9/11 facts to discuss....

There are programs where one man at a computer can fly several planes at once placing them on any flight route desired...
:lol: Wow! Shit for brains can't even understand his own statements! You still have someone piloting the planes! :lol: Just because he can put them on autopilot doesn't mean it is just a program guiding the plane with no human intervention.

BTW, you never did answer how the government could possibly get on board 4 planes of two different types and completely rework their entire software suite to allow them to remote control the planes. You also didn't explain how they could install all the hardware needed to accomplish the task without anyone from the airline, any mechanic, or any pilot noticing.
 
Remote operating passenger planes was developed just before 9/11 specifically to take over boeing, etc planes from hijackers...

Killtown's:  9/11 coincidences and oddities page! - 2001

August 25, 2001 - Raytheon and the U.S. Air Force successfully auto lands a pilot-less FedEx Boeing 727 six times at Holloman AFB, NM using a military GPS landing system that will enable ground control to take control of a hijacked airplane and force land it.

Civil-Military Interoperability For GPS Assisted Aircraft Landings Demonstrated

Civil-Military Interoperability For GPS Assisted Aircraft Landings Demonstrated

The JPALS system is being developed to meet the Defense Department's need for an anti-jam, secure, all weather Category II/III aircraft landing system that will be fully interoperable with planned civil systems utilizing the same technology.
Marlborough - Oct. 1, 2001
A government-industry team accomplished the first precision approach by a civil aircraft using a military Global Positioning System (GPS) landing system Aug. 25 at Holloman AFB, N.M., Raytheon Company announced today.

Sicherheitssystem: Entführte Maschinen landen selbständig - SPIEGEL ONLINE - Nachrichten - Wissenschaft
 
Remote operating passenger planes was developed just before 9/11 specifically to take over boeing, etc planes from hijackers...

Killtown's:* 9/11 coincidences and oddities page! - 2001

August 25, 2001 - Raytheon and the U.S. Air Force successfully auto lands a pilot-less FedEx Boeing 727 six times at Holloman AFB, NM using a military GPS landing system that will enable ground control to take control of a hijacked airplane and force land it.

Civil-Military Interoperability For GPS Assisted Aircraft Landings Demonstrated

Civil-Military Interoperability For GPS Assisted Aircraft Landings Demonstrated

The JPALS system is being developed to meet the Defense Department's need for an anti-jam, secure, all weather Category II/III aircraft landing system that will be fully interoperable with planned civil systems utilizing the same technology.
Marlborough - Oct. 1, 2001
A government-industry team accomplished the first precision approach by a civil aircraft using a military Global Positioning System (GPS) landing system Aug. 25 at Holloman AFB, N.M., Raytheon Company announced today.

Sicherheitssystem: Entführte Maschinen landen selbständig - SPIEGEL ONLINE - Nachrichten - Wissenschaft

And? Just because the technology was in it's infancy back then doesn't mean it was implemented for 9/11. You still haven't shown how they could have gotten these units on to two different aircraft types with nobody noticing, plus fake everything else like the cockpit voice recorder and the discussions between passengers and loved ones / co-workers. Don't you think SOMEONE would have noticed the hijackers were not in control of the plane? ESPECIALLY the hijackers? :lol:

Assuming they did this for all the planes, why did flight 77 have to fly the spiral to get it on the right heading / altitude? Not only that, but the FDR shows the person at the controls was all over the place and not smooth like a computer would be.
 
Please explain in your own words how WTC 7 collapsed

I would like someone to please explain why there was a tree fort built in World Trade Center 7 just before 9/11...

This tree fort built in Building 7 was a terrorism fighting headquatrers...

Just before 9/11 it was in the news about rigging boeing planes with remote control for a precaution in the event a plane got hijacked...

Just before 9/11 it was in the news about successfully flying pilotless boeing planes with remote control...

Just before 9/11 it was in the news how the remote flying of boing planes was a terrorism hijacking precaution to be controlled by a terrorism fighting headquarters...

There was a terrorism fighting headquarters built like a tree fort in World Trade Center 7...

The terrorism fighting tree fort was a high floor in Building 7 which was the only floor with reinforced walls, windows, etc...

