Abbas says Palestinians no longer bound by pacts with Israel

[aris2chat]

Israel no longer bound to share money for trade tariffs with the PA then? Or limited control of WB? Or cooperation of mount? Or work permits? Or travel and services to hospitals? Or share security with PA police?
No more attempt at a two state solution, Israel will just take back the WB and G................ deport "foreign" terrorists and out law Palestinian groups? Out law the use of the term Palestinian. Arrest supporters of Palestinians as supporters of terrorism?

Only Israeli muslims can access the mount, Palestinian waqf gone, Jordan custodian gone.

 

[pbel]

Israel no longer bound to share money for trade tariffs with the PA then? Or limited control of WB? Or cooperation of mount? Or work permits? Or travel and services to hospitals? Or share security with PA police?
No more attempt at a two state solution, Israel will just take back the WB and G................ deport "foreign" terrorists and out law Palestinian groups? Out law the use of the term Palestinian. Arrest supporters of Palestinians as supporters of terrorism?

Only Israeli muslims can access the mount, Palestinian waqf gone, Jordan custodian gone.

its their mount...

 

[rylah]

but we know it's just another round of

Israel no longer bound to share money for trade tariffs with the PA then? Or limited control of WB? Or cooperation of mount? Or work permits? Or travel and services to hospitals? Or share security with PA police?
No more attempt at a two state solution, Israel will just take back the WB and G................ deport "foreign" terrorists and out law Palestinian groups? Out law the use of the term Palestinian. Arrest supporters of Palestinians as supporters of terrorism?

Only Israeli muslims can access the mount, Palestinian waqf gone, Jordan custodian gone.

its their mount...

Never was never will be, especially since been kicked out by sons of Jacob...
but of course muslims consider all world to be their playground for Jihad

 

[Indeependent]

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

 

[rylah]

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

well they've built a unique time capsule

 

[USAF 2023]

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

" Right of Return" is DOA

 

[Hollie]

RE: Abbas says Palestinians no longer bound by pacts with Israel

Infidel ladies and gentlemen, I give you the inevitable, logical outcome of that colossal exercise in brainless social policy known as islamic taqiyya: They never were.

Hey, wait a minute... Didn't Mahmoud Abbas write a Holocaust denial book as his doctoral thesis? Hey! "Peace Partner"!

Well, I guess it doesn't matter anyway, because this "peace partner" nonsense is all just duplicitous chicanery. It's just window dressing on the dirty, cracked, and broken window that is Pal'istinian Arab society. Abbas just wants to maintain that patina of moderation that the MSM and Western useful idiots actually believe in.

 

[pbel]

RE: Abbas says Palestinians no longer bound by pacts with Israel

Infidel ladies and gentlemen, I give you the inevitable, logical outcome of that colossal exercise in brainless social policy known as islamic taqiyya: They never were.

Hey, wait a minute... Didn't Mahmoud Abbas write a Holocaust denial book as his doctoral thesis? Hey! "Peace Partner"!

Well, I guess it doesn't matter anyway, because this "peace partner" nonsense is all just duplicitous chicanery. It's just window dressing on the dirty, cracked, and broken window that is Pal'istinian Arab society. Abbas just wants to maintain that patina of moderation that the MSM and Western useful idiots actually believe in.

Abbas, Doctorate was about the collusion and partnership between Hitler's Nazis and your Zionist forefathers.

Abbas, Doctorate - Google Search

Feedback
Mahmoud Abbas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mahmud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaAbbas

• Cached

Wikipedia

Loading...
The thesis of 1982 doctoral dissertation of Mahmoud Abbas, was "The Secret Connection between the Nazis and the Leaders of the Zionist Movement".
President‎: ‎Yasser Arafat
Political party‎: ‎Fatah
Religion‎: ‎Sunni Islam
Prime Minister‎: ‎Ahmed Qurei; Nabil Sha...

 

[Hollie]

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

well they've built a unique time capsule

It's a time capsule these knuckle draggers have never been able to escape from. Violence and murder has defined muhammedans.

When murder and destruction are used for the purpose of achieving practical gains, success is often measured in increments rather than in decisively conclusive victories. When Islamic terrorists draw world attention to their cause with their vile acts of criminality and barbarism, that is a positive achievement for them, even if that attention primarily takes the form of disgust and outrage--the message is still reaching an audience.

When their acts of terror win them even a small portion of their demands, this is a material and psychological triumph. In short, whenever the investment of terrorism does not exceed its gains, it is a success.

 

[RoccoR]

ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Yes, I agree. Where is the "Right of Return" stipulated in law?

