A more 'logical' 9/11 conspiracy theory

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Bern80, Nov 25, 2008.

  1. Bern80
    Offline

    Bern80 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,094
    Thanks Received:
    720
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Ratings:
    +726
    This is more for fun and to poke fun at the conspriacy theorists, but I came up with this last night and had to share.

    eots and the like harp on how the Bush admin let this happen and new about it, but is the Bush administration really the most plausible aminstration behind the attacks. I say no.

    The more plausible explanation is that the Clinton administration orchestrated 9/11. It was Clinton who let the 9/11 master mind go and now one has to ask why. Could it have been a power play to continue democratic control and keep Clinton's in power? Bush is a bit of nitwit, yet he is given credit by the conspiracy theorists for a 9/11 cover up. Clinton on the other hand, not so dumb. Perhaps it was a set up to doom the next administration to failure and low and behold who was running for President again when the smoke cleared after 8 years. A Clinton.
     
  2. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    so other than watching television or popular mechanics how much have you researched the events of and just prior to 911...who was john Oneil when and where and how
    did he die ....for a start
     
  3. Steerpike
    Offline

    Steerpike VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,847
    Thanks Received:
    182
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +182
    Bern80, you used the word "plausible" in conjunction with a post on 9/11 conspiracy theories. That's an automatic fail.
     
  4. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    81,431
    Thanks Received:
    12,698
    Trophy Points:
    2,205
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +29,879
    How sad to use the victims as the butt of a joke.
     
  5. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,560
    Thanks Received:
    13,013
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,439
    Bern, do you have enough of what you're taking for the rest of the class?
     
  6. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    so you find the chain of events of the bush story of 911 to be plausible ???

    and John ONeil is who ?
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2008
  7. Steerpike
    Offline

    Steerpike VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,847
    Thanks Received:
    182
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +182
    It is far more plausible than the extremely unlikely scenario painted by the advocates of 9/11 conspiracy theories. It is also more or less the simplest explanation that fits the facts.
     
  8. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    the limited facts you have made yourself aware of..
     
  9. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    John Owho ?
     
  10. Steerpike
    Offline

    Steerpike VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,847
    Thanks Received:
    182
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +182
    Sure. Of course, this is a baseless assumption, and it's the type of thing you expect from proponents of conspiracy theories. You are too insecure to accept that idea that someone may have researched the issue and reached a different conclusion.

    That's also a good example of why you can't discuss these things with people like you who adhere to the conspiracy theories. Your mind operates entirely on baseless assumptions, so what you get are things like your last post, and then relatively quickly insults, etc.

    I've read all the 9/11 conspiracy stuff I've found on the web, seen everything Alex Jones has on it, as well as the 9/11 truthers. It's a whole lot of nothing.
     

Share This Page