A Bi-Partisan Motion for Censure

[DGS49]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

 

[MAGAman]

 

[BULLDOG]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

You trying to say Trump supporters would have voted to censure him? No way in hell. The Trump party has no integrity, and they didn't have any 6 months ago either.

 

[Coyote]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

You trying to say Trump supporters would have voted to censure him? No way in hell. The Trump party has no integrity, and they didn't have any 6 months ago either.

I agree with that. They would have voted against censure.

 

[Silent Warrior]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

You trying to say Trump supporters would have voted to censure him? No way in hell. The Trump party has no integrity, and they didn't have any 6 months ago either.

Some may have. Lets face it, the democratic party proved, after four years of attempting to overturn an election with fabricated conjecture and phony evidence, that they are truly a party with no integrity.

 

[Dick Foster]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

Here's the thing, it's his job to fuck with foreign aid like that, not the congress lest of all the house alone.

 

[alang1216]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

Here's the thing, it's his job to fuck with foreign aid like that, not the congress lest of all the house alone.

It's his job to fuck with foreign aid in the interests of the country, not for his re-election.

 

[jwoodie]

It's his job to fuck with foreign aid in the interests of the country, not for his re-election.

The problem with your argument is that anything he does in the interests of the country also benefit him politically. Is that why you are rooting for a recession?

 

[Harry Dresden]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

You trying to say Trump supporters would have voted to censure him? No way in hell. The Trump party has no integrity, and they didn't have any 6 months ago either.

yea like the democrats have so much integrity....

 

[BULLDOG]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

Don't be ridiculous. Minimizing Trump' behavior wouldn't have been appropriate, and the Trump party would have not taken censure seriously.

 

[MAGAman]

It's his job to fuck with foreign aid in the interests of the country, not for his re-election.

If there were evidence of that, you'd have a point.

But there isn't so you don't.

 

[alang1216]

It's his job to fuck with foreign aid in the interests of the country, not for his re-election.

The problem with your argument is that anything he does in the interests of the country also benefit him politically. Is that why you are rooting for a recession?

Anything he does to advance the interests of the country should also benefit him politically. Nothing that he does to benefit him politically advances the interests of the country. At least none I can think of.

 

[Ame®icano]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

Don't be ridiculous. Minimizing Trump' behavior wouldn't have been appropriate, and the Trump party would have not taken censure seriously.

And we're taking this joke of impeachment seriously?

 

[August West]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

Pelosi and the Democrats took an oath to defend this country including it`s elections. They did not take an oath to ignore criminal behavior so they can be re-elected. It`s called Patriotism.

 

[Claudette]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

If they do censure him I'd be he pays about as much attention to it as Andrew Jackson did.

Which was a big fat 0.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

You trying to say Trump supporters would have voted to censure him? No way in hell. The Trump party has no integrity, and they didn't have any 6 months ago either.

Some may have. Lets face it, the democratic party proved, after four years of attempting to overturn an election with fabricated conjecture and phony evidence, that they are truly a party with no integrity.

If that is true why have there been Republicans who agreed he has done wrong. If you can't see that it is because you are a Trump Humper with your head stuck in your 4th POC.

 

[Claudette]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

Pelosi and the Democrats took an oath to defend this country including it`s elections. They did not take an oath to ignore criminal behavior so they can be re-elected. It`s called Patriotism.

Funny how they ignored Biden's criminal behavior.

He did exactly what they tried to impeach Trump for. Didn't see any of them trying to impeach Biden.

Hell. He even bragged about it on National television. He outed himself the dumbass.

There was no criminal behavior and its called hating Trump. You sure are an idiot.

 

[rightwinger]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

Mitch McConnell will never allow such a motion

Dems impeached Trump and he will remain an impeached President. That can’t be reversed.

 

[Roudy]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

I'm just wondering if there was a censure motion from Obama for weaponizing the IRS during the 2012 elections, Fast and Furious, and him and Hi-liary lying to Americans about Ben Ghazi.

 

[August West]

So roll the tape back about six months.

Would Pelosi and the Democrats have been better off politically if they had just tried to craft and pass a censure motion, basically telling the President that it's not OK to fuck with foreign aid like this?

Surely, they could have come up with language that was innocuous enough to get a fairly significant number of Republicans to sign on. After all, the President's conduct was clearly inappropriate and probably a violation of law.

And Pelosi would be getting accolades for being able to come up with an appropriate bi-partisan response to the President's outrageous behavior.

But now, they have managed to get the Trump supporters super-energized to throw these D bastards out of office, while accomplishing next to nothing for the eventual Democrat nominee.

Pelosi and the Democrats took an oath to defend this country including it`s elections. They did not take an oath to ignore criminal behavior so they can be re-elected. It`s called Patriotism.

Funny how they ignored Biden's criminal behavior.

He did exactly what they tried to impeach Trump for. Didn't see any of them trying to impeach Biden.

Hell. He even bragged about it on National television. He outed himself the dumbass.

There was no criminal behavior and its called hating Trump. You sure are an idiot.

I`ll assume you just don`t know any better so here`s a short tutorial for you regarding Biden`s behavior that was not criminal. There was an international effort to remove Shokin because he refused to investigate Trump like corrupt politicians.
What really happened when Biden forced out Ukraine's top prosecutor
Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance
Shokin was removed for failing to investigate political corruption