About the "collapse" of WTC7

[n0spam4me]

How many people are aware of the fact that WTC7 descended for 2.25 sec at 9.8 m/s^2?
that is the acceleration of gravity, and for 2.25 sec. and during that time, the North & West walls of the skyscraper are observed to have kept their shape, and fell vertically. Just exactly how is that done with "fires" as was supposed to have been the cause, was WTC7 a "towering inferno"?
whats up with that?

 

[Moonglow]

I am...

 

[Katzndogz]

It was deliberately brought down as everyone knows. It was ordered by the owner Larry Silverstein.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

I'm still terribly upset by the "sinister" contrails and just can't take another scary conspiracy yet.

Maybe tomorrow ...

 

[SAYIT]

How many people are aware of the fact that WTC7 descended for 2.25 sec at 9.8 m/s^2?
that is the acceleration of gravity, and for 2.25 sec. and during that time, the North & West walls of the skyscraper are observed to have kept their shape, and fell vertically. Just exactly how is that done with "fires" as was supposed to have been the cause, was WTC7 a "towering inferno"?
whats up with that?

Seriously?
You have had your Chia-Pet CT slashed, bashed and trashed in a dozen other threads here and you have the temerity to start another based on the same foil-hatted silliness? I was hoping you were about to provide solid evidence of the controlled demo you claim but, alas, it's just another useless CT thread in which you'll insist "no planes were hijacked on 9/11" and that the fires were "staged and controlled" but, of course, provide not a shred of substance.
Bummer dude.

 

[n0spam4me]

How many people are aware of the fact that WTC7 descended for 2.25 sec at 9.8 m/s^2?
that is the acceleration of gravity, and for 2.25 sec. and during that time, the North & West walls of the skyscraper are observed to have kept their shape, and fell vertically. Just exactly how is that done with "fires" as was supposed to have been the cause, was WTC7 a "towering inferno"?
whats up with that?

Seriously?
You have had your Chia-Pet CT slashed, bashed and trashed in a dozen other threads here and you have the temerity to start another based on the same foil-hatted silliness? I was hoping you were about to provide solid evidence of the controlled demo you claim but, alas, it's just another useless CT thread in which you'll insist "no planes were hijacked on 9/11" and that the fires were "staged and controlled" but, of course, provide not a shred of substance.
Bummer dude.

The EVIDENCE is in the fact of total destruction of 3 skyscrapers and the fact that all three "collapsed" down accelerating as they "collapsed" and its a crazy state of affairs that it would appear that all too many AMERICANS slept through middle school science. oh my!

 

[SAYIT]

How many people are aware of the fact that WTC7 descended for 2.25 sec at 9.8 m/s^2?
that is the acceleration of gravity, and for 2.25 sec. and during that time, the North & West walls of the skyscraper are observed to have kept their shape, and fell vertically. Just exactly how is that done with "fires" as was supposed to have been the cause, was WTC7 a "towering inferno"?
whats up with that?

Seriously?
You have had your Chia-Pet CT slashed, bashed and trashed in a dozen other threads here and you have the temerity to start another based on the same foil-hatted silliness? I was hoping you were about to provide solid evidence of the controlled demo you claim but, alas, it's just another useless CT thread in which you'll insist "no planes were hijacked on 9/11" and that the fires were "staged and controlled" but, of course, provide not a shred of substance.
Bummer dude.

The EVIDENCE is in the fact of total destruction of 3 skyscrapers and the fact that all three "collapsed" down accelerating as they "collapsed" and its a crazy state of affairs that it would appear that all too many AMERICANS slept through middle school science. oh my!

So rather than accept what so many of us witnessed live or on TV as it transpired you would have us believe it was a conspiracy to kill thousands, perpetrated by the millions (which now includes all in the MS media) necessary to accomplish it, based on your middle school equation.
Woo.
If your were, as the popular 9/11 CT websites lament, a disinformationalist trying to defame the "Truther" Movement with your foiled-hatted silliness I could have some respect for you. As it is I'm convinced you really believe the BS you spew here.

 

[daws101]

How many people are aware of the fact that WTC7 descended for 2.25 sec at 9.8 m/s^2?
that is the acceleration of gravity, and for 2.25 sec. and during that time, the North & West walls of the skyscraper are observed to have kept their shape, and fell vertically. Just exactly how is that done with "fires" as was supposed to have been the cause, was WTC7 a "towering inferno"?
whats up with that?

 

[n0spam4me]

and again, a post with virtually no content ...... oh well ....
whatever ..........................................................................

