A very serious question to all Bush haters

Press Release: SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers; 2007-190; Sept. 19, 2007



SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers
Eight Years After Passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Key Provisions Will Now Be Implemented
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2007-190
Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2007 - Ending eight years of stalled negotiations and impasse, the Commission today voted to adopt, jointly with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), new rules that will finally implement the bank broker provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Board will consider these final rules at its Sept. 24, 2007 meeting. The Commission and the Board consulted with and sought the concurrence of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift Supervision.
 
For 8 year the Bush team held back the broker rules which would have prevented this mess
 
Wow, someone is actually going to try to defend that cocksucker?

There's no denying Bush has a better record than Obama. The numbers don't lie.

wow great proof .........oh wait all you did was spout stupidity with nothing to back it

Do your own homework Liberal asswipe. I'll even spot you a link. Go look at the unemployment rate during Bush's time and Obama's time. Obama's policies aren't working.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
 
If Bush was so great? Why did he not show his face for the last 2 elections to endorse a candidate?

LOL even Bush knows he is not so great as some demented persons think.

You gonna tell us how great Bush looks in blue jeans?

NO way would ANYONE suggest Bush in the campaign that was run by the MSM!

I mean the MSM got Obama elected and re-elected! Think they would be honest about Bush??
FACTS...
Let's just look at one simple easy to understand example of the MSM bias against Bush and favoring Obama!


"There is a liberal bias. It's demonstrable. You look at some statistics. About 85 percent of the reporters who cover the White House vote Democratic, they have for a long time. There is a, particularly at the networks, at the lower levels, among the editors and the so-called infrastructure, there is a liberal bias.-
Newsweek Washington Bureau Chief Evan Thomas

Thomas' assertion of 85% reporters vote Democratic is further backed up by:
"MSNBC.com identified 144 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes.
Only 17 gave to Republicans. Two gave to both parties."
Journalists give campaign cash - politics | NBC News

When you take the above statements by Thomas and when you consider these two statements again by Thomas...

Well, our job is to bash the president, that's what we do." --
Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington,
February 2, 2007.Newsweek's Evan Thomas: 'Our Job Is To Bash the President' | NewsBusters.org

But then when it comes to Obama???

I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Evan Thomas on Hardball, June 5, 2009.
Newsweek

SO wouldn't a logical sane person come to the conclusion :
A) MSM votes and donates to Democrats
B) Editor of MSM magazine SAYS there is a Liberal bias.
C) Says his job was to BASH BUSH!
D) Same guy who's job was to bash Bush CALLS OBAMA A GOD!!!

If that isn't conclusive evidence that Bush is hated by the MSM that puts out biased content favoring Obama what is???
 
They lied us into war.

the right will have to face that fact some day.

The rest of the world KNOWS the truth

Are these 32 democrat quotes LIES then???
I'm using LARGE font because I don't think you are dealing with FACTS!!!
BEFORE BUSH ... When CLINTON was President...

"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger- Clinton National. Security. Advisor 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999

AFTER CLINTON...
"Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
"Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
"Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
"Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
"give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs.threat our security".Kerry 2002
"..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
"Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
"He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
"Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002
 
If Bush was so great? Why did he not show his face for the last 2 elections to endorse a candidate?

LOL even Bush knows he is not so great as some demented persons think.

You gonna tell us how great Bush looks in blue jeans?

NO way would ANYONE suggest Bush in the campaign that was run by the MSM!

I mean the MSM got Obama elected and re-elected! Think they would be honest about Bush??
FACTS...
Let's just look at one simple easy to understand example of the MSM bias against Bush and favoring Obama!


"There is a liberal bias. It's demonstrable. You look at some statistics. About 85 percent of the reporters who cover the White House vote Democratic, they have for a long time. There is a, particularly at the networks, at the lower levels, among the editors and the so-called infrastructure, there is a liberal bias.-
Newsweek Washington Bureau Chief Evan Thomas

Thomas' assertion of 85% reporters vote Democratic is further backed up by:
"MSNBC.com identified 144 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes.
Only 17 gave to Republicans. Two gave to both parties."
Journalists give campaign cash - politics | NBC News

When you take the above statements by Thomas and when you consider these two statements again by Thomas...

Well, our job is to bash the president, that's what we do." --
Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington,
February 2, 2007.Newsweek's Evan Thomas: 'Our Job Is To Bash the President' | NewsBusters.org

But then when it comes to Obama???

I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Evan Thomas on Hardball, June 5, 2009.
Newsweek

SO wouldn't a logical sane person come to the conclusion :
A) MSM votes and donates to Democrats
B) Editor of MSM magazine SAYS there is a Liberal bias.
C) Says his job was to BASH BUSH!
D) Same guy who's job was to bash Bush CALLS OBAMA A GOD!!!

If that isn't conclusive evidence that Bush is hated by the MSM that puts out biased content favoring Obama what is???

Great posts HM, unfortunately you're talking to a group of people whose ears are closed, who have no basis in reality, objectivity, logic, or common sense. It's like trying to educate a dog to love cats, it's just beyond their capabilities. It doesn't matter what facts you present, sadly. It doesn't bode well for our future as a free country, I can only hope and pray that God's purpose is in this mess somewhere, it's about all we have left.
 
are you crazy? Are you older then 18 years OLD?