Terrorism fighting by developing remote operating systems to be installed in boeing planes in the event of a hijacking to be controlled by a terrorism fighting headquarters just like the one built like a tree fort in Building 7...


Most people with at least a couple I.Q. points already know how...hence why this is going on...


Now well over 1,400 Licensed Architects and Engineers who are well educated, very experienced, and experts in their field want a new and real investigation into the collapses of the three World Trade Center buildings AE911Truth.org

Numbers are growing since this sign was put out...

ae911billboard-4.jpg

Still can't trust anything you say since you won' come clean about your past lies.
 
Please explain why just one high floor in Building 7 had all its floors walls, windows, etc reinforced to resist explosions, debris, etc making it a tree fort?
 
I wonder if a building actually fell on WTC 7, as SFC Ollie claims as his explanation for its collapse, if this floor would be able to withstand it.

:lol::lol::lol:

A building did not fall on it....a piece of steel hit the face of it and it is claimed one support was hit...
 
I wonder if a building actually fell on WTC 7, as SFC Ollie claims as his explanation for its collapse, if this floor would be able to withstand it.

:lol::lol::lol:

This is NOT Building 7 and stood with no problem even though it received real damage...many, many times more damage...

murrah_building.jpg
 
Last edited:
I wonder if a building actually fell on WTC 7, as SFC Ollie claims as his explanation for its collapse, if this floor would be able to withstand it.

:lol::lol::lol:

This is NOT Building 7 and stood with no problem even though it received real damage...many, many times more damage...

murrah_building.jpg

Ah, yes, the truthtard bullshit claim that all buildings should react EXACTLY the same regardless of construction, material or circumstances.

In this case, CreativeBullshit is pretending that a nine story, steel reinforced concrete structure hit with a bomb taking out half the building is somehow comparable to a steel framed 47 floor structure that suffered eight hours of uncontested fire. Anyone else need more evidence of how big a dumbass CreativeBullshit is?

Tell us, CB.... how much weight was there bearing down on the damaged structure of the Murrah building? Was it comparable to the fourty floors of weight that were bearing down on the damaged supports in the WTC 7?

:lol: Man, you stupid fucks sure do know how to lay some DISGUSTING piles of bullshit! Thanks for the laughs! :lol:
 
I wonder if a building actually fell on WTC 7, as SFC Ollie claims as his explanation for its collapse, if this floor would be able to withstand it.

:lol::lol::lol:

This is NOT Building 7 and stood with no problem even though it received real damage...many, many times more damage...

murrah_building.jpg

They'll just say that all buildings were built differently then the WTC ones, but have no viable reasons as to why only steel in Manhattan responded the way it did, while siding with a NIST report that has been proven to be very dubious, while comparing railroad tracks to the steel used in the WTC as evidence to back the farce up :lol:
 
I wonder if a building actually fell on WTC 7, as SFC Ollie claims as his explanation for its collapse, if this floor would be able to withstand it.

:lol::lol::lol:

This is NOT Building 7 and stood with no problem even though it received real damage...many, many times more damage...

murrah_building.jpg

They'll just say that all buildings were built differently then the WTC ones, but have no viable reasons as to why only steel in Manhattan responded the way it did, while siding with a NIST report that has been proven to be very dubious, while comparing railroad tracks to the steel used in the WTC as evidence to back the farce up :lol:

Or, you'll get a whiny little bitch named Mr. Jones who repeats what I say and pretends it doesn't mean anything. :lol: What a fucktard!

Hey, Jonsie! Why is it only the steel framed section of the Madrid tower collapsed? Is it now part of Manhattan? :lol:
 
They'll just say that all buildings were built differently then the WTC ones, but have no viable reasons as to why only steel in Manhattan responded the way it did, while siding with a NIST report that has been proven to be very dubious, while comparing railroad tracks to the steel used in the WTC as evidence to back the farce up :lol:

LOL...that's why we have this!!!

Bermuda Triangle

New York Square

Arlington Pentagon

Shanksville Hexagon

The few places in the UNIVERSE where ALL of physics changes!!!:eek::eek:
 
They'll just say that all buildings were built differently then the WTC ones, but have no viable reasons as to why only steel in Manhattan responded the way it did, while siding with a NIST report that has been proven to be very dubious, while comparing railroad tracks to the steel used in the WTC as evidence to back the farce up :lol:

LOL...that's why we have this!!!

