A Conquered People

William Joyce

Chemotherapy for PC
Jan 23, 2004
9,758
1,156
190
Caucasiastan
What if you were part of a group of people who weren't even allowed to speak their own name?

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.com/authors/Johnson-white.html

But, according to Noonan, “If John McCain said, ‘I got the white vote, baby!’ his candidacy would be over.” We whites, you see, are the only group that is not allowed to think of ourselves as a distinct group with distinct interests. We are the only group that is not allowed to select leaders based on their membership in our group and their commitment to our interests.

We whites are the race that dare not speak its name.

Instead, we whites are supposed to pretend that we do not exist as a people, but only as adherents of the abstract "color-blind" ideology of human equality. In the name of that ideology, we have to give away our wealth and power, debase our standards, corrupt our culture and institutions, and reduce ourselves to a minority. We have to do this any time members of selfish, race-conscious groups like Jews, blacks, Mestizos, etc. demand something from us, as long as they cloak their demands in the language of equality.

What kind of people has to surrender everything to others, upon demand? A conquered people. We whites have to behave as a conquered people in our own country. If we persist in this long enough, of course, we will physically cease to exist as a people. We will succumb to miscegenation, demographic collapse, or outright mass murder, as conquered and enslaved peoples often do.

Obama’s white supporters want to believe that his candidacy transcends race. They hope that by electing a black man president, they will absolve themselves of the burden of spurious “white guilt” that they have accepted. They hope that electing a black president will cause blacks to stop hating them and America. They hope that an articulate, intelligent black president will finally induce blacks to set aside their sullenness, resentment, and excuse-making and actually participate in American society. And, since deep-down most liberal whites are quite uncomfortable with the majority of blacks, they hope that president Obama will be the role model who will finally get the gangbangers, crack heads, and welfare queens to abandon the bad manners, foul language, cornrows, gold teeth, doo-rags, silly names, and criminal mayhem and become like the blacks they see on TV.
 
Where I grew up there were a lot of small farming communities that were settle by people of various nationalities or religious sects. I grew up largely in a German community where the French lived south of us, the Italians across the river to the west, and a large Polish community was to the east of us, with a smattering of Amish and Menonite communities in between. I could ride my bike and in a day hear the older people speaking in each of their various tongues in each of these different places.

Today the divisions have largely disappeared, but at that same time I remember hearing and watching the news about the way the blacks were treated in south and immediately recognized the injustice, having witnessed how so many people of different origins could live together in relative peace (save a few basketball games) at home.

We had little experience with the issue, as the black population was practically nil there, and wondered how people could treat each other the way they were. We listened to Martin Luther King and watched the marches and I even remember feeling pride in seeing Catholic priests marching in there right along with them, as I was raised Catholic.

So, you can imagine, as I got older and moved south, my surprise and shock when I was suddenly confronted one day with the statement that I was white and, consequently, guilty of something!?! I remember saying something like " what kind of white are you talking about?" If I identified myself with anything it was German, although my father was Scottish, but I was really confused by the statement.

Suddenly, I was being thrown into a big basket of people that consisted of French, Italian, German, British, so on and so on. Groups that I saw as different and unique. I finally came to realize that the issue is based and exists on ignorance and it rests on with all parties involved.
 
Where I grew up there were a lot of small farming communities that were settle by people of various nationalities or religious sects. I grew up largely in a German community where the French lived south of us, the Italians across the river to the west, and a large Polish community was to the east of us, with a smattering of Amish and Menonite communities in between. I could ride my bike and in a day hear the older people speaking in each of their various tongues in each of these different places.

Today the divisions have largely disappeared, but at that same time I remember hearing and watching the news about the way the blacks were treated in south and immediately recognized the injustice, having witnessed how so many people of different origins could live together in relative peace (save a few basketball games) at home.

We had little experience with the issue, as the black population was practically nil there, and wondered how people could treat each other the way they were. We listened to Martin Luther King and watched the marches and I even remember feeling pride in seeing Catholic priests marching in there right along with them, as I was raised Catholic.