If you aren't crazy AND older then 18 please tell me what alternate universe you lived in during the last 13 years where THESE events didn't occur?

1) 1991 Cease Fire meant Saddam agreed to stop fighting and USA agreed not to invade Iraq and remove him. Remember this?
And so after 9/11 with 92% of Americans WANTING something done and since SADDAM never KEPT the 1991 Cease Fire the 1991 war continued and finished 5/2003!

So my question to you: If you sign a legal document agreeing to terms and you fail to keep the terms.. DO YOU NOT EXPECT some penalties..
The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 Public law 105-338 CNN - Clinton: Iraq has abused its last chance - December 16, 1998
Clinton signed The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 Public law 105-338 expressed the sense of congress it should be policy to support efforts to remove from power the
current Iraqi regime. "The President has authority under the consitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States."

2) Do you remember the dot.com bubble THAT BURST in 2000?
The Stock Market Crash of 2000-2002 caused the loss of $5 trillion in the market value of companies from March 2000 to October 2002.
Dot-com bubble - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Caused a recession that started then in 3/2001 and $5 trillion in market losses. Allowed taxpayers to deduct each year after 2002 $166 billion from their taxable income.
Lost 300,000 jobs

3) Does the minor event on 9/11/2001 mean anything to you? $2 trillion in losses that again are being written off and in so doing reduces the tax payments to the USA
145,000 jobs lost

4) From 2003 to 2008 WORST HURRICANE SEASONS in history with 7 of the worst 10 hurricanes rom 2004 through 2008 $1 trillion and 400,000 jobs..

YET in spite of that:
Bush had 5 million more people working at the end of his term !
The GDP grew 16% with a $769 billion growth in 2005 the best in 50 years!

Now where are your statistics???

Why do you keep starting new threads on exactly the same subject? This has to be about the 20th time you've done this.
 
If Bush was so great? Why did he not show his face for the last 2 elections to endorse a candidate?

LOL even Bush knows he is not so great as some demented persons think.

You gonna tell us how great Bush looks in blue jeans?

NO way would ANYONE suggest Bush in the campaign that was run by the MSM!

I mean the MSM got Obama elected and re-elected! Think they would be honest about Bush??
FACTS...
Let's just look at one simple easy to understand example of the MSM bias against Bush and favoring Obama!


"There is a liberal bias. It's demonstrable. You look at some statistics. About 85 percent of the reporters who cover the White House vote Democratic, they have for a long time. There is a, particularly at the networks, at the lower levels, among the editors and the so-called infrastructure, there is a liberal bias.-
Newsweek Washington Bureau Chief Evan Thomas

Thomas' assertion of 85% reporters vote Democratic is further backed up by:
"MSNBC.com identified 144 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes.
Only 17 gave to Republicans. Two gave to both parties."
Journalists give campaign cash - politics | NBC News

When you take the above statements by Thomas and when you consider these two statements again by Thomas...

Well, our job is to bash the president, that's what we do." --
Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington,
February 2, 2007.Newsweek's Evan Thomas: 'Our Job Is To Bash the President' | NewsBusters.org

But then when it comes to Obama???

I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Evan Thomas on Hardball, June 5, 2009.
Newsweek

SO wouldn't a logical sane person come to the conclusion :
A) MSM votes and donates to Democrats
B) Editor of MSM magazine SAYS there is a Liberal bias.
C) Says his job was to BASH BUSH!
D) Same guy who's job was to bash Bush CALLS OBAMA A GOD!!!

If that isn't conclusive evidence that Bush is hated by the MSM that puts out biased content favoring Obama what is???

Great posts HM, unfortunately you're talking to a group of people whose ears are closed, who have no basis in reality, objectivity, logic, or common sense. It's like trying to educate a dog to love cats, it's just beyond their capabilities. It doesn't matter what facts you present, sadly. It doesn't bode well for our future as a free country, I can only hope and pray that God's purpose is in this mess somewhere, it's about all we have left.


YOU ARE RIGHT! I just post these comments for those growing numbers that are NOW getting concerned about Obama's 2nd term which now goes wild!
Hopefully 2014 congressional elections where 10 Dem Senate seats are up giving power to GOP and the IMPEACHMENT proceedings that are being formulated in the GOP HOUSE as we speak can then move forward... remember this:


In July 1973, as evidence mounted against the president's staff, including testimony provided by former staff members in an investigation conducted by the Senate Watergate Committee, it was revealed that President Nixon had a tape-recording system in his offices and he had recorded many conversations.[3][4] Recordings from these tapes implicated the president, revealing he had attempted to cover up the break-in.[2][5] After a protracted series of bitter court battles, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the president had to hand over the tapes to government investigators; he ultimately complied.

Facing near-certain impeachment in the House of Representatives and a strong possibility of a conviction in the Senate, Nixon resigned the presidency on August 9, 1974.[6][7] His successor, Gerald Ford, then issued a pardon to Nixon.
 

Forum List

Back
Top