911 WTC Demolition! The Final Nail in the Debunker/Posers Coffin!

[eots]

Logically speaking, is it totally necessary to define what sort of explosive was used and how it was deployed
in order to know that the WTC was a controlled demolition?

Absolutely it is. How else can one conceive of how it was done? Without that information it's nothing more than imaginative speculation.

How was such a monumental undertaking done with such complete ambiguity? Not a single witness or whistleblower?

That is the key to the theory. I, as well as others have asked repeatedly how this was done on this scale without notice either during application or while sifting through debris. Not a peep from the truthers.

Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?
Page 2 of Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

Which agencies were on site supervising the sifting of debris? What were they looking for? What did they find?

NIST did not test for the residue of explosives in the steel.

Did they sift debris for remains?
What else were they looking for?
What else did they find?

How did they know it was a " pressure cooker" bomb following the Boston bombing?

Was there ANY suggestion that evidence was found of hundreds of charges being set deliberately while sifting the ground zero debris?

right they never found the black boxes but the found the hijackers passport the following day and you actually buy that ?

 

[Hollie]

Absolutely it is. How else can one conceive of how it was done? Without that information it's nothing more than imaginative speculation.

How was such a monumental undertaking done with such complete ambiguity? Not a single witness or whistleblower?

That is the key to the theory. I, as well as others have asked repeatedly how this was done on this scale without notice either during application or while sifting through debris. Not a peep from the truthers.

Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?
Page 2 of Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

Which agencies were on site supervising the sifting of debris? What were they looking for? What did they find?

NIST did not test for the residue of explosives in the steel.

Did they sift debris for remains?
What else were they looking for?
What else did they find?

How did they know it was a " pressure cooker" bomb following the Boston bombing?

Was there ANY suggestion that evidence was found of hundreds of charges being set deliberately while sifting the ground zero debris?

right they never found the black boxes but the found the hijackers passport the following day and you actually buy that ?

I don't buy it. Here's the twoof.

 

[Hollie]

Link?
How many wireless detonators were used?
What frequency spectrum do they operate on? What sort of controller/ transmitter was needed to maintain the necessary frequency separation in order to achieve the desired detonation in a timely series?
Where were they placed? Could they all be hidden and still achieve the desired effect?
Is every device rendered unrecognizable to a bomb investigator?

there was no investigation

Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that NIST would do a good job with the investigation.“They’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job.But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire.And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information.What prevented all of this?I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST.And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything
Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

There was a high degree of scrutiny paid to the debris. It was sorted and processed according to type. I've been to the 9/11 memorial and museum and there are countless little bits that were recovered and identified. I find it hard to believe that there wouldn't have been piles of components that would have later been identified as explosive components given the number likely needed.

the towers would of contained miles of wiring and electronic components specfic forensic testing would be required and this was never done

Whatever dude. How many ,of what type and where were the charges placed? How do they keep all of those involved quiet? You actively argue that no physical evidence was uncovered yet you assert there was and is perhaps the largest conspiracy in human history. That is maybe the very definition of crazy.

one could argue that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident perhaps the larger of the two..

The Jooooos were responsible for the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

Dats da twoof.

 

[Hollie]

Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?
Page 2 of Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

nice info! unfortunately you wont get any of these people to read it, and even if they did its doubtful they would comprehend any of it.

The Jooooooos and the North Koreans are filtering the comments you post. As I read your post, the comments were changed to suggest you agree with the NIST report.

 

[KokomoJojo]

Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?
Page 2 of Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

nice info! unfortunately you wont get any of these people to read it, and even if they did its doubtful they would comprehend any of it.

The Jooooooos and the North Koreans are filtering the comments you post. As I read your post, the comments were changed to suggest you agree with the NIST report.

even a broken cock is right 2 times per day
no one said anything about joooos except some brainless debunker.

