Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Doesn't matter. They aren't asking for the ultrasound and the government has no right to force it on them. You people all bitched about the government forcing Catholic charities to pay for contraception, and rightly so, but then you turn around and have no problem with them forcing an ultrasound up a woman's cooch. See the hypocrisy here?
Nope,kinda hard to be a hypocrite and save lives at the same time.
The real tragically hypocritical angle,is that so many deny what they once were and what would and will be. Its always a human,be it boy or girl,never anything else,but are more than willing to kill their offspring for a long list of lame excuses ,but mostly just convenience.
Actually, it's more about forcing the abortion industry to be more accountable for what they do. They already are appallingly under-regulated. This is about making THEM provide the sort of care they claim they are all about...forcing THEM to be honest with their clients, forcing THEM to share information and provide women with options.
If "invasive" procedures are to be restricted, then we shouldn't allow abortions in the first place. Again, this isn't about the abortion industry and pro-abortionists protecting women. It's about exploiting them, refusing to provide them with the information they need to make informed decisions, and withholding knowledge from them, and stats from those who would monitor THEM. They don't want the world to know exactly how many late term babies they're cutting up and hiding.
Nope,kinda hard to be a hypocrite and save lives at the same time.
The real tragically hypocritical angle,is that so many deny what they once were and what would and will be. Its always a human,be it boy or girl,never anything else,but are more than willing to kill their offspring for a long list of lame excuses ,but mostly just convenience.
Actually, it's more about forcing the abortion industry to be more accountable for what they do. They already are appallingly under-regulated. This is about making THEM provide the sort of care they claim they are all about...forcing THEM to be honest with their clients, forcing THEM to share information and provide women with options.
If "invasive" procedures are to be restricted, then we shouldn't allow abortions in the first place. Again, this isn't about the abortion industry and pro-abortionists protecting women. It's about exploiting them, refusing to provide them with the information they need to make informed decisions, and withholding knowledge from them, and stats from those who would monitor THEM. They don't want the world to know exactly how many late term babies they're cutting up and hiding.
so you are for bigger more intrusive government and it's regulations?
There is no need to perform the majority of abortions.
The point is, pro-abortionists don't give a shit about invasive procedures. They don't want women to see their babies, because they might make an informed choice and choose not to kill it.
Horrors. Choice. The one thing the progressives despise.
Forcing women to see their fetus as an attempt to coerce...
Nope,kinda hard to be a hypocrite and save lives at the same time.
The real tragically hypocritical angle,is that so many deny what they once were and what would and will be. Its always a human,be it boy or girl,never anything else,but are more than willing to kill their offspring for a long list of lame excuses ,but mostly just convenience.
Actually, it's more about forcing the abortion industry to be more accountable for what they do. They already are appallingly under-regulated. This is about making THEM provide the sort of care they claim they are all about...forcing THEM to be honest with their clients, forcing THEM to share information and provide women with options.
If "invasive" procedures are to be restricted, then we shouldn't allow abortions in the first place. Again, this isn't about the abortion industry and pro-abortionists protecting women. It's about exploiting them, refusing to provide them with the information they need to make informed decisions, and withholding knowledge from them, and stats from those who would monitor THEM. They don't want the world to know exactly how many late term babies they're cutting up and hiding.
so you are for bigger more intrusive government and it's regulations?
There is no need to perform the majority of abortions.
The point is, pro-abortionists don't give a shit about invasive procedures. They don't want women to see their babies, because they might make an informed choice and choose not to kill it.
Horrors. Choice. The one thing the progressives despise.
Forcing women to see their fetus as an attempt to coerce...
that's really all this is. roe v wade won't be overturned so they're looking for ways to guilt women into doing what they think is right.
The vast majority of abortions aren't medically necessary. Do you oppose them?
God will judge everybody, and murderers among them, when we stand before God.
Until then, we have laws to protect ourselves from murder. Even murder done in the name of "science" and "health" and "women's rights".
No, wrong. Just because God will judge us all doesn't mean we don't judge murderers now. Just as we judge all other monsters and criminals.
God will take care of the mass murderers, the child molesters, the batterers, the serial rapists....in his time. That doesn't mean we give them a pass here and now, though I understand there are a lot of people motivated to change that.
God will judge everybody, and murderers among them, when we stand before God.
Until then, we have laws to protect ourselves from murder. Even murder done in the name of "science" and "health" and "women's rights".
Yes. God will judge us. Not you. Glad we could get tha straightened out.
I do not discuss the morals of the people of Missouri, but let them settle that matter for themselves. I hold that the people of the slaveholding States are civilized men as well as ourselves; that they bear consciences as well as we, and that they are accountable to God and their posterity, and not to us. It is for them to decide, therefore, the moral and religious right of the slavery question for themselves within their own limits.
The personhood bill in Virginia has nothing to do with ultrasound.There is no need to perform the majority of abortions.
The point is, pro-abortionists don't give a shit about invasive procedures. They don't want women to see their babies, because they might make an informed choice and choose not to kill it.
Horrors. Choice. The one thing the progressives despise.
I don't want to force women to look at their fetus. We also don't oppose procedures. I oppose procedures that aren't medically necessary.
Forcing women to see their fetus as an attempt to coerce is not medically necessary.
No, wrong. Just because God will judge us all doesn't mean we don't judge murderers now. Just as we judge all other monsters and criminals.
God will take care of the mass murderers, the child molesters, the batterers, the serial rapists....in his time. That doesn't mean we give them a pass here and now, though I understand there are a lot of people motivated to change that.
Tough nuts for you. Abortion is "murder" in your opinion only.
The rest, to include your own inequities, are up to God.
There is no need to perform the majority of abortions.
The point is, pro-abortionists don't give a shit about invasive procedures. They don't want women to see their babies, because they might make an informed choice and choose not to kill it.
Horrors. Choice. The one thing the progressives despise.
Indeed, the unltrasound IS a mandate for elective abortions in Virginia. THAT bill passed, as it should have. And, contrary to what you've been told by others, no woman is required to look at her ultra sound. I'd link to the bill, but frankly, I'm tired of doing so. Few bother to do their own thinking.There is no need to perform the majority of abortions.
The point is, pro-abortionists don't give a shit about invasive procedures. They don't want women to see their babies, because they might make an informed choice and choose not to kill it.
Horrors. Choice. The one thing the progressives despise.
Choice is exactly what was not being offered here. The ultrasound was a mandate.
Until then, we have laws to protect ourselves from murder. Even murder done in the name of "science" and "health" and "women's rights".
God will judge everybody, and murderers among them, when we stand before God.
Until then, we have laws to protect ourselves from murder. Even murder done in the name of "science" and "health" and "women's rights".