- Dec 6, 2009
- 78,178
- 4,279
- 1,815
Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Indeed, it had nothing to to with Arab-Moslem sovereignty. Please identify what authority established Arab-Moslem sovereignty.
Shirley, you can link to a YouTube video. One produced by Pallywood Studios, perhaps?
Indeed.
The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Indeed, it had nothing to to with Arab-Moslem sovereignty. Please identify what authority established Arab-Moslem sovereignty.
Shirley, you can link to a YouTube video. One produced by Pallywood Studios, perhaps?
Indeed.
Link?The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Indeed, it had nothing to to with Arab-Moslem sovereignty. Please identify what authority established Arab-Moslem sovereignty.
Shirley, you can link to a YouTube video. One produced by Pallywood Studios, perhaps?
Indeed.
That assertion has already been proven to be false.
The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Indeed, it had nothing to to with Arab-Moslem sovereignty. Please identify what authority established Arab-Moslem sovereignty.
Shirley, you can link to a YouTube video. One produced by Pallywood Studios, perhaps?
Indeed.
Nobody has ever proven it to be false. They just dance around the issue.The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Indeed, it had nothing to to with Arab-Moslem sovereignty. Please identify what authority established Arab-Moslem sovereignty.
Shirley, you can link to a YouTube video. One produced by Pallywood Studios, perhaps?
Indeed.
You still cling to that falsehood.
No dancing.Nobody has ever proven it to be false. They just dance around the issue.The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Indeed, it had nothing to to with Arab-Moslem sovereignty. Please identify what authority established Arab-Moslem sovereignty.
Shirley, you can link to a YouTube video. One produced by Pallywood Studios, perhaps?
Indeed.
You still cling to that falsehood.
Nobody has ever proven it to be false. They just dance around the issue.The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Indeed, it had nothing to to with Arab-Moslem sovereignty. Please identify what authority established Arab-Moslem sovereignty.
Shirley, you can link to a YouTube video. One produced by Pallywood Studios, perhaps?
Indeed.
You still cling to that falsehood.
Nobody has ever proven it to be false. They just dance around the issue.The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Indeed, it had nothing to to with Arab-Moslem sovereignty. Please identify what authority established Arab-Moslem sovereignty.
Shirley, you can link to a YouTube video. One produced by Pallywood Studios, perhaps?
Indeed.
You still cling to that falsehood.
(COMMENT)Debatable, but it really does not matter. It was a joint project.Jewish immigration, ⇒ no matter what the Arab Palestinian impression, was not then and is not now, a Jewish Puppet Colony of the British Empire.
(COMMENT)Nobody has ever proven it to be false. They just dance around the issue.The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.beginning in April, 1939, “no further Jewish immigration will be permitted unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to acquiesce in it.”
Indeed, it had nothing to to with Arab-Moslem sovereignty. Please identify what authority established Arab-Moslem sovereignty.
Shirley, you can link to a YouTube video. One produced by Pallywood Studios, perhaps?
Indeed.
You still cling to that falsehood.
RE: Abbas calls Israel a colonial project unrelated to Judaism
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Was it a joint project? (Rhetorical) Yes, very much so.
(COMMENT)Debatable, but it really does not matter. It was a joint project.Jewish immigration, ⇒ no matter what the Arab Palestinian impression, was not then and is not now, a Jewish Puppet Colony of the British Empire.
Whatever else was said, the principle objective was the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.
Most Respectfully,
R
It is the Palestinians, not foreigners, who have the right to determine such a thing.the principle objective was the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.
RE: Abbas calls Israel a colonial project unrelated to Judaism
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Was it a joint project? (Rhetorical) Yes, very much so.
(COMMENT)Debatable, but it really does not matter. It was a joint project.Jewish immigration, ⇒ no matter what the Arab Palestinian impression, was not then and is not now, a Jewish Puppet Colony of the British Empire.
Whatever else was said, the principle objective was the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.
Most Respectfully,
RIt is the Palestinians, not foreigners, who have the right to determine such a thing.the principle objective was the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.
(COMMENT)It is the Palestinians, not foreigners, who have the right to determine such a thing.the principle objective was the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.
Why would everyone say "in Palestine" if there was no Palestine?You placed emphasis on in Palestine, as if it was directly related to some characteristic or consequence of today's Arab Palestinians. That would be wrong.
When did Palestine's international borders change since 1922?(what instrument determines the boundaries of the 21st Century terrain)?
The Tinmore Claim
is
The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.
(The authority of a state to govern itself.)
So, when Israel claims that there never was a Palestine and there never were any Palestinians, what is their source?RE: Abbas calls Israel a colonial project unrelated to Judaism
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
That is probably true, "Nobody has ever proven it to be false."
This is a basic Law of Logic.
(COMMENT)Nobody has ever proven it to be false. They just dance around the issue.The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, Palestinian sovereignty over the land.
Indeed, it had nothing to to with Arab-Moslem sovereignty. Please identify what authority established Arab-Moslem sovereignty.
Shirley, you can link to a YouTube video. One produced by Pallywood Studios, perhaps?
Indeed.
You still cling to that falsehood.
The Tinmore Claim
is
The Palestinians have had sovereignty since the Treaty of Lausanne.
(The authority of a state to govern itself.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question (Excluding the Gaza Strip): In the last thousand years, Where did the Palestinians maintain
a self-governing territory (Sovereignty ⇒ Supreme Authority) state, or nation known as Palestine?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I will agree that, there are cases in which the existence of something absent from reality (Palestinians sovereignty or self-governing territory) IS possible to prove; but it would not conform to logical thought. But it would put you into a new realm:
The existence of the "Tinmore Claim that sovereignty for the Palestinians originated from the Treaty of Lausanne" is not anymore unlikely as the existence of a "Unicorn."
I cannot prove there is no such thing (non-existence) as a "Unicorn" or the "Tinmore Claim." (I cannot prove the non-existence of a Bigfoot, Dragons, Monsters, Fairy's, Mermaid, Elf, witches and warlocks, UFOs, astral projections, mental telepathy, ESP, clairvoyance, spirit photography, telekinetic movement, full trance mediums, the Loch Ness monster, and the theory of Atlantis.)
Theoretically, everyone is a member of a constituency that has the "Right to Sovereignty;" treaty or not.
Most Respectfully,
R
(COMMENT)Why would everyone say "in Palestine" if there was no Palestine?You placed emphasis on in Palestine, as if it was directly related to some characteristic or consequence of today's Arab Palestinians. That would be wrong.
You don't make any sense.