Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Fear of testifying under oath?
/-----/ But the seriousness of the charges far outweigh the lack of any evidence.Nor does it look like she intends to.
Chuck Grassley: Kavanaugh accuser hasn't responded to invitation to testify
What a shit show our government has become...
/----/Fear of testifying under oath?
Why? She supposedly passed a lie detector test!
Her lawyer will release a statement that it's unfair to make her relive such trauma. This is the same as Revictimizing her. She is too traumatized to testify. The system failed her.
/----/Fear of testifying under oath?
Why? She supposedly passed a lie detector test!
Experts doubt claim of ‘truthful’ polygraph result from Kavanaugh accuser
by Eddie Scarry
| September 17, 2018 04:31 PM
sexually assaulted her decades ago state that she took a polygraph test that deemed her to be “truthful.”
But experts interviewed by the Washington Examiner doubt the significance of that finding, and assert that such tests are unable to assess at all whether a person is lying or is truthful.
Thomas Mauriello, a former senior polygraph examiner who worked at the Defense Department for 30 years, said in an interview Monday that polygraph tests merely detect when a subject is experiencing a physiological reaction — like perspiration or an increased heart rate — to one or more questions.
The tests don’t, he said, determine whether a person is lying or attempting to deceive. Instead, the results have to be interpreted by the person administering the test.
“The polygraph is not a lie detector,” said Mauriello, who now works as a part-time professor at the University of Maryland’s criminology and criminal justice department. “Let’s make that clear. There is no such thing as a lie detector. It’s simply an investigative tool that will record physiological reactions when you’re asked a question and give a response.”
/----/ Do I smell a BOOK DEAL?Her lawyer will release a statement that it's unfair to make her relive such trauma. This is the same as Revictimizing her. She is too traumatized to testify.
The system failed her.
/----/ A warning flag from the democRATs to every conservative judge who may be chosen for the USSC. "We'll destroy you."Nor does it look like she intends to.
Chuck Grassley: Kavanaugh accuser hasn't responded to invitation to testify
What a shit show our government has become...
That sword cuts both ways. The more this continues; the more paralyzed our government will become. I can’t say that’s necessarily a bad thing./----/ A warning flag from the democRATs to every conservative judge who may be chosen for the USSC. "We'll destroy you."Nor does it look like she intends to.
Chuck Grassley: Kavanaugh accuser hasn't responded to invitation to testify
What a shit show our government has become...
I am sure her Lawyer does not want her to testify she could not stand up to the questions, and has very little info, about it to give it any truth. Having worked many cases like this the victim has a lot of info on the suspect even what type of clothes he was wearing and what he said. She just does not have the time to rehearse the lines and or the timeline to make anything that would sound truthfulHer lawyer is claiming she shouldn’t have to prove it.Fear of testifying under oath?
Nor does it look like she intends to.
Chuck Grassley: Kavanaugh accuser hasn't responded to invitation to testify
What a shit show our government has become...
That would not be a good move if she wants to be believed. She should testify.....she's made an accusation.Nor does it look like she intends to.
Chuck Grassley: Kavanaugh accuser hasn't responded to invitation to testify
What a shit show our government has become...