So, you can imagine, as I got older and moved south, my surprise and shock when I was suddenly confronted one day with the statement that I was white and, consequently, guilty of something!?! I remember saying something like " what kind of white are you talking about?" If I identified myself with anything it was German, although my father was Scottish, but I was really confused by the statement.

Suddenly, I was being thrown into a big basket of people that consisted of French, Italian, German, British, so on and so on. Groups that I saw as different and unique. I finally came to realize that the issue is based and exists on ignorance and it rests on with all parties involved.
 
Where I grew up there were a lot of small farming communities that were settle by people of various nationalities or religious sects. I grew up largely in a German community where the French lived south of us, the Italians across the river to the west, and a large Polish community was to the east of us, with a smattering of Amish and Menonite communities in between. I could ride my bike and in a day hear the older people speaking in each of their various tongues in each of these different places.

Today the divisions have largely disappeared, but at that same time I remember hearing and watching the news about the way the blacks were treated in south and immediately recognized the injustice, having witnessed how so many people of different origins could live together in relative peace (save a few basketball games) at home.

We had little experience with the issue, as the black population was practically nil there, and wondered how people could treat each other the way they were. We listened to Martin Luther King and watched the marches and I even remember feeling pride in seeing Catholic priests marching in there right along with them, as I was raised Catholic.

So, you can imagine, as I got older and moved south, my surprise and shock when I was suddenly confronted one day with the statement that I was white and, consequently, guilty of something!?! I remember saying something like " what kind of white are you talking about?" If I identified myself with anything it was German, although my father was Scottish, but I was really confused by the statement.

Suddenly, I was being thrown into a big basket of people that consisted of French, Italian, German, British, so on and so on. Groups that I saw as different and unique. I finally came to realize that the issue is based and exists on ignorance and it rests on with all parties involved.


Exactly...ignorance. People generalize unfortunately. That would be like saying that all Germans are guilty of the Holocaust. :rolleyes:
 
Where I grew up there were a lot of small farming communities that were settle by people of various nationalities or religious sects. I grew up largely in a German community where the French lived south of us, the Italians across the river to the west, and a large Polish community was to the east of us, with a smattering of Amish and Menonite communities in between. I could ride my bike and in a day hear the older people speaking in each of their various tongues in each of these different places.

Today the divisions have largely disappeared, but at that same time I remember hearing and watching the news about the way the blacks were treated in south and immediately recognized the injustice, having witnessed how so many people of different origins could live together in relative peace (save a few basketball games) at home.

We had little experience with the issue, as the black population was practically nil there, and wondered how people could treat each other the way they were. We listened to Martin Luther King and watched the marches and I even remember feeling pride in seeing Catholic priests marching in there right along with them, as I was raised Catholic.

So, you can imagine, as I got older and moved south, my surprise and shock when I was suddenly confronted one day with the statement that I was white and, consequently, guilty of something!?! I remember saying something like " what kind of white are you talking about?" If I identified myself with anything it was German, although my father was Scottish, but I was really confused by the statement.

Suddenly, I was being thrown into a big basket of people that consisted of French, Italian, German, British, so on and so on. Groups that I saw as different and unique. I finally came to realize that the issue is based and exists on ignorance and it rests on with all parties involved.
I'll trade you our Blacks for your Amish if you think there is no difference.

Try living in France, Italy, Germany, or Poland and then moving to Haiti, South Africa, Zaire, Liberia, Rhodesia, the Gambia, inner city Detroit, Somalia, or the Sudan. But whatever you do, don't encourage any of them to move over here until you have lived with them.

As for me, I am proud to say that I am descended from the original settler people of a country made prosperous by the White Race.
 
William, have you noticed that a lot of elderly northern white people are supporting Obama?

I think that has a lot to do with the guilt tripping they've been fed since WW2. First it was the Nazis are going to conquer us and they think they are better than you.
Then, after the war, those Nazis were evil racists.
Next, in the 60s, it was, "well you don't want to BE a Nazi do you?"
Finally, we are at the point where everything prior was Nazi, something we should be ashamed of.

