this topic is racist?

Very bizarre.

If so, then mentioning facts like White colonialism, or German Nazis must be racist too, no?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
During the 1800s, the American Colonization Society enticed free Negroes to go to Africa. Slaves were freed on the condition they leave. These two groups that became the “Americo-Liberians” who ruled Liberia, carried with them the evils of racism and the limitations of slavery.

Racism inevitably reproduces itself in the minds of the oppressed in order to rise. In the “Imitation of Supremacy,” as victim becomes victimizer, the Americo-Liberians saw the natives the way whites saw them. Now that the Americo-Liberians were rulers, they mimicked white rule. They justified their exploitation of the natives on the basis of cultural inferiority just as whites used racism to justify slavery. In America, race trumped all other considerations. In Liberia, culture trumped race as the classification of inferiority.

In the “Imitation of Superiority,” [some? many?] Americo-Liberians mimicked and retained the culture of the antebellum South because they derived their cultural superiority from it. The vast majority of the Americo-Liberians were freed slaves, including slaves freed on the high seas. Because of the limitations of slavery, they were image rather than reality. What they evolved was a pseudo culture, a poor replication of what they didn’t really understand. As slaves they had had only a “taste” of Western culture.

Ironically, they replicated what they despised – oppression and discrimination based upon “inferiority.” Natives were disparaged and ridiculed as “country people.” The Americo-Liberians set up all the Jim Crow laws of the South in Liberia. There was social segregation in Monrovia, the capital city. Among other things, natives could not enter through the front door. They could not vote. They could not speak unless spoken to. There were sexual restrictions. No native man could marry or have a sexual relationship with an Americo-Liberian woman. Even when natives became educated, they were restricted from government positions. Only a token few were allowed to participate.

Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians -

This is what happens when stormfront troopers are allowed to argue about racism in America. They talk about Liberia and aren't even honest when they do that.

So, why did African Americans in Liberia mistreat indigenous Africans, in the same manner Whites did to them?

Hypocrites much?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
I wonder how we can entice feral, racist, knuckle dragging, trailer trash. kkk to go back to hell - from whence they came.

They cannot be taught past about the 4th grade, they take up space, air and other valuable resources that be better utilized by actual human beings.

Borglum a KKK member carved Mount Rushmore.

Wermher Von Braun a Nazi member put a man on the Moon.

Darwin who championed evolution, had thought Fuegian Natives were hardly Human savages.

Thomas Edison played racist film reels.

Nikola Tesla spoke about cleansing the savages of the Earth.

James Watson who co-discovered DNA structure thought that Africans are not equal.

William Shockley who invented the transistor radio, thought Blacks were not equal, and championed eugenics.

The great philosophers of Voltaire, Kant, and Schopenhauer were all racists.

Do these racists sound like what you're describing?
 
During the 1800s, the American Colonization Society enticed free Negroes to go to Africa. Slaves were freed on the condition they leave. These two groups that became the “Americo-Liberians” who ruled Liberia, carried with them the evils of racism and the limitations of slavery.

Racism inevitably reproduces itself in the minds of the oppressed in order to rise. In the “Imitation of Supremacy,” as victim becomes victimizer, the Americo-Liberians saw the natives the way whites saw them. Now that the Americo-Liberians were rulers, they mimicked white rule. They justified their exploitation of the natives on the basis of cultural inferiority just as whites used racism to justify slavery. In America, race trumped all other considerations. In Liberia, culture trumped race as the classification of inferiority.

In the “Imitation of Superiority,” [some? many?] Americo-Liberians mimicked and retained the culture of the antebellum South because they derived their cultural superiority from it. The vast majority of the Americo-Liberians were freed slaves, including slaves freed on the high seas. Because of the limitations of slavery, they were image rather than reality. What they evolved was a pseudo culture, a poor replication of what they didn’t really understand. As slaves they had had only a “taste” of Western culture.

