97% of Warmer posts are total crap

[RandomVariable]

Record snow fall on Mother's Day. Just saying.

 

[Dot Com]

deniers are losing their cool (pun intended )

 

[RandomVariable]

deniers are losing their cool (pun intended )

 

[IlarMeilyr]

AGW Faithers lost their cool long ago.

Even in the middle of an ice age.

 

[Dot Com]

why on the offensive now Frank57

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Climate Change Statement Review

Climate Change Statement Review
Supporting Documents
Charge to the POPA Subcommittee to Review Climate Change Statement
Framing Document for Workshop
Complete Transcript of Workshop
APS Climate Change Statement Workshop Expert Bios
Related Information
2007 APS Climate Change Statement
Panel on Public Affairs
POPA 2014 Energy & Environment Subcommittee
The American Physical Society formally reviews its statements every five years. In accordance with that process, the APS Panel on Public Affairs (POPA) formed a Subcommittee to review its Climate Change Statement. The members of the Subcommittee are: Steven Koonin (chair), Phillip Coyle, Scott Kemp, Tim Meyer, Robert Rosner and Susan Seestrom. The Charge to the Subcommittee was approved by POPA and the APS Executive Board and is included in the Supporting Documents links.
As part of the POPA-approved process, on January 8, 2014 the Subcommittee convened a workshop with six climate experts. The Subcommittee used that meeting to delve more deeply into aspects of the IPCC consensus view of the physical basis of climate science. In doing so, it hoped to illuminate for itself, for the APS membership, and for the broader public both the certainties and boundaries of current climate science understanding. The framing document, expert bios, and the complete transcript for the workshop are included in the Supporting Documents links.
The workshop was the first step in a deliberative process. As a membership organization of over 50,000 physicists, APS adheres to rigorous scientific standards in developing all its statements. If the Subcommittee recommends updating the existing APS Climate Change Statement, then, consistent with APS by-laws, all APS members will be given an opportunity to review the statement and provide input during a comment period.

IPCC "We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy"

Now that's how science is done, amiright AGWCult?

We'll see if the new people on the APS Board will accept "Can I get an 'Amen!'?" as "rigorous scientific standard"

 

[CrusaderFrank]

why on the offensive now Frank57

cuz people say I'm offensive

 

[emilynghiem]

1. CO2 does not drive the climate
2. Science is not done by Consensus, you're thinking of "Project Runway"
3. Global Warming Petition Project 31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs
4. The Warmer have been caught with their thumb on the scale so many times their "facts" must be in dispute
5. THEY HAVE FAILED TO PRODUCE ONE SINGLE EXPERIMENT THAT SHOWS A TEMPERATURE INCREASE FROM ADDING 100, 200, 400ppM OF CO2.

Dear CF: Didn't the original man who came up with Global Warming
DENOUNCE and DEBUNK all the movement as corrupt and selling it out for profit?

Can you help me find and post links/resources to that?
Someone told me, and I wanted to confirm anyway.

Do you know what this is referring to?

 

[westwall]

Not only will that not happen, the APS is going to harden it's stance on the fact that we are right now seeing the effects of the GHGs in the atmosphere. Scientifically illiterate people like SSDD will once again scream conspiracy.

Sure it is. Just like the Royal Society did too. What a silly person....

 

[westwall]

Record snow fall on Mother's Day. Just saying.

Yeah, that means it was COLD!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Record snow fall on Mother's Day. Just saying.

Yeah, that means it was COLD!

denier!

It means the Climate was disrupted!

 

[Dot Com]

deniers!!!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Can you imagine all the good they could do if the AGWCult would put that dogged determination into something productive

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

 

[HelenaHandbag]

Can you imagine all the good they could do if the AGWCult would put that dogged determination into something productive

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

Clean out the gutters.

Mow the lawn.

Replace the old kitchen faucet.

Tidy up the garage.

Wash the car.

 

[boedicca]

1. CO2 does not drive the climate
2. Science is not done by Consensus, you're thinking of "Project Runway"
3. Global Warming Petition Project 31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs
4. The Warmer have been caught with their thumb on the scale so many times their "facts" must be in dispute
5. THEY HAVE FAILED TO PRODUCE ONE SINGLE EXPERIMENT THAT SHOWS A TEMPERATURE INCREASE FROM ADDING 100, 200, 400ppM OF CO2.

6. Water is a green house gas, and the atmosphere contains much more of it than CO2, yet the Warmers don't call for bans on water...(yet).

 

[boedicca]

Can you imagine all the good they could do if the AGWCult would put that dogged determination into something productive

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

Clean out the gutters.

Mow the lawn.

Replace the old kitchen faucet.

Tidy up the garage.

Wash the car.

Get rid of the gasoline using cars and only walk or ride a bicycle

Stop heating and cooling their homes using 'lectricty

Get rid of their computers...cuz they use 'lectricity too

Stop washing their clothes...cuz that uses Water and 'Lectricity

Eat only soy products cuz soy doesn't fart

...Until they do these things CONSISTENTLY they are just a bunch of hypocrites

 

[percysunshine]

deniers!!!

As a scientist, I am kind of curious about the second flame in the picture below the gun barrel flame. WTF is that about?

A malfunctioning lotto dispenser? Spontaneous global warming?

.

 

[RandomVariable]

Climate Change Statement Review

Climate Change Statement Review
Supporting Documents
Charge to the POPA Subcommittee to Review Climate Change Statement
Framing Document for Workshop
Complete Transcript of Workshop
APS Climate Change Statement Workshop Expert Bios
Related Information
2007 APS Climate Change Statement
Panel on Public Affairs
POPA 2014 Energy & Environment Subcommittee
The American Physical Society formally reviews its statements every five years. In accordance with that process, the APS Panel on Public Affairs (POPA) formed a Subcommittee to review its Climate Change Statement. The members of the Subcommittee are: Steven Koonin (chair), Phillip Coyle, Scott Kemp, Tim Meyer, Robert Rosner and Susan Seestrom. The Charge to the Subcommittee was approved by POPA and the APS Executive Board and is included in the Supporting Documents links.
As part of the POPA-approved process, on January 8, 2014 the Subcommittee convened a workshop with six climate experts. The Subcommittee used that meeting to delve more deeply into aspects of the IPCC consensus view of the physical basis of climate science. In doing so, it hoped to illuminate for itself, for the APS membership, and for the broader public both the certainties and boundaries of current climate science understanding. The framing document, expert bios, and the complete transcript for the workshop are included in the Supporting Documents links.
The workshop was the first step in a deliberative process. As a membership organization of over 50,000 physicists, APS adheres to rigorous scientific standards in developing all its statements. If the Subcommittee recommends updating the existing APS Climate Change Statement, then, consistent with APS by-laws, all APS members will be given an opportunity to review the statement and provide input during a comment period.

IPCC "We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy"

Now that's how science is done, amiright AGWCult?

We'll see if the new people on the APS Board will accept "Can I get an 'Amen!'?" as "rigorous scientific standard"

I just saw that conspiracy on a YouTube video. It explains a lot. Climate change is not a global conspiracy to create a New World Order. It makes for great videos though. You should check out the one on the President and the UFOs.

 

[RandomVariable]

deniers!!!

As a scientist, I am kind of curious about the second flame in the picture below the gun barrel flame. WTF is that about?

A malfunctioning lotto dispenser? Spontaneous global warming?

.

It looks like the gun might have fired then kicked up. The flash is when it first went off. Just a guess.

 

[Kosh]

So far after asking time and time again for the AGW cultists to post one link with datasets and source code, they still have not posted it.

You figure with all this over whelming "science" that they could post at least one link with the requested info.