 

[eots]

there was no investigation

Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that NIST would do a good job with the investigation.“They’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job.But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire.And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information.What prevented all of this?I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST.And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything
Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

There was a high degree of scrutiny paid to the debris. It was sorted and processed according to type. I've been to the 9/11 memorial and museum and there are countless little bits that were recovered and identified. I find it hard to believe that there wouldn't have been piles of components that would have later been identified as explosive components given the number likely needed.

the towers would of contained miles of wiring and electronic components specfic forensic testing would be required and this was never done

Whatever dude. How many ,of what type and where were the charges placed? How do they keep all of those involved quiet? You actively argue that no physical evidence was uncovered yet you assert there was and is perhaps the largest conspiracy in human history. That is maybe the very definition of crazy.

one could argue that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident perhaps the larger of the two..

Dats da twoof.

• there was no investigation

Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that NIST would do a good job with the investigation.“They’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job.But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire.And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information.What prevented all of this?I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST.And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything
Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

There was a high degree of scrutiny paid to the debris. It was sorted and processed according to type. I've been to the 9/11 memorial and museum and there are countless little bits that were recovered and identified. I find it hard to believe that there wouldn't have been piles of components that would have later been identified as explosive components given the number likely needed.

the towers would of contained miles of wiring and electronic components specfic forensic testing would be required and this was never done

Whatever dude. How many ,of what type and where were the charges placed? How do they keep all of those involved quiet? You actively argue that no physical evidence was uncovered yet you assert there was and is perhaps the largest conspiracy in human history. That is maybe the very definition of crazy.

one could argue that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident perhaps the larger of the two..

The Jooooos were responsible for the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

Dats da twoof.

Questions about the Gulf of Tonkin incidents have persisted for more than 40 years. But once-classified documents and tapes released in the past several years, combined with previously uncovered facts, make clear that high government officials distorted facts and deceived the American public about events that led to full U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War
The Truth About Tonkin U.S. Naval Institute

 

[KokomoJojo]

Whatever dude. How many ,of what type and where were the charges placed? How do they keep all of those involved quiet? You actively argue that no physical evidence was uncovered yet you assert there was and is perhaps the largest conspiracy in human history. That is maybe the very definition of crazy.

The 9/11 farce is as peculiar as things can get.

In 1940 it was possible to build a model of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge which duplicated the oscillating behavior of the real bridge. They did not have computers.



The model is at 7 minutes.

So if airliner impact and fires could destroy the towers in less than two hours why didn't we have a model in 2002? Instead the NIST report that takes 10,000 pages can't even specify the total amount of concrete.

Why isn't the physics of collapse PROVEN? Curious how Retard Gages "experts" really don't try to do the collapse physics.

psik

in the case of 7 their model did not look remotely the same as the real building which it was intended to duplicate. They proved themselves that it could not have happened the way they told the story, and the cherry on top is that they will not release the node data used because it would jeopardize public safety! Why would any building engineer want to know how fire managed to bring down a building so they can prevent it in the future after all....

You see the whole fucking thing is preposterous on every level.

 

[Hollie]

Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?
Page 2 of Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

nice info! unfortunately you wont get any of these people to read it, and even if they did its doubtful they would comprehend any of it.

The Jooooooos and the North Koreans are filtering the comments you post. As I read your post, the comments were changed to suggest you agree with the NIST report.

even a broken cock is right 2 times per day
no one said anything about joooos except some brainless debunker.

Well actually, the Joooooo involvement in 9/11 is a staple among you conspiracy theory loons.

 

[Hollie]

Whatever dude. How many ,of what type and where were the charges placed? How do they keep all of those involved quiet? You actively argue that no physical evidence was uncovered yet you assert there was and is perhaps the largest conspiracy in human history. That is maybe the very definition of crazy.

The 9/11 farce is as peculiar as things can get.

In 1940 it was possible to build a model of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge which duplicated the oscillating behavior of the real bridge. They did not have computers.



The model is at 7 minutes.

So if airliner impact and fires could destroy the towers in less than two hours why didn't we have a model in 2002? Instead the NIST report that takes 10,000 pages can't even specify the total amount of concrete.

Why isn't the physics of collapse PROVEN? Curious how Retard Gages "experts" really don't try to do the collapse physics.

psik

in the case of 7 their model did not look remotely the same as the real building which it was intended to duplicate. They proved themselves that it could not have happened the way they told the story, and the cherry on top is that they will not release the node data used because it would jeopardize public safety! Why would any building engineer want to know how fire managed to bring down a building so they can prevent it in the future after all....