They are ashamed of their existence in the past, they feel the common stain of the being of the same ilk as those evil racists so they seek one last act of redemption before they leave this Earth.
 
William, have you noticed that a lot of elderly northern white people are supporting Obama?

I think that has a lot to do with the guilt tripping they've been fed since WW2. First it was the Nazis are going to conquer us and they think they are better than you.
Then, after the war, those Nazis were evil racists.
Next, in the 60s, it was, "well you don't want to BE a Nazi do you?"
Finally, we are at the point where everything prior was Nazi, something we should be ashamed of.

They are ashamed of their existence in the past, they feel the common stain of the being of the same ilk as those evil racists so they seek one last act of redemption before they leave this Earth.

Yawn
 
William, have you noticed that a lot of elderly northern white people are supporting Obama?

I think that has a lot to do with the guilt tripping they've been fed since WW2

...

They are ashamed of their existence in the past, they feel the common stain of the being of the same ilk as those evil racists so they seek one last act of redemption before they leave this Earth.

Absolutely. Whites have gone from being true "supremacists" to total capitulists. We can't seem to find a resting spot between being slaveholders and willing slaves. By supporting Obama, white after white seeks to absolve himself/herself of white guilt. It has nothing to do with his stance on the issues, which is imperceptibly different from Hillary's. It is fascinating to watch, and depressing. White people desperately need to recognize their own unique humanity, that they are not perfect but not responsible for all the world's ills, and that they deserve a patch of peaceful earth as much as any other group. Their children deserve a future.
 
I try to avoid labeling myself as a member of the white race or any race besides the human race. I do not hold loyalty to the Republican Party or the Democrat Party. Even though my skin is a shade closer to white that it is to black, I do not have more or less loyalty to the white race than I do to the black race. I am an individual. Therefore, I am not a conquered people.
 
President Abraham Lincoln said:
~ as reported by the New York Tribune 15 August 1862 found in The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln(1953) editor Roy R. Basler Work V 370-375;
~ as cited in American Statesmen On Slavery and the Negro (1971) Nathaniel Weyl and William Marina;



Why should the people of your race be colonized and where? Why should they leave this country? This is, perhaps, the first question for proper consideration. You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffers very greatly, many of them by living among us,while ours suffers from your presence. In a word we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at east why we should be separated.

...

Your race are suffering, in my judgment, the greatest wrong inflicted on any people. But even when you cease to be slaves, you are yet far removed from being placed on an equality with the white race. You are cut off from many of the advantages which the other race enjoy. The aspiration of men is to enjoy equality with the best when free, but on this broad continent not a single man of your race is made the equal of a single man of ours. Go where you are treated the best, and the ban is still upon you.

I do not propose to discuss this, but to present it as a fact with which we have to deal. I cannot alter it if I would. It is a fact about which we all think and feel alike, I and you. We look to our condition, owing to the existence of the two races on this continent. I need not recount to you the effects upon white men growing out of the institution of Slavery. I believe in its general evil effects on the white race. See our present condition--the country engaged in war!--our white men cutting one another's throats, none knowing how far it will extend; and then consider what we know to be the truth. But for your race among us there could not be war, although many men engaged on either side do not care for you one way or the other. Nevertheless, I repeat, without the institution of Slavery and the colored race as a basis, the war could not have an existence.

It is better for us both, therefore, to be separated. I know that there are free men among you, who even if they could better their condition are not as much inclined to go out of the country as those, who being slaves could obtain their freedom on this condition. I suppose one of the principal difficulties in the way of colonization is that the free colored man cannot see that his comfort would be advanced by it. You may believe you can live in Washington or elsewhere in the United States the remainder of your life (as easily), perhaps more so than you can in any foreign country, and hence you may come to the conclusion that you have nothing to do with the idea of going to a foreign country. This is (I speak in no unkind sense) an extremely selfish view of the case.

