Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
Trump on his "vigorous stance against" gay marriage. Advises "you have to be realistic". Trump in other interviews describes gay marriages he attended personally as "beautiful".
Pretty weak video...but the potency begins to gather strength with this radio ad:
Still no mention of children though, and how the Supreme Court ruled that even constitutionally protected rights can't harm children. If they do, they are void. If a candidate could tap the gay marriage = children without a mother and father for life, they would spill beyond the evangelical ranks and into the common Joe ranks and draw them all in too.
Food for thought here. New York vs Ferber (1982) was a Supreme Court case that was a man trying to sell child porn and claiming his 1st Amendment right to free speech. At first he won his appeals. But when New York took it up to the US Supreme Court, they stopped Ferber cold. Remember, the High Court is exceptionally supportive of the 1st Amendment, even in cases of extreme vulgarity. But not this time. This is what the Court said and what should appear in ads in some form or another:
For more information on children, the Infant Doctrine & necessities and New York vs Ferber, visit this link: Is Gay Marriage Void? New York v Ferber (1982) Etc.
Children's unique contractual rights to the thousands-years-old marriage contract were not represented at Obergefell. You can't have a contract revised without all parties at the table. Moreover, and worse for the "legality" of gay marriage with respect to infants and contract law regarding child-necessities, a contract is not only voidable if it strips a child of a necessity their peers enjoy, but it is ALREADY VOID before its ink is dry without a challenge.
Any state can and should raise these issues. But for sure GOP candidates seeking a victory should. There is no topic more visceral than the protection of children. Even agnostics and atheists sit up if it is explained to them how a situation causes real harm to children.
Hmmm.. And Marco Rubio seems to have plunged down the dark road too. This makes me really believe he was hand-groomed by the Cheney (lesbian daughter) Rove machine:
Pretty weak video...but the potency begins to gather strength with this radio ad:
Still no mention of children though, and how the Supreme Court ruled that even constitutionally protected rights can't harm children. If they do, they are void. If a candidate could tap the gay marriage = children without a mother and father for life, they would spill beyond the evangelical ranks and into the common Joe ranks and draw them all in too.
Food for thought here. New York vs Ferber (1982) was a Supreme Court case that was a man trying to sell child porn and claiming his 1st Amendment right to free speech. At first he won his appeals. But when New York took it up to the US Supreme Court, they stopped Ferber cold. Remember, the High Court is exceptionally supportive of the 1st Amendment, even in cases of extreme vulgarity. But not this time. This is what the Court said and what should appear in ads in some form or another:
For more information on children, the Infant Doctrine & necessities and New York vs Ferber, visit this link: Is Gay Marriage Void? New York v Ferber (1982) Etc.
Children's unique contractual rights to the thousands-years-old marriage contract were not represented at Obergefell. You can't have a contract revised without all parties at the table. Moreover, and worse for the "legality" of gay marriage with respect to infants and contract law regarding child-necessities, a contract is not only voidable if it strips a child of a necessity their peers enjoy, but it is ALREADY VOID before its ink is dry without a challenge.
Any state can and should raise these issues. But for sure GOP candidates seeking a victory should. There is no topic more visceral than the protection of children. Even agnostics and atheists sit up if it is explained to them how a situation causes real harm to children.
Hmmm.. And Marco Rubio seems to have plunged down the dark road too. This makes me really believe he was hand-groomed by the Cheney (lesbian daughter) Rove machine:
Last edited:
