Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
because he doesn’t own the work. All he has done is exposed how dumb he is
He might want to check that contract he signed.MSN And there you have it folks, He is oppsoed to the United States of America where everyone normal is treated equally, instead of abnormal behavior being rewarded with some type of trophy. So now this angry Marxist doesnt want anyone putting money into his coffers anymore, and soon when he is there in San Fransicko, drugging up and homeless, he will realize what a mistake it was to go against the country.
View attachment 800725
I bet that actor does not own the rights to those programs.Based on the Supreme Court's precedent, he absolutely has the right.
- He created an expressive work.
- That work is protected by the first amendment.
- Therefore, his free speech rights entitle him to prohibit who will buy that work after all.
I bet that actor does not own the rights to those programs.
/---/ Just another washed-up, has-been actor trolling for attention.MSN And there you have it folks, He is oppsoed to the United States of America where everyone normal is treated equally, instead of abnormal behavior being rewarded with some type of trophy. So now this angry Marxist doesnt want anyone putting money into his coffers anymore, and soon when he is there in San Fransicko, drugging up and homeless, he will realize what a mistake it was to go against the country.
View attachment 800725
There's a big difference between equal opportunity and equal outcomes. Democrats push equity because they want equal outcomes, which is stupid because it discourages competition and personal improvement. Our country will never thrive for long under Democrat policy.Why are you opposed to every U.S. citizen being treated equally?
/----/ I added your post, Why are you opposed to every U.S. citizen being treated equally? to my sig line, if that's OK.Why are you opposed to every U.S. citizen being treated equally?
/---/ Give an actor, even a mediocre one like Imperioli, a script and the promise of free publicity, and he'll say anything.I'm surprised. I thought Imperioli had a brain. If he would have put the same effort into saving Adrianna, Paulie and Sil might not have taken her out down in the pine barons.
.You imbeciles always proclaim that I’m “triggered” when I’m not. I get it. You wish I were. But your constant false claims only serve to establish that you are even less reliable than previously thought.
Copyright laws and contracts still apply, moron.This isn't about copyrights, it's about first amendment rights. Actors don't typically have copyrights to movies or shows in which they perform. But they don't lose their first amendment rights in the process.
Didn't you read the Supreme Court's decision?
Copyright laws and contracts still apply, moron.
He can give up his rights to any royalties if he wants to.
Why do you have your head up your ass? Why ask why? Bud Dry!So why is it you want this guy to give up his money, but not the graphic designer designing wedding websites? Why is she entitled to first amendment rights but not this guy?
Is that the same Goodfellas where a lot of racist and homophobic profanity is used?
.So why is it you want this guy to give up his money, but not the graphic designer designing wedding websites? Why is she entitled to first amendment rights but not this guy?
Why do you have your head up your ass? Why ask why? Bud Dry!
He obviously has a failing career and is so desperate to revive it that he has tried as hard as he can to employ a tactic that has already cost some big corporations many billions.
/----/ Hey Dumb Bunny Blondie -- The wedding designer controls who uses her services. The washed-up, has-been, actor can't control who watches the shows he appeared in. And anyone who bought the episodes on Netflix can watch it as many times as he/she wants. GEEEZESo why is it you want this guy to give up his money, but not the graphic designer designing wedding websites? Why is she entitled to first amendment rights but not this guy?