Ironically, they replicated what they despised – oppression and discrimination based upon “inferiority.” Natives were disparaged and ridiculed as “country people.” The Americo-Liberians set up all the Jim Crow laws of the South in Liberia. There was social segregation in Monrovia, the capital city. Among other things, natives could not enter through the front door. They could not vote. They could not speak unless spoken to. There were sexual restrictions. No native man could marry or have a sexual relationship with an Americo-Liberian woman. Even when natives became educated, they were restricted from government positions. Only a token few were allowed to participate.

Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians -

This is what happens when stormfront troopers are allowed to argue about racism in America. They talk about Liberia and aren't even honest when they do that.

So, why did African Americans in Liberia mistreat indigenous Africans, in the same manner Whites did to them?

Hypocrites much?

What does this have to do with American segregation by whites against all people of color?

Nothing.

Is Liberia the only African country? And was Liberia the only place Africans who were made to come here went back to? Is the same segregation going on in Liberia now? Do we live in Liberia?

No. So you are here making a disingenuous assertion.
 
Last edited:
It seems the innocent eternal victims aren't so innocent.

Certainly Whites aren't the only guilty party.

When the tables turned African Americans certainly in Liberia saw nothing wrong with mistreating indigenous Liberians.

Gee, how hypocritical.

Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians

During the 1800s, the American Colonization Society enticed free Negroes to go to Africa. Slaves were freed on the condition they leave. These two groups that became the “Americo-Liberians” who ruled Liberia, carried with them the evils of racism and the limitations of slavery.

Racism inevitably reproduces itself in the minds of the oppressed in order to rise. In the “Imitation of Supremacy,” as victim becomes victimizer, the Americo-Liberians saw the natives the way whites saw them. Now that the Americo-Liberians were rulers, they mimicked white rule. They justified their exploitation of the natives on the basis of cultural inferiority just as whites used racism to justify slavery. In America, race trumped all other considerations. In Liberia, culture trumped race as the classification of inferiority.

In the “Imitation of Superiority,” [some? many?] Americo-Liberians mimicked and retained the culture of the antebellum South because they derived their cultural superiority from it. The vast majority of the Americo-Liberians were freed slaves, including slaves freed on the high seas. Because of the limitations of slavery, they were image rather than reality. What they evolved was a pseudo culture, a poor replication of what they didn’t really understand. As slaves they had had only a “taste” of Western culture.

Ironically, they replicated what they despised – oppression and discrimination based upon “inferiority.” Natives were disparaged and ridiculed as “country people.” The Americo-Liberians set up all the Jim Crow laws of the South in Liberia. There was social segregation in Monrovia, the capital city. Among other things, natives could not enter through the front door. They could not vote. They could not speak unless spoken to. There were sexual restrictions. No native man could marry or have a sexual relationship with an Americo-Liberian woman. Even when natives became educated, they were restricted from government positions. Only a token few were allowed to participate.

-
People for sale: Where lives are auctioned for $400 - CNN
This is disgusting
 
It seems the innocent eternal victims aren't so innocent.

Certainly Whites aren't the only guilty party.

When the tables turned African Americans certainly in Liberia saw nothing wrong with mistreating indigenous Liberians.

Gee, how hypocritical.

Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians

During the 1800s, the American Colonization Society enticed free Negroes to go to Africa. Slaves were freed on the condition they leave. These two groups that became the “Americo-Liberians” who ruled Liberia, carried with them the evils of racism and the limitations of slavery.

Racism inevitably reproduces itself in the minds of the oppressed in order to rise. In the “Imitation of Supremacy,” as victim becomes victimizer, the Americo-Liberians saw the natives the way whites saw them. Now that the Americo-Liberians were rulers, they mimicked white rule. They justified their exploitation of the natives on the basis of cultural inferiority just as whites used racism to justify slavery. In America, race trumped all other considerations. In Liberia, culture trumped race as the classification of inferiority.

In the “Imitation of Superiority,” [some? many?] Americo-Liberians mimicked and retained the culture of the antebellum South because they derived their cultural superiority from it. The vast majority of the Americo-Liberians were freed slaves, including slaves freed on the high seas. Because of the limitations of slavery, they were image rather than reality. What they evolved was a pseudo culture, a poor replication of what they didn’t really understand. As slaves they had had only a “taste” of Western culture.