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

" Right of Return" is DOA

(COMMENT)

To my knowledge, the "Right of Return" has not become Customary International Law. And clearly, 1948 UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), and while it does layout the general stipulation for the "Right of Return" or the alternative compensation for their losses, IT IS NOT INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Phoenall]

Israel no longer bound to share money for trade tariffs with the PA then? Or limited control of WB? Or cooperation of mount? Or work permits? Or travel and services to hospitals? Or share security with PA police?
No more attempt at a two state solution, Israel will just take back the WB and G................ deport "foreign" terrorists and out law Palestinian groups? Out law the use of the term Palestinian. Arrest supporters of Palestinians as supporters of terrorism?

Only Israeli muslims can access the mount, Palestinian waqf gone, Jordan custodian gone.

its their mount...

NO it is the Jews mount who were there first, and it is the Palestinians that don't want the agreement made in 1967 to be in force so out they go. Then dismantle the carbuncles and build them at the furthest eastern boundary of Jerusalem so they still have their eyesores that did not exist in mo'mads time.

 

[Phoenall]

RE: Abbas says Palestinians no longer bound by pacts with Israel

Infidel ladies and gentlemen, I give you the inevitable, logical outcome of that colossal exercise in brainless social policy known as islamic taqiyya: They never were.

Hey, wait a minute... Didn't Mahmoud Abbas write a Holocaust denial book as his doctoral thesis? Hey! "Peace Partner"!

Well, I guess it doesn't matter anyway, because this "peace partner" nonsense is all just duplicitous chicanery. It's just window dressing on the dirty, cracked, and broken window that is Pal'istinian Arab society. Abbas just wants to maintain that patina of moderation that the MSM and Western useful idiots actually believe in.

Abbas, Doctorate was about the collusion and partnership between Hitler's Nazis and your Zionist forefathers.

Abbas, Doctorate - Google Search

Feedback
Mahmoud Abbas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mahmud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaAbbas

• Cached

Wikipedia

Loading...
The thesis of 1982 doctoral dissertation of Mahmoud Abbas, was "The Secret Connection between the Nazis and the Leaders of the Zionist Movement".
President‎: ‎Yasser Arafat
Political party‎: ‎Fatah
Religion‎: ‎Sunni Islam
Prime Minister‎: ‎Ahmed Qurei; Nabil Sha...

Which never existed in the manner you islamonazi's try and portray. The Nazi's from both Germany and Palestine did not want the Jews saving and moving to their NATIONal home because they would be too many for the arab muslims to fight so they upped the price for every Jew that tried to leave Europe and the Zionists could not raise the money to save them all. The Nazi's had already taken all the Jews movable wealth so they could not raise the money themselves, and the Nazi's wanted foreign money or precious metals/gems only.

Not the LIES you peddle as facts that are just pure BLOOD LIBELS

 

[P F Tinmore]

ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Yes, I agree. Where is the "Right of Return" stipulated in law?

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

" Right of Return" is DOA

(COMMENT)

To my knowledge, the "Right of Return" has not become Customary International Law. And clearly, 1948 UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), and while it does layout the general stipulation for the "Right of Return" or the alternative compensation for their losses, IT IS NOT INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Most Respectfully,
R

Of course UN resolutions and many legal scholars disagree with you.

Do you have anyone denying the right of return in any other case but Palestine?

 

[Hollie]

ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Yes, I agree. Where is the "Right of Return" stipulated in law?

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

" Right of Return" is DOA

(COMMENT)

To my knowledge, the "Right of Return" has not become Customary International Law. And clearly, 1948 UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), and while it does layout the general stipulation for the "Right of Return" or the alternative compensation for their losses, IT IS NOT INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Most Respectfully,
R

Of course UN resolutions and many legal scholars disagree with you.

Do you have anyone denying the right of return in any other case but Palestine?

It seems the countries of origin for the beggars and land grabbers sometimes called "Pal'istanians" are denying them the right of return.

The "Pal'istanians" have made themselves undesirables in the view of their countries of origin: Egypt, Syria, Labanon, etc.

Not a one of these nations will grant a right of return to the welfare cheats and rabble otherwise known as Islamic terrorist enablers.

 

[USAF 2023]

ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Yes, I agree. Where is the "Right of Return" stipulated in law?

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

" Right of Return" is DOA

(COMMENT)

To my knowledge, the "Right of Return" has not become Customary International Law. And clearly, 1948 UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), and while it does layout the general stipulation for the "Right of Return" or the alternative compensation for their losses, IT IS NOT INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Most Respectfully,
R

Of course UN resolutions and many legal scholars disagree with you.

Do you have anyone denying the right of return in any other case but Palestine?

YAWN .. Not going to happen . That would eventually make Jews a minority and annex Isrsel to " Palestine" Just hope they keep demanding it !!

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Actually, you are asking the wrong question. To pass into customary law, it must have a previous history of being enforced.

