eots
no fly list
right they never found the black boxes but the found the hijackers passport the following day and you actually buy that ?NIST did not test for the residue of explosives in the steel.Spoliation of a fire scene is a basis for destroying a legal case in an investigation. Most of the steel was discarded, although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have. Why hasn't NIST declared that this spoliation of the steel was a gross error?Logically speaking, is it totally necessary to define what sort of explosive was used and how it was deployed
in order to know that the WTC was a controlled demolition?
Absolutely it is. How else can one conceive of how it was done? Without that information it's nothing more than imaginative speculation.
How was such a monumental undertaking done with such complete ambiguity? Not a single witness or whistleblower?
That is the key to the theory. I, as well as others have asked repeatedly how this was done on this scale without notice either during application or while sifting through debris. Not a peep from the truthers.
Page 2 of Article Former Chief of NIST s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation OpEdNews
Which agencies were on site supervising the sifting of debris? What were they looking for? What did they find?
Did they sift debris for remains?
What else were they looking for?
What else did they find?
How did they know it was a " pressure cooker" bomb following the Boston bombing?
Was there ANY suggestion that evidence was found of hundreds of charges being set deliberately while sifting the ground zero debris?