Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
haha no it’s not.
Nonsense.You really don't know what you're talking about, and I assure you I'm well versed on the subject.
The court case at hand was decided on free speech rights. The rights to distribute, license, or copy a finished piece like a movie or TV show are about copyrights.
The court's decision says that a speaker's first amendment rights also entails a right to limit who is permitted to hear the speech. And that is what is at issue here.
.Who, the graphic designer from the court case? You may be right.
So why is it the queers arent forcing Muslim bakers to do queer wedding cakes? Come on try to explain that?You really don't know what you're talking about, and I assure you I'm well versed on the subject.
The court case at hand was decided on free speech rights. The rights to distribute, license, or copy a finished piece like a movie or TV show are about copyrights.
The court's decision says that a speaker's first amendment rights also entails a right to limit who is permitted to hear the speech. And that is what is at issue here.
Did you hear that the stupid bitch AOC wants to impeach the Supreme Court Justices that dont agree wit her? I say that the speak of the house should get the Republican Majority and start impeachment proceedings on the 3 Marxist women judges. Tell AOC thank you for the idea....I have never heard of Imperioli.
He sounds like a typical angry dumb bigot Democrat.
The Supreme Court ruled that Gays cannot violate the business owner's 1st Amendment Rights.
The Free Exercise Clause prohibits government interference with religious belief and, within limits, religious practice.
The Dumb Left Wingers need to change the constitution if they want to harass Christian business owners.
The Demofascists/Marxists always set a precedence in government and i say , let the Republicans use it to show the idiocy of their ideas.Democratic "Squad" member Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., slammed the U.S. Supreme Court for what she called an "abuse of power" Sunday, following landmark decisions this past week rejecting affirmative action and Biden's student loan debt plan. She proposed impeachment and subpoenas be put into play in order to limit the justices' powers.
haha i know what the case is aboutYou really don't know what you're talking about, and I assure you I'm well versed on the subject.
The court case at hand was decided on free speech rights. The rights to distribute, license, or copy a finished piece like a movie or TV show are about copyrights.
The court's decision says that a speaker's first amendment rights also entails a right to limit who is permitted to hear the speech. And that is what is at issue here.
This is the second actor from the sopranos that has gone on with his far left extremism and he is a millionaire to boot. Stevie can Zandt aka “Silvio” made some terrible remarks as well that we’re also quite violent.MSN And there you have it folks, He is oppsoed to the United States of America where everyone normal is treated equally, instead of abnormal behavior being rewarded with some type of trophy. So now this angry Marxist doesnt want anyone putting money into his coffers anymore, and soon when he is there in San Fransicko, drugging up and homeless, he will realize what a mistake it was to go against the country.
View attachment 800725
This isn't about copyrights, it's about first amendment rights. Actors don't typically have copyrights to movies or shows in which they perform. But they don't lose their first amendment rights in the process.
Didn't you read the Supreme Court's decision?
But that doesn't diminish the actor's first amendment rights.
So why is it you want this guy to give up his money, but not the graphic designer designing wedding websites? Why is she entitled to first amendment rights but not this guy?
Now you're starting to get it. As a result of the court's decision, speakers are now entitled to regulate who can hear that speech.
The court's decision says that a speaker's first amendment rights also entails a right to limit who is permitted to hear the speech
Can you follow the logic of a conversation?Are you retarded?
It's his way of saying that he's an imbecile who can't defend the position that Fox told him he has.Is this your way of saying you really don't give a care as long as you get your way?
They're not big on reading. The lack of comprehension makes their heads hurt.It wasn't about religious beliefs, it was about free speech. READ THE OPINION.
Can you follow the logic of a conversation?
I was at one time trying to become an actor, was even in the FBI files back in the late 1990s. But then i thought about some of the rolls i could be put in, like having to kiss another man, and i realized that my morals were more important than any fame. So i worked electronically and eventually became an inspector, made less than the high paying actors, but never had to go against my morals..haha i know what the case is about
who doesn’t is the actor in the OP. He can’t keep people from watching movies or shows he’s been in. He doesn’t own the work. He had the time to object prior to performing it like the person in the case
