Zone1 90 Ways to Empower Students to Address Antisemitism

Status
Not open for further replies.
Meaningless. Jordan is a corrupt Monarchy, and the one time they let Egyptians vote on what kind of government they wanted, the voted for the most radical Islamist bunch of nitwits they could find. By blindly fueling the Zionists, we increase the amount of Islamic radicalism, not decrease it.

That said, I wasn't talking about Israel's neighbors ending it. Israel will end the same way South Africa did. Because their system of apartheid will become unacceptable to... everyone. Eventually, the Botha Regime had to acquiesce to the end of Apartheid in South Africa.

South Africa: Twenty-Five Years Since Apartheid​


In April 1994, South Africans of all races voted in the country’s first democratic elections, choosing Mandela as their first black president. The inhumane apartheid regime seemed to be miraculously ending peacefully, though much work remained to improve the lives of all South Africans.
Mandela casting his ballot for the first time in his life in 1994.

Today much of that initial promise remains unfulfilled. After 25 years in power, the ANC draws intense criticism for South Africa’s persistent poverty, inequality, violence, health crises, and corruption.

As he works to renovate South Africa, new president Cyril Ramaphosa faces a daunting list of tasks: jump-start economic growth, shrink the debt, build functioning, law-based governance, and hold together the ANC when it seems to be coming apart at the seams...

Today there are more squatters in Cape Town than there were under apartheid.

While housing has improved for many people, 14% of the population still lives in so-called informal settlements. Targets for housing construction have not been met and long backlogs have grown from an estimated 1.5 million units in 1994 to 2.1 million in 2018...

Access to schooling remains a major issue in post-apartheid South Africa. The death of a child in a pit toilet in Mpumalanga Province, following several similar incidents in the past few years, highlights that even now roughly 4,000 South African schools have only pit toilets.

[I read about that death. The girl went to an outhouse. Somehow the seat broke, and she was drowned in human feces and urine. ]

A report from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development found that after six years of schooling, 27% of black South African students still could not read...

To try to ease crushing rural poverty, the government has begun to explore legislation that would allow land to be seized without compensation.

Such proposals have provoked a bitter backlash from the center-right Democratic Alliance, prompting comparisons to Zimbabwe, where Robert Mugabe used land expropriation in 2000 to reward his supporters, with disastrous economic results...

Counting potential workers who have given up looking for jobs, unemployment may be as high as 40%; its official rate is 27%. Critics on the left argue that spending on social services is low in comparison to other countries, even as the country’s national debt has ballooned to seven times what it was in 1994...

Critics of the ANC government are on firm footing when they point to the astounding levels of corruption. In 2018, the World Bank ranked South Africa as the most corrupt country in the world...

In places like Mpumalanga, the ANC has grown as a party because of a patronage machine that effectively buys supporters and votes by diverting government money. David Mabuza, the former premier of the province, used this to power Ramaphosa’s ascendency. Stories about ANC members living in luxury amid their constituents’ poverty are routine in the media...

Perceptions about crime have to do with the fact that white South Africans are far more exposed to crime than they were under apartheid. South Africa is home to the largest private security sector in the world, and even that has its roots under apartheid...

The story of HIV/AIDS in South Africa has been complicated and often tragic. Thabo Mbeki, president from 1999 until 2008, was a prominent AIDS denialist who refuted any link between HIV and AIDS and went so far as to ban antiretroviral drugs in public hospitals, which likely cost hundreds of thousands of lives. Mbeki’s position was treated with scorn across the world and by South Africans such as Archbishop Desmond Tutu, but it took nearly a decade for the Ministry of Health to take HIV/AIDS seriously...

nearly 19% of the population is infected with HIV...

 
You are trying to take two phrases out of context in the ramblings of Hitler's writing.

Here's what Hitler really thought about the Jews.

...The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the value of personality in man, contests the significance of nationality and race, and thereby withdraws from humanity the premise of its existence and its culture. As a foundation of the universe, this doctrine would bring about the end of any order intellectually conceivable to man. And as, in this greatest of all recognizable organisms, the result of an application of such a law could only be chaos, on earth it could only be destruction for the inhabitants of this planet.

If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men.

With satanic joy in his face, the black-haired Jewish youth lurks in wait for the unsuspecting girl whom he defiles with his blood, thus stealing her from her people. With every means he tries to destroy the racial foundations of the people he has set out to subjugate. Just as he himself systematically ruins women and girls, he does not shrink back from pulling down the blood barriers for others, even on a large scale. It was and it is Jews who bring the Negroes into the Rhineland, always with the same secret thought and clear aim of ruining the hated white race by the necessarily resulting bastardization, throwing it down from its cultural and political height, and himself rising to be its master.