 

[daws101]

and again, a post with virtually no content ...... oh well ....
whatever ..........................................................................

it had the perfect content....

 

[wihosa]

How is it done with fires?
Easy, just insist it was done by fires and provide no science to back it up.
Simply insist it is so and that anyone who questions it is obviously a "Conspiracy Theorist"

 

[SAYIT]

How is it done with fires?
Easy, just insist it was done by fires and provide no science to back it up.
Simply insist it is so and that anyone who questions it is obviously a "Conspiracy Theorist"

How is what done with fires?
Do you refer to the collapse of WTC7?
Do you think the 20-story gash in the side of WTC 7 after the tower collapses seriously compromised 7's structural integrity or do you simply ignore inconvenient truths?

 

[n0spam4me]

How is it done with fires?
Easy, just insist it was done by fires and provide no science to back it up.
Simply insist it is so and that anyone who questions it is obviously a "Conspiracy Theorist"

How is what done with fires?
Do you refer to the collapse of WTC7?
Do you think the 20-story gash in the side of WTC 7 after the tower collapses seriously compromised 7's structural integrity or do you simply ignore inconvenient truths?

May I point out that in order to get a controlled demolition to actually destroy a building, there must be precision placed explosives and said precision placed explosives set off in a very specific order to do the job, controlled demolitions gone wrong, most often end in incomplete demolition. Now with that said, uncontrolled fires are alleged to have done exactly what a very well planned and executed controlled demolition could be expected to do.

 

[SAYIT]

How is it done with fires?
Easy, just insist it was done by fires and provide no science to back it up.
Simply insist it is so and that anyone who questions it is obviously a "Conspiracy Theorist"

How is what done with fires?
Do you refer to the collapse of WTC7?
Do you think the 20-story gash in the side of WTC 7 after the tower collapses seriously compromised 7's structural integrity or do you simply ignore inconvenient truths?

May I point out that in order to get a controlled demolition to actually destroy a building, there must be precision placed explosives and said precision placed explosives set off in a very specific order to do the job, controlled demolitions gone wrong, most often end in incomplete demolition. Now with that said, uncontrolled fires are alleged to have done exactly what a very well planned and executed controlled demolition could be expected to do.

Except while there were eye-witnesses to the damage done to WTC7 by the Tower's falling debris, there remains 13 years after the attack, still no evidence of a controlled demo which, as you admit, requires an extensive, well-planned execution ... tough to do after hours of "uncontrolled fires."

 

[n0spam4me]

How is it done with fires?
Easy, just insist it was done by fires and provide no science to back it up.
Simply insist it is so and that anyone who questions it is obviously a "Conspiracy Theorist"

How is what done with fires?
Do you refer to the collapse of WTC7?
Do you think the 20-story gash in the side of WTC 7 after the tower collapses seriously compromised 7's structural integrity or do you simply ignore inconvenient truths?

May I point out that in order to get a controlled demolition to actually destroy a building, there must be precision placed explosives and said precision placed explosives set off in a very specific order to do the job, controlled demolitions gone wrong, most often end in incomplete demolition. Now with that said, uncontrolled fires are alleged to have done exactly what a very well planned and executed controlled demolition could be expected to do.

Except while there were eye-witnesses to the damage done to WTC7 by the Tower's falling debris, there remains 13 years after the attack, still no evidence of a controlled demo which, as you admit, requires an extensive, well-planned execution ... tough to do after hours of "uncontrolled fires."

If indeed they were uncontrolled fires.....
the whole scene was a bit of theater....

 

[SAYIT]

How is it done with fires?
Easy, just insist it was done by fires and provide no science to back it up.
Simply insist it is so and that anyone who questions it is obviously a "Conspiracy Theorist"

How is what done with fires?
Do you refer to the collapse of WTC7?
Do you think the 20-story gash in the side of WTC 7 after the tower collapses seriously compromised 7's structural integrity or do you simply ignore inconvenient truths?

May I point out that in order to get a controlled demolition to actually destroy a building, there must be precision placed explosives and said precision placed explosives set off in a very specific order to do the job, controlled demolitions gone wrong, most often end in incomplete demolition. Now with that said, uncontrolled fires are alleged to have done exactly what a very well planned and executed controlled demolition could be expected to do.

Except while there were eye-witnesses to the damage done to WTC7 by the Tower's falling debris, there remains 13 years after the attack, still no evidence of a controlled demo which, as you admit, requires an extensive, well-planned execution ... tough to do after hours of "uncontrolled fires."