But you ought to do something to help those who are not so fortunate as yourselves. There is an unwillingness on the part of our people harsh as it may be, for you free colored people to remain with us. Now if you could give a start to white people, you would open a wide door for many to be made free. If we deal with those who are not free at the beginning, and whose intellects are clouded by Slavery, we have very poor materials to start with. If intelligent colored men, such as are before me, would move in this matter, much might be accomplished. It is exceedingly important that we have men at the beginning capable of thinking as white men, and not those who have been systematically oppressed.

There is much to encourage you. For the sake of your race you should sacrifice something of your present comfort for the purpose of being as grand in that respect as the white people. It is a cheerful thought throughout life that something can be done to ameliorate the condition of those who have been subject to the hard usage of the world. It is difficult to make a man miserable while he feels he is worthy of himself, and claims kindred to the great God who made him. In the American Revolutionary war sacrifices were made by men engaged in it; but they were cheered by the future. Gen. Washington himself endured greater physical hardships than if he had remained a British subject. Yet he was a happy man, because he was engaged in benefiting his race--something for the children of his neighbors, having none of his own.
The colony of Liberia has been in existence a long time. In a certain sense it is a success. The old President of Liberia, Roberts, has just been with me--the first time I ever saw him. He says they have within the bounds of that colony between 300,000 and 400,000 people, or more than in some of our old States, such as Rhode Island or Delaware, or in some of our newer States, and less than in some of our larger ones. They are not all American colonist, or their descendants. Something less than 12,000 have been sent thither from this country. Many of the original settlers have died, yet, like people elsewhere, their offspring outnumber those deceased.

The question is if the colored people are persuaded to go anywhere, why not there? One reason for an unwillingness to do so is that some of you would rather remain within reach of the country of your nativity. I do not know how much attachment you may have toward our race. It does not strike me that you have the greatest reason to love them. But still you are attached to them at all events.

The place I am thinking about having for a colony is in Central America It is nearer to us than Liberia--not much more than one-fourth as far as Liberia, and within seven days' run by steamers. Unlike Liberia it is on a great line of travel--it is a highway. The country is a very excellent one for any people, and with great natural resources and advantages, and especially because of the similarity of climate with your native land--thus being suited to your physical condition.

The particular place I have in view is to be a great highway from the Atlantic or Caribbean Sea to the Pacific Ocean, and this particular place has all the advantages for a colony. On both sides there are harbors among the finest in the world. Again, there is evidence of very rich coal mines. A certain amount of coal is valuable in any country, and there may be more than enough for the wants of the country. Why I attach so much importance to coal is, it will afford an opportunity to the inhabitants for immediate employment till they get ready to settle permanently in their homes.

If you take colonist where there is no good landing, there is a bad show; and so where there is nothing to cultivate, and of which to make a farm. But if something is started so you can get your daily bread as soon as you reach there, it is a great advantage. Coal land is the best thing I know of with which to commence an enterprise.

To return, you have been talked to upon this subject, and told that a speculation is intended by gentlemen, who have an interest in the country, including the coal mines. We have been mistaken all our lives if we do not know whites as well as blacks look to their self-interest. Unless among those deficient of intellect everybody you trade with makes something. You meet with these things here as elsewhere.

If such persons have what will be an advantage to them, the question is whether it cannot be made of advantage to you. You are intelligent, and know that success does not as much depend on external help as on self-reliance. Much, therefore, depends on yourselves As to the coal mines, I think I see the means available for your self-reliance.

I shall, if I get a sufficient number of you engaged, have provisions made that you shall not be wronged. If you will engage in the enterprise I will spend some of the money intrusted to me. I am not sure you will succeed. The Government may lose the money, but we cannot succeed unless we try; but we think, with care, we can succeed.

The political affairs in Central America are not in quite as satisfactory condition as I wish. There are contending factions in that quarter; but it is true all the factions are agreed allike on the subject of colonization, and want it, and are more generous than we are here. To your colored race they have no objection. Besides, I would endeavor to have you made equals of the best.