Nowhere in this does Hitler claim that Jews are inferior.
 
Well, if you need to believe that... but maybe you should read about the Crusades some time and how that all worked out for the invaders.
During the Crusades Arab civilization was at its height. History has bi passed the Arabs. It is not coming back. Without oil wealth the Arabs are as comical as Ahab the Arab.

 
Last edited:
I didn't say nor imply anything about the forum being for Blacks only. I was simply pointing out that antisemitism is considered religious persecution not racial discrimination or "bigotry", per the U.S. government.
This thread should be in the Religion forum or now the Conspiracy Theory forum.
 
This thread should be in the Religion forum or now the Conspiracy Theory forum.

This thread is being used to push pseudo-scientific opinions on race, by some folks that have never taken any classes on physical anthropology, biology or genetics.

It is being used to do the opposite of what Zone 1 should be used for, and instead, it is making the Jewish community look terrible. IMO

http://www.iapsych.com/wj3ewok/LinkedDocuments/Murray2005.pdf
Once we acknowledge that race is a biological classification, it becomes acceptable to inquire into the genetic reasons for intractable racial differences in average intelligence, and rates of crime and illegitimacy.
Throughout history and pre history superior human groups have displaced inferior human groups. That is the way the human species has evolved.
If white Gentiles, Jews, and Orientals cease to exist the advance of civilization will grind to a halt, because the other races lack the intelligence to carry on without us.
right---you touched on the very logic that the murdering raping and pillaging
arabs use to plop their yellow pustule and ass-up perversion palace on the


1690062902007.png



Lack of peer review​

Herrnstein and Murray did not submit their work to peer review before publication, an omission many have seen as incompatible with their presentation of it as a scholarly text.[11][15] Nicholas Lemann noted that the book was not circulated in galley proofs, a common practice to allow potential reviewers and media professionals an opportunity to prepare for the book's arrival.[11]


Race and intelligence​

". . . See also: History of the race and intelligence controversy

One part of the controversy concerned the parts of the book which dealt with racial group differences on IQ and the consequences of this. In chapter 13, the authors state: "It seems highly likely to us that both genes and the environment have something to do with racial differences." The introduction to the chapter, however, provides the caveat that "The debate about whether and how much genes and environment have to do with ethnic differences remains unresolved".

In an article praising the book, economist Thomas Sowell criticized some of its aspects, including some of its arguments about race and the malleability of IQ:


When European immigrant groups in the United States scored below the national average on mental tests, they scored lowest on the abstract parts of those tests. So did white mountaineer children in the United States tested back in the early 1930s ... Strangely, Herrnstein and Murray refer to "folklore" that "Jews and other immigrant groups were thought to be below average in intelligence." It was neither folklore nor anything as subjective as thoughts. It was based on hard data, as hard as any data in The Bell Curve. These groups repeatedly tested below average on the mental tests of the World War I era, both in the army and in civilian life. For Jews, it is clear that later tests showed radically different results—during an era when there was very little intermarriage to change the genetic makeup of American Jews.[45]

In 1996, Stephen Jay Gould released a revised and expanded edition of his 1981 book The Mismeasure of Man, intended to more directly refute many of The Bell Curve's claims regarding race and intelligence, and argued that the evidence for heritability of IQ did not indicate a genetic origin to group differences in intelligence.[46][47]

Psychologist David Marks has suggested that the ASVAB test used in the analyses of The Bell Curve correlates highly with measures of literacy, and argues that the ASVAB test in fact is not a measure of general intelligence but of literacy.[48][49]

Melvin Konner, professor of anthropology and associate professor of psychiatry and neurology at Emory University, called Bell Curve a "deliberate assault on efforts to improve the school performance of African-Americans":


This book presented strong evidence that genes play a role in intelligence but linked it to the unsupported claim that genes explain the small but consistent black-white difference in IQ. The juxtaposition of good argument with a bad one seemed politically motivated, and persuasive refutations soon appeared. Actually, African-Americans have excelled in virtually every enriched environment they have been placed in, most of which they were previously barred from, and this in only the first decade or two of improved but still not equal opportunity. It is likely that the real curves for the two races will one day be superimposable on each other, but this may require decades of change and different environments for different people. Claims about genetic potential are meaningless except in light of this requirement.[50]
. . . .

Etc.

Thread Locked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top