• The question is: When was "Right of Return" (RoR) last enforced?
​

If you repeat misinformation often enough, some people will begin to belive it.

ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Yes, I agree. Where is the "Right of Return" stipulated in law?

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

" Right of Return" is DOA

(COMMENT)

To my knowledge, the "Right of Return" has not become Customary International Law. And clearly, 1948 UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), and while it does layout the general stipulation for the "Right of Return" or the alternative compensation for their losses, IT IS NOT INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Most Respectfully,
R

Of course UN resolutions and many legal scholars disagree with you.

Do you have anyone denying the right of return in any other case but Palestine?

(REFERENCE)

• The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting, 1 September 2000:
• UN General Assembly Resolution 194, ratified on 11 December 1948 is not a binding resolution.
• By contrast the right of return has not passed into customary international law, although it remains an important aspirational human right. Instead, international law gives each country the right to decide for itself to whom it will give citizenship.
• UN Security Council Resolution 242, does not mention the RoR;.
• Although Arab leaders point to Resolution 194 as proof that Arab refugees have a right to return or be compensated, it is important to note that the Arab States: Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen voted against Resolution 194. Israel is not even mentioned in the resolution. The fact that plural wording also is used – “governments or authorities” – suggests that, contrary to Arab claims, the burden of compensation does not fall solely upon one side of the conflict. Because seven Arab armies invaded Israel, Israel was not responsible for creating the refugee problem. When hundreds of thousands of Arab Jews, under threat of death, attack and other forms of persecution, were forced to flee Arab communities, the State of Israel absorbed the overwhelming majority of them into the then-fledgling nation. (See Voting Record A/PV.186)
• No large scale refugee problem has ever been solved by repatriation, and there are certainly no grounds for believing that this particular problem [the Palestinian refugee problem] can be so solved... The facts we must face force us to the conclusion that for most of the world’s refugees the only solution is integration where they are. (Dr. Elfan Rees, Century of the Homeless Man, as quoted in Radley, p 611-612)

(COMMENT)

Well there are a couple of examples in the post-WW II era.

"At the conclusion in 1923 of the Greek-Turkish War, harsh treatment of Greek communities in Turkey caused large numbers of these Turkish Greeks to flee their homes. Because of this, the peace treaty between the two sides provided for a mutual exchange of populations – about 2 million Greeks who had been Turkish citizens were relocated to Greece, while about 500,000 Turks who had been Greek citizens were relocated to Turkey. The immoveable property left behind was seized by the respective Governments and was used, in part, to resettle the incoming refugees." (Eyal Benvenisti and Eyal Zamir, Private Claims to Property Rights in the Future Israeli-Palestinian Settlement, The American Journal of International Law, April 1995, p 322)

"The Potsdam Declaration imposed by the Allies following World War 2 provided for the transfer to Germany of approximately 15 million Germans, particularly from those parts of eastern Germany which after the war were allotted to Poland. Under the Declaration the German populations in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Austria were relocated to Germany, these German refugees lost title to the property they left behind, and no arrangements were made to compensate them for their losses." (Benvenisti and Zamir, p 322)

"Settlement of the conflict between Hindus and Muslims in British India via division of the region into India and Pakistan required relocation of millions of people. Once again, immoveable property left behind by these refugees was seized by the respective governments to help settle the incoming refugees." (Benvenisti and Zamir, p 323)
​

I would be interested in knowing were you think the RoR exist in International Law.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Phoenall]

ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Yes, I agree. Where is the "Right of Return" stipulated in law?

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

" Right of Return" is DOA

(COMMENT)

To my knowledge, the "Right of Return" has not become Customary International Law. And clearly, 1948 UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), and while it does layout the general stipulation for the "Right of Return" or the alternative compensation for their losses, IT IS NOT INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Most Respectfully,
R

Of course UN resolutions and many legal scholars disagree with you.

Do you have anyone denying the right of return in any other case but Palestine?

Un resolutions are nothing but recommendations of action that some UN members would like to see take place, they carry no legal weight and are not worth the paper they are written on. The alleged legal scholars have been proven to be LIARS and/or Jew hating Nazis,

THERE IS NO LEGAL RIGHT OF RETURN AND THE WEST USES IT EVERY DAY The UK stopped muslim terrorists from returning to Britain by rescinding their passports.

 

[pbel]

ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Yes, I agree. Where is the "Right of Return" stipulated in law?

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

" Right of Return" is DOA

(COMMENT)

To my knowledge, the "Right of Return" has not become Customary International Law. And clearly, 1948 UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), and while it does layout the general stipulation for the "Right of Return" or the alternative compensation for their losses, IT IS NOT INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Most Respectfully,
R

Of course UN resolutions and many legal scholars disagree with you.