The practical thing I want to ascertain is whether I can get a number of abled-bodied men, with their wives and children, who are willing to go, when I present evidence of encouragement and protection. Could I get a hundred tolerably intelligent men, with their wives and children, to 'cut their own fodder'. so to speak? Can I have fifty? If I could find twenty-five able-bodied men, with a mixture of women and children, good things in the family relation, I think I could make a successful commencement.

I want you to let me know whether this can be done or not. This is the practical part of my wish to see you. These are subjects of very great importance, worthy of a month's study, (instead_ of a speech delivered in an hour. I ask you then to consider seriously not pertaining to yourselves merely, nor for your race, and ours, for the present time, but as one of the things, if successfully managed, for the good of mankind--not confined to the present generation, but as
"From age to age descends the lay,
"To millions yet to be,
"Till far its echoes roll away,
Into eternity."
All errors in the above are assumed to be mine.


I believe we have in America the benefit of a better selection of Liberty minded people than in Europe as those self-same people tend towards adventure and enterprise, which immigration to America promised; but there is still a shame that not more branches were tendered from the trunks of such like Ben. Franklin.

It is true, though, that a man of lesser intelligence may make fortune through absolute dedication and morality. I would also say that from persistence and applied labors comes both intelligence and respect. In the above we can read that President Lincoln intended to provide the means of self-improvement to the Black Community. Just as White people now acknowledge the superiority of Japan relative to the rest of the Orient, a prosperous Panama would have demanded recognition. Considering the overwhelming pride which many in the Black Nationalist community felt towards free Ethiopia (an almost separate race of Africans from most in America), a successful venture would have done much to imrpove their perceptions and thus their condition. If a man thinks he is capable of only stupidity he will be stupid.

So William, I do not think that we are so dichotomous as you describe but there is a remedy for such cases; separation.


As President Lincoln said, no segregation will ever be equal but speration is an entirely different world of dilemmas. Until we regain a pride in ourselves we shall continue to perish and the longer it takes for that pride to recover the worse the reaction will be (example Wiemar Germany).

For whatever we endure though, it is equally bad on the Black Community as they are coddled and kept stupid by obsequious bureaucrats, profiteering race mongers (Sharpton and Jackson), and the entertainment industry. In that way their refinement and development is retarded and regressed. And you must remember that they were brought here from a near Stone Age existence; it took a millennium for the Germanic invaders of Europe to pickup where Rome fell off.
 
I try to avoid labeling myself as a member of the white race or any race besides the human race. I do not hold loyalty to the Republican Party or the Democrat Party. Even though my skin is a shade closer to white that it is to black, I do not have more or less loyalty to the white race than I do to the black race. I am an individual. Therefore, I am not a conquered people.

Quit tripping over yourself mate, it is embarrassing.

Enjoy being an individual in a retirement home.
 
William, have you noticed that a lot of elderly northern white people are supporting Obama?

I think that has a lot to do with the guilt tripping they've been fed since WW2. First it was the Nazis are going to conquer us and they think they are better than you.
Then, after the war, those Nazis were evil racists.
Next, in the 60s, it was, "well you don't want to BE a Nazi do you?"
Finally, we are at the point where everything prior was Nazi, something we should be ashamed of.

They are ashamed of their existence in the past, they feel the common stain of the being of the same ilk as those evil racists so they seek one last act of redemption before they leave this Earth.


:cuckoo:
 
Quit tripping over yourself mate, it is embarrassing.

Enjoy being an individual in a retirement home.

Yes. I guess that I sounded arrogant. I just get so turned off by this race-baiting race war for lack of a better description. There is simply no reason to play the divisive we-vs.-them game.
 
William, have you noticed that a lot of elderly northern white people are supporting Obama?

I think that has a lot to do with the guilt tripping they've been fed since WW2. First it was the Nazis are going to conquer us and they think they are better than you.
Then, after the war, those Nazis were evil racists.
Next, in the 60s, it was, "well you don't want to BE a Nazi do you?"
Finally, we are at the point where everything prior was Nazi, something we should be ashamed of.