Ironically, they replicated what they despised – oppression and discrimination based upon “inferiority.” Natives were disparaged and ridiculed as “country people.” The Americo-Liberians set up all the Jim Crow laws of the South in Liberia. There was social segregation in Monrovia, the capital city. Among other things, natives could not enter through the front door. They could not vote. They could not speak unless spoken to. There were sexual restrictions. No native man could marry or have a sexual relationship with an Americo-Liberian woman. Even when natives became educated, they were restricted from government positions. Only a token few were allowed to participate.

-

What happened in Ghana? Nigeria? Cote D' Ivore? Cameroon? Senegal? Guinea? Sierra Leone? Mali?

The America Colonization Society?

Blacks all just didn't go back to Liberia and Liberia is only one country in Africa. And then you talk about 18,000 people from America and the Caribbean who actually went there out of millions of existing blacks who did not. So while you tell your half ass story about Liberia, we see that in reality this colonization created strife between the blacks who got shipped there and the blacks who were natives. Things didn't happen exactly as you say and only the willfully dumb who want to believe any kind of made up story about this supposed lack racism believe this.

The Americo-Liberian settlers did not relate well to the indigenous peoples they encountered, especially those in communities of the more isolated "bush", They knew nothing of their cultures, languages or animist religion. Encounters with tribal Africans in the bush often developed as violent confrontations. The colonial settlements were raided by the Kru and Grebo from their inland chiefdoms. Because of feeling set apart and superior by their culture and education to the indigenous peoples, the Americo-Liberians developed as a small elite that held on to political power.

Liberia - Wikipedia

Now given the reality that none of us live in Liberia, then this thread is just another disingenuous argument waged by racists in order to try denying what happened here in America. If we lived in Liberia, maybe we could talk about this, but we don't. Maybe if the US had not decided that this piece land belonged to them and the former slaves had gone over there without assurances from this government that the land was theirs, maybe we could talk. But hat's not how it happened.

Last here we are talking about something that happened before we all were born MOLLY. And as usual you see nothing wrong with the formation of a white made organization that decides to colonize another country but you are here talking about how terrible those blacks are. Yet you are not a racist.

Sobeiski we all know you are racist trash. Your tale about Liberia leaves out so much that it can't be taken seriously. Others who lived in Liberia say to the bog writer:

Daniel Joseph
May 8, 2009 at 11:29 am

Dr. Dennis,

I was also part of the Americo-Liberian society and never saw many of the practices you mention. Some of my best friends are of native descent and we all grew up as equals. I also believe your comparison of Liberia to America is in error, unless you can provide evidence of Liberia’s “Jim crow laws”. Perhaps you should be more explicit in your writings by identifying these practices as commonplace amongst some Americo-Liberians.


And this:

Stephanie Horton
June 10, 2009 at 9:27 pm

I am shocked by the venom and stereotypical hate speech in this book. To characterize an entire group of people in this way staggers the imagination. Too many contradictions. Too many reductive inhumane comparisons. There seems to be something sinister afoot or this author truly personifies the term self hatred. My “Americo Liberian” father as he is characterized married a Kpelle woman, as did his brothers marry Grebo and Mende women respectively. No one I grew up with had a family whose bloodlines were not commingled with indigenous ancestry, and I am 50 years old as on 2009. This book gives no references but instead reads like a Nazi propaganda manual.

And this:

Julius Weeks
June 12, 2009 at 10:19 am

What is Dr. Dennis’ purpose for writing this book? To further cleave the Liberian society? To further complicate the delicate socio-cultural environment that exists in our country? A country just now attempting to recover from too many years of war and destruction? Some of what Dr. Dennis presents in his book is true. However, to generalize that this was the way things were across the board in Liberian society is an outright lie! I lived in a family that was a mixture of settlers from Barbados and settlers from Richmond, Virginia. My father worked his way up from poverty to become the President of the University of Liberia and later the Minister of Foreign Affairs (the US equivalent of The Secretary of State). My parents reared two indigenous Liberian children that are, slept and went to school with us. Yes, in the same bedrooms at the same dining room table and at the Methodist Elementary School and later the College of West Africa where we also studied. If we got new shoes so did they. They were treated no different than we were. Of course this is not to say that there were not families that treated their indigenous ward differently from the way they treated their biological children. In any society you will find evil. That does not suggest that that society is evil through and through.