You see the whole fucking thing is preposterous on every level.

It does provide sustenance for you conspiracy theory loons

 

[Hollie]

There was a high degree of scrutiny paid to the debris. It was sorted and processed according to type. I've been to the 9/11 memorial and museum and there are countless little bits that were recovered and identified. I find it hard to believe that there wouldn't have been piles of components that would have later been identified as explosive components given the number likely needed.

the towers would of contained miles of wiring and electronic components specfic forensic testing would be required and this was never done

Whatever dude. How many ,of what type and where were the charges placed? How do they keep all of those involved quiet? You actively argue that no physical evidence was uncovered yet you assert there was and is perhaps the largest conspiracy in human history. That is maybe the very definition of crazy.

one could argue that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident perhaps the larger of the two..

Dats da twoof.

There was a high degree of scrutiny paid to the debris. It was sorted and processed according to type. I've been to the 9/11 memorial and museum and there are countless little bits that were recovered and identified. I find it hard to believe that there wouldn't have been piles of components that would have later been identified as explosive components given the number likely needed.

the towers would of contained miles of wiring and electronic components specfic forensic testing would be required and this was never done

Whatever dude. How many ,of what type and where were the charges placed? How do they keep all of those involved quiet? You actively argue that no physical evidence was uncovered yet you assert there was and is perhaps the largest conspiracy in human history. That is maybe the very definition of crazy.

one could argue that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident perhaps the larger of the two..

The Jooooos were responsible for the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

Dats da twoof.

Questions about the Gulf of Tonkin incidents have persisted for more than 40 years. But once-classified documents and tapes released in the past several years, combined with previously uncovered facts, make clear that high government officials distorted facts and deceived the American public about events that led to full U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War
The Truth About Tonkin U.S. Naval Institute

Twoof talk. That's so cute.

Let's move on to your space alien conspiracy theories, shall we?

 

[psikeyhackr]

even a broken cock is right 2 times per day

Yeah, it just hangs limp at 6 am and 6 pm.

Of course if it is a digital cock it might be hard all of the time.

Are there digital dildos on the market?

psik

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Whatever dude. How many ,of what type and where were the charges placed? How do they keep all of those involved quiet? You actively argue that no physical evidence was uncovered yet you assert there was and is perhaps the largest conspiracy in human history. That is maybe the very definition of crazy.

The 9/11 farce is as peculiar as things can get.

In 1940 it was possible to build a model of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge which duplicated the oscillating behavior of the real bridge. They did not have computers.



The model is at 7 minutes.

So if airliner impact and fires could destroy the towers in less than two hours why didn't we have a model in 2002? Instead the NIST report that takes 10,000 pages can't even specify the total amount of concrete.

Why isn't the physics of collapse PROVEN? Curious how Retard Gages "experts" really don't try to do the collapse physics.

psik

in the case of 7 their model did not look remotely the same as the real building which it was intended to duplicate. They proved themselves that it could not have happened the way they told the story, and the cherry on top is that they will not release the node data used because it would jeopardize public safety! Why would any building engineer want to know how fire managed to bring down a building so they can prevent it in the future after all....

You see the whole fucking thing is preposterous on every level.

starsky and hutch heres knowledge is only in tv land obviously,He spent so much much of his life watching starsky and hutch,he never got educated in school ditching science classes.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Absolutely it is. How else can one conceive of how it was done? Without that information it's nothing more than imaginative speculation.

How was such a monumental undertaking done with such complete ambiguity? Not a single witness or whistleblower?

That is the key to the theory. I, as well as others have asked repeatedly how this was done on this scale without notice either during application or while sifting through debris. Not a peep from the truthers.

Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?
Page 2 of Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

Which agencies were on site supervising the sifting of debris? What were they looking for? What did they find?

NIST did not test for the residue of explosives in the steel.

Did they sift debris for remains?
What else were they looking for?
What else did they find?

How did they know it was a " pressure cooker" bomb following the Boston bombing?