They are ashamed of their existence in the past, they feel the common stain of the being of the same ilk as those evil racists so they seek one last act of redemption before they leave this Earth.

Or, you know maybe they just like his policies better.

Sorry, racism is out of vogue these days.
 
I'll trade you our Blacks for your Amish if you think there is no difference.

Try living in France, Italy, Germany, or Poland and then moving to Haiti, South Africa, Zaire, Liberia, Rhodesia, the Gambia, inner city Detroit, Somalia, or the Sudan. But whatever you do, don't encourage any of them to move over here until you have lived with them.

All states who were former colonies. Your right, it is hard to recover after being enslaved, its a damned shame really.

As for me, I am proud to say that I am descended from the original settler people of a country made prosperous by the White Race.

And their black slaves. Forgot about that little tidbit, didn't you.
 
As for me, I am proud to say that I am descended from the original settler people of a country made prosperous by the White Race.

What is the "White Race"? I've asked WJ this several times, and he simply is not able to answer so maybe you can bail him out. What hue (color) is the cut off for a person being black or white?
 
mattskramer said:
Yes. I guess that I sounded arrogant. I just get so turned off by this race-baiting race war for lack of a better description. There is simply no reason to play the divisive we-vs.-them game.
You didn't sound arrogant. If you don't give a shit just say "I don't give a shit and you guys are full of it". You don't need to be obsequious to prove you are of different opinion.

Larkinn said:
you know maybe they just like his policies better.
Policies which are originated from the above simplex.

Sorry, racism is out of vogue these days.
Only as out of vogue as the Devil is with Pentecostal preachers.

Larkinn said:
All states who were former colonies. Your right, it is hard to recover after being enslaved, its a damned shame really.
And it is even harder after democide, just ask the Native Americans.

And their black slaves. Forgot about that little tidbit, didn't you.
Who won the War Between the States and how did they?

ReillyT said:
Where are you from?
Between over yonder and there.

CharlestonChad said:
What is the "White Race"? I've asked WJ this several times, and he simply is not able to answer so maybe you can bail him out. What hue (color) is the cut off for a person being black or white?
Anyone descended from a European stock typified by the Indo-European language family (with peripherials in the Middle East to Aryan descendants in India). If of a fourth non-white ancestory than of any who are visually similar to and of a moral character with a good working ethic.

There are those who advocate for the One Drop Hypothesis, and this was the policy of the United States for a time.

It is an average game; there are Whites with dark skin but the more predominant that trait becomes in a population the less likely they are to have other features typical of the European stock. The same is true with the other features; anatomical and psychological. Dark skin and kinked hair are the quickest identifier as they would not originate from selective pressures in the higher lattitudes.

You would not describe a Dravidian or a Tasmanian as being of the same ilk as a Bantu.
 
Anyone descended from a European stock typified by the Indo-European language family (with peripherials in the Middle East to Aryan descendants in India). If of a fourth non-white ancestory than of any who are visually similar to and of a moral character with a good working ethic.

There are those who advocate for the One Drop Hypothesis, and this was the policy of the United States for a time.

It is an average game; there are Whites with dark skin but the more predominant that trait becomes in a population the less likely they are to have other features typical of the European stock. The same is true with the other features; anatomical and psychological. Dark skin and kinked hair are the quickest identifier as they would not originate from selective pressures in the higher lattitudes.

You would not describe a Dravidian or a Tasmanian as being of the same ilk as a Bantu.

What color (hue) determines if a person is white or black? You didn't answer this. If you're going to determine races of people, you would need a pedigree and that alone still does not cover the penetrance and expressivity of the genes that determine pigment production.

Moral character and work ethic are relative, so that isn't a determinate of race.

Visually similar? Not sure how you determine this. Indians and Europeans have near identical features, so how must you determine an Italian from an 3/4th Italian and 1/4th Indian?

Why is the one drop hypothesis no longer valid?

One last question, are Brazilians wrong in their way of determining races? If so, then why?
 

Forum List

Back
Top