If indeed they were uncontrolled fires.....
the whole scene was a bit of theater....

Got a link to that bit of spam, Spammy?

 

[wihosa]

How is it done with fires?
Easy, just insist it was done by fires and provide no science to back it up.
Simply insist it is so and that anyone who questions it is obviously a "Conspiracy Theorist"

How is what done with fires?
Do you refer to the collapse of WTC7?
Do you think the 20-story gash in the side of WTC 7 after the tower collapses seriously compromised 7's structural integrity or do you simply ignore inconvenient truths?

A gash in the curtain wall exterior in no way compromises the structural integrity of the building because the curtain wall is not a structural element.

No modern steel framed high rise building has ever collapsed due to fire. There have been thousands of fires in skyscrapers and never has one caused collapse until 911 when THREE did!!!

 

[n0spam4me]

no evidence of a controlled demo

Note that the building descends for 2.25 sec, at free fall acceleration and keeps its shape as it falls, also the feature of total destruction of the building being exactly like controlled demolition.

 

[SAYIT]

How is it done with fires?
Easy, just insist it was done by fires and provide no science to back it up.
Simply insist it is so and that anyone who questions it is obviously a "Conspiracy Theorist"

How is what done with fires?
Do you refer to the collapse of WTC7?
Do you think the 20-story gash in the side of WTC 7 after the tower collapses seriously compromised 7's structural integrity or do you simply ignore inconvenient truths?

A gash in the curtain wall exterior in no way compromises the structural integrity of the building because the curtain wall is not a structural element.

No modern steel framed high rise building has ever collapsed due to fire. There have been thousands of fires in skyscrapers and never has one caused collapse until 911 when THREE did!!!

Did you say "curtain?" Those who were there had a different POV.
Where you also there by chance?

"WTC Building 7 appears to have suffered significant damage at some point after the WTC Towers had collapsed, according to firefighters at the scene. Firefighter Butch Brandies tells other firefighters that nobody is to go into Building 7 because of creaking and noises coming out of there. [Firehouse Magazine, 8/02]

Battalion Chief John Norman later recalls, “At the edge of the south face you could see that it is very heavily damaged.” [Firehouse Magazine, 5/02]

Deputy Chief Nick Visconti also later recalls recounts, “A big chunk of the lower floors had been taken out on the Vesey Street side.” Captain Chris Boyle recalls, “On the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors.” [Firehouse Magazine, 8/02]

"The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was the collapse (Of the WTC towers) had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, World Trade Center collapsed completely" - Daniel Nigro
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...gro_Daniel.txt

"They told us to get out of there because they were worried about 7 World Trade Center, which is right behind it, coming down. We were up on the upper floors of the Verizon building looking at it. You could just see the whole bottom corner of the building was gone. We could look right out over to where the Trade Centers were because we were that high up. Looking over the smaller buildings. I just remember it was tremendous, tremendous fires going on. Finally they pulled us out. They said all right, get out of that building because that 7, they were really worried about. They pulled us out of there and then they regrouped everybody on Vesey Street, between the water and West Street. They put everybody back in there. Finally it did come down. From there - this is much later on in the day, because every day we were so worried about that building we didn't really want to get people close. They were trying to limit the amount of people that were in there. Finally it did come down." - Richard Banaciski
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...ki_Richard.txt

"Early on, there was concern that 7 World Trade Center might have been both impacted by the collapsing tower and had several fires in it and there was a concern that it might collapse. So we instructed that a collapse area -- (Q. A collapse zone?) -- Yeah -- be set up and maintained so that when the expected collapse of 7 happened, we wouldn't have people working in it. There was considerable discussion with Con Ed regarding the substation in that building and the feeders and the oil coolants and so on. And their concern was of the type of fire we might have when it collapsed." - Chief Cruthers
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...C/Cruthers.txt

As always he "Truther" is reduced to posting half-truths, innuendo, rumors and outright fabrications because the truth just doesn't support the CT POV.

 

[n0spam4me]

As always he "Truther" is reduced to posting half-truths, innuendo, rumors and outright fabrications because the truth just doesn't support the CT POV.

is it or is it not FACT that WTC7 spent 2.25 sec descending at 9.8 m/s^2 and kept its shape while falling? This is important to define, it is completely independent of when during the whole "collapse" sequence it happened and unless this was an engineered event, made to happen by either explosives &or thermite or for that matter black-magic, the fact is that structures simply do not "collapse" at free fall acceleration unless they have had some serious help to do it.