Was there ANY suggestion that evidence was found of hundreds of charges being set deliberately while sifting the ground zero debris?

right they never found the black boxes but the found the hijackers passport the following day and you actually buy that ?

starskey believes in fairy tales obviously.

knowing his warped mind,he probably thinks the two people starskey and hutch are real people and those were real events the way he falls for fairy tales.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?
Page 2 of Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

nice info! unfortunately you wont get any of these people to read it, and even if they did its doubtful they would comprehend any of it.

yeah they wont read it,they wont read anything that goes against their warped views or watch videos that goes against their warped views either.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Link?
How many wireless detonators were used?
What frequency spectrum do they operate on? What sort of controller/ transmitter was needed to maintain the necessary frequency separation in order to achieve the desired detonation in a timely series?
Where were they placed? Could they all be hidden and still achieve the desired effect?
Is every device rendered unrecognizable to a bomb investigator?

there was no investigation

Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that NIST would do a good job with the investigation.“They’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job.But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire.And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information.What prevented all of this?I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST.And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything
Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

There was a high degree of scrutiny paid to the debris. It was sorted and processed according to type. I've been to the 9/11 memorial and museum and there are countless little bits that were recovered and identified. I find it hard to believe that there wouldn't have been piles of components that would have later been identified as explosive components given the number likely needed.

the towers would of contained miles of wiring and electronic components specfic forensic testing would be required and this was never done

Whatever dude. How many ,of what type and where were the charges placed? How do they keep all of those involved quiet? You actively argue that no physical evidence was uncovered yet you assert there was and is perhaps the largest conspiracy in human history. That is maybe the very definition of crazy.

one could argue that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident perhaps the larger of the two..

He probably isnt even aware that the commander of that ship has even come out and said it was a false flag operation.that the government lied about that event.

 

[Hollie]

Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?
Page 2 of Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

Which agencies were on site supervising the sifting of debris? What were they looking for? What did they find?

NIST did not test for the residue of explosives in the steel.

Did they sift debris for remains?
What else were they looking for?
What else did they find?

How did they know it was a " pressure cooker" bomb following the Boston bombing?

Was there ANY suggestion that evidence was found of hundreds of charges being set deliberately while sifting the ground zero debris?

right they never found the black boxes but the found the hijackers passport the following day and you actually buy that ?

starskey believes in fairy tales obviously.

knowing his warped mind,he probably thinks the two people starskey and hutch are real people and those were real events the way he falls for fairy tales.

Not unlike you Alex Jones groupies. Charlatans such as Jones can easily persuade you low IQ types into believing anything.

 

[Hollie]

Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?
Page 2 of Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

nice info! unfortunately you wont get any of these people to read it, and even if they did its doubtful they would comprehend any of it.

yeah they wont read it,they wont read anything that goes against their warped views or watch videos that goes against warped views either.

Twoofer News Network has a small audience of the gullible and the ignorant such as you Alex Jones groupies.

 

[Hollie]

there was no investigation

Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that NIST would do a good job with the investigation.“They’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job.But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire.And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information.What prevented all of this?I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST.And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything
Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews

There was a high degree of scrutiny paid to the debris. It was sorted and processed according to type. I've been to the 9/11 memorial and museum and there are countless little bits that were recovered and identified. I find it hard to believe that there wouldn't have been piles of components that would have later been identified as explosive components given the number likely needed.

the towers would of contained miles of wiring and electronic components specfic forensic testing would be required and this was never done

Whatever dude. How many ,of what type and where were the charges placed? How do they keep all of those involved quiet? You actively argue that no physical evidence was uncovered yet you assert there was and is perhaps the largest conspiracy in human history. That is maybe the very definition of crazy.

one could argue that the Gulf of Tonkin Incident perhaps the larger of the two..

He probably isnt even aware that the commander of that ship has even come out and said it was a false flag operation.that the government lied about that event.

I guess you read that in an article on "News For The Stupid".

 

[LA RAM FAN]

someone farted in here.^

 

[Hollie]

someone farted in here.^

Run along, Spammy. Don't make me humiliate you again.