Do you have anyone denying the right of return in any other case but Palestine?

Un resolutions are nothing but recommendations of action that some UN members would like to see take place, they carry no legal weight and are not worth the paper they are written on. The alleged legal scholars have been proven to be LIARS and/or Jew hating Nazis,

THERE IS NO LEGAL RIGHT OF RETURN AND THE WEST USES IT EVERY DAY The UK stopped muslim terrorists from returning to Britain by rescinding their passports.

You pick and choose which UN actions you support like a New York hustler on 5th Avenue...

 

[docmauser1]

Of course UN resolutions and many legal scholars disagree with you.

The UN united arab-muslim front can't find its arse in daytime, of course.

Do you have anyone denying the right of return in any other case but Palestine?

Most of the former are resettled, except palistanian occupational refugees, and if the latter want to go on providing employment for those feeding around them, while living in shitt themselves, then be it so, of course.

 

[docmauser1]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Actually, you are asking the wrong question. To pass into customary law, it must have a previous history of being enforced.

• The question is: When was "Right of Return" (RoR) last enforced?
​

If you repeat misinformation often enough, some people will begin to belive it.

ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Yes, I agree. Where is the "Right of Return" stipulated in law?

You think maybe now the Muzlems will try to destroy Israel?
Oh wait! They'd be trying to be doing that for 60 years already.
You notice how Muslims suck at almost everything they do?
Including murdering each other?

" Right of Return" is DOA

(COMMENT)

To my knowledge, the "Right of Return" has not become Customary International Law. And clearly, 1948 UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), and while it does layout the general stipulation for the "Right of Return" or the alternative compensation for their losses, IT IS NOT INTERNATIONAL LAW.

Most Respectfully,
R

Of course UN resolutions and many legal scholars disagree with you.

Do you have anyone denying the right of return in any other case but Palestine?

(REFERENCE)

• The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting, 1 September 2000:
• UN General Assembly Resolution 194, ratified on 11 December 1948 is not a binding resolution.
• By contrast the right of return has not passed into customary international law, although it remains an important aspirational human right. Instead, international law gives each country the right to decide for itself to whom it will give citizenship.
• UN Security Council Resolution 242, does not mention the RoR;.
• Although Arab leaders point to Resolution 194 as proof that Arab refugees have a right to return or be compensated, it is important to note that the Arab States: Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen voted against Resolution 194. Israel is not even mentioned in the resolution. The fact that plural wording also is used – “governments or authorities” – suggests that, contrary to Arab claims, the burden of compensation does not fall solely upon one side of the conflict. Because seven Arab armies invaded Israel, Israel was not responsible for creating the refugee problem. When hundreds of thousands of Arab Jews, under threat of death, attack and other forms of persecution, were forced to flee Arab communities, the State of Israel absorbed the overwhelming majority of them into the then-fledgling nation. (See Voting Record A/PV.186)
• No large scale refugee problem has ever been solved by repatriation, and there are certainly no grounds for believing that this particular problem [the Palestinian refugee problem] can be so solved... The facts we must face force us to the conclusion that for most of the world’s refugees the only solution is integration where they are. (Dr. Elfan Rees, Century of the Homeless Man, as quoted in Radley, p 611-612)

(COMMENT)

Well there are a couple of examples in the post-WW II era.

"At the conclusion in 1923 of the Greek-Turkish War, harsh treatment of Greek communities in Turkey caused large numbers of these Turkish Greeks to flee their homes. Because of this, the peace treaty between the two sides provided for a mutual exchange of populations – about 2 million Greeks who had been Turkish citizens were relocated to Greece, while about 500,000 Turks who had been Greek citizens were relocated to Turkey. The immoveable property left behind was seized by the respective Governments and was used, in part, to resettle the incoming refugees." (Eyal Benvenisti and Eyal Zamir, Private Claims to Property Rights in the Future Israeli-Palestinian Settlement, The American Journal of International Law, April 1995, p 322)

"The Potsdam Declaration imposed by the Allies following World War 2 provided for the transfer to Germany of approximately 15 million Germans, particularly from those parts of eastern Germany which after the war were allotted to Poland. Under the Declaration the German populations in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Austria were relocated to Germany, these German refugees lost title to the property they left behind, and no arrangements were made to compensate them for their losses." (Benvenisti and Zamir, p 322)

"Settlement of the conflict between Hindus and Muslims in British India via division of the region into India and Pakistan required relocation of millions of people. Once again, immoveable property left behind by these refugees was seized by the respective governments to help settle the incoming refugees." (Benvenisti and Zamir, p 323)
​

I would be interested in knowing were you think the RoR exist in International Law.
Most Respectfully,
R

Damn! The Potsdam declaration was my idea to mention. I'm not pressing charges, though.