Bermuda Triangle

New York Square

Arlington Pentagon

Shanksville Hexagon

The few places in the UNIVERSE where ALL of physics changes!!!:eek::eek:

Hey CreativeBullshit. Why is it you can't exactly state the laws of physics that were broken? Physics is a science. You know what that means, right? You should be able to prove with absolute certainty which laws were broken and the scientific evidence to back it up.

Instead all we get is you bitching and moaning about how the laws were broken! :lol: Newsflash! Nobody is going to believe a dishonest fuck like you when you've been proven to be lying time and time again and continue to repeat completely debunked bullshit that you can't respond to.
 
This building totally collapsed due to fire.
CASE STUDY: THE KADER TOY FACTORY FIRE

Now what?

Don't go pointing out other places where truthtard physics (as opposed to real, scientific physics) don't apply! CreativeBullshit is running out of font sizes!

Anyone ever wonder why truthtards vary their font size? It doesn't lend their posts any additional credibility. It just makes them look like a complete ass.
 
I wonder if a building actually fell on WTC 7, as SFC Ollie claims as his explanation for its collapse, if this floor would be able to withstand it.

:lol::lol::lol:

This is NOT Building 7 and stood with no problem even though it received real damage...many, many times more damage...

murrah_building.jpg

They'll just say that all buildings were built differently then the WTC ones, but have no viable reasons as to why only steel in Manhattan responded the way it did, while siding with a NIST report that has been proven to be very dubious, while comparing railroad tracks to the steel used in the WTC as evidence to back the farce up :lol:




THAT IS JUST SIMPLY HILARIOUS!!


BECAUSE ITS TRUE! :lol:
 
This is NOT Building 7 and stood with no problem even though it received real damage...many, many times more damage...

murrah_building.jpg

They'll just say that all buildings were built differently then the WTC ones, but have no viable reasons as to why only steel in Manhattan responded the way it did, while siding with a NIST report that has been proven to be very dubious, while comparing railroad tracks to the steel used in the WTC as evidence to back the farce up :lol:




THAT IS JUST SIMPLY HILARIOUS!!


BECAUSE ITS TRUE! :lol:

Hey Triton.

Why did they Kader Toy Factory totally collapse? I was only fire right? I guess you'll just avoid this question also.
 
Well...fess up Mr. O.J. Simpsons defense attorney...otherwise known as Patriot911...did you get some of that anthrax antidote too before the attack even happened?

Here are links to show the white house began taking cipro before the anthrax attack even occurred...

White House Mail Machine Has Anthrax

Below is a paragraph about the anthrax attack during the 9/11 time frame out of the "Washington Post"...
At least some White House personnel were given Cipro six weeks ago. White House officials won't discuss who might be receiving the anthrax-treating antibiotic now.

On the night of the Sept. 11 attacks, the White House Medical Office dispensed Cipro to staff accompanying Vice President Dick Cheney as he was secreted off to the safety of Camp David, and told them it was "a precaution," according to one person directly involved

2001 anthrax attacks - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Below is a paragraph about the anthrax attack during the 9/11 time frame out of "Wiki"...

White House precautions
On September 11, the president and White House staff began taking a regimen of Cipro, a powerful antibiotic. The public interest group Judicial Watch filed lawsuits in June 2002 against federal agencies to obtain information about how, what and when the White House knew on 9/11 about the danger of anthrax weeks before the first known victim of the anthrax attacks.[40][41] The issue, therefore, is on what grounds governmental officials were alerted to prepare for the coming anthrax attacks, which were later traced to a U.S. army medical research institute.
And the guy kills himself...riiiight
The number of people with ties to 9-11 'suicided" or mysteriously killed is really astounding.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - Mysterious Deaths of 9/11 Witnesses (MUST SEE)[/ame]

9-11 Research: Assassinations
Check out the references at the bottom of the page.

Just watched the video for the first time...it gets very interesting, disturbing, and informative as it goes along...
 

Forum List

Back
Top