Dr. Dennis will find people on both sides of the discussion (Native Liberians and Settler Liberians) who will vehemently disagree with his thesis.

I am personally saddened by his manuscript and believe it serves no useful purpose.

So what we see here is a manipulation and it's based on mainly false assumptions.
 
It seems the innocent eternal victims aren't so innocent.

Certainly Whites aren't the only guilty party.

When the tables turned African Americans certainly in Liberia saw nothing wrong with mistreating indigenous Liberians.

Gee, how hypocritical.

Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians

During the 1800s, the American Colonization Society enticed free Negroes to go to Africa. Slaves were freed on the condition they leave. These two groups that became the “Americo-Liberians” who ruled Liberia, carried with them the evils of racism and the limitations of slavery.

Racism inevitably reproduces itself in the minds of the oppressed in order to rise. In the “Imitation of Supremacy,” as victim becomes victimizer, the Americo-Liberians saw the natives the way whites saw them. Now that the Americo-Liberians were rulers, they mimicked white rule. They justified their exploitation of the natives on the basis of cultural inferiority just as whites used racism to justify slavery. In America, race trumped all other considerations. In Liberia, culture trumped race as the classification of inferiority.

In the “Imitation of Superiority,” [some? many?] Americo-Liberians mimicked and retained the culture of the antebellum South because they derived their cultural superiority from it. The vast majority of the Americo-Liberians were freed slaves, including slaves freed on the high seas. Because of the limitations of slavery, they were image rather than reality. What they evolved was a pseudo culture, a poor replication of what they didn’t really understand. As slaves they had had only a “taste” of Western culture.

Ironically, they replicated what they despised – oppression and discrimination based upon “inferiority.” Natives were disparaged and ridiculed as “country people.” The Americo-Liberians set up all the Jim Crow laws of the South in Liberia. There was social segregation in Monrovia, the capital city. Among other things, natives could not enter through the front door. They could not vote. They could not speak unless spoken to. There were sexual restrictions. No native man could marry or have a sexual relationship with an Americo-Liberian woman. Even when natives became educated, they were restricted from government positions. Only a token few were allowed to participate.

-
People for sale: Where lives are auctioned for $400 - CNN
This is disgusting

What's disgusting. is whites like yourself looking for any excuse any other issue to try denying the problem that faces you in your own country because y our race created it.
 
It seems the innocent eternal victims aren't so innocent.

Certainly Whites aren't the only guilty party.

When the tables turned African Americans certainly in Liberia saw nothing wrong with mistreating indigenous Liberians.

Gee, how hypocritical.

Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians

During the 1800s, the American Colonization Society enticed free Negroes to go to Africa. Slaves were freed on the condition they leave. These two groups that became the “Americo-Liberians” who ruled Liberia, carried with them the evils of racism and the limitations of slavery.

Racism inevitably reproduces itself in the minds of the oppressed in order to rise. In the “Imitation of Supremacy,” as victim becomes victimizer, the Americo-Liberians saw the natives the way whites saw them. Now that the Americo-Liberians were rulers, they mimicked white rule. They justified their exploitation of the natives on the basis of cultural inferiority just as whites used racism to justify slavery. In America, race trumped all other considerations. In Liberia, culture trumped race as the classification of inferiority.

In the “Imitation of Superiority,” [some? many?] Americo-Liberians mimicked and retained the culture of the antebellum South because they derived their cultural superiority from it. The vast majority of the Americo-Liberians were freed slaves, including slaves freed on the high seas. Because of the limitations of slavery, they were image rather than reality. What they evolved was a pseudo culture, a poor replication of what they didn’t really understand. As slaves they had had only a “taste” of Western culture.

Ironically, they replicated what they despised – oppression and discrimination based upon “inferiority.” Natives were disparaged and ridiculed as “country people.” The Americo-Liberians set up all the Jim Crow laws of the South in Liberia. There was social segregation in Monrovia, the capital city. Among other things, natives could not enter through the front door. They could not vote. They could not speak unless spoken to. There were sexual restrictions. No native man could marry or have a sexual relationship with an Americo-Liberian woman. Even when natives became educated, they were restricted from government positions. Only a token few were allowed to participate.

-
People for sale: Where lives are auctioned for $400 - CNN
This is disgusting

What's disgusting. is whites like yourself looking for any excuse any other issue to try denying the problem that faces you in your own country because y our race created it.
You have once again proven yourself to be an angry idiot. I never once denied anything. I post something that I find horrible, instead of agreeing, you have an angry comeback, for no reason, other that to belittle white posters. Shame on you, you seriously need anger management help.
 
It seems the innocent eternal victims aren't so innocent.

Certainly Whites aren't the only guilty party.

When the tables turned African Americans certainly in Liberia saw nothing wrong with mistreating indigenous Liberians.

Gee, how hypocritical.

Global Impacts of White Racism: Americo-Liberians

During the 1800s, the American Colonization Society enticed free Negroes to go to Africa. Slaves were freed on the condition they leave. These two groups that became the “Americo-Liberians” who ruled Liberia, carried with them the evils of racism and the limitations of slavery.

Racism inevitably reproduces itself in the minds of the oppressed in order to rise. In the “Imitation of Supremacy,” as victim becomes victimizer, the Americo-Liberians saw the natives the way whites saw them. Now that the Americo-Liberians were rulers, they mimicked white rule. They justified their exploitation of the natives on the basis of cultural inferiority just as whites used racism to justify slavery. In America, race trumped all other considerations. In Liberia, culture trumped race as the classification of inferiority.

In the “Imitation of Superiority,” [some? many?] Americo-Liberians mimicked and retained the culture of the antebellum South because they derived their cultural superiority from it. The vast majority of the Americo-Liberians were freed slaves, including slaves freed on the high seas. Because of the limitations of slavery, they were image rather than reality. What they evolved was a pseudo culture, a poor replication of what they didn’t really understand. As slaves they had had only a “taste” of Western culture.

Ironically, they replicated what they despised – oppression and discrimination based upon “inferiority.” Natives were disparaged and ridiculed as “country people.” The Americo-Liberians set up all the Jim Crow laws of the South in Liberia. There was social segregation in Monrovia, the capital city. Among other things, natives could not enter through the front door. They could not vote. They could not speak unless spoken to. There were sexual restrictions. No native man could marry or have a sexual relationship with an Americo-Liberian woman. Even when natives became educated, they were restricted from government positions. Only a token few were allowed to participate.

-
People for sale: Where lives are auctioned for $400 - CNN
This is disgusting

What's disgusting. is whites like yourself looking for any excuse any other issue to try denying the problem that faces you in your own country because y our race created it.
You have once again proven yourself to be an angry idiot. I never once denied anything. I post something that I find horrible, instead of agreeing, you have an angry comeback, for no reason, other that to belittle white posters. Shame on you, you seriously need anger management help.

Well hen you can find something from whites to call horrible, then talk. And if I am angry learn to understand that I have every right to be. I don't now what it is with whites like you but if you think that we have to endure this and smile, check yourself into a mental health facility.

For as you have been shown this depiction of Liberia is wrong. Secondly we don't live in Liberia so there is no reason to discuss Liberia from 150 years ago when whites like you claim that we can't talk about what whites did in America 150 years ago Instead of saying that to the OP you bring up a subject that has nothing to do with this thread.

I don't need anger management class for justified anger. You take anger management when you have uncontrolled anger. Learn the differences beefier you talk. Because what you suggest is unhealthy, I am supposed to hold back anger just so you can feel comfortable as a white person.

So let me tell you this for 2018 and beyond. You whites are in here denigrating blacks all the time, so don't start crying when you get it back.
 

Forum List

Back
Top